The argument presented in this article is a relatively basic one but one that has been overlooked by students of public administration ethics. The analysis is grounded in the writing and ideas of John A. Rohr. Rohr’s body of work includes a focus on ethics and regime values. I show that transparency and ethics are two terms frequently conflated in common usage. Rohr developed the concept of regime values, which is a central component of this article. My first key point is that governmental transparency fits the definition of a regime value laid out by Rohr. Second, while transparency and ethics are frequently conflated, ethics is conceptually broader than transparency.
PiotrowskiS. (2010). Transparency and secrecy: A reader linking literature and contemporary debate. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
12.
RobertsA. S. (2006). Blacked out: Government secrecy in the information age. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13.
RohrJ. (1989). Ethics for bureaucrats: An essay on law and values (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
14.
RohrJ. (1998a). Ethics and the academic/practitioner divide. In RohrJ. (Ed.), Public service, ethics and constitutional practice (pp. 76-84). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
15.
RohrJ. (1998b). The problem of financial disclosure. In RohrJ. (Ed.), Public service, ethics, and constitutional practice (pp. 43-50). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
16.
RohrJ. (2004). On Cooper’s “big questions.”Public Administration Review, 64, 408-409.
17.
RourkeF. (1960). Administrative secrecy: A congressional dilemma. American Political Science Review, 54, 684-694.
Transparency International. (2002). First launched in 1995, the corruption perceptions index has been widely credited with putting the issue of corruption on the international policy agenda. Retrieved from http://www.transparency.org/research/cpi/overview
