Mock jurors (N = 363) read a mock trial transcript that examined the influence of age of witness (child vs. adult), the witness’s relationship to the crime (bystander vs. victim), and the type of eyewitness identification decision (positive vs. foil vs. nonidentification) on their perception of the witness’s accuracy for other crime details, credibility, and verdict. The offender’s physical description was perceived as more accurate with a positive versus foil identification. The perceived accuracy of the offender’s description did not vary with a positive identification versus nonidentification. Child victims were perceived as credible as adult victims, but a child as a bystander was perceived as less credible than an adult as a bystander. More guilty verdicts were rendered with a positive identification versus a foil identification or a nonidentification. Guilty verdicts were made at a comparable rate when the witness made a foil identification or a nonidentification.
Bornstein, B.H. ( 1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75-91.
2.
Ceci, S.J., & Bruck, M. ( 1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403-437.
3.
Christianson, S.A. ( 1992). Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review . Psychological Bulletin, 112, 284-309.
4.
Christianson, S., & Hübinette, B. (1993). Hands up! A study of witnesses’ emotional reactions and memories associated with bank robberies . Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 365-379.
5.
Cutler, B.L., Penrod, S.D., & Stuve, T.E. ( 1988). Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases . Law and Human Behavior, 12, 41-55.
Goldstein, A.G., Johnson, K.S., & Chance, J.E. ( 1979). Does fluency of face description imply superior face recognition? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 15-18.
8.
Goodman, G.S., Golding, J.M., & Haith, M.M. ( 1984). Juror’s reactions to child witnesses. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 139-156.
9.
Goodman, G.S., Golding, J.M., Helgson, V.S., Haith, M.M., & Michelli, J. ( 1987). When a child takes the stand: Juror’s perceptions of children’s eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior , 11, 27-40.
Kassin, S.M., Ellsworth, P.C., & Smith, V.L. ( 1989). The "general acceptance" of psychological research on eyewitness testimony: A survey of experts. American Psychologist , 44, 1089-1098.
12.
MacCoun, R.J., & Kerr, N.L. ( 1988). Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors’ bias for leniency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 54, 21-33.
13.
Malpass, R.S., Lavigueur, H., & Weldon, D.E. ( 1973). Verbal and visual training in face recognition . Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 285-292.
14.
Nikonova, O., & Ogloff, J.R.P. (2005). Mock jurors’ perceptions of child witnesses: The impact of judicial warning. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 37, 1-19.
15.
Parker, J.F., & Ryan, V. ( 1993). An attempt to reduce guessing behavior in children’s and adults’ eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 11-26.
16.
Pigott, M.A., Brigham, J.C., & Bothwell, R.K. (1990). A field study on the relationship between quality of eyewitnesses’ descriptions and identification accuracy . Journal of Police Science and Administration, 17, 84-88.
17.
Pozzulo, J.D., Dempsey, J.L., & Crescini, C. (in press). Preschoolers’ person description and identification accuracy: A comparison of the simultaneous and elimination lineup procedures. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology.
18.
Pozzulo, J.D., Dempsey, J.L., O’Neill, M., & Grech, D. (in press). The relationship between recalling a person and recognizing that person. American Journal of Forensic Psychology.
19.
Pozzulo, J.D., Lemieux, J.M.T., Wells, E., & McCuaig, H.J. ( 2006). The influence of eyewitness identification decisions and age of witness on jurors’ verdicts and perceptions of reliability . Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 641-652.
20.
Pozzulo, J.D., & Lindsay, R.C.L. (1998). Identification accuracy of children versus adults: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 549-570.
21.
Pozzulo, J.D., & Warren, K.L. ( 2003). Descriptions and identifications of strangers by youth and adult eyewitnesses. Journal of Applied Psychology , 88, 315-323.
22.
Ross, D.F., Dunning, D., Toglia, M.P., & Ceci, S.J. ( 1990). The child in the eyes of the jury: Assessing mock jurors’ perceptions of the child witness. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 5-23.
23.
Ross, D.F., Jurden, F.H., Lindsay, R.C.L., & Keeney, J.M. ( 2003). Replications and limitations of a two factor model of child witness credibility. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 33, 418-430.
24.
Schmidt, C.W., & Brigham, J.C. ( 1996). Jurors’ perceptions of child victim-witnesses in a simulated sexual abuse trial. Law and Human Behaviour , 20, 581-606.
25.
Sears, D.O. ( 1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530.
26.
Skolnick, P., & Shaw, J.I. ( 2001). A comparison of eyewitness and physical evidence on mock-juror decision making. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 28, 614-630.
27.
Sporer, S.L. ( 1989). Verbal and visual processes in person identification . In H. Wegener, F. Loesel, & J. Haisch (Eds.), Criminal behavior and the justice system: Psychological perspectives (pp. 303-324). New York: Springer .
28.
Wagstaff, G.F., MacVeigh, J., Boston, R., Scott, L., Brunas-Wagstaff, J., & Cole, J. ( 2003). Can laboratory findings on eyewitness testimony be generalized to the real world? An archival analysis of the influence of violence, weapon presence, and age on eyewitness accuracy. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 137, 17-28.
29.
Wells, G.L. ( 1984). The psychology of photoarray identifications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 89-103.
30.
Wells, G.L. ( 1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification ? American Psychologist, 48, 553-571.
31.
Yuille, J.C., & Cutshall, J.L. (1986). A case study of eyewitness memory of a crime. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 291-301.
32.
Yuille, J.C., & Tollestrup, P.A. (1992). A model of the diverse effects of emotion on eyewitness testimony. In S. A. Christianson (Ed.), The handbook of emotion and memory: Research and theory (pp. 201-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
