Understood in economic terms, interest elevates baser human impulses and degrades higher human potential as it motivates individuals to value material gains over moral ones. Because of this influence, it is difficult to consider interest as a regime value. But just because it is beleaguered does not mean it ought to be abandoned, especially because interest is placed front and center in the constitutional order. Providing a perspective of the merits of interest, Alexis de Tocqueville offers a conceptualization that allows this regime value to be relevant even for contemporary administrators operating in spaces of diffused public responsibility.
AdairD. (1974). Fame and the founding fathers. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
2.
BaoG.WangX.LarsenG. L.MorganD. F. (2013). Beyond new public governance: A value-based global framework for performance management, governance, and leadership. Administration & Society, 45, 443-467.
3.
BarberB. R. (1998). A place for us. New York, NY: Hill & Wang.
4.
BarthT. J. (1993). Constitutional subordinate autonomy: Serving multiple masters—A normative theory in practice. Administration & Society, 25, 160-182.
5.
BellahR.MadsenR.SullivanW. M.SwidlerA.TiptonS. M. (2008). Habits of the heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
BinghamL. B.NabatchiT.O’LearyR. (2005). The New Governance. Public Administration Review, 65, 547-558.
7.
BozemanB. (2007). Public values and public interest. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
8.
BryerT. A. (2007). Toward a relevant agenda for a responsive public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 479-500.
9.
BumgarnerJ.NewswanderC. B. (2009). The irony of NPM: The inevitable extension of the role of the American state. American Review of Public Administration, 39, 189-207.
10.
CaroR. A. (1990). The path to power. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
11.
CaroR. A. (2003). Master of the senate. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
12.
CookeJ. E. (Ed.). (1961). The federalist. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
13.
deLeonL.DenhardtR. B. (2000). The political theory of reinvention. Public Administration Review, 60, 89-97.
14.
Department of Homeland Security v. MacLean. (2015). 574 U.S.
15.
TocquevilleA. de (2000). Democracy in America (MansfieldH. C.WinthropD., Trans.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
16.
DobelJ. P. (1999). Public integrity. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
EikenberryA. M.KluverJ. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk?Public Administration Review, 64, 132-140.
19.
ElkinS. L. (2004). Thinking constitutionally: The problem of deliberative democracy. Social Philosophy & Policy, 21(1), 39-75.
20.
Explaining the result. (1895, November7). The New York Times, p. 4.
21.
FredericksonH. G.HartD. K. (1985). The public service and the patriotism of benevolence. Public Administration Review, 45, 547-553.
22.
FukuyamaF. (1995). Trust. New York, NY: Free Press.
23.
FukuyamaF. (2006). The end of history and the last man. New York, NY: Free Press.
24.
GlendonM. A. (1991). Rights talk. New York, NY: Free Press.
25.
GreenR. T.HubbelL. (1996). On governance and reinventing government. In WamsleyG. L.WolfJ. F. (Eds.), Refounding democratic public administration (pp. 38-67). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
GunnJ. A. W. (1969). Politics and the public interest in the seventeenth century. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
27.
HartD. K. (1989). A partnership in virtue among all citizens: The public service and civic humanism. Public Administration Review, 49, 101-107.
28.
HartD. K.SmithP. A. (1988). Fame, fame-worthiness, and the public service. Administration & Society, 20, 131-151.
29.
HirschmanA. O. (2013). The passions and the interests. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
JørgensenT. B.RutgersM. R. (2015). Public values: Core or confusion?American Review of Public Administration, 45, 3-12.
31.
Law and duty of police. (1895, July26). The New York Times, p. 8.
32.
LengelE. (2005). General George Washington. New York, NY: Random House.
33.
MainzerL. C. (1991). Vulgar ethics for public administration. Administration & Society, 23, 3-28.
34.
MandevilleB. (1724). The fable of the bees. London, England: Printed for J. Tonson.
35.
MansfieldH. C. (1989). Taming the prince: The ambivalence of modern executive power. Baltimore, CA: The John Hopkins University Press.
36.
MansfieldH. C. (1995). Self-interest rightly understood. Political Theory, 23, 48-66.
37.
MasurL. P. (Ed.). (2003). The autobiography of Benjamin Franklin. New York, NY: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
38.
McCoyD. R. (1980). The elusive republic. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
39.
MilwardH. B.ProvanK. G. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 359-379.
40.
MorganD. F. (1994). The public interest. In CooperT. L. (Ed.), Handbook of administrative ethics (pp. 125-146). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
41.
MorganD. F.CookB. J. (Eds.). (2014). New public governance: A regime-centered perspective. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
42.
MorganD. F.KirwanK. A.RohrJ. A.RosenbloomD. H.SchaeferD. L. (2010). Recovering, restoring, and renewing the foundations of American public administration: The contributions of Herbert J. Storing. Public Administration Review, 70, 621-633.
43.
MorrisE. (2001). The rise of Theodore Roosevelt. New York, NY: Random House.
44.
Mr. Roosevelt answers. (1895, July17). The New York Times, p. 1.
45.
NewboldS. P. (2005). Statesmanship and ethics: The case of Thomas Jefferson’s dirty hands. Public Administration Review, 65(6), 669-677.
46.
NewswanderC. B. (2015). The balance wheel reconsidered: Addressing constitutional principle disputes in practice. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 37, 18-33.
NiskanenW. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
49.
OsborneD.GaeblerT. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
50.
OsborneS. P. (Ed.). (2010). The new public governance: Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
OvereemP. (2015). The concept of regime values: Are revitalization and regime change possible?American Review of Public Administration, 45, 46-60.
52.
PangleT. L. (1988). The spirit of modern republicanism. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
53.
Plato. (1991). The republic of Plato (2nd ed., BloomA., Trans.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
54.
Police and excise law. (1895, July24). The New York Times, p. 1.
55.
Polybius. (1979). The rise of the Roman Empire. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
56.
PutnamR. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
RaheP. A. (2009). Soft despotism, democracy’s drift. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
58.
RichardsonW. D. (1997). Democracy, bureaucracy, and character: Founding thought. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
59.
RohrJ. A. (1986). To run a constitution. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
60.
RohrJ. A. (1989). Ethics for bureaucrats. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
61.
RohrJ. A. (1993). Public administration and the French state. Public Administration Review, 53, 473-478.
62.
RohrJ. A. (2002). Civil servants and their constitutions. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
63.
RooseveltT. (1920). Theodore Roosevelt: An autobiography. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
64.
RooseveltT. (1951). In MorisonE. E. (Ed.), The letters of Theodore Roosevelt (Vol. 1: The Years of Preparation, pp. 454-596). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65.
RosenbloomD. H.PiotrowskiS. (2005). Outsourcing the constitution and administrative law norms. American Review of Public Administration, 35, 103-121.
66.
RutgersM. R. (2001). Traditional flavors? The different sentiments in European and American administrative thought. Administraiton & Society, 33, 220-244.
67.
SalamonL. M. (Ed.). (2012). The state of nonprofit America. Harrisonburg, VA: Brookings Institution Press.
68.
SandelM. J. (1996). Democracy’s discontent. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
69.
SchaarJ. H. (1964). Some ways of thinking about equality. The Journal of Politics, 26, 867-895.
70.
SchambraW. B. (Ed.). (1992). As far as republican principles will admit: Essays by Martin Diamond. Washington, DC: The AEI Press.
71.
SpicerM. W. (2014). Reflections on John Rohr’s “regime values,” neorepublican freedom, and public administration. Administration & Society, 46, 153-159.
72.
StillmanR. J. (1997). American v. European public administration. Public Administration Review, 57, 332-338.
73.
StiversC. (1994). The listening bureaucrat: Responsiveness in public administration. Public Administration Review, 54, 364-369.
74.
StoringH. J. (1988). American statesmanship: Old and new. In LawlerP. A.SchaeferR. M.SchaeferD. L. (Eds.), Active duty (pp. 5-32). New York, NY: Rowan & Littlefield.
75.
TerryL. D. (1998). Administrative leadership, neo-managerialism, and the public management movement. Public Administration Review, 58, 194-200.
76.
TocquevilleA. de (2000). Democracy in America (MansfieldH. C.WinthropD., Trans.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
UhrJ. (2014). John Rohr’s concept of regime values. Administration & Society, 46, 141-152.
79.
WashingtonG. (1985). To a continental congress camp committee. In ChaseP. D.TwohigD.GrizzardF. E.HothD. R.FerraroW. M.LengelE. G.HugginsB. L. (Eds.), Papers of George Washington: Revolutionary war series (Vol. 13, pp. 376-409). Charlottesville: University of Virginia.
80.
WeberM. (2002). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York, NY: Penguin Classics.
81.
WolinS. S. (2001). Tocqueville between two worlds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
82.
WolinS. S. (2004). Politics and vision. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
83.
WoodG. S. (2004). The Americanization of Benjamin Franklin. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
