Using a cross-sectional survey of 254 Turkish district governors, this study assesses the impact of personality on decision-making among public managers. The research evaluates self-reported results from the Five-Factor Model of personality and the Decision-Making Questionnaire of the psychology literature. The findings suggest that Openness, Conscientiousness, and Extraversion are important in the analysis of decision-making subjects, tasks, and contexts, respectively. Departing from previous research, the analysis here suggests that culture and structure are important factors in explaining personality and decision-making in public administration.
Points for practitioners
This study offers policy implications for the recruitment, performance appraisal, training, and assignment of practitioners in the public service. Personality assessments can be used as a valuable tool during the evaluation of public officials under consideration for recruitment, appointment, and promotion. Matching the personalities of potential candidates to positions requiring comparable qualifications has important organizational, personnel, and financial implications. Our research also suggests that decision-making and personality should also account for social, cultural, and organizational differences in their applications.
Ackerman PL, Bowen KR, Beier M and Kanfer R (2001) Determinants of individual differences and gender differences in knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology 93(4): 797–825.
2.
Adair J (2010) Decision-making and Problem Solving Strategies (2nd edn). Philadelphia: Kogan Page.
3.
BanduraA (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, New York: Freeman.
4.
BarenbaumNBWinterDG (1999) History of modern personality theory and research. In: PervinLAJohnOP (eds) Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, New York: Guilford Press, pp. 3–27.
5.
BarrickMRMountMK (1991) The big five dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology44(1): 1–26.
6.
BarrickMRMountMKStraussJP (1993) Conscientiousness and performance among sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology78(5): 715–722.
7.
BarrickMRStewartGLPiotrowskiM (2002) Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology87(1): 43–51.
8.
BazermanMHMooreDA (2009) Judgment in Managerial Decision-making, (7th edn). New York: Wiley.
9.
BlauPM (1970) A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. American Sociological Review35(2): 201–218.
10.
Block J (1968) Some reasons for the apparent inconsistency of personality. Psychologıcal Bulletin 70(3): 210–212.
11.
BrudneyJLHebertFTWrightDS (1999) Reinventing government in the American states: Measuring and explaining administrative reform. Public Administration Review59(1): 19–30.
12.
BryantPDunfordR (2008) The influence of regulatory focus on risky decision-making. Applied Psychology: An International Review57(2): 335–359.
13.
ByrnesJPMillerDCSchaferWD (1999) Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin125(3): 367–383.
14.
CampbellJP (1990) Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In: DunnetteMDHoughLM (eds) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational PsychologyVol 2, Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, pp. 687–732.
15.
Cannon-Bowers JA and Salas E (2002) Individual and team decision-making under stress: Theoretical underpinnings. In: Cannon-Bowers JA and Salas E (eds) Making Decisions under Stress. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 17–38.
16.
CapraraGVCervoneD (2000) Personality: Determinants, Dynamics and Potentials, New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
CarloGOkunMAKnightG (2005) The interplay of traits and motives on volunteering: Agreeableness, extraversion and prosocial value motivation. Personality and Individual Differences38: 1293–1305.
18.
ChildJ (1972) Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology6(1): 1–22.
19.
CooperCAKnottsHGMcCordDM (2012) Taking personality seriously: The five-factor model and public management. The American Review of Public Administration43(4): 397–415.
20.
CostaPTJrMcCraeRR (1992) NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual, Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
21.
CostaPTJrTerraccianoAMcCraeRR (2001) Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology81(2): 322–331.
22.
CrosonRGneezyU (2009) Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature47(2): 448–474.
23.
DavisCPatteKTweedS (2007) Personality traits associated with decision-making deficits. Personality and Individual Differences42(2): 279–290.
24.
DeLongisAHoltzmanS (2005) Coping in context: The role of stress, social support, and personality in coping. Journal of Personality73(6): 1633–1656.
25.
DewberryCJuanchicMNarendranS (2013) Decision-making competence in everyday life: The roles of general cognitive styles, decision-making styles and personality. Personality and Individual Differences55: 783–788.
26.
DreyfusHL (1997) Intuitive, deliberative, and calculative models of expert performance. In: ZsambokCEKleinG (eds) Naturalistic Decision-making, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 17–28.
27.
DudleyNMOrvisKALebieckiJE (2006) A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology91(1): 40–57.
28.
DuhaimeIMBairdIS (1987) Divestment decision-making: The role of business unit size. Journal of Management13(3): 483–498.
29.
EmreC (2002) İyi Yönetim Arayışında Türkiye’de Mülki İdarenin Geleceği, Ankara: Türk İdari Araştırmalar Vakfı.
30.
EpsteinS (1994) Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist49(8): 709–724.
31.
FlanneryDJWilliamsLLVazsonyiAT (1999) Who are they with and what are they doing? Delinquent behavior, substance use, and early adolescents’ after-school time. American Journal of Ortopsychiatry69(2): 247–253.
32.
Fredrickson JW and Iaquinto AL (1989) Inertia and creeping rationality in strategic decision processes. Academy of Management Journal 32(3): 516–542.
33.
GigerenzerGBrightonH (2009) Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science1: 107–143.
34.
GigerenzerGToddPM (1999) Fast and frugal heuristics, adaptive toolbox. In: GigerenzerGToddPM (eds) Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–34.
35.
GillSStockardJJohnsonM (1987) Measuring gender differences: The expressive dimension and critique of androgyny scales. Sex Roles17(7/8): 375–400.
36.
Greenberg J and Baron RA (2010) Behavior in Organizations (10th edn). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
37.
GülgözS (2002) Five-factor model and NEO-PI-R in Turkey. In: McCraeRRAllikJ (eds) The Five-factor Model of Personality Across Cultures, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 175–196.
38.
HarrisCRJenkinsMGlaserD (2006) Gender differences in risk assessment: Why do women take fewer risks than men?. Judgment and Decision-making1(1): 48–63.
39.
HeinströmJ (2003) Five personality dimensions and their influence on information behaviour. Information Research9(1): 165.
40.
HessTMOsowskiNLLeclercCM (2005) Age and experience influences on the complexity of social inferences. Psychology and Aging20(3): 447–459.
41.
HoganRHoganJRobertsBW (1996) Personality measurement and employment decisions: Questions and answers. American Psychologist51(5): 469–477.
42.
HookerK (2002) New directions for research in personality and aging: A comprehensive model for linking levels, structures, and processes. Journal of Research in Personality36(4): 318–334.
43.
JanisIL (1971) Groupthink: The desperate drive for consensus at any cost. In: ShafritzJMOttJSJangYS (eds) Classics of Organization Theory, Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth, pp. 185–192.
44.
JiangCWangDZhouF (2009) Personality traits and job performance in local government organizations in China. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal37: 451–457.
45.
JohnOPSrivastavaS (1999) The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: PervinLAJohnOP (eds) Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, (2nd edn). New York: Guilford Press, pp. 102–138.
46.
JudgeTAIliesR (2002) Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology87(4): 797–807.
47.
JudgeTAHigginsCAThoresenCJ (1999) The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology52(4): 621–652.
48.
Lindblom CE (1959) The science of ‘Muddling Through'. Public Administration Review 19(2): 79–88.
49.
LipshitzRStraussO (1997) Coping with uncertainty: A naturalistic decision-making analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes69(2): 149–163.
50.
LizarragaMLSBaquedanoMTSOliverMS (2009) Development and validation of a decision-making questionnaire. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling37(3): 357–373.
51.
McAdamsDP (2008) The Person: An Introduction to the Science of Personality Psychology, Hoboken: Wiley.
52.
McCraeRRCostaPTJr (1997) Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist52(5): 509–516.
53.
McCraeRRJohnOP (1992) An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality60(2): 175–215.
54.
McRaeRRTerraccianoA (2005) Personality profiles of cultures: Aggregate personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89(3): 407–425.
55.
McCraeRRCostaPTJrOstendorfF (2000) Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and lifespan development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology78(1): 173–186.
56.
McKinneyJBHowardLC (1998) Public Administration: Balancing Power and Accountability, (2nd edn). Westport: Praeger Publishing.
57.
MellersBSchwartzARitovI (1999) Emotion-based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology128(3): 332–345.
58.
MeyerBJFTalbotAPRanalliC (2007) Why older adults make more immediate treatment decisions about cancer than younger adults. Psychology and Aging22(3): 505–524.
59.
MilgramNTenneR (2000) Personality correlates of decisional and task avoidant procrastination. European Journal of Personality14(2): 141–156.
60.
MillerDCByrnesJP (2001) To achieve or not to achieve: A self-regulation perspective on adolescents’ academic decision-making. Journal of Educational Psychology93(4): 677–685.
61.
O’BrienTBDeLongisA (1996) The interactional context of problem-emotion, and relationship-focused coping: The role of the big five personality factors. Journal of Personality64(4): 775–813.
62.
OrasanuJConnollyT (1993) The reinvention of decision-making. In: Klein G, Orasanu J and Calderwood R (eds) Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods, Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. 3–20. .
63.
PaciniREpsteinS (1999) The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology76(6): 972–987.
64.
PetersEHessTMVastfjallD (2007) Adult age differences in dual information processes: Implications for the role of affective and deliberative processes in older adults’ decision-making. Perspectives on Psychological Science2(1): 1–23.
65.
RenderBStairRSJrHannaME (2009) Quantitative Analysis For Management, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
66.
RobinsonMD (2007) Personality, affective processing, and self-regulation: Toward process-based views of extraversion, neuroticism, and agreeableness. Social and Personality Psychology Compass1(1): 223–235.
67.
RollinsonD (2008) Organisational Behaviour and Analysis: An Integrated Approach, (4th edn). London: Pearson Education Limited.
68.
SalgadoJF (1997) The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology82(1): 30–43.
69.
SchmittDPAllikJMcCraeRR (2007) The geographic distribution of big five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology38(2): 173–212.
70.
SherifM (1936) The Social Psychology of Group Norms, New York: Harper & Row.
71.
SimonHA (1960) The New Science of Management Decision, New York: Harper & Row.
72.
SniezekJAPaesePWSwitzerFS (1990) The effect of choosing on confidence in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes46(2): 264–282.
73.
SvensonOMauleAJ (1993) Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment Decision-making, New York: Plenum Press.
74.
TIAV (Türk İdari Araştırmalar Vakfı) (2013) Toplumda İçişleri Bakanlığı ve Mülki İdareAlgısı.. Prepared by TIAV, Ankara.
75.
Van EmmerikH (2008) Relationship between personality and time-related strains. Psychological Reports102: 484–494.
76.
WayneJHMusiscaNFleesonW (2004) Considering the role of personality in the work–family experience: Relationships of the big five to work–family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior64: 108–130.
77.
Wilfling S, Cantner U and Silbereisen RK (2011) Which big-five personality traits drive entrepreneurial failure in highly innovative firms? In: Dime-Druid Academy Winter Conference, Aalborg, Denmark, 20–22 January 2011.
78.
WigginsJSTrapnellPD (1996) A dyadic-interactional perspective on the five-factor model. In: WigginsJS (ed.) The Five Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives, New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 88–162.
79.
WoodJT (1990) Gendered Lives: Communication, Gender, and Culture, Belmont: Wadsworth.
80.
ZuckermanM (1995) Good and bad humor: Biochemical bases of personality and its disorders. Psychological Science6: 325–332.
