Governments deny people’s internationally recognized rights to asylum by preventing them from arriving in territories where they may request asylum and by using case law to restrict eligibility. While research tends to focus on either deflection or restriction tactics, this paper builds on studies that examine the interaction between them. To further examine the interaction between these “bordering” practices at and beyond the physical U.S. border, we conducted two years of ethnographic research with asylum seekers in three ICE detention centers, one district of the “Migrant Protection Protocols,” and via Title 42 expulsions. We show how paralegal manipulations of time interact with spatial and legal modalities of exclusion to deflect asylum seekers from Latin America and the Caribbean in particular. The result for people who are subjected to these processes is compounded trauma inflicted through a paradoxical combination of state violence and statelessness in the United States and abroad.
AleinikoffAlexander T.MartinDavidMotomuraHiroshiFullertonMaryellenStumpfJuliet2021 “Asylum and other humanitarian protections,” pp. 729–828 in Immigration and Citizenship: Process and Policy. West Academic Publishing.
6.
BigoDidier2011 “Pierre Bourdieu and international relations: Power of practices, practices of power.” International Political Sociology5 (3): 225–258.
7.
BlueEthan2015 “Strange passages: Carceral mobility and the liminal in the catastrophic history of American deportation.” National Identities17 (2): 175–194.
EspirituYen2014Body Counts: The Vietnam War and Militarized Refugees. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
GilboyJanet1991 “Deciding who gets in: Decisionmaking by immigration inspectors.” Law and Society Review25 (3): 571–600.
24.
Golash-BozaTanya2015 “Targeting Latino men: Mass deportation from the USA, 1998–2012.” Ethnic and Racial Studies38 (8): 1221–1228.
25.
Golash-BozaTanya2016 “The parallels between mass incarceration and mass deportation: An intersectional analysis of state repression.” Journal of World Systems Research22 (2): 484–509.
26.
Golash-BozaTanya2018 “Raced and gendered logics of immigration law enforcement in the United States,” pp. 229–244 in BosworthMaryParmarAlpaVázquezYolanda (eds.), Race, Criminal Justice, and Migration Control: Enforcing the Boundaries of Belonging. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
Golash-BozaTanyaHondagneu-SoteloPierrette2013 “Latino immigrant men and the deportation crisis: A gendered racial removal program.” Latino Studies11 (3): 271–292.
28.
Gómez CervantesAndreaAlvordDanielMenjívarCecilia2018 “‘Bad hombres’: The effects of criminalizing Latino immigrants through law and media in the rural Midwest.” Migration Letters15 (2): 182–196.
29.
GonzalesAlberto2013Reform Without Justice: Latino Migrant Politics and the Homeland Security State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
GormanCynthia S.2017 “Redefining refugees: Interpretive control and the bordering work of legal categorization in U.S. asylum law.” Political Geography58 (May): 36–45.
31.
GormanCynthia S.2019 “Singled out: Scaling violence and social groups as legal borderwork in U.S. asylum law.” Geographical Review109 (4): 487–506.
32.
GormanCynthia S.2021 “Defined by the flood: Alarmism and the legal thresholds of US political asylum.” Geopolitics26 (1): 215–235.
33.
HiemstraNancy2019Detain and Deport: The Chaotic U.S. Immigration Enforcement Regime. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press.
HyndmanJenniferMountzAlison2008 “Another brick in the wall? Neo-refoulement and the externalization of asylum by Australia and Europe.” Government and Opposition43 (2): 249–269.
36.
KahnRobert S.1996Other People's Blood: U.S. Immigration Prisons in the Reagan Decade. New York: Routledge.
37.
KatzJack2001 “A Theory of Qualitative Methodology: The Social System of Analytic Fieldwork,” pp. 127–148 in EmersonRobert (ed.), Contemporary Field Research: A Collection of Readings. Prospect Heights, Illinois: Waveland Press.
38.
KjaerumMorten2002 “Refugee protection between state interests and human rights: Where Is Europe heading?” Human Rights Quarterly24 (2): 513–536.
39.
KohJennifer Lee2017 “Removal in the shadows of immigration court.” California Law Review90: 181–235.
40.
LindskoogCarl2018Detain and Punish: Haitian Refugees and the Rise of the World's Largest Immigration Detention System. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
41.
LoydJenniferMountzAlison2018Boats, Borders, and Bases: Race, the Cold War, and the Rise of Migration Detention in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.
42.
MertonRobert1987 “Three fragments from a sociologist's notebooks: Establishing the phenomenon, specified ignorance, and strategic research materials.” Annual Review of Sociology13 (August): 1–29.
MountzAlison2011 “Specters at the port of entry: Understanding state mobilities through an ontology of exclusion.” Mobilities6 (3): 317–334.
45.
SatzewichVic2016Points of Entry: How Canada’s Immigration Officers Decide Who Gets In. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
46.
SchragPhilp2020Baby Jails: The Fight to End the Incarceration of Refugee Children in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
47.
ShattuckKatherine2018 “Preventing erroneous expedited removals: Immigration judge review and requests for reconsideration of negative credible fear determinations.” Washington Law Review93: 459–522.
48.
SmallMario L.2009 “‘How many cases do I need?’ On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research.” Ethnography10 (1): 5–38.
49.
TimmermansStefanTavoryIdo2012 “Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis.” Sociological Theory30 (2): 167–86.
UrryJohn2005 “The complexities of the global.” Theory, Culture & Society22: 235–254.
52.
ValdezInésColemanMatAkbarAmna2017"Missing in action: Practice, paralegality, and the nature of immigration enforcement.” Citizenship Studies21 (5): 547–569.
