Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-10
Parametric optimization and modeling of the fused filament fabrication (FFF) manufacturing using recycled polyethylene terephthalate (PET) from water bottles
Most earlier studies on distributed recycling additive manufacturing (DRAM) have focused on using recycle-bots—waste plastic extruders—to produce raw materials for fused fluid fabrication (FFF). In the present study, an innovative recycling method designed explicitly for post-consumer water bottles was introduced and evaluated for its effectiveness in producing high-quality PET filament. The PET material was thoroughly characterized before and after filament production and following the 3D printing process. This approach successfully preserved the crystallinity of PET and prevented its thermal degradation. Key parameters, including infill density, printing speed, and layer thickness, were investigated using Taguchi’s method in conjunction with Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) to optimize the printing of recycled PET. This methodology aimed to maximize Young’s modulus and tensile strength while minimizing printing time and material usage. The results highlighted a trade-off between mechanical performance and printing efficiency. The best mechanical properties were achieved with a layer thickness of 0.1 mm and 100% infill density, yielding a tensile strength of 30 MPa and a Young’s modulus of 2311 MPa—values comparable to commercially available recycled PET and PLA filaments.
MohanNSenthilPVinodhS, et al.A review on composite materials and process parameters optimisation for the fused deposition modelling process. Virtual Phys Prototyp2017; 12(1): 47–59.
2.
ChuJSKoaySCChanMY, et al.Recycled plastic filament made from post-consumer expanded polystyrene and polypropylene for fused filament fabrication. Polym Eng Sci2022; 62(11): 2742–2749.
ZanderNEParkJHBoelterZR, et al.Recycled cellulose polypropylene composite feedstocks for material extrusion additive manufacturing. Polym Eng Sci2020; 60(3): 520–529.
5.
RahimizadehAKalmanJFayazbakhshK, et al.Mechanical and thermal study of 3D printing composite filaments from wind turbine waste. Polym Compos2021; 42(6): 2305–2316.
6.
VidakisNPetousisMManiadiA. Sustainable additive manufacturing: mechanical response of high-density polyethylene over multiple recycling processes. Recycling2021; 6(1): 4.
7.
KumarSRameshMRDoddamaniM. Recycling potential of MWCNTs/HDPE nanocomposite filament: 3D printing and mechanical characterization. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag2023; 25: 1168–1178.
8.
ShahrajabianHSadeghianF. The investigation of alumina nanoparticles’ effects on the mechanical and thermal properties of HDPE/rPET/MAPE blends. Int Nano Lett2019; 9(3): 213–219.
9.
FerrariFEsposito CorcioneCMontagnaF, et al.3D printing of polymer waste for improving people’s awareness about marine litter. Polymers2020; 12(8): 1738–1744.
10.
Bustos SeibertMMazzei CapoteGAGruberM, et al.Manufacturing of a PET filament from recycled material for material extrusion (MEX). Recycling2022; 7(5): 69.
11.
LittleHATanikellaNGReichMJ, et al.Towards distributed recycling with additive manufacturing of PET flake feedstocks. Materials2020; 13(19): 4273.
12.
PetsiukALavuBDickR, et al.Waste plastic direct extrusion hangprinter. Inventions2022; 7(3): 70.
13.
LeeJYTanWSAnJ, et al.The potential to enhance membrane module design with 3D printing technology. J Membr Sci2016; 514: 596–602.
14.
TsaiH-HWuS-JWuY-D, et al.Feasibility study on the fused filaments of injection-molding-grade poly(ethylene terephthalate) for 3D printing. Polymers2022; 14: 2276.
15.
BakırAAAtikRÖzerinçS. Effect of fused deposition modeling process parameters on the mechanical properties of recycled polyethylene terephthalate parts. J Appl Polym Sci2021; 138: e49709.
16.
AkhoundiBHajamiF. Extruded polymer instability study of the polylactic acid in fused filament fabrication process: printing speed effects on tensile strength. Polym Eng Sci2022; 62: 4145–4155.
17.
ArifinFZamheriAMartomiES, et al.Optimization of process parameters in 3D printing FDM by using the Taguchi and grey relational analysis methods. J Manuf Technol Manag2021; 32(2): 392–407.
18.
SharmaKKumarKSinghKR, et al.Optimization of FDM 3D printing process parameters using Taguchi technique. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2021; 1168(1): 012022.
19.
SoodAKOhdarRKMahapatraSS. Improving dimensional accuracy of Fused Deposition Modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method. Mater Des2009; 30(10): 4243–4252.
20.
ChenZShahrajabianHBagherzadehSA, et al.The impact energy analysis by genetic algorithm and response surface methods to study the plastic composite, compatibilizer, and recycled poly effects. J Therm Anal Calorim2020; 141(1): 421–433.
21.
van BerkelJGGuigoNKolstadJJ, et al.Isothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate). Macromol Mater Eng2015; 300(7): 466–474.
22.
Chung WangCLinTHuS. Optimizing the rapid prototyping process by integrating the Taguchi method with the Gray relational analysis. Rapid Prototyp J2007; 13: 304–315.
23.
MeiabadiMSMoradiMKaramimoghadamM, et al.Modeling the producibility of 3D printing in polylactic acid using artificial neural networks and fused filament fabrication. Polymers2021; 13: 3219.
24.
LiZShahrajabianHBagherzadehSA, et al.Effects of nano-clay content, foaming temperature and foaming time on density and cell size of PVC matrix foam by presented Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator statistical regression via suitable experiments as a function of MMT content. Phys Stat Mech Appl2020; 537: 122637.
25.
ElloumiAJerbiABen AmorR, et al.A Comparative study of gray relational analysis and VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje approaches for enhancing mechanical properties and productivity in 3D-Printed copper-filled PLA parts. J Elastomers Plast2024; 56(5): 675–692.
26.
LeeKPMBrandtMShanksR, et al.Rheology and 3D printability of percolated graphene-polyamide-6 composites. Polym Eng Sci2020; 60(4): 844–852.
LiuYBaiWChengX, et al.Effects of printing layer thickness on mechanical properties of 3D-printed custom trays. J Prosthet Dent2020; 124(6): 751–757.
29.
YangTCYehCH. Morphology and mechanical properties of 3D printed wood fiber/polylactic acid composite parts using fused deposition modeling (FDM): the effects of printing speed. Polymers2020; 12(6): 1334.
30.
AnsariAAKamilM. Effect of print speed and extrusion temperature on properties of 3D printed PLA using fused deposition modeling process. Mater Today Proc2021; 45: 5462–5468.
31.
SajjadMAAshrafMRashidA, et al.Effect of extruder temperature and printing speed on the tensile strength of fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printed samples: a meta-analysis study. Polym Eng Sci2022; 62(4): 883–893.
32.
AlgarniM. The influence of raster angle and moisture content on the mechanical properties of PLA parts produced by fused deposition modeling. Polymers2021; 13(2): 237.
33.
BakırAAAtikR&ÖzerinçS. Effect of fused deposition modeling process parameters on the mechanical properties of recycled polyethylene terephthalate parts. Applied Polymer Science2020; 137(45): 49709.
34.
NguyenVHHuynhTNNguyenTP, et al.Single and multi-objective optimization of processing parameters for fused deposition modeling in 3D printing technology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 17(1): 7542–7551.
35.
SouissiSBennourWKhammassiR, et al.Mechanical properties of 3D printed parts: effect of ultraviolet PLA filaments ageing and water absorption. J Elastomers Plast2022; 55: 009524432211447.
