We make values explicit when routines break down. I do not deduct a particular pragmatic way of dealing with such conflicts from a position of value pluralism, something that seems to have attracted the ire of my learned colleagues in this debate. Instead, it is the other way around. I used value pluralism to explain not only how administrators dealt with difficult choices but also that, in the large majority of cases, they managed to arrive at decisions that seemed judged to be reasonable. This makes for a very different project than my colleagues make it out to be.
AndersonE. (1993). Value in ethics and economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
AndersonE. (1997). Practical reason and incommensurable goods. In ChangR. (Ed.), Incommensurability, incomparability, and practical reason (pp. 90-110). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BarnesB. (2001). Practice as collective action. In SchatzkiT. S.Knorr CetinaK.von SavignyE. (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 17-29). London, England: Routledge.
4.
ChangR. (Ed.). (1997). Incommensurability, incomparability, and practical reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
ChangR. (2015). Value pluralism. In WrightJ.D. (Editor in chief) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 25, pp. 21-26). Oxford: Elsevier.
6.
KekesJ. (1993). The morality of pluralism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
NicoliniD. (2012). Practice theory, work and organization: An introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9.
NussbaumM. (1990). The discernment of perception. An Aristotelian conception of private and public rationality. In Love’s knowledge: Essays on philosophy and literature (pp. 54-106). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.
OvereemP.VerhoefJ. (2014). Moral dilemmas, theoretical confusion: Value pluralism and its supposed implications for public administration. Administration & Society, 46, 986-1009.
11.
StockerM. (1990). Plural and conflicting values. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
12.
TaylorC. (1997). Leading a life. In ChangR. (Ed.), Incommensurability, incomparability, and practical reason (pp. 170-184). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
WagenaarH. (2002). Value pluralism in public administration: Two perspectives on administrative morality. In JunJ. S. (Eds.), Rethinking administrative theory: The challenge of the new century (pp. 105-131). Westport, CT: Praeger.
14.
WagenaarH. (2006). Bureaucratic order and personal order: The narrative analysis of administrative practice. In van den BrinkM.MetzeT. (Eds.), Words matter in policy and planning. Discourse Theory and Method in the Social Sciences (pp. 43-65). Utrecht: Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig genootschap.
15.
WagenaarH. (2011). Meaning in action: Interpretation and dialogue in policy analysis. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
16.
WagenaarH. (2014a). The agonistic experience: Informality, hegemony and the prospects for democratic governance. In GriggsS.NorvalA.WagenaarH. (Eds.), Practices of freedom: Democracy, conflict and participation in decentred governance (pp. 217-248). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
WagenaarH. (2014b). The necessity of value pluralism in administrative practice: A reply to Overeem. Administration & Society, 46, 1020-1028.
18.
WagenaarH.CookS. D. N. (2003). Understanding policy practices: Action, dialectic and deliberation in policy analysis. In HajerM.WagenaarH. (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (pp. 139-171). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
WagenaarH.HartendorpR. (2000). Oedipus in the welfare office. In WagenaarH. (Ed.), Government institutions: Effects, changes and normative foundations. (pp 147-178). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
20.
WagenaarH.van der HeijdenJ. (2015). The promise of democracy? Civic enterprise, localism and the transformation of democratic capitalism. In MadanipourA.DavoudiS. (Eds.), Reconsidering localism (pp. 126-146). Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge.
