We examined the use of risk-change information in sexual offender risk assessments featuring the Violence Risk Scale–Sexual Offender version (VRS-SO), a sex offender risk assessment and treatment planning tool. The study featured a combined international sample of 539 sex offenders followed up an average of 15.5 years post-release. Pre- and posttreatment VRS-SO ratings were amalgamated from two treated samples of sex offenders from Canada and New Zealand. Analyses focused on examinations and applications of change data and its relationship to sexual and violent recidivism. VRS-SO change scores were significantly associated with decreases in these outcome criteria with, and without, controlling for indicators of pretreatment risk (e.g., Static-99R score) and individual differences in follow-up time. Applications of logistic regression using fixed 5-year follow-ups generated estimated rates of sexual and violent recidivism at different VRS-SO score thresholds. The use of logistic regression demonstrated a clinically useful and systematic means of combining risk and change information into posttreatment risk appraisals. Implications for the use of change information in the assessment and management of sexual offender risk are discussed.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct, fifth edition. New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis.
2.
BeggsS. M.GraceR. C. (2010). Assessment of dynamic risk factors: An independent validation study of the Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender Version. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 234-251. doi:10.1177/1079063210369014
3.
BeggsS. M.GraceR. C. (2011).Treatment gains for sexual offenders against children predicts reduced recidivism: A comparative validity study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 182-192. doi:10.1037/a0022900
4.
DouglasK. S.KroppP. R. (2002). A prevention-based paradigm for violence risk assessment: Clinical and research applications. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 617-658. doi:10.1177/009385402236735
5.
DouglasK. S.SkeemJ. (2005). Violence risk assessment: Getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 347-383. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.11.3.347
6.
GordonA.WongS. C. P. (2010). Offense analogue behaviours as indicator of criminogenic need and treatment progress. In DaffernM.JonesL.ShineJ. (Eds.), Offence paralleling behaviour: An individualised approach to offender assessment and treatment (pp. 171-183). London, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
7.
GossnerD.WormithJ. S. (2007). The prediction of recidivism among young offenders in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Police & Security Services, 5, 70-82.
8.
HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M.HelmusL.ThorntonD. (2013). Quantifying the relative risk ratios for Static-99R. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25(5), 482-515. doi:10.1177/1079063212469060
9.
HansonR. K.BourgonG.HelmusL.HodgsonS. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 865-891. doi:10.1177/0093854809338545
10.
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. R.ScottT.HelmusL. (2007). Assessing the risk of sex offenders on community supervision (User Report No. 2007-05). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
11.
HansonR. K.HelmusL.ThorntonD. (2010). Predicting recidivism among sexual offenders: A multi-site study of Static-2002. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 198-211. doi:10.1007/s10979-009-9180-1
12.
HansonR. K.LloydC. D.HelmusL.ThorntonD. (2012). Developing non-arbitrary metrics for risk communication: Percentile ranks for the Static-99/R and Static-2002/R sexual offender risk tools. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11, 9-23. doi:10.1080/14999013.2012.667511
13.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (1999). Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders (User Report 99-02). Ottawa, Ontario: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
14.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.QuinseyV. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315-335. doi:10.1177/0093854893020004001
15.
HelmusL.HansonR. K.ThorntonD.BabchishinK. M.HarrisA. J. R. (2012). Absolute recidivism rates predicted by Static-99R and Static-2002R sex offender risk assessment tools vary across samples: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 1148-1171. doi:10.1177/0093854812443648
16.
HelmusL.ThorntonD.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M. (2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: Revised age weights. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 64-101. doi:10.1177/1079063211409951
17.
HudsonS. M.WalesD. S.BakkerL.WardT. (2002). Dynamic risk factors: The Kia Marama evaluation. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 103-119. doi:10.1177/107906320201400203
18.
JungS.GuyaletsM. (2011). Using clinical variables to evaluate treatment effectiveness in programmes for sexual offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression17, 166-180. doi:10.1080/13552601003802238
19.
KraemerH. C.KazdinA. E.OffordD. R.KesslerR. C.JensenP. S.KupferD. J. (1997). Coming to terms with the terms of risk. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54, 337-343. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830160065009
20.
NunesK. L.BabchishinK. M.CortoniF. (2011). Measuring treatment changes in sex offenders: Clinical and statistical significance. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 157-173. doi:10.1177/0093854810391054
21.
NunesK. L.CortoniF. (2007). Assessing treatment change in sexual offenders (Research Report 2008 No R-184). Ottawa, Ontario: Correctional Service of Canada.
22.
OlverM. E.WongS. C. P. (2006). Psychopathy, sexual deviance, and recidivism among sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 65-82. doi:10.1007/s11194-006-9006-3
23.
OlverM. E.WongS. C. P. (2011). A comparison of static and dynamic assessment of sexual offender risk and need in a treatment context. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 113-126. doi:10.1177/0093854810389534
24.
OlverM. E.WongS. C. P.NicholaichukT.GordonA. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale–Sexual Offender version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological Assessment, 19, 318-329. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.318
25.
ProchaskaJ. O.DiClementeC. C.NorcrossJ. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to the addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47, 1102-1114.
26.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615-620. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
27.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T.LangC.CormierC. A. (2006). Violent sex offenses: How are they best measured from official records?Law and Human Behavior, 30, 525-541. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9022-3
28.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
29.
ThorntonD. (2011, November). Interpreting SRA-FV total need scores. Paper presented at the 30th annual meeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
30.
ViljoenJ. L.ScaloraM.CuadraL.BaderS.ChavezV.UllmanD.LawrenceL. (2008). Assessing risk for violence in adolescents who have sexually offended: A comparison of the J-SOAP-II, J-SORRAT-II, and SAVRY. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 5-23. doi:10.1177/0093854809340991
31.
WakelingH.BeechA. R.FreemantleN. (2013). Treatment change and its relationship to recidivism in a sample of 3773 sex offenders in the UK. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 19, 233-252. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2011.626413
32.
WongS. C. P.GordonA. (2006). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale: A treatment-friendly violence risk assessment tool. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 279-309. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.12.3.279
33.
WongS. C. P.OlverM. E.NicholaichukT. P.GordonA. (2003). The Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender version (VRS-SO). Saskatoon: Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
