Policy regarding the inclusion of transgender soldiers in the U.S. Military has shifted back and forth in recent years, with public opinion likely a significant factor shaping the eventual policy outcome. As such, this study examines the factors that shape public attitudes toward military service by transgender people. In particular, we examine the influence of sex, social gender roles, and attitudes toward gender in shaping transgender military service attitudes. Further, we hypothesize that personal experiences with the military and with transgender people, along with values, personality predispositions, and religion, are likely to influence individual attitudes. We test these hypotheses using data from a unique October 2015 national survey of American adults. The results suggest that personal experiences, attitudes toward gender roles, and religion have substantial but sometimes conditional effects on attitudes toward military service by transgender people.
AllportG. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
2.
BachmanJ. G.SigelmanL.DiamondG. (1987). Self-selection, socialization, and distinctive military values: Attitudes of high school seniors. Armed Forces & Society, 13, 169–187.
3.
BeckwithK. (2005). A common language of gender. Politics & Gender, 1, 128–137.
4.
BittnerA.Goodyear-GrantE. (2017). Sex isn’t gender: Reforming concepts and measurements in the study of public opinion. Political Behavior, 39, 1019–1041.
BrownG. R. (1988). Transsexuals in the military: Flight into hypermasculinity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 17, 527–537.
9.
BurnsN.GallagherK. (2010). Public opinion on gender issues: The politics of equity and roles. Annual Review of Political Science, 13, 425–443.
10.
CarrollS. J.FoxR. L. (Eds.). (2018). Gender and elections: Shaping the future of American politics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CastleJ. (2018). New fronts in the culture wars? Religion, partisanship, and polarization on religious liberty and transgender rights in the United States. American Politics Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1532673X18818169
12.
ClarkA. (2017). Updating the gender gap(s): A multilevel approach to what underpins changing cultural attitudes. Politics & Gender, 13, 26–56.
13.
DeBellM.WilsonC.SeguraG.JackmanS.HutchingsV. (2011). Methodology report and user’s guide for the ANES 2010-2012 evaluations of government and society study. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
FloresA. R. (2015). Attitudes toward transgender rights: Perceived knowledge and secondary interpersonal contact. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 3, 398–416.
19.
FloresA. R.BarclayS. (2016). Backlash, consensus, legitimacy, or polarization: The effect of same-sex marriage policy on mass attitudes. Political Research Quarterly, 69, 43–56.
20.
FloresA. R.Haider-MarkelD.LewisD.MillerP.TadlockB.TaylorJ. (2018a). Challenged expectations: Mere exposure effects on attitudes about transgender people and rights. Political Psychology, 39, 197–216.
21.
FloresA. R.Haider-MarkelD.LewisD.MillerP.TadlockB.TaylorJ. (2018b, March 20). Transgender Prejudice reduction and opinions on transgender rights: results from a mediation analysis on experimental data. Research & Politics. doi:10.1177/2053168018764945
GarretsonJ. (2017). The how, why, and who of LGBTQ “victory”: A critical examination of change in public attitudes involving LGBTQ people. In BrettschneiderM.BurgessS.KeatingC. (Eds.), LGBTQ politics: A critical reader (pp. 252–269). New York: New York University Press.
Haider-MarkelD.VieuxA. (2008). Gender and conditional support for torture in the war on terror. Politics & Gender, 4, 5–33.
26.
HaidtJ.McCauleyC.RozinP. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 701–713.
27.
HarrisonB.MichelsonM. (2018). Gender, masculinity threat, and support for transgender rights: An experimental study. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0916-6
28.
Harrison-QuintanaJ.HermanJ. (2012–2013). Still serving in silence: Transgender service members and veterans in the national transgender discrimination survey. LGBTQ Policy Journal at the Harvard Kennedy School, 3, 39–52.
29.
HatemiP.McDermottR.BaileyJ.MartinN. (2012). The different effects of gender and sex on vote choice. Political Research Quarterly, 65, 76–92.
30.
IskraD. (2007). Attitudes toward expanding roles for Navy women at sea: Results of a content analysis. Armed Forces & Society, 33, 203–223.
31.
JacksonJ.ThoemmesF.JonkmannK.LüdtkeO.TrautweinU. (2012). Military training and personality trait development: Does the military make the man, or does the man make the military?Psychological Science, 23, 270–277.
32.
JenningM.MarkusG. (1977). The effect of military service on political attitudes: A panel study. American Political Science Review, 71, 131–147.
33.
JonesP.BrewerP.YoungD.LambeJ.HoffmanL. (2018). Explaining public opinion toward transgender people, rights, and candidates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82, 252–278.
34.
KellermannM. (2014). Self-selection and opposition to gay rights among military career-seekers. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 2, 443–458.
35.
KerrP.HoldenR. (1996). Development of the Gender Role Beliefs Scale (GRBS). Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 11, 3–16.
36.
KingG.HonakerJ.JosephA.ScheveK. (2001). Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review, 95, 49–69.
37.
KreitzerR.HamiltonA.TolbertC. (2014). Does policy adoption change opinions on minority rights? The effects of legalizing same-sex marriage. Political Research Quarterly, 67, 795–808.
38.
LealD. (2005). American public opinion toward the military: Differences by race, class and gender. Armed Forces & Society, 32, 123–138.
39.
LewisD.FloresA.Haider-MarkelD.MillerP.TadlockB.TaylorJ. (2017). Degrees of acceptance: Variation in attitudes toward segments of the LGBT community. Political Research Quarterly, 70, 861–875.
40.
LewisD.JacobsmeierM. (2017). Evaluating policy representation with dynamic MRP estimates: Direct democracy and same-sex relationship policies in the U.S. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 17, 441–464.
41.
MatthewsM.EnderM.LaurenceJ.RohallD. (2009). Role of group affiliation and gender on attitudes toward women in the military. Military Psychology, 21, 241–251.
42.
McDuffieE.BrownG. R. (2010). 70 U.S. veterans with gender identity disturbances: A descriptive study. International Journal of Transgenderism, 12, 21–30.
43.
MilesM.Haider-MarkelD. (2018). Personality and genetic associations with military service. Armed Forces & Society. doi:1177/0095327X18765449
44.
MillerP.ConoverP. (2015). Why partisan warriors don’t listen: The gendered dynamics of intergroup anxiety and partisan conflict. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 3, 21–39.
45.
MillerP.FloresA.Haider-MarkelD.LewisD.TadlockB.TaylorJ. (2017). Transgender politics as body politics: Effects of disgust sensitivity and authoritarianism on transgender rights attitudes. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5, 4–24.
46.
MucciaroniG. (2017). Whither the LGBTQ movement in a post-civil rights era? In BrettschneiderM.BurgessS.KeatingC. (Eds.), LGBTQ politics: A critical reader (pp. 525–544). New York: New York University Press.
47.
NagoshiJ.AdamsK.TerrellH.HillE.BrzuzyS.NagoshiC. (2008). Gender differences in correlates of homophobia and transphobia. Sex Roles, 59, 521–531.
48.
NortonA.HerekG. (2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of U.S. adults. Sex Roles, 68, 738–753.
49.
NtetaT.TarsiM. (2016). Self-selection versus socialization revisited: Military service, racial resentment, and generational membership. Armed Forces & Society, 42, 362–385.
50.
OkrosA.ScottD. (2015). Gender identity in the Canadian forces: A review of possible impacts on operational effectiveness. Armed Forces & Society, 41, 243–256.
ParcoJ.LevyD.SpearsS. (2015). Transgender military personnel in the post-DADT repeal era: A phenomenological study. Armed Forces & Society, 41, 221–242.
53.
PolcharJ.SweijsT.MartenP.GladigaJ. (2014). LGBT military personnel: A strategic vision for inclusion. The Hague, the Netherlands: The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies.
54.
SapiroV. (2003). Theorizing gender in political psychology research. In SearsD.HuddyL.JervisR. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 601–634). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
55.
SchneiderM.BosA. (2019). The application of social roles theory to the study of gender in politics. Political Psychology, 40, 173–213.
56.
SegalD.Scott KinzerN.WoelfelJ. (1977). The concept of citizenship and attitudes toward women in combat. Sex Roles, 3, 469–477.
SorokaS. N.WlezienC. (2010). Degrees of democracy: Politics, public opinion, and policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
59.
TadlockB.FloresA.Haider-MarkelD.LewisD.MillerP.TaylorJ. (2017). Testing contact theory and attitudes on transgender rights. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81, 956–972.
60.
TajfelH. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
61.
TaylorJ.LewisD. (2014). The advocacy coalition framework and transgender inclusion in LGBT rights activism. In TaylorJ. K. (Ed.), Transgender rights and politics (pp. 108–134). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
62.
TaylorJ.LewisD.Haider-MarkelD. (2018). The remarkable rise of transgender rights. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
63.
TaylorJ.LewisD.Haider-MarkelD.FloresA.MillerP.TadlockB. (2018a). The factors underlying public opinion of transgender rights. In TaylorJ.LewisD.Haider-MarkelD. (Eds.), The remarkable rise of transgender rights (pp. 107–127). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
64.
TaylorJ.LewisD.Haider-MarkelD.FloresA.MillerP.TadlockB. (2018b, January 6). Public attitudes about transgender participation in athletics: The role of gender. Southern political science association annual meeting. New Orleans, LA.
65.
TaylorJ.LewisD.JacobsmeierM.DiSarroB. (2012). Content and complexity in policy reinvention and diffusion: Gay and transgender-inclusive laws against discrimination. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 12, 92–115.
66.
TeslerM.SearsD. O. (2010). Obama’s race: The 2008 election and the dream of a post-racial America. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. WinterN. (2005). Framing gender: Political rhetoric, gender schemas, and public opinion on U.S. health care reform. Politics & Gender, 1, 453–480.
67.
WoodW.EaglyA. (2015). Two traditions of research on gender identity. Sex Roles, 73, 461–473.
68.
YeagerD. S.KrosnickJ. A.ChangL.JavitzH. S.LevenduskyM. S.SimpserA.WangR. (2011). Comparing the accuracy of RDD telephone surveys and internet surveys conducted with probability and non-probability samples. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 709–747.
69.
YoungL.NautaM. (2013). Sexism as a predictor of attitudes toward women in the military and in combat. Military Psychology, 25, 166–171.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
