This study explores connections between the military experiences of a new generation of War on Terror (WoT) veterans elected to the U.S. Congress and controversial policy decisions on domestic security during the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests. WoT veterans became the largest cohort of lawmakers with common military experiences on Capitol Hill in 2020, and this article examines their engagement through two original case studies of legislative debates over command and control of the National Guard mobilization during BLM protests. Confrontations between federal law enforcement officers and BLM protestors led some WoT veterans to propose legislation to restrict executive authority over National Guard deployments, including reforms of Titles 10 and 32 of the U.S. Code and the Insurrection Act, but other WoT veterans challenged these positions. This exploratory study of events and circumstances links the timely topic of domestic security to traditional debates in the civil–military relations literature on whether veterans are more or less likely to support the use of military force and try to expand congressional oversight of presidential powers. By bridging the gap between research areas and crossing generations, this article offers lessons for past, present, and potentially future debates about the use of troops for domestic security operations.
AbramowitzA.McCoyJ. (2019). United States: Racial resentment, negative partisanship, and polarization in Trump’s America. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 137–156.
2.
AlthausS. L.BramlettB. H.GimpelJ. G. (2012). When war hits home: The geography of military losses and support for war in time and space. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(3), 382–412.
AvantD. D. (1996). Are the reluctant warriors out of control? Why the US military is averse to responding to post-cold war low-level threats. Security Studies, 6(2), 51–90.
5.
BabbieE. (2007). The practice of social research (11th ed.). Thompson-Wadsworth.
6.
BachmanJ. G.Freedman-DoanP.SegalD. R.O’MalleyP. M. (2000). Distinctive military attitudes among US Enlistees, 1976-1997: Self-selection versus socialization. Armed Forces & Society, 26(4), 561–585.
7.
BartelsL.JackmanS. (2014). A generational model of political learning. Electoral Studies, 33, 7–18.
BengtssonB.RuonavaaraH. (2017). Comparative process tracing: Making historical comparison structured and focused. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 47(1), 44–66.
10.
BiancoW. (2005). Last post for “The Greatest Generation”: The policy implications of the decline of military experience in the U.S. Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30(1), 85–102.
11.
BiancoW.MarkhamJ. (2001). Vanishing veterans: The decline of military experience in the U.S. Congress. In FeaverP.KohnR. H. (Eds.), Soldiers and civilians: The civil-military gap and American National Security (pp. 275–288). MIT Press.
12.
BlankshainJ. D.CohnL. P.KrinerD. L. (2022). Citizens to soldiers: Mobilization, cost perceptions, and support for military action. Journal of Global Security Studies, 7(4), ogac017.
13.
BlattmanC. (2009). From violence to voting: War and political participation in Uganda. American Political Science Review, 103(2), 231–247.
14.
BrooksR. (2008). Shaping strategy: The Civil-military politics of strategic assessment. Princeton University Press.
15.
BrooksR. (2020). Paradoxes of professionalism: Rethinking civil-military relations in the United States. International Security, 44(4), 7–44.
16.
BrooksR.GolbyJ.UrbenH. (2021, April9). Crisis of command: America’s broken civil-military relationship imperils National Security. Foreign Affairs, p. 100.
17.
BrooksR.GrewalS. (2022). “Twice the Citizen”: How military attitudes of superiority undermine civilian control in the United States. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 66(4–5), 623–650.
CoakleyR. W. (2011). The role of federal military forces in domestic disorders, 1789– 1878. Center of Military History.
24.
CohnL. P. (2022). To execute the laws of the union: Domestic uses of federal military force in the United States. In CollinsP.HallR. A. (Eds.), Military operation and engagement in the domestic jurisdiction (pp. 57–90). Brill Nijhoff.
25.
CormackL. (2018). Congress and U.S. veterans: From the GI Bill to the VA crisis. Praeger.
DempseyM. E. (2018). Redefining the modern military: The intersection of profession and ethics. Naval Institute Press.
29.
DeschM. (2001). Civilian control of the military: The changing security environment. Johns Hopkins University Press.
30.
DiCiccoJ.FordhamB. (2018). The things they carried: Generational effects of the Vietnam War on elite opinion. International Studies Quarterly, 62(1), 131–144.
31.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E. (2007). Theory-building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
32.
ElseaJ. (2006, March4). Congressional authority to limit military operations. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
33.
EndicottT. W. (2020). Combat experience and the foreign policy positions of veterans. Social Science Quarterly, 101(4), 1413–1429.
GallegoR.DeFeliceJ. (2021). They called us “lucky”: The life and afterlife of the Iraq war’s hardest hit unit. Custom House.
45.
GelpiC.FeaverP. (2002). Speak softly and carry a big stick? Veterans in the political elite and the American use of force. The American Political Science Review, 96(4), 779–793.
46.
GeorgeA. L.BennettA. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
47.
GerringJ.CojocaruL. (2015). Selecting cases for intensive analysis: A diversity of goals and methods. Sociological Methods & Research, 45(3), 392–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124116631692
GolbyJ.CohnL. P.FeaverP. D. (2016). Thank you for your service: Civilian and Veteran attitudes after fifteen years of war. In SchakeK.MattisJ. (Eds.), Warriors and citizens: American views of our military (pp. 97–142). Hoover Institution Press.
50.
GolbyJ.FeaverP.DroppK. (2018). Elite military cues and public opinion about the use of military force. Armed Forces & Society, 44(1), 44–71.
51.
GrossmanG.ManekinD.MiodownikD. (2015). The political legacies of combat: Attitudes toward war and peace among Israeli ex-combatants. International Organization, 69(4), 981–1009.
52.
HajjarR. M. (2014). Emergent postmodern US Military Culture. Armed Forces & Society, 40(1), 118–145.
53.
HerrickR.MooreM. K.HibbingJ. R. (1994). Unfastening the electoral connection: The behavior of US representatives when reelection is no longer a factor. The Journal of Politics, 56(1), 214–227.
54.
HolstiO. R. (2001). Politicization of the United States military: Crisis or tempest in a teapot?International Journal, 57(1), 1–18.
55.
HorowitzM. C.StamA. C. (2014). How prior military experience influences the future militarized behavior of leaders. International Organization, 68(3), 527–559.
56.
HorowitzM. C.StamA. C.EllisC. M. (2015). Why leaders fight. Cambridge University Press.
JakupcakM.CookJ.ImelZ.FontanaA.RosenheckR.McFallM. (2009). Post-traumatic stress disorder as a risk factor for suicidal ideation in Iraq and Veterans. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(4), 303–306.
62.
JanowitzM. (1960). The professional soldier. The Free Press.
63.
JostT.MeshkinK.SchubR. (2022). The character and origins of military attitudes on the use of force. International Studies Quarterly, 66(2), 441–459.
KnightD. M. (2014). Veterans in Congress: The policy impact of veterans in the US House of Representatives. Georgetown University.
68.
KrebsR. R.RalstonR.RapportA. (2021). Why they fight: How perceived motivations for military service shape support for the use of force. International Studies Quarterly, 65(4), 1012–1026.
69.
KrebsR. R.RalstonR.RapportA. (2023). No right to be wrong: What Americans think about civil-military relations. Perspectives on Politics, 21(2), 606–624.
70.
KrinerD. L.ShenF. X. (2014). Reassessing American casualty sensitivity: The mediating influence of inequality. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58(7), 1174–1201.
LealD. L.TeigenJ. M. (2018). Military service and political participation in the United States: Institutional experience and the vote. Electoral Studies, 53, 99–110.
75.
LuptonD. L. (2017). Out of the service: Into the house: Military experience and congressional war oversight. Political Research Quarterly, 70(2), 327–339.
76.
LuptonD. L. (2022). Military experience and elite decision-making: Self-selection, socialization, and the Vietnam draft lottery. International Studies Quarterly, 66(1), sqab052.
MochtakM.GlaurdićJ.LesschaeveC. (2022). Talking war: Representation, veterans and ideology in post-war parliamentary debates. Government and Opposition, 57(1), 148–170.
84.
MoskosC. C. (1998). The American soldier after the cold war: Toward a postmodern military [ARI Research Note 99-02, Research and Advanced Concepts Office]. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
85.
MoskosC. C. (2000). Toward a postmodern military: The United States as a paradigm. In MoskosC. C.WilliamsJ. A.SegalD. R. (Eds.), The postmodern military: Armed forces after the cold war (pp. 14–31). Oxford University Press.
86.
MoskosC. C.BurkJ. (1994). The postmodern military. In BurkJ. (Ed.), The military in new times: Adapting armed forces to a turbulent world (pp. 141–162). Westview Press.
ShieldsP.WhetsellT. A. (2017). Doing practical research and publishing in military studies. In SoetersJ.ShieldsP.RietjensS. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of research in military studies (pp. 312–325). Routledge.
StebbinsR. A. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences. Sage.
103.
TeigenJ. (2008). Invoking military credentials in congressional elections, 2000-2006. In ReveronD. S.StiehmJ. (Eds.), Inside defense (pp. 115–125). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230613782_10
104.
TeigenJ. (2018). Why veterans run: Military service in American presidential elections, 1789-2016. Temple University Press.
105.
TheysM.KruegerJ. S.PedrazaF. I. (2020). Identity fusion and the use of force: A group-psychological explanation for support of military interventions. Political Research Quarterly, 73(2), 381–395.
UrbenH. A. (2014). Wearing politics on their sleeves? Levels of political activism of active duty Army officers. Armed Forces & Society, 40(3), 568–591.
Watson Institute. (2020). The long-term costs of United States care for veterans of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar
113.
WinslowD. (2007). Military organization and culture from three perspectives: The case of army. In CaforioG. (Ed.), Social sciences and the military: An interdisciplinary overview (pp. 67–88). Routledge.
114.
ZychowiczM. E. (2023). The PACT Act: Enhancing health care access for military personnel and veterans. North Carolina Medical Journal, 84(6), 379–380.
