We examined the incremental contributions of static and dynamic sexual violence risk assessment in a multisite sample of 1,289 men treated for sexual offending. The study extends validation work that established new risk categories and recidivism estimates for the Violence Risk Scale–Sexual Offense version (VRS-SO), using the risk assessment common language (CL) framework. Different rates of sexual recidivism were observed at different thresholds of static risk (Static-99R) as a function of dynamic risk and treatment change, particularly for men who were actuarially above or well above average risk (Levels IVa and IVb, respectively). A framework integrating CL risk levels for Static-99R and VRS-SO dynamic scores into overall CL risk levels is presented. We discuss implications for dynamic sexual violence risk assessment regarding the language used for risk communication and the importance of dynamic risk instruments in sexual violence evaluations, particularly when credible agents of risk change may be present.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018362
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.WormithJ. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128705281756
3.
BeggsS. M.GraceR. C. (2010). Assessment of dynamic risk factors: An independent validation study of the Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender version. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210369014
4.
BeggsS. M.GraceR. C. (2011). Treatment gains for sexual offenders against children predicts reduced recidivism: A comparative validity study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022900
5.
BontaJ.BourgonG.RuggeT.ScottT.YessineA. K.GutierrezL.LiJ. (2011). An experimental demonstration of training probation officers in evidence-based community supervision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1127–1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811420678
6.
BurtG. N.OlverM. E.WongS. C. P. (2016). Investigating characteristics of the nonrecidivating psychopathic offender. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 1741–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816661215
7.
CouplandR. B. A.OlverM. E. (2020). Assessing protective factors in treated violent offenders: Associations with recidivism reduction and positive community outcomes. Psychological Assessment, 32, 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000807
8.
de VogelV.de RuiterC.BoumanY. H. A.de Vries RobbéM. (2009). SAPROF: Guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk. Forum Educatief.
9.
de Vries RobbéM.de VogelV.DouglasK. S.NijmanH. L. I. (2015). Changes in dynamic risk and protective factors for violence during inpatient forensic psychiatric treatment: Predicting reductions in postdischarge community recidivism. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000089
10.
HansonR. K. (2002). Recidivism and age: Data from 4,673 sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 1046–1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626002236659
11.
HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M.HelmusL. M.ThorntonD.PhenixA. (2017). Communicating the results of criterion referenced prediction measures: Risk categories for the Static-99R and Static-2002R sexual offender risk assessment tools. Psychological Assessment, 29, 582–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000371
12.
HansonR. K.BourgonG.HelmusL.HodgsonS. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 865–891. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809338545
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (1999). Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders (User Report 99-02). Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
15.
HelmusL.ThorntonD.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M. (2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: Revised age weights. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 64–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211409951
16.
MannR. E.HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210366039
OlverM. E.Beggs ChristoffersonS. M.NicholaichukT. P.WongS. C. P. (2020). Predictive properties of the Violence Risk Scale–Sexual Offense version as a function of age. Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120914405
OlverM. E.MundtJ. C.ThorntonD.Beggs ChristoffersonS. M.KingstonD. A.SowdenJ. N.NicholaichukT. P.GordonA.WongS. C. P. (2018). Using the Violence Risk Scale–Sexual Offense version in sexual violence risk assessments: Updated risk categories and recidivism estimates from a multisite sample of treated sexual offenders. Psychological Assessment, 30(7), 941–955. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000538
21.
OlverM. E.NicholaichukT. P.KingstonD. A.WongS. C. P. (2014). A multisite examination of sexual violence risk and therapeutic change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035340
22.
OlverM. E.NicholaichukT. P.KingstonD. A.WongS. C. P. (2020). A prospective multisite examination of dynamic sexual violence risk: Extension and update to Olver, Nicholaichuk, Kingston, and Wong (2014). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 88, 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000478
23.
OlverM. E.NicholaichukT. P.WongS. C. P. (2014). The predictive and convergent validity of a psychometric battery used to assess sexual offenders in a treatment programme: An 18-year follow-up. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 20, 216–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2013.816791
24.
OlverM. E.StockdaleK. C. (2020). Evaluating change in men who have sexually offended: Linkages to risk assessment and management. Current Psychiatry Reports, 22, 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-020-01146-3
25.
OlverM. E.StockdaleK. C.WormithJ. S. (2011). A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment attrition and its relationship to recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022200
26.
OlverM. E.WongS. C. P. (2011). A comparison of static and dynamic assessment of sexual offender risk and need in a treatment context. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810389534
27.
OlverM. E.WongS. C. P.NicholaichukT.GordonA. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological Assessment, 19, 318–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.318
PolaschekD. L. L.YesbergJ. A.ChuahanP. (2018). An integrated examination of potential mechanisms for successful reentry in high-risk violent prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45, 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817752757
30.
PrendergastM. L.PearsonF. S.PodusD.HamiltonZ. K.GreenwellL. (2013). The Andrews’ principles of risk, needs, and responsivity as applied in drug treatment programs: Meta-analysis of crime and drug use outcomes. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9, 275–300. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-013-9178-z
31.
ProchaskaJ. O.DiClementeC. C.NorcrossJ. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47, 1102–1114. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.9.1102
32.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
33.
SowdenJ. N.OlverM. E. (2017). Use of the Violence Risk Scale–Sexual Offender version and the Stable 2007 to assess dynamic sexual violence risk in a sample of treated sexual offenders. Psychological Assessment, 29, 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000345
34.
ThorntonD. (2006). Age and sexual recidivism: A variable connection. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320601800202
35.
WillisG. M.KelleyS. M.ThorntonD. (2020). Interrater reliability and construct validity of proposed protective factors against sexual reoffending. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47, 1448–1467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820941039
36.
WillisG. M.ThorntonD.KelleyS.de Vries RobbéM. (2018). Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk—Sexual Offence version [Pilot manual, Unpublished Scale].
37.
WongS.OlverM. E.NicholaichukT. P.GordonA. (2003–2017). The Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offense version (VRS-SO). Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan.
38.
ZumboB. D. (1999). The simple difference score as an inherently poor measure of change: Some reality, much mythology. In ThompsonB. (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology (Vol. 5, pp. 269–304). JAI Press.
