Sentiment Analysis of Russian-Language Social Media Posts Discussing the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine

Abstract

The current study sought to identify the sentiment of Russian-language social media posts about the war in Ukraine and to contrast sentiment between two popular social media platforms in Russia: VK and Telegram. Overall, 1,393,245 posts were gathered from social media platforms from February 2022 to September 2022 using keywords associated with the conflict. Using the sentiment analysis program Valence Aware Dictionary for sEntiment Reasoning (VADER), we completed an analysis of 15,000 randomly selected, translated Russian-language posts related to the war. Overall, findings show that sentiment was initially positive in the early stages of the invasion before becoming more neutral by the end of the study period. On VK, sentiment followed a similar positive-to-negative trend over the study period. Alternatively, on Telegram, sentiment was neutral throughout the study period. Findings show an initial difference in sentiment toward the war that existed among Russian-language speakers on the two sites before lessening over time.

Keywords

psychology coups & conflicts civil wars consequences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akbari

Gabdulhakov

(2019). Platform surveillance and resistance in Iran and Russia: The case of Telegram. Surveillance & Society, 17(1/2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.12928

Alyukov

(2022, March 9). In Russia, opinion polls are a political weapon. Open Democracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/russia-opinion-polls-war-ukraine/

Aron

(2011). Nyetizdat: How the internet is building civil society in Russia. Russian Outlook, pp. 1–10. https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/RO-Spring-2011-g.pdf

Bergengruen

(2022, March 21). How Telegram became the digital battlefield in the Russia-Ukraine War. Time. https://time.com/6158437/telegram-russia-ukraine-information-war/

Bhadane

Dalal

Doshi

(2015). Sentiment analysis: Measuring opinions. Procedia Computer Science, 45, 808–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.159

Boyd

R. L.

Ashokkumar

Seraj

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2022). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC-22 (pp. 1–47). University of Texas at Austin. https://www.liwc.app

Burgers

Robinson

D. R.

(2016). Networked authoritarianism is on the rise. Sicherheit und Frieden (S+ F)/Security and Peace, 34(4), 248–252. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26429018

Chaithra

V. D.

(2019). Hybrid approach: Naive Bayes and sentiment VADER for analyzing sentiment of mobile unboxing video comments. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 9(5), 4452–4459. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v9i5.pp4452-4459

Chaudhry

H. N.

Javed

Kulsoom

Mehmood

Khan

Z. I.

Shoaib

Janjua

S. H.

(2021). Sentiment analysis of before and after elections: Twitter data of us election 2020. Electronics, 10(17), 2082. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10172082

10.

Chauhan

Sharma

Sikka

(2021). The emergence of social media data and sentiment analysis in election prediction. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12, 2601–2627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02423-y

11.

The Chronicles Project. (n.d.). Chronicles 7. https://www.chronicles.report/en/chapter7

12.

Denisova

(2017). Democracy, protest and public sphere in Russia after the 2011–2012 anti-government protests: Digital media at stake. Media, Culture & Society, 39(7), 976–994. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716682075

13.

Dollbaum

J. M.

(2021). Social policy on social media: How opposition actors used Twitter and VKontakte to oppose the Russian pension reform. Problems of Post-Communism, 68(6), 509–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2020.1800492

14.

Drus

Khalid

(2019). Sentiment analysis in social media and its application: Systematic literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 707–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.174

15.

Edmondson

Muschelli

Richardson

(2020). googleLanguageR: Call Google’s “Natural Language” API, “Cloud Translation” API, “Cloud Speech” API and “Cloud Text-to-Speech” API [R program]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/googleLanguageR/index.html

16.

Engesser

Ernst

Esser

Büchel

(2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697

17.

Enikolopov

Makarin

Petrova

(2020). Social media and protest participation: Evidence from Russia. Econometrica, 88(4), 1479–1514. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA14281

18.

Frye

Gehlbach

Marquardt

K. L.

Reuter

O. J.

(2023). Is Putin’s popularity (still) real? A cautionary note on using list experiments to measure popularity in authoritarian regimes. Post-Soviet Affairs, 39(3), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2023.2187195

19.

Gandhi

(2015). Elections and political regimes. Government and Opposition, 50(3), 446–468. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26349775.pdf

20.

Garner

(2022). “We’ve got to kill them”: Responses to Bucha on Russian social media groups. Journal of Genocide Research, 25(3–4), 418–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2022.2074020

21.

Gioe

Styles

(2022). Vladimir Putin’s Russian world turned upside down. Armed Forces & Society, 50(2), 588–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X221121778

22.

Gunitsky

(2015). Corrupting the cyber-commons: Social media as a tool of autocratic stability. Perspectives on Politics, 13(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714003120

23.

Haenschen

(2016). Social pressure on social media: Using Facebook status updates to increase voter turnout. Journal of Communication, 66(4), 542–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12236

24.

Howard

P. N.

Duffy

Freelon

Hussain

M. M.

Mari

Maziad

(2011). Opening closed regimes: What was the role of social media during the Arab Spring? Project on Information Technology & Political Islam. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2595096

25.

Hruska

Maresova

(2020). Use of social media platforms among adults in the United States—Behavior on social media. Societies, 10(27), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10010027

26.

Hutto

Gilbert

(2014). VADER: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 8(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550

27.

Institute for Strategic Dialogue. (2022, October 26). A false picture for many audiences: How Russian-language pro-Kremlin Telegram channels spread propaganda and disinformation about refugees from Ukraine. https://www.isdglobal.org/digital_dispatches/a-false-picture-for-many-audiences-how-russian-language-pro-kremlin-telegram-channels-spread-propaganda-and-disinformation-about-refugees-from-ukraine/

28.

Kizilova

Norris

(2022). Assessing Russian public opinion on the Ukraine war. Russian Analytical Digest, 281, 2–5. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000539633

29.

Knockel

Dalek

Meletti

Ermoshina

(2023, July 26). Not OK on VK: An analysis of in-platform censorship on Russia’s VKontakte. University of Toronto. https://citizenlab.ca/2023/07/an-analysis-of-in-platform-censorship-on-russias-vkontakte/

30.

Knutsen

C. H.

Nygård

H. M.

Wig

(2017). Autocratic elections: Stabilizing tool or force for change? World Politics, 69(1), 98–143. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887116000149

31.

Koltsova

Bodrunova

S. S.

(2019). Public discussion in Russian social media: An introduction. Media and Communication, 7(3), 114–118. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i3.2389murthy

32.

Leung

(2013). Generational differences in content generation in social media: The roles of the gratifications sought and of narcissism. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.028

33.

Liu

(2021). Public attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines on English-language Twitter: A sentiment analysis. Vaccine, 39(39), 5499–5505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.058

34.

Loucaides

(2023, February 2). The Kremlin Has Entered the Chat. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/the-kremlin-has-entered-the-chat/

35.

MacKinnon

(2011). China’s “networked authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy, 22(2), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2011.0033

36.

Maréchal

(2017). Networked authoritarianism and the geopolitics of information: Understanding Russian Internet policy. Media and Communication, 5(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i1.808

37.

Meaker

(2022, June 1). How the Kremlin infiltrated Russia’s Facebook. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/vk-russia-democracy/

38.

Mueller

J. E.

(1970). Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson. The American Political Science Review, 64(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955610

39.

Murthy

(2012). Towards a sociological understanding of social media: Theorizing Twitter. Sociology, 46(6), 1059–1073. https://doi.org/0.1177/00380385

40.

Ooms

Sites

(2022). Cld2: Google’s Compact Language Detector 2 [R Program]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/cld2/index.html

41.

OVD-Info. (2022, June 7). Internet blocks as a tool of political censorship. https://en.ovdinfo.org/internet-blocks-tool-political-censorship#8-2

42.

Ptaszek

Yuskiv

Khomych

(2023). War on frames: Text mining of conflict in Russian and Ukrainian news agency coverage on Telegram during the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Media, War & Conflict, 17(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352231166327

43.

Roskomsvoboda. (2022, August 23). За полгода военной цензуры под блокировку попали около 7 тысяч интернет-ресурсов. Большой обзор [ After six moths of military censorship, approximately seven thousand websites blocked. Big review]. https://roskomsvoboda.org/post/polgoda-voyennoi-cenzury/

44.

Roskomsvoboda. (2023, November 27). 15,000 websites—A new “record” for wartime censorship. https://roskomsvoboda.org/analysis/new-record-for-wartime-censorship/

45.

Schmitt-Beck

Mackenrodt

(2010). Social networks and mass media as mobilizers and demobilizers: A study of turnout at a German local election. Electoral Studies, 29(3), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.011

46.

Shields

P. M.

(2020). Dynamic intersection of military and society. In Sookermany

(Eds.), Handbook of military sciences (pp. 1–23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02866-4_31-1

47.

Staalensen

(2022, March 16). A wave of war propaganda is gushing over Russian youth. The Barents Observer. https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2022/03/wave-warmongering-gushing-over-russian-youth

48.

Stoner

(2022). The war in Ukraine: How Putin’s war in Ukraine has ruined Russia. Journal of Democracy, 33(3), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2022.0038

49.

Sundahl

A. M. H.

(2023). A personality cult or a mere matter of popularity? International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 36, 431–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-022-09423-0

50.

Taylor

Pagliari

(2018). Mining social media data: How are research sponsors and researchers addressing the ethical challenges? Research Ethics, 14(2), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117738559

51.

Tazeros. (n.d.). Russia & Ukraine. https://tazeros.com/

52.

Teresi

Michelson

M. R.

(2015). Wired to mobilize: The effect of social networking messages on voter turnout. The Social Science Journal, 52(2), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.09.004

53.

Townsend

Wallace

(2018). Social media research: A guide to ethics. University of Aberdeen. https://www.bolton.ac.uk/assets/Uploads/Social-media-ethics-study-Aberdeen-2018.pdf

54.

Urman

(2019). News consumption of Russian Vkontakte users: Polarization and news avoidance. International Journal of Communication, 13, 5158–5182. https://boris.unibe.ch/142408/1/11161-41540-1-PB.pdf

55.

Wijermars

Lokot

(2022). Is Telegram a “harbinger of freedom”? The performance, practices, and perception of platforms as political actors in authoritarian states. Post-Soviet Affairs, 38(1-2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2022.2030645

56.

Yaqub

Ali Malik

Zaman

(2020). Sentiment analysis of Russian IRA troll messages on Twitter during US Presidential Elections of 2016 [Conference session]. 2020 7th International Conference on Behavioural and Social Computing (BESC), pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/BESC51023.2020.9348287

57.

Zakharova

(2022). Russian social network VK gains Carte Blanche following the closure of Instagram and Facebook in the country. Russian Analytical Digest, 280, 20–22. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-87005-2

58.

Zhuravskaya

Petrova

Enikolopov

(2020). Political effects of the internet and social media. Annual Review of Economics, 12, 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-050239

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.15 MB

0.03 MB