Treatment Combinations: The Joint Effects of Multiple Evidence-Based Interventions on Recidivism Reduction

Abstract

Evidence-based interventions have been implemented within penal institutions to reduce the propensity of postrelease reoffending across states. Traditional program evaluations explore these interventions and demonstrate treatment effects most often for a single specific intervention. Although this process supports the doctrine of evidence-based research, little is known of the joint effects of multiple program assignments. The current study examines the treatment effects of sequence combinations of institutional programs on recidivism outcomes. Results demonstrate that correctional clients experienced incremental improvements when receiving more than two interventions compared with those who participated in a standalone intervention. Those who participated in three types of treatment combinations consisting of basic skills, vocational training, and cognitive behavioral treatment were more likely to reduce postrelease reconvictions.

Keywords

multiple treatment effects institutional programs recidivism propensity score matching treatment dosage

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(2010a). The psychology of criminal conduct. Anderson.

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(2010b). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018362

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

Wormith

J. S.

(2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52, 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128705281756

Andrews

D. A.

Zinger

Hoge

R. D.

Bonta

Gendreau

Cullen

F. T.

(1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1990.tb01330.x

Aos

Miller

Drake

(2006a). Evidence-based adult corrections programs: What works and what does not (Document No. 06-01-1201). Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

Aos

Miller

Drake

(2006b). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce future prison construction, criminal justice costs: Implications in Washington State (Document No. 06-10-1201). Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

Aos

Phipps

Barnoski

Lieb

(2001). The comparative costs and benefits of programs to reduce crime (Document No. 01-05-1201). Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

Barnes

G. C.

Hyatt

J. M.

Sherman

L. W.

(2017). Even a little bit helps: An implementation and experimental evaluation of cognitive-behavioral therapy for high-risk probationers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44, 611–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816673862

Barnoski

(1997). Standards for improving research effectiveness in adult and juvenile justice (Doc. No. 97-12- 1201). Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

10.

Bitney

Drake

Grice

Hirsch

Lee

(2017). The effectiveness of reentry programs for incarcerated persons: Findings for the Washington Statewide Reentry Council (Doc. No. 17-05- 1901). Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

11.

Bogue

Campbell

Carey

Clawson

Faust

Florio

Joplin

Keiser

Wasson

Woodward

(2004). Implementing evidence-based practice in community corrections: The principles of effective intervention. National Institute of Corrections. http://www.nicic.org/pubs/2004/019342.pdf

12.

Bonta

Blais

Wilson

H. A.

(2013). The prediction of risk for mentally disordered offenders: A quantitative synthesis. Public Safety Canada.

13.

Bouffard

J. A.

MacKenzie

D. L.

Hickman

L. J.

(2000). Effectiveness of vocational education and employment programs for adult offenders: A methodology-based analysis of the literature. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 31, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v31n01_01

14.

Callan

Gardner

(2005). Vocational education and training provision and recidivism in Queensland correctional institutions. National Center for Vocational Education Research.

15.

Cecil

D. K.

Drapkim

D. A.

Mackenzie

D. L.

Hickman

L. J.

(2000). The effective- ness of adult basic education and life-skills programs in reducing recidivism: A review and assessment of the research. Journal of Correctional Education, 51, 207–226.

16.

Cho

R. M.

Tyler

J. H.

(2010). Does prison-based adult basic education improve postrelease outcomes for male prisoners in Florida? Crime and Delinquency, 59(7), 915–1005. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128710389588

17.

Clark

(2010). Preventing future crime with cognitive behavioral therapy. NIJ Journal, 265, 22–25.

18.

Davis

L. M.

Bozick

Steele

Saunders

Miles

J. N. V.

(2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of correctional education: A meta-analysis of programs that provide education to incarcerated adults. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR266.html

19.

Drake

(2013). Inventory of evidence-based and research-based programs for adult corrections (Doc. No. 13-2-1901). Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

20.

Duriez

S. A.

Sullivan

Latessa

E. J.

Lovins

L. B.

(2018). The evolution of correctional program assessment in the age of evidence-based practices. Corrections: Policy, Practice and Research, 3, 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2017.1343104

21.

Duwe

(2010). Prison-based chemical dependency treatment in Minnesota: An outcome evaluation. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 6, 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9090-8

22.

Duwe

(2017). The use and impact of correctional programming for inmates on pre-and post-release outcomes (NCJ 250476). Department of Justice.

23.

Duwe

(2018). The effects of the timing and dosage of correctional programming on recidivism. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 57, 256–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2017.1401025

24.

Duwe

(2019). Optimizing the effectiveness of correctional programming: The importance of dosage, timing, and sequencing. American Enterprise Institute. https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Optimizing-the-Effectiveness-of-Correctional-Programming.pdf?x91208

25.

Duwe

Clark

(2015). Importance of program integrity: Outcome evaluation of a gender-responsive, cognitive-behavioral program for female offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 14, 301–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12123

26.

Duwe

Clark

(2017). The rehabilitative ideal versus the criminogenic reality: The consequences of warehousing prisoners. Corrections: Policy, Practice and Research, 2, 41–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2016.1240596

27.

Eeren

H. V.

de Rooij

(2015). Estimating subgroup effects using the propensity score method. Medical Care, 53, 366–373. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000325

28.

Ellison

Szifris

Horgan

Fox

(2017). A rapid evidence assessment of the effectiveness of prison education in reducing recidivism and increasing employment. Probation Journal, 64, 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550517699290

29.

Farrington

D. P.

(2005). Childhood origins of antisocial behavior. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 12, 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.448

30.

Friendship

Beech

A. R.

Browne

K. D.

(2002). Reconviction as an outcome measure in research: A methodological note. The British Journal of Criminology, 42, 442–444.

31.

Frölich

(2002). Programme evaluation with multiple treatments (No. 542). http://ftp.iza.org/dp542.pdf

32.

Gendreau

Andrews

(1989). Correctional Program Assessment Inventory (CPAI). University of New Brunswick Press.

33.

Guo

Fraser

M. W.

(2010). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. SAGE.

34.

Hall

(2015). Correctional education and recidivism: Toward a tool for reduction. The Journal of Correctional Education, 66, 4–29.

35.

Hamilton

Campagna

Tollefsbol

Van Wormer

Barnoski

(2017). A more consistent application of the RNR model Assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44, 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816678032

36.

Hamilton

Kigerl

Barnoski

Campagna

Lee

Van Wormer

Block

(2016). Designed to fit: The development and validation of the STRONG-R recidivism risk assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 230–263.

37.

Hansen

(2008). Cognitive-behavioral interventions: Where they come from and what they do. Federal Probation, 72, 1–13.

38.

Hanson

R. K.

Bourgon

(2017). Advancing sexual offender risk assessment: Standardized risk levels based on psychologically meaningful offender characteristics. In Taxman

F. S.

(Ed.), Handbook on risk and need assessment: Theory and practice (pp. 244–268). Routledge.

39.

Harer

M. D.

(1995). Prison education program participation and recidivism: A test of the normalization hypothesis. Federal Bureau of Prisons. https://www.bop.gov/resources/research_projects/published_reports/recidivism/orepredprg.pdf

40.

Hofmann

S. G.

Asnaani

Vonk

I. J. J.

Sawyer

A. T.

Fang

(2012). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36, 427–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-012-9476-1

41.

Hollin

McGuire

Hounsome

Hatcher

Bilby

Palmer

(2008). Cognitive skills behavior programs for offenders in the community. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854807312234

42.

Hsieh

M.-L.

Hamilton

Z. K.

(2016). Predicting success in residential substance abuse interventions: New Jersey’s pre-release incarceration alternatives. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 27, 182–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403414556148

43.

Jenson

E. L.

Reed

G. E.

(2008). Adult correctional education programs: An update on current status based on recent studies. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 44, 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v44n01_05

44.

Konstenius

Jayaram-Lindström

Guterstam

Beck

Philips

Franck

(2014). Methylphenidate for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and drug relapse in criminal offenders with substance dependence: A 24-week randomized placebo-controlled trial. Addiction, 109, 440–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12369

45.

Landenberger

Lipsey

(2005). The positive effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-Analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-005-3541-7

46.

S. D.

MacKenzie

D. L.

(2003). The gendered effects of adult social bonds on the criminal activities of probationers. Criminal Justice Review, 28, 278–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/073401680302800205

47.

Lipsey

M. W.

(2019). Rehabilitation programs for adult offenders: A meta-analysis in support of guidelines for effective practice (Document No. 252504). Department of Justice.

48.

Lipsey

M. W.

Chapman

G. L.

Landenberger

N. A.

(2001). Cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620157800109

49.

Lipsey

M. W.

Howell

J. C.

Kelly

M. R.

Chapman

Carver

(2010). Improving the effectiveness of juvenile justice programs: A new perspective on evidence-based practice. Center for Juvenile Justice Reform.

50.

Lockwood

Nally

J. M.

Knutson

(2012). The effect of correctional education on postrelease employment and recidivism: A 5-year follow-up study in the State of Indiana. Crime and Delinquency, 58, 380–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128712441695

51.

MacKenzie

D. L.

(2000). Evidence-based corrections: Identifying what works. Crime and Delinquency, 46, 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128700046004003

52.

MacKenzie

D. L.

(2006). What works in corrections: Reducing the criminal activities of offenders and delinquents. Cambridge University Press.

53.

MacSwain

M.-A.

Farrell-MacDonald

Cheverie

Fischer

(2014). Assessing the impact of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) on post-release recidivism among male federal correctional inmates in Canada. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 380–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813501495

54.

Mailloux

D. L.

Abracen

Serin

Cousineau

Malcolm

Looman

(2003). Dosage of treatment to sexual offenders: Are we overprescribing? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 4, 7171–7184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X03251096

55.

McNiel

D. E.

Binder

R. L.

(2007). Effectiveness of a mental health court in reducing criminal recidivism and violence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 1395–1403. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06101664

56.

Milkman

Wanberg

(2007). A review and discussion for corrections professionals (NIC 021657). Department of Justice.

57.

Mocan

H. N.

Billups

S. C.

Overland

(2005). A dynamic model of differential human capital and criminal activity. Economica, 72, 655–681. https://doi.org/10.3386/w7584

58.

Mohammed

Mohamed

W. A. W.

(2015). Reducing recidivism rates through vocational education and training. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 272–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.151

59.

Olver

M. E.

Stockdale

K. C.

(2018). Assessing and treating violent offenders. In Ternes

Magaletta

P. R.

Patry

M. W.

(Eds.), The practice of correctional psychology (pp. 143–172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00452-1_7

60.

Pearson

F. S.

Lipton

D. S.

Cleland

C. M.

Yee

D. S.

(2002). The effects of behavioral/cognitive-behavioral programs on recidivism. Crime and Delinquency, 48, 476–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/001112870204800306

61.

Pearson

F. S.

Prendergast

Podus

Vazan

Greenwell

Hamilton

(2012). Meta-analyses of seven of the National Institute on Drug Abuse’s principles of drug addiction treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 43, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2011.10.005

62.

Pearson

D. A. S.

McDougall

Kanaan

Torgerson

D.J

Bowles

R.A.

(2016). Evaluation of the citizenship evidence-based probation supervision program using a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Crime and Delinquency, 62(7), 899–924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128714530824

63.

Perry

A. E.

Woodhouse

Neilson

James

M. M.

Glanville

Hewitt

Trépel

(2016). Are non-pharmacological interventions effective in reducing drug use and criminality? A systematic and meta-analytical review with an economic appraisal of these interventions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Pubic Health, 13, 966–985. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13100966

64.

Prendergast

Pearson

Podus

Hamilton

Greenwell

(2013). The Andrews’ principles of risk, needs, and responsivity as applied in drug treatment programs: Meta-analysis of crime and drug use outcomes. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9, 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-013-9178-z

65.

Proctor

Hoffmann

Allison

(2012). The effectiveness of interactive journaling in reducing recidivism among substance-dependent jail inmates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56, 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X11399274

66.

Rice

M. E.

Harris

G. T.

(2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7

67.

Rosenbaum

P. R.

Rubin

D. B.

(1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2335942

68.

Rosenbaum

P. R.

Rubin

D. B.

(1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39, 33–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/2683903

69.

Sedgley

N. H.

Scott

C. E.

Williams

N. A.

Derrick

F. W.

(2010). Prison’s dilemma: Do education and jobs programmes affect recidivism? Economica, 77, 497–517.

70.

Sobel

M. E.

(2005). Discussion: The scientific model of causality. Sociological Methodology, 35, 99–133.

71.

Somers

J. M.

Currie

Moniruzzaman

Eiboff

Patterson

(2012). Drug treatment court of Vancouver: An empirical evaluation of recidivism. International Journal of Drug Policy, 230, 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.01.011

72.

Stephan

J. J.

(2008). Census of state and federal correctional facilities, 2005 (NCJ 222182). U.S. Department of Justice.

73.

Stephenson

Harkins

Woodhams

(2013). The sequencing of interventions with offenders: An addition to the responsivity principle. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 13, 429–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2013.850318

74.

Taylor

(2017). Improving in-prison rehabilitation programs. Legislative Analyst’s Office.

75.

Usher

A. M.

Stewart

L. A.

(2014). Effectiveness of correctional programs with ethnically diverse offenders: A meta-analytic study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X12469507

76.

Vansteenkiste

Simons

Lens

Sheldon

K. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246

77.

Wanner

(2008). Inventory of evidence-based, research-based, and promising programs for adult corrections (Document Number 18-02-1901). Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

78.

Ward

Stewart

(2003). The treatment of sex offenders: Risk management and good lives. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.34.4.353

79.

Washington State Institute for Public Policy. (2021a). Cognitive behavioral therapy. http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/BenefitCost/ProgramPdf/10/Cognitive-behavioral-therapy-CBT-for-individuals-classified-as-high-or-moderate-risk

80.

Washington State Institute for Public Policy. (2021b). Correctional education. http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/BenefitCost/ProgramPdf/734/Correctional-education-basic-skills

81.

Washington State Institute for Public Policy. (2021c). Vocational education in prison. http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/BenefitCost/ProgramPdf/6/Vocational-education-in-prison

82.

Wilson

D. B.

Bouffard

L. A.

MacKenzie

D. L.

(2005). A quantitative review of structured, group-oriented, cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 172–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854804272889

83.

Wilson

D. B.

Gallagher

C. A.

MacKenzie

D. L.

(2000). A meta-analysis of corrections-based education, vocation, and work programs for adult offenders. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 37, 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427800037004001