Parliamentary oversight is a cornerstone of democratic control of the armed forces, but its influence on civil–military relations (CMR) remains underexplored. We argue that parliaments in transitioning democracies face unique structural challenges in developing robust oversight of the military compared to advanced democracies. We developed a typology of three distinctive types of parliamentary oversight and proposed that cooperative oversight potentially offers a solution to structural challenges faced by parliaments in transitioning democracies. In our case study of Indonesia, cooperative oversight promoted harmonious working relations between the Parliament and the military/executive, stabilizing CMR. However, cooperative oversight also stalled civil–military reforms, eroded democratic management of the defense sector, and reinforced an unhealthy dependence on the military to self-regulate and the President’s appointment power of the armed forces’ commander. Over the longer term, we believe that the Indonesian Parliament needs to incorporate a mix of oversight strategies and raise its institutional capacity to strengthen oversight of the defence sector.
AgujaM. J.BornH. (2016). Good governance of the security sector in Southeast Asia: What role for parliament? In AgujaM. J. (Ed.), Good governance of the security sector in Southeast Asia: What role for parliament? (pp. 1–10). DCAF.
3.
AuerswaldD. P. (2017). Legislatures and civil–military relations in the United States and the United Kingdom. West European Politics, 40(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1240404
4.
AvantD. D. (1994). Political institutions and military change: Lessons from peripheral wars. Cornell University Press.
5.
BornH. (2006). Parliamentary oversight of defence in Cambodia, Indonesia, Philippines, and Thailand: Status and prospects. In The Editor. Parliamentary accountability and security sector governance in Southeast Asia (pp. 55–75). Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
6.
BruneauT. C.GoetzeR. B. (2006). Ministries of defense and democratic control. In BruneauT. C.TollefsonS. D. (Eds.), Who guards the guardians and how democratic civil-military relations. University of Texas Press.
Canes-WroneB.HowellW. G.LewisD. E. (2008). Toward a broader understanding of presidential power: A reevaluation of the two presidencies thesis. The Journal of Politics, 70(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381607080061
9.
CNN Indonesia. (2022, September13). Pernyataan Lengkap Effendi Simbolon yang Dikecam Prajurit TNI. CNN Indonesia.
10.
CotteyA.EdmundsT.ForsterA. (2002). The second generation problematic: Rethinking democracy and civil-military relations. Armed Forces & Society, 29(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X0202900103
11.
CroissantA. (2009). Patterns of civilian control of the military in East Asia’s new democracies. Journal of East Asian Studies, 9(2), 187–217.
12.
CrouchH. A. (2010). Political reform in Indonesia after Soeharto. ISEAS.
The Editors. (2005). Current data on the Indonesian military elite, [2003–2005] [Electronic resource]. Indonesia, 80, 123–159.
18.
EldemT. (2017). Democratic control and military effectiveness of the Turkish armed forces. In CroissantA.KuehnD. (Eds.), Reforming civil-military relations in new democracies (pp. 171–192). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53189-2_9
19.
FeaverP. (2005). Armed servants: Agency, oversight, and civil-military relations. Harvard University Press.
20.
FowlerL. L. (2015). Watchdogs on the hill the decline of congressional oversight of U.S. foreign relations. Princeton University Press.
GiraldoJ. K. (2006). Legislatures and national defense: Global comparisons. In BruneauT. C.TollefsonS. D. (Eds.), Who guards the guardians and how (pp. 34–70). University of Texas Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7560/712782.7
24.
GunawanA. B. (2017a). Civilian control and defense policy in Indonesia’s nascent democracy. In CroissantA.KuehnD. (Eds.), Reforming civil-military relations in new democracies (pp. 129–150). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53189-2_7
25.
GunawanA. B. (2017b). Kontrol Sipil atas Militer dan Kebijakan Pertahanan di Indonesia Pasca Orde Baru. Jurnal Politik, 2, 197. https://doi.org/10.7454/jp.v2i2.117
26.
GunawanA. B. (2019). Indonesia: The military’s growing assertiveness on nondefense missions. In BruneauT. C.CroissantA. (Eds.), Civil-military relations: Control and effectiveness across regimes (pp. 141–156). Lynne Rienner Publishers.
HöhneB. (2015). Parteien als Vertreter außen- und sicherheitspolitischer Bevölkerungseinstellungen? Responsivität politischer Parteien in einem gouvernemental geprägten Politikfeld. In BiehlH.SchoenH. (Eds.), Sicherheitspolitik und Streitkräfte im Urteil der Bürger: Theorien, Methoden, Befunde (pp. 207–236). Springer.
KimK. J. (2014). The soldier and the state in South Korea: Crafting democratic civilian control of the military. Journal of International and Area Studies, 21(2), 119–131.
LagasséP.SaidemanS. M. (2017). Public critic or secretive monitor: Party objectives and legislative oversight of the military in Canada. West European Politics, 40(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1240409
37.
LagasséP.SaidemanS. M. (2019). When civilian control is civil: Parliamentary oversight of the military in Belgium and New Zealand. European Journal of International Security, 4(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2018.17
MalleyM. (2008). Democratisation and the challenge of defense reform in Indonesia. In BruneauT.TrinkunasH. (Eds.), Global politics of defense reform. Initiatives in strategic studies: Issues and policies (pp. 251–270). Palgrave Macmillan.
42.
ManeaM.-G.RülandJ. (2020). The diffusion of parliamentary oversight: Investigating the democratization of the armed forces in Indonesia and Nigeria. Contemporary Politics, 26(2), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2019.1703067
43.
McCubbinsM. D.SchwartzT. (1984). Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110792
44.
MelloP. A.PetersD. (2018). Parliaments in security policy: Involvement, politicisation, and influence. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 20(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117745684
45.
MengkoD. M.FitriA. (2020). Peran Militer Dalam Penanganan Pandemi Covid-19 dan Dinamika Pengawasannya di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 17(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v17i2.898
MietznerM. (2011). Overcoming path dependence: The quality of civilian control of the military in post-authoritarian Indonesia. Asian Journal of Political Science, 19(3), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2011.628148
NetoO. A.AccorsiP. (2022). Presidents and generals: Systems of government and the selection of defense ministers. Armed Forces & Society, 48(1), 136–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X19900368
Pion-BerlinD. (2001). Introduction. In Pion-BerlinD. (Ed.), Civil-military relations in Latin America: New analytical perspectives. University of North Carolina Press.
52.
Pion-BerlinD. (2009). Defense organization and civil–military relations in Latin America. Armed Forces & Society, 35(3), 562–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X08322565
53.
Pion-BerlinD.TrinkunasH. A. (2007). Attention deficits: Why politicians ignore defense policy in Latin America [Falta De Atención: ?Por Qué Los Políticos Ignoran Las Políticas de Defensa en América Latina?]. Latin American Research Review, 42(3), 76–100. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2007.0031
RosénG.RaubeK. (2018). Influence beyond formal powers: The parliamentarisation of European Union security policy. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 20(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117747105
SebastianL. C.SyailendraE. A.MarzukiK. I. (2018). Civil-military relations in Indonesia after the reform period. Asia Policy, 13(3), 49–78.
62.
SherlockS. (2012). Made by committee and consensus: Parties and policy in the Indonesian parliament. South East Asia Research, 20(4), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.5367/sear.2012.0121
63.
SlaterD.SimmonsE. (2013). Coping by colluding: Political uncertainty and promiscuous power sharing in Indonesia and Bolivia. Comparative Political Studies, 46(11), 1366–1393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012453447
TrinkunasH. A. (2000). Crafting civilian control in emerging democracies: Argentina and Venezuela. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 42(3), 77–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2000.tb00148.x
67.
YamamotoH. (2007). Tools for parliamentary oversight: A comparative study of 88 national parliaments. Inter-Parliamentary Union.
