Military organizations often emphasize the importance of loyalty. It has been suggested that loyalty enhances motivation to take great risks and strive to accomplish a mission. However, research into what influences loyalty among military personnel is scarce. Hence, the aim of this study was to examine how leadership and social identity fusion relate to loyalty, using data from a sample consisting of a Swedish military unit on a United Nation mission (N = 152) in Mali. Hierarchical multiple regression results generally showed that social identity fusion and leadership were positively related to a willingness to show loyalty to the closest workgroup, one’s own unit, and the mission. The findings indicate that leadership and high levels of social identity fusion may influence the willingness to be loyal to organizational goals. The practical implication of this study is increased knowledge about the importance of leadership and social identity in developing relevant loyalties.
ÅngströmJ.WidénJ. (2014). Contemporary military theory: The dynamics of war. Taylor & Francis.
2.
AronA.AronE.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 593–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
3.
BassB. M. (1997). Does the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries?American Psychologist, 52(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.2.130
4.
BassB. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398410
BeerA.WatsonD. (2009). The individual and group loyalty scales (IGLS): Construction and preliminary validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(3), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902794341
7.
BelleD.Van LaarC.EllemersN. (2016). The Queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 456–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.007
8.
BerghausP. T.CartagenaN. L. (2013). Developing good soldiers: The problem of fragmentation within the army. Journal of Military Ethics, 12(4), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2013.869389
9.
BoeO.HolthT. (2015). The relationship between developmental leadership, the results of leadership and personality factors. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26(1), 849–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00892-8
10.
BrosdahlD. J. (2013). Every man for himself! A review of shopping loyalty differences between men and women. In MillerL.MooreW. (Eds.), Psychology of loyalty (pp. 109–121). Nova Science Publishers.
CoatsS.SmithE. R.ClaypoolH. M.BannerM. J. (2000). Overlapping mental representations of self and in-group: Reaction time evidence and its relationship with explicit measures of group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1416
ConnorJ.AndrewsD. J.Noack-LundbergK.WadhamB. (2019). Military loyalty as a moral emotion. Armed Forces and Society, 47(3), 530–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X19880248
15.
DahlingJ. J.GutworthM. B. (2017). Loyal rebels? A test of the normative conflict model of constructive deviance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(8), 1167–1182. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2194
16.
DingX.LiQ.ZhangH.ShengZ.WangZ. (2017). Linking transformational leadership and work outcomes in temporary organizations: A social identity approach. International Journal of Project Management, 35(4), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.005
EngelkesT. G.HedlundE.LarssonG. (in press). Loyal to the end (?): Examining the meaning of loyalty among high-ranking military officers. Res Militaris.
19.
EngelkesT. G.LindholmT.SverkeM. (2022). Measuring loyalty: Developing a scale for a military context [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Psychology, Stockholm University.
FitriyaniE. N. (2018). The influence of transformational leadership, work environment, and religiosity toward employee loyalty of IAIN Salatiga. Journal of Islamic Economics and Banking, 9(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.18326/muqtasid.v9i1.29-39
22.
FletcherG. P. (1993). Loyalty-an essay on the morality of relationships. Oxford University Press.
23.
FoustM. A. (2018). Loyalty, justice, and rights: Royce and police ethics in twenty-first-century America. Criminal Justice Ethics, 37(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2018.1449362
24.
GabrielR. A. (1982). To serve with honor—A treatise on military ethics and the way of the soldier. Greenwood Press.
GreeneC. N. (1975). The reciprocal nature of influence between leader and subordinate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076552
27.
GuillonO.CezanneC. (2014). Employee loyalty and organizational performance: A critical survey. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 27(5), 839–850. https://doi.org/10.1108/J0CM-02-2014-0025
28.
HaidtJ.JosephC. (2007). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In CarruthersP.LaurenceS.StichS. (Eds.), The innate mind: Foundations and the future (Vol. 3, pp. 367–391). Oxford University Press.
HeineckenL. (2009). Discontent within the ranks? Officers’ attitudes toward military employment and representation: A four country study. Armed Forces and Society, 35(3), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X08322563
32.
HirschmanA. O. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty. Harvard University Press.
33.
HoggM. A.TerryD. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.2791606
34.
HuntingtonS. P. (1957). The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil-military relations. Belknap Press.
KhodakaramiN.DiraniK. (2020). Drivers of employee engagement: Differences by work area and gender. Industrial and Commercial Training, 52(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-06-2019-0060
KleinigJ. (2014). On loyalty and loyalties. Oxford University Press.
39.
KlineR. B. (2009). Becoming a behavioral science researcher. The Guilford Press.
40.
KlopotanI.BuntakK.DrozdekI. (2015). Employee loyalty: Differences between genders and the public and the private sector. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 14(3), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.14.3.3
LarssonG. (2006). The developmental leadership questionnaire (DLQ): Some psychometric properties. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47(4), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00515.x
43.
LarssonG.CarlstedtL.AnderssonJ.AnderssonL.DanielssonE.JohanssonA.JohanssonE.RobertssonI.. . . MichelP.-O. (2003). A comprehensive system for leader evaluation and development. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730310457294
44.
LarssonG.SandahlC.SöderhjelmT.SjövoldE.ZanderA. (2017). Leadership behavior changes following a theory-based leadership development intervention: A longitudinal study of subordinates’ and leaders’ evaluations. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58(1), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12337
45.
LuanY.ZhaoK.WangZ.FengH. (2022). Exploring the antecedents of unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB): A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05269-w
46.
MoskosC. C. (1975). UN peacekeepers: The constabulary ethic and military professionalism. Armed Forces and Society, 1(4), 388–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X7500100402
47.
MoskosC. C. (1977). From institution to occupation: Trends in military organizations. Armed Forces and Society, 4(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/45346051
48.
MoskosC. C.WoodF. R. (1988). The military: More than just a job?Pergamon-Brassey’s International Defense.
OlsthoornP. (2011a). Loyalty and professionalization in the military. In WolfendaleJ.TripodiP. (Eds.), New wars and new soldiers: Military ethics in the contemporary world (pp. 257–272). Routledge.
51.
OlsthoornP. (2011b). Military ethics and virtues-an interdisciplinary approach for the 21st century. Routledge.
52.
PanaccioA.VandenbergheC. (2012). Five-factor model of personality and organizational commitment: The mediating role of positive and negative affective states. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 647–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.03.002
53.
PengS.LiaoY.SunR. (2020). The influence of transformational leadership on employees’ affective organizations: A moderated mediation model. Public Personnel Management, 49(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026019835233
54.
RiceB.KnoxK.RiceJ.MartinN.FiegerP.FitzgeraldA. (2017). Loyal employees in difficult settings: The compounding effects of inter-professional dysfunction and employee loyalty on job tension. Personnel Review, 46(8), 1755–1769. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05-2016-0124
55.
RobertsonC. B. (2010). Organizational management of conflicting professional identities. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 43(3), 603–624.
RonesN.StederF. B. (2018). The queen bees and the women’s team: A contextual examination of enmity and friendship between military women. Women, Gender & Research, 27(2–3), 32–48. https://doi.org//10.7146/kkf.v27i2-3.110846
SfarlogB.BarsanG.IonitaD.MosteanuD.CojocaruM. (2018). A study on a charismatic leader in a tactical military. Scientific Journal of the Military University of Land Forces, 50(1), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0011.7372
60.
ShalitB. (1988). The psychology of conflict and combat. Praeger.
61.
SwannW. B.GomezÁ.DovidioJ. F.HartS.JettenJ. (2010). Dying and killing for one’s in-group: Identity fusion moderates response to intergroup versions of the trolley problem. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1176–1183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376656
62.
SwannW. B.GomezA.SeyleC. D.MoralesJ. F.HuiciC. (2009). Identity fusion: The interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 995–1011. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013668
63.
SwannW. B.JettenJ.GómezÁ.WhitehouseH.BastianB. (2012, May28). When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion. Psychological Review, 119(3), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028589
64.
Swedish Armed Forces. (2016). Military strategic doctrine (MSD16). Swedish Armed Forces.
65.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
ThrasherG.DicksonM.Biermeier-HansonB.Najor-DurackA. (2020). Social identity theory and leader-member exchange: Individual, dyadic and situational factors affecting the relationship between leader-member exchange and job performance. Organization Management Journal, 17(3), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/OMJ-04-2019-0719
68.
UmphressE. E.BinghamJ. B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0559
69.
UmphressE. E.BinghamJ. B.MitchellM. S. (2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 769–780. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019214
Van CreveldM. (1982). Fighting power: German and U.S. Army performance 1939-1945. Greenwood Press.
73.
Van LaarC.BleekerD.EllemersN.MeijerE. (2014). Ingroup and outgroup support for upward mobility: Divergent responses to ingroup identification in low. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(1), 563–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2046
74.
Van VugtM.HartC. M. (2004). Social identity as social glue: The origins of group loyalty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(4), 585–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.585
75.
VegoM. N. (2004). Operational command and control in the information age. Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University.
76.
VegoM. N. (2007). Joint operational warfare: Theory and practice. Swedish Defence University.
77.
WalzerM. (1994). Thick and thin: Moral argument at home and abroad. University of Notre Dame Press.
78.
WhitehouseH.McQuinnB.BuhrmeisterM.SwannW. B. (2014). Brothers in arms: Libyan revolutionaries bond like family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(50), 17783–17785. https://www-jstor-org.ezp.sub.su.se/stable/43278785
79.
WilkinsonL. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.594
80.
WittA. L. (1993). Reactions to work assignment as predictors of organizational commitment. Journal of Business Research, 26(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(93)90040-V
81.
ZaccaroS. J.RittmanA. L.MarksM. A. (2001). Team leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 451–483.
