In this article, we discuss the recent ascendancy of the market state and its consequences for regime values, ethics, and institutions. Three types of market states—entrepreneurial, managerial, and mercantile—are outlined, along with their primary ethical basis and associated public values. We then turn to a discussion of globalization and hypermodernity, which we argue characterize the current global cultural context. Difficult as it may be to imagine, we suggest that a global response is likely the only way to address worldwide governance challenges and offer three trajectories that—even if vigorously pursued—seem likely only to ameliorate our global challenges at best.
AdamsG. B.BalfourD. L. (2012). Towards restoring public integrity in praetorian times: The value of “putting cruelty first.”Public Integrity, 14, 325-339.
3.
AugeM. (1995). Non-places: An introduction to supermodernity (HoweJ., Trans.). London, England: Verso.
4.
BarrettW. (1979). The illusion of technique. Garden City, NY: Anchor Doubleday.
5.
BaumanZ. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
FriedmanT. (2007). The world is flat. New York: NY:The New York Times.
12.
FukuyamaF. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York, NY: Free Press.
13.
GabrielY. (2005). Glass cages and glass palaces: Images of organization in image-conscious times. Organization, 12, 9-27.
14.
HackerJ. S.PiersonP. (2010). Winner take all politics: How Washington made the rich richer and turned its back on the middle class. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
15.
HarveyD. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
HecloH. (2008). On thinking institutionally. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Press.
17.
HuntingtonS. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of the world order. New York, NY: Touchstone.
18.
IgnatieffM. (2012). Reimagining a global ethic. Ethics and International Affairs, 26, 7-19.
19.
OsborneS. P. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
PortilloE.CostaP. (2010, June). The role of technological acceleration in the crisis of modernity: A view by Paul Virilio. Paper presented at the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society, Wollongong, Australia.
21.
ReichR. (2007). Supercapitalism: The transformation of business, democracy, and everyday life. New York, NY: Knopf.
22.
RitzerG. (2004). The McDonaldization of society (Revised New Century Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
RohrJ. (1998). Public service, ethics, and constitutional practice. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
24.
RosenbloomD. H.PiotrowskiS. J. (2005). Outsourcing the constitution and administrative law norms. American Review of Public Administration, 35, 103-121.
25.
SandelM. (2009). Justice: What’s the right thing to do?New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
26.
SassenS. (1998). Globalization and its discontents. New York, NY: Free Press.
27.
SchonD. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York, NY: Basic Books.
StiglitzJ. E. (2010). Free fall: America, free markets and the sinking of the world economy. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
30.
VanderburgW. H. (1985). The growth of minds and cultures: A unified theory of the structure of human experience. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
31.
VanderburgW. H. (2005). Living in the Labyrinth of technology. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
32.
VirilioP. (2006). Speed and politics. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e). (Original work published 1977).
