In 2006, Armed Forces & Society published my article on small unit cohesion, “The Word of Command.” It has been the focus of considerable discussion since that time. This essay describes the origins and the purpose of that 2006 article, as an attempt to contribute to an emergent “practical” paradigm in the study of cohesion. Instead of focusing on interpersonal cohesion, my original article prioritized skill—task cohesion. This commentary argues that although the political implications of small unit cohesion was subordinate in 2006, that initial article—and my wider work on cohesion—speaks directly to a key theme in the journal: civil-military relations.
AranG. (1974). Parachuting. American Journal of Sociology, 80(1), 123–152.
2.
ArkinW.DobrofksyL. (1978). Military socialization and masculinity. Journal of Social Issues, 34(1), 151–166.
3.
BartovO. (1992a). The conduct of war: Soldiers and the barbarization of warfare. Journal of Modern History, 64(Suppl.), S32–S45.
4.
BartovO. (1992b). Hitler’s army. Oxford University Press.
5.
Ben-ShalomU.LehrerZ.Ben-AriE. (2005). Cohesion during military operations: A field study on combat units in the Al-Aqsa Intifada. Armed Forces & Society, 32(1), 63–79.
6.
CockerhamW. (1978). Attitudes towards combat among U.S. Army paratroopers. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 6, 1–15.
7.
The Economist. (2023, February25). The might of miltech. The Economist, pp. 37–38.
8.
FinerS. (1974). The man on horseback—1974. Armed Forces & Society, 1(1), 5–37.
9.
FreedmanL. (2022). Command: The politics of military operations from Korea to Ukraine. Allen Lane.
10.
GeertzC. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretative theory of culture. In GeertzC. (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). Basic Books.
11.
HaldénP. (2018). Organized armed groups as ruling organizations. Armed Forces & Society, 44(4), 606–625.
12.
HansenS. J. (2018). Unity under Allah? Cohesion mechanisms in Jihadist organizations in Africa. Armed Forces & Society, 44(4), 587–605.
13.
HuntingtonS. (1957). The soldier and the state. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
14.
JanowitzM. (1960). The professional soldier. Free Press.
15.
JanowitzM. (1974). Armed Forces and Society: An interdisciplinary journal. Armed Forces & Society, 1(1), 3–4.
16.
JanowitzM.ShilsE. (1948). Cohesion and disintegration in the Wehrmacht in World War II. Public Opinion Quarterly, 12, 280–315.
17.
KäikhöI. (2018a). Broadening the perspective on military cohesion. Armed Forces & Society, 44(4), 571–586.
18.
KäikhöI. (2018b). Introduction to the armed forces and society forum on broadening the perspective on military cohesion. Armed Forces & Society, 44(4), 563–570.
19.
KierE. (1998). Homosexuality in the U.S. military: Open integration and combat effectiveness. International Security, 23(2), 5–39.
20.
KingA. (2006). The word of command: Communication and cohesion in the military. Armed Forces & Society, 32(1), 493–512.
21.
KingA. (2013). The combat soldier: Infantry tactics and cohesion in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Oxford University Press.
22.
KingA. (2016). Combat effectiveness in the small infantry unit: Beyond the primary group thesis. Security Studies, 25(4), 688–728.
23.
Kinzer StewartN. (1991). Mates and Muchachos: Unit cohesion in the Falklands/Malvinas War. Brassey’s Inc.
KolditzT. A.WongL.MillenR. A.PotterT. M. (2003). Why they fight: Combat motivation in the Iraq War. Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
26.
LittleR. (1964). Buddy relations and combat performance. In JanowitzM. (Ed.), The new military (pp. 195–224). Russell Sage Foundation.
27.
MacCounR. (1993). Unit cohesion and military performance. In National Defence Research Institute (Ed.), Sexual orientation and U.S. military personnel policy: Options and assessment (pp. 136–166). RAND.
28.
MacCounR.KierE.BelkinA. (2006). Does social cohesion determine motivation in combat? An old question with an old answer. Armed Forces & Society, 32(4), 646–654.
29.
MalesevicS. (2022). Why humans fight: The social dynamics of close range violence. Cambridge University Press.
30.
MarshallS. L. A. (2000). Men against fire. The University of Oklahoma.
31.
MoskosC. (1970). The American enlisted Man: The rank and file in today’s military. Russell Sage Foundation.
32.
MoskosC. (1975). The American combat soldier in Vietnam. Journal of Social Issues, 31(4), 25–37.
33.
ReidA. (2022). Borderland: A journey through the history of Ukraine. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
34.
SavageP.GabrielR. (1976). Cohesion and disintegration in the American Army: An alternative perspective. Armed Forces & Society, 2(3), 340–370.
35.
SegalD.KestnbaumM. (2002). Professional closure in the military market: A critique of pure cohesion. In SniderD. (Ed.), The future of the army profession (pp. 441–458). Primis.
36.
SieboldG. (2007). The essence of military cohesion. Armed Forces & Society, 33(2), 286–295.
37.
StoufferS.LumsdaineA.HarperM.LumsdaineR. M.WilliansR.Brewster SmithM.JanisI. L.StarS. A.CottrellL. (1949). The American soldier: Combat and its aftermath (Vol. II). Princeton University Press.
38.
StoufferS.SuchmanE.DeVinneyL.StarS.WilliamsR. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment during army life (Vol. 1). Princeton University Press.
39.
StrachanH. (2006). Training, morale and modern war. Journal of Contemporary History, 41(2), 211–227.
40.
StrachanH. (2013). The direction of war. Cambridge University Press.
41.
VerweijenJ. (2018). Soldiers without an army? Patronage networks and cohesion in the armed forces of the DR Congo. Armed Forces & Society, 44(4), 626–646.
42.
WesbrookS. (1980). The potential for military disintegration. In SarkesianS. (Ed.), Combat effectiveness and cohesion (pp. 244–278). Sage.
43.
WinslowD. (1997). The Canadian airborne regiment: A socio-cultural inquiry. Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Canada.
