Putting on the Blitz: Urgency and Department of Defense Communications in Times of Budget Shortfall

Abstract

The existing theories of interaction between Congress and the Department of Defense (DOD) focus on elite-level principle-actor problems. However, the Department, as one of the most popular institutions in the United States, also has significant public appeal and maintains an active public affairs arm. This article builds on theories of bureaucratic reputation to argue that the DOD uses its public communications to advocate for its own budget. I leverage computerized text analysis to examine over 40,000 public facing documents published by the DOD since 2005. I find evidence that the DOD changed both the timing and the content of its public-facing communications to strategically argue for its budget. This is true during large budgetary shifts (like the U.S. budget sequester) and during the period of the year that the budget is under debate.

Keywords

military civil–military relations Department of Defense military public affairs congress text analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bacevich

A. J.

(2013). The new American militarism: How Americans are seduced by war. Oxford University Press.

Banks

J. S.

Weingast

B. R.

(1992). The political control of bureaucracies under asymmetric information. American Journal of Political Science, 36(2), 509–524. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111488

Blankshain

D. J. D.

(n.d.). A primer on U.S. civil–military relations for national security practitioners (p. 30). https://media.defense.gov/2020/Jul/07/2002449936/-1/-1/1/BLANKSHAIN.PDF

Carpenter

D. P.

(2001). The forging of bureaucratic autonomy. Princeton University Press.

Carpenter

D. P.

(2002). Groups, the media, agency waiting costs, and FDA drug approval. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 490–505. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088394

Carpenter

D. P.

(2010). Reputation and power. Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691141800/reputation-and-power

Coletta

Feaver

(2006). Civilian monitoring of U.S. military operations in the information age. Armed Forces & Society, 33(1), 106–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X05282530

Congressional Budget Office. (2020, April 15). Discretionary spending in 2019: An infographic—congressional budget office, CongressionalBudgetOffice. https://www.cbo.gov/publication/56326

Department of Defense. (n.d.). Special report: Sequestration. Sequestration. https://dod.defense.gov/News/Special-Reports/Sequestration/

10.

Eichenberg

R. C.

Stoll

(2003). Representing defense: Democratic control of the defense budget in the United States and Western Europe. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47(4), 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002703254477

11.

Epstein

D. O.

Halloran

(1999). Delegating powers: A transaction cost politics approach to policy making under separate powers. Cambridge University Press.

12.

Feaver

(2003). Armed servants: Agency, oversight, and civil-military relations. Harvard University Press.

13.

Fulbright

J. W.

(1970). The Pentagon Propaganda Machine. Vintage Books.

14.

Gilad

Maor

Bloom

P. B.-N.

(2015). Organizational reputation, the content of public allegations, and regulatory communication. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut041

15.

Golby

Feaver

Dropp

(2018). Elite military cues and public opinion about the use of military force. Armed Forces & Society, 44(1), 44–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X16687067

16.

Grimmer

(2010). A Bayesian hierarchical topic model for political texts: Measuring expressed agendas in Senate Press releases. Political Analysis, 18(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpp034

17.

Grimmer

Roberts

M. E.

Stewart

B. M.

(2022). Text as data: A new framework for machine learning and the social sciences. Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691207544/text-as-data

18.

Grimmer

Stewart

B. M.

(2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis, 21(3), 267–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps028

19.

Hartley

Russett

(1992). Public opinion and the common defense: Who governs military spending in the United States? The American Political Science Review, 86(4), 905–915. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964343

20.

Hastings

(2012, May 18). Congressmen seek to lift propaganda ban. BuzzFeed News. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/mhastings/congressmen-seek-to-lift-propaganda-ban

21.

King

Lam

Roberts

M. E.

(2017). Computer-assisted keyword and document set discovery from unstructured text. American Journal of Political Science, 61(4), 971–988. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12291

22.

Krause

G. A.

Douglas

J. W.

(2006). Does agency competition improve the quality of policy analysis? Evidence from OMB and CBO fiscal projections. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20156

23.

Manheim

J. B.

(1991). All of the people, all the time: Strategic communication and American politics. M.E. Sharpe.

24.

Manning

Raghavan

Schütze

(2009). Introduction to information retrieval (Vol. 16). Cambridge University Press. https://nlp.stanford.edu/IR-book/pdf/irbookonlinereading.pdf

25.

Maor

Sulitzeanu-Kenan

(2016). Responsive change: Agency output response to reputational threats. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv001

26.

Nielsen

S. C.

Snider

D. M.

(2009). American civil-military relations: The soldier and the state in a new era. Johns Hopkins University Press.

27.

Roberts

M. E.

Tingley

Stewart

B. M.

Airoldi

E. M.

(2013). The structural topic model and applied social science. Neural Information Processing Society.

28.

Shane

III . (2019, July 22). Survey: Public confidence in the military is high, especially among older generations. Military Times. https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2019/07/22/survey-public-confidence-in-the-military-is-high-especially-among-older-generations/

29.

Stairs

(1998). The media and the military in Canada: Reflections on a time of troubles. International Journal, 53(3), 544–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/002070209805300310

30.

Teigen

J. M.

(2013). Military experience in elections and perceptions of issue competence: An experimental study with television ads. Armed Forces & Society, 39(3), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X12451561

31.

U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2013). Sequestration: Observations on the Department of Defense’s approach in fiscal year 2013 (GAO-14-177R). https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-14-177r

32.

Whitlock

(2013, July 7). Somali American caught up in a shadowy Pentagon counterpropaganda campaign. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/somali-american-caught-up-in-a-shadowy-pentagon-counterpropaganda-campaign/2013/07/07/b3aca190-d2c5-11e2-bc43-c404c3269c73_story.html

33.

Wyckoff

P. G.

(1990). The simple analytics of slack-maximizing bureaucracy. Public Choice, 67(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01890155

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB