Scholars and media outlets that cover the U.S. Congress devote substantial attention to the rise in partisanship and polarization over the past few decades. The steady increases in partisanship and polarization coincide with a comparable decline in veteran representation in Congress. While there are many factors that influence a congressperson’s behavior, an understudied issue is whether these trends suggest that veterans are more likely to exhibit bipartisanship than their nonveteran colleagues. Using two different measures of bipartisanship, this article draws on data from 12 different Congresses to examine whether veterans are more likely to be bipartisan than nonveterans. Utilizing difference in means tests, the results provide only modest evidence that increasing veteran representation would lead to more bipartisanship when controlling for generational differences. This article suggests a research agenda to further assess these findings and discusses the implications of increasing veteran presence in Congress on civil–military relations.
AbramowitzA. I.SaundersK. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth?The Journal of Politics, 70, 542–555. doi:10.1017/S0022381608080493
2.
AldrichJ. H. (2011). Why parties? A second look. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
AldrichJ. H.RohdeD. W. (2001). The logic of conditional party government. In DoddL. C.OppenheimerB. I. (Eds.), Congress reconsidered (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
4.
AndrisC.LeeD.HamiltonM. J.MartinoM.GunningC. E.SeldenJ. A. (2015). The rise of partisanship and super-cooperators in the U.S. House of representatives. PLoS one, 10, 1–14. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123507
5.
Babcock-LumishB. (2013). Uninformed, not uniformed? The apolitical myth. Military Review, 93, 48–56.
BrattonK. A. (2002). The effect of legislative diversity on agenda setting: Evidence from six state legislatures. American Politics Research, 30, 115–142.
12.
BurbachD. T. (2018). Partisan dimensions of confidence in the U.S. Military, 1973–2016. Armed Forces & Society. doi:10.1177/0095327x17747205
13.
CampbellA.ConverseP. E.MillerW. E.StokesD. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: John Wiley.
14.
CarminesE. G. (2011). Review symposium: Class politics, American style. Perspectives on Politics, 9, 645–647.
15.
CarrollS. J. (2001). The impact of women in public office. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
16.
CavanaghT. E (1982). The calculus of representation: A congressional perspective. Western Political Quarterly, 35, 120–129.
17.
ClarkJ. H. (2015). Minority parties in U.S. legislatures: Conditions of influence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
18.
CohenE. (2002). Supreme command: Soldiers, statesmen, and leadership in wartime. New York, NY: The Free Press.
19.
CohenJ. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 65, 145–153.
20.
ConverseP. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In ApterD. E. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York, NY: Free Press.
21.
CoxE.ParkK. W.SondheimerR. M.WilsonI. (2011). Growing military professionalism across generations. Military Review, 91, 34–42.
22.
CoxG. W.McCubbinsM. D. (2005). Setting the agenda: Responsible party government in the U.S. House of representatives. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23.
DavidsonJ. (2013). The contemporary presidency: Civil–military friction and presidential decision-making: Explaining the broken dialogue. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 43, 129–145.
24.
DavidsonR. H.OleszekW. J.LeeF. E.SchicklerE. (2016). Congress and its members (15th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.
25.
DempseyJ. K. (2009). Our army: Soldiers, politics, and American civil–military relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
DodsonD. L. (2006). The impact of women in congress. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
30.
EganP. J. (2013). Partisan priorities: How issue ownership drives and distorts American politics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
31.
FeaverP. (1996). The civil–military problematique: Huntington, janowitz, and the question of civilian control. Armed Forces & Society, 23, 149–178. doi:10.1177/0095327X9602300203
32.
FeaverP.GelpiC. (2004). Choosing your Battles: American civil–military relations and the use of force. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
FennoR. F. (1978). Home style: House members in their districts. New York, NY: Longman.
34.
FiorinaM. P.AbramsS. J.PopeJ. (2011). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Longman.
35.
FleisherR.BondJ. R. (2004). The shrinking middle in the U.S. congress. British Journal of Political Science, 34, 429–451.
36.
ForsytheG. B.KeithB. (2004). The evolving USMA academic curriculum, 1952–2002. Abilene, TX: State House Press.
37.
GelpiC.FeaverP. (2002). Speak softly and carry a big stick? Veterans in the political elite and the American use of force. The American Political Science Review, 96, 779–793.
GolbyJ. T.CohnL. P.FeaverP. D. (2016). Thanks for your service: Civilian and veteran attitudes after fifteen years of war. In MattisJ.SchakeK. (Eds.), Warriors and citizens: American views of our military. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
GreenD.PalmquistB.SchicklerE. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42.
HayesD. (2008). Party reputations, journalistic expectations: How issue ownership influences election news. Political Communication, 25, 377–400. doi:10.1080/10584600802426981
43.
HilleyJ. L. (2008). The challenge of legislation: Bipartisanship in a partisan world. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
44.
HolstiO. R. (1998). Of chasms and convergences: Attitudes and beliefs of civilians and military elites at the start of a new millennium. In FeaverP.KohnR. H. (Eds.), Soldiers and civilians: The civil-military gap and American national security (pp. 15–99). Cambridge, England: MIT Press.
45.
HuntingtonS. P. (1957). The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil–military relations. Cambridge, England: Belknap Press.
46.
JacobsonG. C. (2000). Party polarization in national politics: The electoral connection. In BondJ.FleisherR. (Eds.), Polarized politics: Congress and the president in a partisan era (pp. 9–30). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
47.
JacobsonG. C. (2004). Partisan and ideological polarization in the California electorate. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 4, 113–139.
48.
JanowitzM. (1960). The professional soldier: A social and political portrait. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
49.
JordanS.Quaile HillK.HurleyP. A. (2017). Constituency representation in congress: In general and in periods of higher and lower partisan polarization. In DoddL. C.OppenheimerB. I. (Eds.), Congress reconsidered (11th ed., pp. 119–137). Los Angeles, CA: CQ Press.
50.
KathleneL. (1994). Power and influence in state legislative policymaking: The interaction of gender and position in committee hearing debates. The American Political Science Review, 88, 560–576. doi:10.2307/2944795
KinderD.IyengarS. (1989). News that matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
53.
KohnR. H. (2002). The erosion of civilian control of the military in the United States Today. Naval War College Review, 55, 9–59.
54.
KrehbielK. (1998). Pivotal politics: A theory of U.S. lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
55.
LaymanG. C.CarseyT. M. (2002). Party polarization and party structuring of policy attitudes: A comparison of three NES panel studies. Political Behavior, 24, 199–236.
56.
LaymanG. C.CarseyT. M.GreenJ. C.HerreraR.CoopermanR. (2010). Activists and conflict extension in American party politics. The American Political Science Review, 104, 324–346.
57.
LaymanG. C.CarseyT. M.HorowitzJ. M. (2006). Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 83–110.
58.
LiebertH.GolbyJ. T. (2017). Midlife crisis? The all-volunteer force at 40. Armed Forces and Society, 43, 115–138.
59.
LynnS. (2016). Iraq & Afghanistan veterans have begun reversing the decades-long decline in congressional military service. Retrieved fromhttp://www.veteranscampaign.org/research/
60.
MariniM.SingerB. (1988). Causality in the social sciences. Sociological Methodology, 18, 347–409.
61.
MasonL. (2015). “I Disrespectfully Agree”: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 128–145.
62.
MatthewsL. J. (2002). The future of the army profession. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
63.
MayhewD. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
ReingoldB.HarrellJ. (2010). The impact of descriptive representation on women’s political engagement: Does party matter?Political Research Quarterly, 63, 280–294.
74.
RohdeD. W. (1991). Parties and leaders in the postreform house. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
SheaD. M. (1999). The passing of realignment and the advent of the “base-less” party system. American Politics Quarterly, 27, 33–57.
77.
ShepsleK. A. (1989). The changing textbook congress. In ChubbJ. E.PetersonP. E. (Eds.), Can the government govern? (pp. 238–266). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
78.
SinclairB. (2001). Bipartisan governing: Possible, yes; likely, no. Political Science and Politics, 34, 81–83.
79.
SinclairB. (2006). Party wars: Polarization and the politics of national policy making. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
80.
SinclairB. (2017). Unorthodox lawmaking: New legislative processes in the U.S. Congress (5th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage CQ Press.
81.
StewartC. H. (2001). Analyzing Congress (1st ed.). New York, NY: Norton.
82.
StrachanH. (2013). The direction of war: Contemporary strategy in historical perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
83.
TheriaultS. M. (2008). Party polarization in congress. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
84.
ThomsenD. M. (2014). Ideological moderates won’t run: How party fit matters for partisan polarization in congress. Journal of Politics, 76, 786–797. doi:10.1017/S0022381614000243
85.
TrubowitzP.MellowN. (2005). “Going Bipartisan”: Politics by other means. Political Science Quarterly, 120, 433–453.
WeigleyR. F. (1993). The American military and the principle of civilian control from Mcclellan to Powell. The Journal of Military History, 57, 27–58.
89.
WeinschenkA. C. (2013). Polls and elections: Partisanship and voting behavior: An update. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 43, 607–617. doi:10.1111/psq.12048
90.
ZallerJ. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
