Job seekers are increasingly turning to the Internet. Government Web sites not only provide information about employment opportunities but also convey messages, whether intentional or not, about values and priorities that affect individuals' perceptions of the attractiveness of the state as an employer. This study replicates private sector–based research by examining the diversity messages reflected in text and visual imagery on 50 state government Web sites. Overall, in contrast with private companies, a majority of states do not demonstrate a clear commitment to diversity on their Web sites. Rather, the states place greater emphasis on customer service and efficiency. Given the increased importance of the Internet as a recruitment tool, findings suggest the need for greater attention to the diversity messages conveyed by state government Web sites. The article concludes with some practical recommendations for more effective use of this medium to advance diversity-related recruitment goals and suggestions for future research.
Abramson, M. A., Demesme, R. B., & Gardner, N. W. (2002, Spring/Summer). The chained gang— Human capital management: The human capital challenge. Journal of Public Inquiry, pp. 43-48.
2.
Avery, D. R., Hernandez, M., & Hebl, M. R. (2004). Who's watching the race? Racial salience in recruitment advertising. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 146-161.
3.
Bart, C. K. (1998). A comparison of mission statements and their rationales in innovative and noninnovative firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 16, 64-77.
4.
Bart, C. K., Bontis, N., & Tagger, S. (2001). A model of the impact of mission statements on firm performance. Management Decision, 39, 19-35.
5.
Bingham, B., Ilg, S., & Davidson, N. (2002). Great candidates fast: On-line job application and electronic processing. Public Personnel Management, 31, 53-64.
6.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2002a, November 21). Job-search methods on-line. Monthly Labor Review (The Editor's Desk). U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved July 21, 2005, from www.bls.gov.opub/ted/2002/nov/wk3/art04.htm
7.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2002b, November 6). Using the Internet to find a job. Monthly Labor Review (The Editor's Desk). U. S. Department of Labor. Retrieved July 21, 2005, from www.bls.gov.opub/ted/2002/nov/wk1/art03.htm
8.
Cober, R. T., Brown, D. J., Blumenthal, A. J., Doverspike, D., & Levy, P. (2000). The quest for the qualified job surfer: It's time the public sector catches the wave [Electronic version]. Public Personnel Management, 29, 479-494.
9.
Doverspike, D., Taylor, M. A., Schultz, K. S., & McKay, P. F. (2000). Responding to the challenge of a changing workforce: Recruiting nontraditional demographic groups. Public Personnel Management, 29, 445-457.
10.
Gardenswartz, L., & Rowe, A. (1993). Managing diversity: A complete desk reference. Homewood, IL: Business One Irwin.
11.
Gatewood, R., Gowan, M., & Lautenschlager, G. (1993). Corporate image, recruitment image and initial job choice decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 414-427.
12.
Green, M. (2000). Beware and prepare: The government workforce of the future. Public Personnel Management, 29, 435-444.
13.
Hays, S. W., & Kearney, R. C. (1992). State personnel directors and the dilemmas of Workforce 2000: A survey. Public Administration Review, 52, 380-389.
14.
Hebert, F. T., Wright, D. S., & Brudney, J. I. (1992). Challenges for state governments: Policy and administrative leadership in the 1990s. Public Productivity and Management Review, 16, 1-22.
15.
Kaufman, H. (1969). Administrative decentralization and political power. Public Administration Review, 29, 3-15.
16.
Kuhn, P., & Skuterud, M. (2000, October). Job search methods: Internet versus traditional. Monthly Labor Review, 123, 3-11.
17.
LaPorte, T. M., Demchak, C. C., & de Jong, M. (2002). Democracy and bureaucracy in the age of the Web: Empirical findings and theoretical speculations. Administration & Society, 34, 411-446.
18.
Lavigna, R. J., & Hays, S. W. (2004). Recruitment and selection of public workers: An international compendium of modern trends and practices. Public Personnel Management, 33, 237-253.
19.
Lievens, F., & Harris, M. M. (2003). Research on Internet recruiting and testing. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 16, pp. 131-165). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
20.
McCabe, B. C., & Stream, C. (2000). Diversity by the numbers: Changes in state and local government workforces 1980-1995. Public Personnel Management, 29, 93-105.
21.
McNab, S. M., & Johnston, L. (2002). The impact of equal employment opportunity statements in job advertisements on applicants' perceptions of organisations. Australian Journal of Psychology, 54, 105-109.
22.
Michaels, E., Handfield-Jones, H., & Axelrod, B. (2001). The war for talent. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
23.
National Commission on the State and Local Public Service (Winter Commission). (1993). Hard truths/tough choices: An agenda for state and local reform. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute of Government.
24.
O'Leary, B. S., Lindholm, M. L., Whitford, R. A., & Freeman, S. E. (2002). Selecting the best and brightest: Leveraging human capital. Human Resource Management, 41, 325-340.
25.
Perkins, L. S., Thomas, K. M., & Taylor, G. A. (2000). Advertising and recruitment: Marketing to minorities. Psychology and Marketing, 17, 235-255.
26.
Reichenberg, N. (2002, October). Branding the government as an employer of choice. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Personnel Management Association for Human Resources, Washington, DC.
27.
Simpson, R. L. (2004). Recruit, retain, assess: Technology's role in diversity. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 28, 217-220.
28.
Singh, P., & Finn, D. (2003). The effects of information technology on recruitment. Journal of Labor Research, 24, 395-409.
29.
Singh, V., & Point, S. (2004). Strategic responses by European companies to the diversity challenge: An online comparison. Long Range Planning, 37, 295-318.
30.
Smith, W. J., Wokutch, R. E., Harrington, K. V., & Dennis, B. S. (2004). Organizational attractiveness and corporate social orientation: Do our values influence our preference for affirmative action and managing diversity?Business & Society, 43, 60-96.
31.
Thomas, K. M., & Wise, P. G. (1999). Organizational attractiveness and individual differences: Are diverse applicants attracted by different factors?Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 375-390.
32.
Tipper, J. (2004). How to increase diversity through your recruitment practices. Industrial and Commercial Training, 36, 158-161.
33.
Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1996). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658-672.
34.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (2001, May). Recruitment best practices report. San Francisco: U.S. Office of Personnel Management, San Francisco Service Center. Retrieved August 11, 2005, from http://www.spd.usace.army.mil/recruiting/Recruitment_Best_Practices_Report.pdf
35.
Weiss, J. A., & Piderit, S. K. (1999). The value of mission statements in public agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, 193-223.
36.
Wise, L. R. (2002). Public management reform: Competing drivers of change. Public Administration Review, 62, 555-567.
