Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Perceptions of the use of coercive tactics in witness interviews were examined. Canadian community members (N = 293) were asked to read a transcript of a witness interview that included either (a) threats/overt coercion, (b) minimization/covert coercion, or (c) no coercion, and answer questions about the interview. Participants rated the threat transcript as being the most coercive, containing the most pressure, involving the most serious consequences for withholding information, and eliciting the most negative feelings from witnesses. Conversely, the minimization transcript tended to be rated less negatively than the threat transcript and was also rated as being the most effective for gathering information. Results indicate that laypeople recognize the issues with explicitly coercive police tactics, but are less clear on the problems with subtler forms of coercion. The implications for the truth-seeking function of the justice system and the role of expert testimony in the courtroom are discussed.

Keywords

police coercion witness interview layperson juror justice system

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blandon-Gitlin

Sperry

Leo

(2011). Jurors believe interrogation tactics are not likely to elicit false confessions: Will expert witness testimony inform them otherwise? Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160903113699

Bond

Smith

(1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111

Cialdini

R. B.

Trost

M. R.

(1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In Gilbert

D. T.

Fiske

S. T.

Lindzey

(Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 151–192). McGraw-Hill.

Cohen

, (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 1155–1159. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155

Costanzo

Shaked-Schroer

Vinson

(2010). Juror beliefs about police interrogations, false confessions, and expert testimony. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 7, 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01177.x

Cutler

Bull Kovera

(2011). Expert psychological testimony. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410388802

DNA exonerations in the United States. (2019). https://www.innocenceproject.org/

Dror

I. E.

Charlton

(2006). Why experts make errors. Journal of Forensic Identification, 56, 600–616.

Freedman

J. L.

Fraser

S. C.

(1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023552

10.

Hasel

L. E.

Kassin

S. M.

(2009). On the presumption of evidentiary independence: Can confessions corrupt eyewitness identifications? Psychological Science, 20, 122–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02262.x

11.

Hickman

T. A.

Poitras

L. A.

Evans

G. T.

(1989). Royal Commission on the Donald Marshall, Jr., Prosecution (N.S.). The Commission.

12.

Homant

R. J.

Witkowski

M. J.

(2011). Support for coercive interrogation among college students: Torture and the ticking bomb scenario. Journal of Applied Security Research, 6, 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2011.552002

13.

Horgan

A. J.

Russano

M. B.

Meissner

C. A.

Evans

J. R.

(2012). Minimization and maximization techniques: Assessing the perceived consequences of confession and confession diagnosticity. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.561801

14.

Inbau

F. E.

Reid

J. E.

Buckley

J. P.

Jayne

B. C.

(2013). Criminal interrogation and confessions (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

15.

Kaplan

Cutler

B. L.

Leach

A. M.

Marion

Eastwood

(2018). Perceptions of coercion: A comparison of perspectives [Master’s thesis, University of Ontario Institute of Technology].

16.

Kassin

S. M.

(1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52, 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.3.221

17.

Kassin

S. M.

Drizin

S. A.

Grisso

Gudjonsson

G. H.

Leo

R. A.

Redlich

A. D.

(2010). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6

18.

Kassin

S. M.

McNall

(1991). Police interrogations and confessions: Communicating promises and threats by pragmatic implication. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061711

19.

Kassin

S. M.

Meissner

C. A.

Norwick

R. J.

(2005). “I’d know a false confession if I saw one”: A comparative study of college students and police investigators. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-2416-9

20.

Kassin

S. M.

Neumann

(1997). On the power of confession evidence: An experimental test of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024871622490

21.

Kassin

S. M.

Redlich

A. D.

Alceste

Luke

T. J.

(2018). On the general acceptance of confessions research: Opinions of the scientific community. American Psychologist, 73, 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000141

22.

Kassin

S. M.

Sukel

(1997). Coerced confessions and the jury: An experimental test of the “harmless error” rule. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024814009769

23.

Kelly

C. E.

Russano

M. B.

Miller

J. C.

Redlich

A. D.

(2019). On the road (to admission): Engaging suspects with minimization. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 25(3), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000199

24.

Klaver

J. R.

Lee

Rose

V. G.

(2008). Effects of personality, interrogation techniques and plausibility in an experimental false confession paradigm. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532507X193051

25.

Lamer

(2006). The Lamer Commission of inquiry pertaining to the cases of: Gregory Parsons, Randy Druken, Ronald Dalton. Office of the Queen’s Printer.

26.

Leo

R. A.

Liu

(2009). What do potential jurors know about police interrogation techniques and false confessions? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27, 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.872

27.

Loftus

E. F.

Palmer

J. C.

(1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3

28.

Loftus

E. F.

Pickrell

J. E.

(1995). The formation of false memories. Psychiatric Annals, 25, 720–725. https://doi.org/10.3928/0048-5713-19951201-07

29.

Loney

D. M.

Cutler

B. L.

(2016). Coercive interrogation of eyewitnesses can produce false accusations. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 31, 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-015-9165-6

30.

Luke

T. J.

Alceste

(2019). The mechanisms of minimization: How interrogation tactics suggest lenient sentencing through pragmatic implication. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/etudk

31.

Marion

S. B.

Kukucka

Collins

Kassin

S. M.

Burke

T. M.

(2016). Lost proof of innocence: The impact of confessions on alibi witnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 40, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000156

32.

Milgram

(1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. Harper & Row.

33.

Milne

Bull

(2003). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Wiley.

34.

Moore

T. E.

Cutler

B. L.

Shulman

(2014, October). Shaping eyewitness and alibi testimony with coercive interview practices. The Champion, pp. 34–40.

35.

Moston

Fisher

(2007). Perceptions of coercion in the questioning of criminal suspects. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 4, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.66

36.

Nourkova

V. V.

Bernstein

D. M.

Loftus

E. F.

(2004). Altering traumatic memories. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 575–585. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00027

37.

Peter-Hagene

L. C.

Salerno

J. M.

Phelan

(2019). Jury decision making. In Brewer

Bradfield Douglass

(Eds.), Psychological science and the law (pp. 338–366). Guilford Press.

38.

R. v. Bonisteel . (2008). BCCA 344.

39.

R. v. Garnier . (2017). NSSC 259.

40.

R. v. Ledesma . (2014). ABQB 788.

41.

R. v. Leslie . (2008). ONCJ 666.

42.

R. v. Mohan . (1994) 2 SCR 9, 1994 CanLII 80 (SCC).

43.

R. v. Morgan . (2013). ONSC 6462, [2013] O.J. No. 5827.

44.

R. v. Oickle . (2000). 2 S. C. R. 3.

45.

R. v. Omar . (2016). ONSC 4065.

46.

R. v. Swampy . (2015). ABQB 107.

47.

Russano

M. B.

Meissner

C. A.

Narchet

F. M.

Kassin

S. M.

(2005). Investigating true and false confessions within a novel experimental paradigm. Psychological Science, 16, 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01560.x

48.

Statistics Canada. (2017). Canada [Country] and Canada [Country] (table): Census profile 2016 Census (Statistics Canada Catalogue No. 98-316-X2016001). https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm?Lang=E

49.

Wallace

D. B.

Kassin

S. M.

(2012). Harmless error analysis: How do judges respond to confession errors? Law and Human Behavior, 36, 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9262-0

50.

Wells

G. L.

(2018). Eyewitness identification. In Luna

(Ed.), Reforming criminal justice: Volume 2, Policing (pp. 259–278). Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law.

51.

Woestehoff

S. A.

Meissner

C. A.

(2016). Juror sensitivity to false confession risk factors: Dispositional vs. situational attributions for a confession. Law and Human Behavior, 40, 564–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000201

Beyond Common Sense and Human Experience: Lay Perceptions of Witness Coercion

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References