This study extends prior work on the social role of nonprofits by investigating Web site use for e-advocacy and e-democracy (civic engagement). Building from interviews with 200 nonprofit executive directors, results reveal that rights groups, environmental organizations, and policy entrepreneurs are consistently likely to mention advocacy and promote civic engagement on their Web sites. By contrast, funding structure and resource dependence generally fail to explain nonprofit use of Web sites for social purposes, suggesting that external controls may not constrain nonprofits. In light of these results, the study concludes with an agenda for future research on the relationship between civic engagement and advocacy.
Alexander, J. (1999). The impact of devolution on nonprofits: A multiphase study of social service organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 10(1), 57-70.
2.
Alexander, J., Nank, R., & Stivers, C. (1999). Implications of welfare reform: Do nonprofit survival strategies threaten civil society? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 452-475.
3.
Bass, G., Arons, D., Guinane, K., & Carter, M. (2007). Seen but not heard. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
4.
Berry, J. (1999). The new liberalism: The rising power of citizen groups. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
5.
Berry, J. (2003). A voice for nonprofits. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
6.
Bhagat, V. (2005). Online advocacy: How the Internet is transforming the way nonprofits reach, motivate, and retain supporters. In T. Hart, J. Greenfield , & M. Johnston (Eds.), Nonprofit Internet strategies (pp. 119-134). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
7.
Boris, E., & Krehely, J. (2002). Civic participation and advocacy. In L. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 299-330). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
8.
Bothwell, R., & Guinane, K. (2004). Continuing attacks on nonprofit speech: Death by a thousand cuts II. Washington, DC: OMB Watch.
9.
Brainard, L., & Siplon, P. (2002). Cyberspace challenges to mainstream nonprofit health organizations. Administration & Society, 34, 141-175.
10.
Chaves, M., Stephens, L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2004). Does government funding suppress nonprofits' political activity? American Sociological Review, 69, 292-316.
11.
Clemens, E. (2006). The constitution of citizens: Political theories of nonprofit organizations. In W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 207-220). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
Cooper, T., Bryer, T., & Meek, J. (2006). Citizen-centered collaborative public management . Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 76-88.
13.
Cortes, M., & Rafter, P. (2007). Nonprofits and technology: Emerging research for usable knowledge. Chicago: Lyceum .
14.
Davis, R. (1999). The Internet's impact on the American political system. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
16.
Dubin, J., & Rivers, D. (1989). Selection bias in linear regression, logit and probit models. Sociological Methods, 18, 360-390.
17.
Eikenberry, A., & Kluver, J. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132-140.
18.
Ehrlich, T. (Ed.). (2000). Civic responsibility and higher education. Westport, CT: Oryx Press.
19.
Frumkin, P. (2002). On being nonprofit: A conceptual and policy primer . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
Frumkin, P., & Galaskiewicz, G. (2004). Institutional isomorphism and public sector organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 283-307.
21.
Galaskiewicz, J., & Bielefeld, W. (1998). Nonprofit organizations in an age of uncertainty: A study of organizational change. Hawthorne, NY: Adline.
22.
Greene, W. (2000). Econometric analysis. New York : Prentice Hall.
23.
Guo, C., & Acar, M. (2005). Understanding collaboration among nonprofit organizations: Combining resource dependency, institutional, and network perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34, 340-361.
24.
Hart, T., Greenfield, J., & Johnston, M. (2005). Nonprofit Internet strategies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
25.
Hwang, H., & Powell, W. (In press). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly .
26.
Jenkins, C. (2006). Nonprofit organizations and political advocacy . In W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The non-profit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 307-332). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
Leech, B. (2006). Funding faction or buying silence? Grants, contracts, and interest group lobbying behavior. Policy Studies Journal , 34(1), 17-35.
28.
Margolis, M., & Resnick, D. (2000). Politics as usual: The cyberspace "revolution ." London: Sage.
29.
Marwell, N. (2004). Privatizing the welfare state: Nonprofit community-based organizations as political actors. American Sociological Review , 69, 265-291.
30.
McNutt, J., & Boland, K.M. (1999). Electronic advocacy by non-profit organizations in social welfare policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly , 28, 432-451.
31.
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
32.
Milofsky, C. (1988). Structure and process in community self-help organizations . In C. Milofsky (Ed.), Community organizations: Studies in resource mobilization and exchange (pp. 183-216). New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
Minkoff, D. (2002). The emergence of hybrid organizational forms: Combining identity-based service provision and political action. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 377-401.
34.
Nicholson-Crotty, J. (2007). Politics, policy, and the motivations for advocacy in nonprofit reproductive health and family planning providers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(1), 5-21.
35.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
36.
Powell, W., & DiMaggio, P. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
38.
Reid, E. (1999). Nonprofit advocacy and political participation . In E. Boris & E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict (pp. 291-327). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
39.
Rethemeyer, R.K. (2007). Policymaking in the age of Internet: Is the Internet tending to make policy networks more or less inclusive? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 259-284.
40.
Salamon, L. (1987). Partners in public service: The scope and theory of government-nonprofit relations. In W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 99-117). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
Salamon, L. (Ed.). (2002). The state of nonprofit America. Washington, DC: Brookings.
42.
Sampson, R., McAdam, D., MacIndoe, H., & Weffer, S. (2005). Civil society reconsidered: The durable nature and community structure of collective civic action. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 673-714.
43.
Schmid, H., Bar, M., & Nirel, R. (2008). Advocacy activities in nonprofit human service organizations: Implications for policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37, 581-602.
44.
Scott, W., & Meyer, J. (1991). The organization of societal sectors: Propositions and early evidence. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 108-142). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
45.
Shaiko, R. (1999). Voices and echoes for the environment. New York: Columbia University Press.
46.
Skocpol, T. (2003). Diminished democracy: From membership to management in American civic life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
47.
Skocpol, T., & Fiorina, M. (1999). Civic engagement in American democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Press.
48.
Smith, S., & Gronbjerg, K. (2006). Scope and theory of government-nonprofit relations . In W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 221-242). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
49.
Steinberg, R. (2006). Economic theories of the nonprofit organizations . In W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 117-139). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
50.
Suárez, D., & Hwang, H. (2007). Civic engagement and nonprofit lobbying in California, 1998-2003. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(1), 93-112.
51.
Tuckman, H., Chatterjee, P., & Muha, D. (2004). Nonprofit Websites: Prevalence, usage and commercial activity. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing , 12(1), 49-67.
52.
Young, D. (1999). Complementary, supplementary, or adversarial? A theoretical and historical examination of nonprofit-government relations in the United States. In E. Boris & C. Steurle (Eds.), Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict (pp. 31-70). Washington, DC : Urban Institute Press.
53.
Zellner, A. (1963). Estimators for seemingly unrelated regression equations: Some exact finite sample results. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 977-992.
