Public recreation agencies are challenged to provide a broad range of programs and activities. The administrator plays a key role in decision making within the park and recreation agency. The purpose of this research is to determine how chief administrative officers of local public recreation agencies perceive their role relating to the administration and delivery of public recreation services. Results indicate two independent yet related administrative roles. As administrative roles are better understood, administrators will be more aware of their behavior and subsequently better equipped to address the demands and expectations of operating a recreation system.
Auld, C. (1996). Management professionalisation and the leisure industry? Social Alternatives, 15(2), 11-14.
2.
Block, J. (1961). The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
3.
Box, R.C. (1992). The administrator as trustee of the public interest . Administration & Society, 24, 323-345.
4.
Bright, A.D. (1997). Attitude-strength and support of recreation management strategies. Journal of Leisure Research, 29, 363-379.
5.
Bright, A.D. (2000). The role of social marketing in leisure and recreation management. Journal of Leisure Research, 32, 12-17.
6.
Brown, S.R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Application of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
Carlson, R.E., MacLean, J.R., Deppe, T.R., & Peterson, J.A. (1979). Recreation and leisure: The changing scene (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
8.
Cooper, T.L. (1987). Hierarchy, virtue, and the practice of public administration: A perspective for normative ethics. Public Administration Review, 47, 320-328.
9.
Cooper, T.L. (1998). The responsible administrator. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Cox, R.W., III, Buck, S.J., & Morgan, B.N. (1994). Public administration in theory and practice. New York: Prentice Hall.
11.
Crompton, J.L. (1999). Financing and acquiring park and recreation resources . Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics .
12.
Edginton, C.R., & Jiang, J. (2000). Outsourcing. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 71(4), 46-49.
13.
Edginton, C.R., Jordan, D.J., DeGraff, D.G., & Edginton, S.R. (1998). Leisure and life satisfaction: Foundational perspectives (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Fisher, C.M. (1998). Resource allocation in the public sector. New York: Routledge.
15.
Frederickson, H.G. (1997). The spirit of public administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16.
Freysinger, V.J., & Kelly, J.R. (2004). 21st Century leisure: Current issues (2nd ed.). State College, PA: Venture.
17.
Godbey, G. (2006). Leisure and leisure services in the 21st century: Toward mid century. State College, PA: Venture.
18.
Hjelte, G., & Shivers, J.S. (1978). Public administration of recreational services . Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger .
19.
Hurd, A.R. (2005). Competency development for entry level public parks and recreation professionals. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 23(3), 45-62.
20.
Hurd, A.R., & McLean, D.D. (2004). An analysis of the perceived competencies of CEOs in public park and recreation agencies. Managing Leisure, 9, 96-110.
21.
Jang, H. (2006). Contracting out parks and recreation services: Correcting for selection bias using a Heckman selection model. International Journal of Public Administration, 29, 799-818.
22.
Kerlinger, F.N. (1973). Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
23.
Knapp, J., & McLean, D. (2003). The passion for public service. Parks & Recreation, 38(5), 24-31.
24.
Kraus, R.G., & Curtis, J.E. (2000). Creative management in recreation, parks, and leisure services. New York: McGraw-Hill .
25.
Kyle, G.T., & Mowen, A.J. (2005). An examination of the leisure involvement-agency commitment relationship. Journal of Leisure Research, 37, 342-363.
26.
Kyle, G.T., Mowen, A.J., Absher, J.D., & Havitz, M.E. (2006). Commitment to public leisure service providers: A conceptual and psychometric analysis. Journal of Leisure Research, 38, 78-103.
27.
Liang, Y. (2005). Research update: An essential management tool . Parks & Recreation, 40(12), 22-29.
28.
McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. (1988). Q methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
McNamee, M.J., Sheridan, H., & Buswell, J. (2000). The limitations of utilitarianism as a professional ethic in public sector leisure policy and provision. Leisure Studies, 20, 173-197.
30.
McShane, I. (2006). Social value and the management of community infrastructure . Australian Journal of Public Administration, 65(4), 82-96.
31.
More, T.A. (1999). A functionalist approach to user fees. Journal of Leisure Research, 31, 227-244.
32.
Morris, P. (1998). Working together to create scheduling harmony . Parks & Recreation, 33(6), 77-79.
33.
Novatorov, E.V., & Crompton, J.L. (2001). A revised conceptualization of marketing in the context of public leisure services. Journal of Leisure Research, 33, 160-185.
34.
Ravenscroft, N. (1998). The changing regulation of public leisure provision . Leisure Studies, 17, 138-154.
35.
Selden, S.C., Brewer, G.A., & Brudney, J.L. (1999). Reconciling competing values in public administration: Understanding the administrative role concept. Administration & Society, 31, 171-204.
Tawse, E.L., & Keogh, W. (1998). Quality in the leisure industry: An investigation . Total Quality Management, 9, 219-222.
38.
Winter, P.L., Palucki, L.J., & Burkhardt, R.L. (1999). Anticipated responses to a fee program: The key is trust. Journal of Leisure Research , 31, 207-226.
39.
Youhn, S. (2000). Good leases gone bad: Who is running your golf course? Parks & Recreation, 35(6), 78-83.
