The authors review evidence of gender-responsive factors for women in prisons. Some gender-responsive needs function as risk factors in prison settings and contribute to women’s maladjustment to prison; guided by these findings, the authors outline ways in which prison management, staff members, and programming can better serve female prisoners by being more gender informed. The authors suggest that prisons provide treatment and programming services aimed at reducing women’s criminogenic need factors, use gendered assessments to place women into appropriate interventions and to appropriately plan for women’s successful reentry into the community, and train staff members to be gender responsive.
AndrewsD. A. (2006). Enhancing adherence to risk-need-responsivity: Making quality a matter of policy. Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 595-602.
2.
AndrewsD. A.ZingerI.HogeR. D.BontaJ.GendreauP.CullenF. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically releveant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
3.
AustinJ.BruceM. A.CarrollL.McCallP. L.RichardsS. C. (2001). The use of incarceration in the United States: American Society of Criminology National Policy Committee. Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 10, 17-41.
4.
BaerJ.MaschiT. (2003). Random acts of delinquency: Trauma and self-destructiveness in juvenile offenders. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 20, 85-98.
5.
BelknapJ. (2007). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth.
6.
BelknapJ.HolsingerK. (2006). The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency. Feminist Criminology, 1, 48-71.
7.
BloomB. (2000). Beyond recidivism: Perspectives on evaluation of programs for female offenders in community corrections. In McMahonM. (Ed.), Assessment to assistance: Programs for women in community corrections (pp. 107-138). Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.
8.
BloomB.CovingtonS. (2009). Addressing the mental health needs of women offenders. In GidoR. L.DalleyL. (Eds.), Women’s mental health issues across the criminal justice system (pp. 160-176). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
9.
BloomB.OwenB.CovingtonS. (2003). Gender-responsive strategies: Research practice and guiding principles for women offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
10.
BloomB.OwenB.CovingtonS. (2004). Women offenders and the gendered effects of public policy. Review of Policy Research, 21, 31-48.
11.
BloomB.OwenB.CovingtonS. (2005). Gender-responsive strategies for women offenders: A summary of research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
12.
BlumeS. (1997). Women: Clinical aspects. In LowinsonJ.RuizP.MilkmanJ.LangrodJ. (Eds.), Substance abuse: A comprehenstive textbook (pp. 645-654). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
13.
BrennanT. (1998). Institutional classification of females: Problems and some proposals for reform. In ZaplinR. (Ed.), Female offenders: Critical perspectives and effective interventions (pp. 179-204). Gathersburg, MD: Aspen.
14.
BrennanT.AustinJ. (1997). Women in jail: Classification issues. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
15.
BrownM.BloomB. (2009). Reentry and renegotiating motherhood: Maternal identity and success on parole. Crime & Delinquency, 55, 313-336.
16.
BrowneA.MillerB.MaguinE. (1999). Prevalence and severity of lifetime physical and sexual victimization among incarcerated women. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 22, 301-322.
17.
BuiH. N.MorashM. (2010). The impact of network relationships, prison experiences, and internal transformation on women’s success after prison release. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49, 1-22.
18.
BurkeP.AdamsL. (1991). Classification for women offenders in state correctional facilities: A handbook for practitioners. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
19.
CaseyE. A.NuriusP. S. (2005). Trauma exposure and sexual revictimization risk: Comparisons across single, multiple incident, and multiple perpetrator victimizations. Violence Against Women, 11, 505-530.
20.
Chesney-LindM.SheldenR. G. (2004). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth.
CobbinaJ. E. (2010). Reintegration success and failure: Factors impacting reintegration among incarcerated and formerly incarcerated women. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49, 210-232.
23.
CovingtonS. (2000). Helping women recover: Creating gender-specific treatment for substance abusing women and girls in community corrections. In McMahonM. (Ed.), Assessment to assistance: Programs for women in community corrections (pp. 171-233). Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.
24.
CovingtonS. (2003). Beyond trauma: A healing journey for women. Center City, MN: Hazeldon.
25.
CovingtonS. (2008). Helping women recover: A program for treating substance abuse. Special edition for use in the criminal justice system. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26.
CovingtonS.BloomB. (2006). Gender responsive treatment and services in correctional settings. Women and Therapy, 29, 9-33.
27.
CovingtonS.BloomB. (2007). Gender-responsive treatment and services in correctional settings. In LeederE. (Ed.), Inside and out: Women, prison, and therapy (pp. 9-34). Binghamton, NY: Haworth.
28.
CovingtonS.SurreyJ. (1997). The relational model of women’s psychological development: Implications for substance abuse. In WilsnackS.WilsnackR. (Eds.), Gender and alcohol: Individual and social perspectives (pp. 335-351). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
29.
DalyK. (1992). Women’s pathways to felony court: Feminist theories of lawbreaking and problems of representation. Southern California Review of Law and Women’s Studies, 2, 11-52.
30.
DodgeM.PogrebinM. R. (2001). Collateral costs of imprisonment for women: Complications of reintegration. Prison Journal, 18, 42-54.
31.
ElliottD. E.BjelajacP.FallotR. D.MarkoffL. S.ReedB. G. (2005). Trauma-informed or trauma denied: Principles and implementation of trauma-informed services for women. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 461-477.
32.
FarrK. A. (2000). Classification for female inmates: Moving forward. Crime & Delinquency, 46, 3-17.
33.
FunkS. J. (1999). Risk assessment for juveniles on probation: A focus on gender. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 44-68.
34.
GavazziS.YarcheckC.Chesney-LindM. (2006). Global risk indicators and the role of gender in a juvenile detention sample. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 597-612.
35.
GendreauP. (1996). The principles of effective intervention with offenders. In HarlandA. T. (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 117-130). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
GreenB. L.MirandaJ.DaroowallaA.SiddiqueJ. (2005). Trauma exposure, mental health functioning, and programming needs of women in jail. Crime & Delinquency, 51, 133-151.
37.
GreenfeldL. A.SnellT. L. (1999). Bureau of Justice Statistics special report: Women offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
38.
GrellaC. E.SteinJ. A.GreenwellL. (2005). Associations among childhood trauma, adolescent problem behaviors, and adverse adult outcomes in substance-abusing women offenders. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19, 43-53.
39.
GuerinoP.HarrisonP. M.SabolW. J. (2011). Prisoners in 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
40.
HallE.PrendergastM.WellischJ.PattenM.CaoY. (2004). Treating drug-using women prisoners: An outcomes evaluation of the Forever Free program. Prison Journal, 84, 81-105.
41.
HardingB. G. (2002). Special issues in corrections: Staffing analysis for women’s prisons and special prison populations. Longmont, CO: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
42.
HardymanP. L.Van VoorhisP. (2004). Developing gender-specific classification systems for women offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
43.
HarrisM.FallotR. D. (2001). Envisioning a trauma-informed service system: A vital paradigm shift. In HarrisM.FallotR. D. (Eds.), Using trauma theory to design service systems (pp. 3-22). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
44.
HeilbrunK.DematteoD.FretzR.EricksonJ.YasuharaK.AnubaN. (2008). How “specific” are gender-specific rehabilitation needs? An empirical analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35,1382-1397.
45.
HendersonD. J. (1998). Drug abuse and incarcerated women: A research review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 15, 579-587.
46.
HolsingerA. M.LurigioA. J.LatessaE. J. (2001). Practitioner’s guide to understanding the basis of assessing offender risk. Federal Probation, 65, 46-50.
47.
HoltfreterK.MorashM. (2003). The needs of women offenders: Implications for correctional programming. Women & Criminal Justice, 14, 137-160.
48.
HoltfreterK.ReisigM. D.MorashM. (2004). Poverty, state capital, and recidivism among women offenders. Criminology and Public Policy, 3, 185-208.
49.
HouserK. A.BelenkoS.BrennanP. K. (in press). The effects of mental health and substance abuse disorders on insitutional misconduct among female inmates. Justice Quarterly.
50.
HubbardD. J.MatthewsB. (2008). Reconciling the differences between the “gender-responsive” and the “what works” literatures to improve services for girls. Crime & Delinquency, 54, 225-258.
51.
HuebnerB. M.DejongC.CobbinaJ. E. (2010). Women coming home: Long-term patterns of recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 27, 225-254.
52.
JamesD. J.GlazeL. E. (2006). Bureau of Justice Statistics special report: Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
53.
Janoff-BulmanR. (1992). Shattered assumptions: Toward a new psychology of trauma. New York: Free Press.
54.
JasinskiJ. L.WilliamsL. M.SiegelJ. (2000). Childhood physical and sexual abuse as risk factors for heavy drinking among African American women: A prospective study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 1061-1071.
55.
JavdaniS.SadehN.VeronaE. (2011). Gendered social forces: A review of the impact of institutionalized factors on women and girls’ criminal justice trajectories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17, 161-211.
56.
Koons-WittB. A.BurrowJ. D.MorashM.BynumT. (1997). Expert and offender perceptions of program elements linked to successful outcomes for incarcerated women. Crime & Delinquency, 43, 513-532.
57.
Koons-WittB. A.SchramP. J. (2003). The prevalence and nature of violent offending by females. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 361-371.
58.
LernerK.ArlingG.BairdS. C. (1986). Client management classification strategies for case supervision. Crime & Delinquency, 32, 254-271.
59.
LeverentzA. (2006). The love of a good man? Romantic relationships as a source of support or hindrance for female ex-offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 459-488.
60.
LinehanM. (1993). Cognitive behavioral therapy for borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford.
61.
LowenkampC. T.LatessaE. J. (2005). Increasing the effectiveness of correctional programming through the risk principle: Identifying offenders for residential placement. Criminology and Public Policy, 4, 263-290.
62.
MaherL. (1997). Sexed work: Gender, race, and resistance in a Brooklyn drug economy. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
63.
MakariosM. D. (2007). Race, abuse, and female criminal violence. Feminist Criminology, 2, 100-116.
64.
MaruschakL. M. (2008). Medical problems of prisoners. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Office, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
65.
MatthewsB.HubbardD. J. (2008). Moving ahead: Five essential elements for working effectively with girls. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 494-502.
66.
McClellanD. S.FarabeeD.CrouchB. M. (1997). Early victimization, drug use, and criminality: A comparison of male and female prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 455-476.
67.
McDaniels-WilsonC.BelknapJ. (2008). The extensive sexual violation and sexual abuse histories of incarcerated women. Violence Against Women, 14, 1090-1127.
68.
MessinaN.GrellaC. (2006). Childhood trauma and women’s health outcomes in a California prison population. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 1-8.
69.
MessinaN.GrellaC.BurdonW.PrendergastM. (2007). Childhood adverse events and current traumatic distress: A comparison of men and women drug-dependent prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1385-1401.
70.
MessinaN.GrellaC.CartierJ.TorresS. (2010). A randomized experimental study of gender-responsive substance abuse treatment for women in prison. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 38, 97-107.
71.
MillerJ. (1998). Up it up: Gender and the accomplishment of street robbery. Criminology, 36, 37-66.
72.
MillerW. R.RollnickS. (2002). Motivational interviewing. New York: Guilford.
73.
MilliganR.-J.AndrewB. (2005). Suicidal and other self-harming behaviour in offender women: The role of shame, anger, and childhood abuse. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 13-25.
74.
MonsterM.MicucciA. (2005). Meeting rehabilitative needs at a Canadian women’s correctional centre. Prison Journal, 85, 168-185.
75.
MorashM.HaarrR. N.RuckerL. (1994). A comparison of programming for women and men in US prisons in the 1980s. Crime & Delinquency, 40, 197-221.
76.
MosesM. (1993, August). Girl Scouts Behind Bars: New program at women’s prison benefits mothers and children. Corrections Today, pp. 132-135.
77.
MosesM. (1995). Keeping incarcerated mothers and their daughters together: Girl Scouts Behind Bars. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
78.
MumolaC. J. (2000). Bureau of Justice Statistics special report: Incarcerated mothers and their children. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
79.
MumolaC. J.KarbergJ. C. (2006). Bureau of Justice Statistics special report: Drug use and dependence, state and federal prisoners, 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
80.
NajavitzL. M. (2002a). “Seeking safety”: Therapy for trauma and substance abuse. Corrections Today, 64, 136-141.
81.
NajavitzL. M. (2002b). Seeking safety: A treatment manual for PTSD and substance abuse. New York: Guilford.
82.
NeffJ. L.WaiteD. E. (2007). Male versus female substance abuse patterns among incarcerated juvenile offenders: Comparing strain and social learning variables. Justice Quarterly, 24, 106-132.
83.
O’BrienP. (2001). Making it in the “free world”: Women in transition from prison. Albany: State University of New York Press.
84.
OwenB. (1998). In the mix: Struggle and survival in a woman’s prison. Albany: State University of New York Press.
85.
OwenB.BloomB. (1995). Profiling women prisoners: Findings from national surveys and a California sample. Prison Journal, 75, 165-185.
86.
PollockJ. M. (2002a). Parenting programs in women’s prisons. Women & Criminal Justice, 14, 131-154.
87.
PollockJ. M. (2002b). Women, prison, and crime (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thompson Learning.
88.
ReisigM. D.HoltfreterK.MorashM. (2002). Social capital among women offenders: Examining distribution of social networks and resources. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 18, 167-187.
89.
ReisigM. D.HoltfreterK.MorashM. (2006). Assessing recidivism risk across female pathways to crime. Justice Quarterly, 23, 384-405.
90.
RettingerL. J.AndrewsD. A. (2010). General risk and need, gender specificity, and the recidivism of female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 29-46.
91.
RichieB. (2001). Challenges incarcerated women face as they return to their communities: Findings from life history interviews. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 368-389.
92.
SalisburyE. J.Van VoorhisP. (2009). Gendered pathways: A quantitative investigation of women probationers’ paths to incarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 541-566.
93.
SalisburyE. J.Van VoorhisP.SpiropoulosG. (2009). The predictive validity of a gender-responsive needs assessment: An exploratory study. Crime & Delinquency, 55, 550-585.
94.
SchramP. J. (2003). Stereotypes and vocational programming for women prisoners. In SharpS. F. (Ed.), The incarcerated woman: Rehabilitative programming in women’s prisons (pp. 17-28). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
95.
SchramP. J.Koons-WittB. A.MorashM. (2004). Management strategies when working with female prisoners. Women & Criminal Justice, 15, 25-50.
96.
SchramP. J.Koons-WittB. A.WilliamsF. P.McShaneM. D. (2006). Supervision strategies and approaches for female parolees: Examining the link between unmet needs and parolee outcome. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 450-471.
97.
SharpS. F. (2003). Mothers in prison: Issues in parent-child contact. In SharpS. F. (Ed.), The incarcerated woman: Rehabilitative programming in women’s prisons (pp. 151-166). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
98.
ShowersJ. (1993). Assessing and remedying parenting knowledge among women inmates. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 20, 35-46.
99.
SmithP.CullenF. T.LatessaE. J. (2009). Can 14,737 women be wrong? A meta-analysis of the LSI-R and recidivism for female offenders. Criminology and Public Policy, 8, 183-208.
100.
SteffensmeierD.AllanE. (1998). The nature of female offending: Patterns and explanation. In ZaplinR. T. (Ed.), Female offenders: Critical perspectives and effective interventions (pp. 5-29). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
101.
SteinerB.WooldredgeJ. (2009). Individual and environmental effects on assaults and nonviolent rule breaking by women in prison. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46, 437-467.
102.
TaylorK. N.BlanchetteK. (2009). The women are not wrong: It is the approach that is debatable. Criminology and Public Policy, 8, 221-229.
103.
Van DietenM. (1998). Moving on. Toronto, Canada: Orbis Partners.
104.
Van VoorhisP.BraswellM.LesterD. (2009). Correctional counseling and rehabilitation. New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis.
105.
Van VoorhisP.SalisburyE. J.WrightE. M.BaumanA. (2008). Achieving accurate pictures of risk and identifying gender-responsive deeds: Two new assessments for women offenders. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
106.
Van VoorhisP.WrightE. M.SalisburyE. J.BaumanA. (2010). Women’s risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of a gender-responsive supplement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 261-288.
107.
WestH. C.SabolW. J.GreenmanS. J. (2010). Prisoners in 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
108.
WidomC. S. (1989). Child abuse, neglect, and violent criminal behavior. Criminology, 27, 251-271.
109.
WidomC. S.MarmorsteinN. R.WhiteH. R. (2006). Childhood victimization and illicit drug use in middle adulthood. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20, 394-403.
110.
WrightE. M.FaganA. A. (2012). Exposure to intimate partner violence: Does the gender of the perpetrator matter for adolescent mental health outcomes?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 26-41.
111.
WrightE. M.SalisburyE. J.Van VoorhisP. (2007). Predicting the prison misconducts of women offenders: The importance of gender-responsive needs. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23, 310-340.
112.
WrightE. M.Van VoorhisP.BaumanA.SalisburyE. J. (2008). Gender-responsive risk/needs assessment: Final report prepared for the Minnesota Department of Corrections. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati Center for Criminal Justice Research.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
