As a commonly used flexible connecting component in train bogies, the performance of rubber ball joints largely depends on the injection molding process. Based on the finite element method and SIGMASOFT® software, this study simulated and analyzed the injection molding process of a typical rubber ball joint product (192 mm × 80 mm) using injection mold models with different numbers of gates (single/double) and vents (0/1/2). By constructing multiple comparative models, the effects of gate position, vent layout and injection pressure on the formation of weld lines and air entrapment, etc. During the molding process were systematically explored. The simulation results showed that the single-gate design could effectively reduce the generation of weld lines, with the length of weld lines being 13 mm less than that of the double-gate model. Compared with the number of vents, the position of vents had a greater impact on air entrapment. The air entrapment volume of the single-gate with 1 vent model was 3.7% less than that of the 2-vent model. When the injection pressure was set to 325 bar, the process scheme of single gate combined with 1 vent could achieve the highest product quality, characterized by the lowest internal defect rate and the optimal filling uniformity. These research results provided important theoretical basis and parameter references for optimizing the actual production process of rubber ball joints for high-speed trains.
ZhangJYZhangHRTianDM, et al.Spherical center axial Hinge knee prosthesis causes lower contact stress on tibial insert and bushing compared with biaxial Hinge knee prosthesis. Knee2021; 29: 1–8.
2.
JangBHLeeKH. Analysis and design of a ball joint, considering manufacturing process. Proc IME C J Mech Eng Sci2014; 228(1): 146–151.
3.
WozniakMSiczekKOzunaG, et al.A study on wear and friction of passenger vehicles control Arm ball joints. Energies2021; 14(11): 3238.
4.
XuCDJiangSY. Analysis of static and dynamic characteristic of hydrostatic spherical Hinge. J Tribol2015; 137(2): 021701.
5.
SimpsonMDolatabadiNRahmaniR, et al.Multibody dynamics of cross groove constant velocity ball joints for high performance racing applications. Mech Mach Theor2023; 188: 105407.
6.
KangJ. Nonlinear vibration induced by friction in a ball joint system. Lubricants2022; 10(9): 201.
7.
ChungSSLeeYZParkSO. Practical evaluation of ball stud plating effects on the increase of free gap of ball joints in the vehicle. Int J Automot Technol2020; 21(5): 1107–1111.
8.
DaiWTZuoJHLiuDH, et al.Tribological properties and seasonal freezing damage evolution of rotating spherical Hinge self-lubricating coating. Appl Sci (Basel)2022; 12(16): 8329.
9.
FengHYYinZHShangguanWB, et al.Analysis and optimization for contact forces and transmission efficiency of an automotive ball joint. Proc Inst Mech Eng - Part D J Automob Eng2020; 234(14): 3207–3223.
10.
OssaEAPalacioCCPaniaguaMA. Failure analysis of a car suspension system ball joint. Eng Fail Anal2011; 18(5): 1388–1394.
11.
Sanchez-CastilloLNedelcuDFrancisco-MarquezM. Redesign of layout runner in rubber injection molding for filling of a multi-cavity mold. Mater Plast2021; 58(3): 121–128.
12.
TariqAPolatADeliktaşB. Boosting machine learning algorithms for predicting the macroscopic material behavior of continuous fiber reinforced composite. J Reinforc Plast Compos2024; 24: 07316844241292694.
13.
TraintingerMAzevedoMKerschbaumerRC, et al.Optimization strategy for process design in rubber injection molding: a simulation-based approach allowing for the prediction of mechanical properties of vulcanizates. Polymers2024; 16(14): 2033.
14.
ChenHMiaoCLinG, et al.Design and optimization of the injection mold for rubber stators in oil production single-screw pumps. Polymers2025; 17(4): 503.
15.
PolatADeliktaşBYazıcıM, et al.Computational modeling of weld-line impacts on mechanical behavior of fiber-reinforced thermoplastics. Eur J Mech A Solids2025; 109: 105485.
16.
ArrillagaAZalduaAMFaridAS. Evaluation of injection-molding simulation tools to model the cure kinetics of rubbers. J Appl Polym Sci2012; 123(3): 1437–1454.
17.
Garcia-CamprubiMAlfaro-IsacCHernandez-GasconB, et al.Numerical approach for the assessment of micro-textured walls effects on rubber injection moulding. Polymers2021; 13(11): 1739.
18.
OuHSahliMBarriereT, et al.Multiphysics modelling and experimental investigations of the filling and curing phases of bi-injection moulding of thermoplastic polymer/liquid silicone rubbers. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2017; 92(9-12): 3871–3882.
19.
BaranovAV. Non-isothermal modelling and optimisation methodology of the injection moulding of rubber products. Polym Polym Compos2017; 25(2): 153–160.
20.
PolatATariqAOkayF, et al.Investigation of the critical buckling load of a column with linearly varying moment of inertia using analytical, numerical, and hybrid machine learning approaches. J Strain Anal Eng Des2025; 35: 03093247251337987.
21.
FedorovaAFDavydovaMLShadrinovNV, et al.Investigation of the effect of plasticizer injection technology on the properties of epichlorohydrin rubbers. J Elastomers Plast2021; 53(7): 757–768.
22.
MitsoulisEBattistiMNeunhausererA, et al.Flow behaviour of rubber in capillary and injection moulding dies. Plast Rubber Compos2017; 46(3): 110–118.
23.
TraintingerMKerschbaumerRCLechnerB, et al.Temperature profile in rubber injection molding: application of a recently developed testing method to improve the process simulation and calculation of curing kinetics. Polymers2021; 13(3): 380.
24.
HiranoKTamuraSObataY, et al.Striped-pattern deterioration and morphological analysis of injection molding comprising polypropylene/ethylene-alpha-olefin rubber blends. II. Influence of heating. J Appl Polym Sci2008; 108(1): 76–84.
25.
RaminiMAgnelliS. Monitoring of shear heating effects during injection molding of rubber to improve the process control. Polym Bull2023; 80(6): 6707–6723.
26.
LiSQTianHCHuGH, et al.Effects of shear during injection molding on the anisotropic microstructure and properties of EPDM/PP TPV containing rubber nanoparticle agglomerates. Polymer2021; 229: 124008.
27.
RaminiMAgnelliS. Shear Heating parameter OF rubber compounds useful for process control in injection molding machine. Rubber Chem Technol2020; 93(4): 729–737.
28.
RaminiMAgnelliSRamorinoG. Applications of shear heating parameter for injection molding process optimization of AEM rubber compounds. Express Polym Lett2022; 16(4): 354–367.
29.
SvaricekFHartelVGogolinJ, et al.Cure time reduction - opportunities and limits of MIMO control of a rubber injection press. KGK, Kautsch Gummi Kunstst2010; 63(5): 170–176.
30.
SenthilKSrinivasanPurushothamanKRajanK. Performance analysis of compression ignition engine using rubber seed oil methyl ester blend with the effect of various injection pressures. Therm Sci2016; 20: S1083–S1090.
31.
ArrillagaAZalduaAMAtxurraRM, et al.Die pressure losses during injection molding of rubber mixes. Rubber Chem Technol2009; 82(1): 62–93.
32.
WeisserDFMayerDSchmidJ, et al.Novel approach to characterize the cross-linking effect of liquid silicone rubber via cavity pressure analysis during injection molding. J Appl Polym Sci2023; 140(4): e53381.
