A growing body of scholarship faults existing risk/needs assessment models for neglecting the risk factors most relevant to women offenders. In response, a series of gender-responsive assessment models were tested for their contributions to widely used gender-neutral risk needs assessments. In six of eight samples studied, subsets of the gender-responsive scales achieved statistically significant contributions to gender-neutral models. Promising results were found for the following: (a) parental stress, family support, self-efficacy, educational assets, housing safety, anger/hostility, and current mental health factors in probation samples; (b) child abuse, anger/hostility, relationship dysfunction, family support, and current mental health factors among prisoners; and (c) adult victimization, anger/hostility, educational assets, and family support among released inmates. The predictive validity of gender-neutral assessments was strong in seven of eight samples studied. However, findings for both gender-neutral and gender-responsive domains suggested different treatment priorities for women from those currently put forward in correctional theory and policy.
Andrews, D.A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R.D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F.T. ( 1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically-relevant and psychologically-informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
8.
Andrews, D.A., Dowden, C., & Rettinger, L.J. (2001). Special populations within corrections. In J. A. Winterdyck (Ed.), Corrections in Canada: Social reactions to crime (pp. 170-212). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Prentice Hall.
9.
Austin, J., Bruce, M.A., Carroll, L., McCall, P.L., & Richards, S.C. (2001). The use of incarceration in the United States: American Society of Criminology National Policy Committee . Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 10, 17-41.
10.
Avison, W.R., & Turner, R.J. ( 1986). Screening for problem parenting: Preliminary evidence on a promising measure. International Journal of Child Abuse and Neglect, 10(2), 157-170.
11.
Beattie, M. ( 1987). Codependent no more. New York : Harper/Hazelden.
12.
Belknap, J. ( 2007). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth.
13.
Belknap, J., Fisher, B., & Cullen, F.T. ( 1999). The development of a comprehensive measure of the sexual victimization of college women. Violence Against Women, 5, 185-214.
14.
Belknap, J., & Holsinger, K. ( 2006). The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency . Feminist Criminology, 1, 48-71.
15.
Benda, B.B. ( 2005). Gender differences in life-course theory of recidivism: A survival analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 325-342.
16.
Bepko, C., & Krestan, J. ( 1985). The responsibility trap: A blueprint for treating the alcoholic family. New York: Macmillan .
17.
Blanchette, K. ( 1996). The relationship between criminal history, mental disorder, and recidivism among federally sentenced female offenders. Unpublished master’s thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
18.
Blanchette, K. ( 2004). Revisiting effective classification strategies for women offenders in Canada. Feminism & Psychology, 14, 231-236.
19.
Blanchette, K. ( 2005). Field-test of a gender-informed security reclassification scale for female offenders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
20.
Blanchette, K., & Brown, S.L. ( 2006). The assessment and treatment of women offenders: An integrative perspective. Chichester, UK: Wiley .
21.
Blanchette, K., & Motiuk, L.L. ( 1995). Female offender risk assessment: The case management strategies approach. Poster session presented at the Annual Convention of the Canadian Psychological Association, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island.
22.
Block, K., & Potthast, M. ( 1998). Girl Scouts beyond bars: Facilitating parent-child contact in correctional settings. Child Welfare, 77, 561-578.
23.
Bloom, B., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2000). Women in prison: Vengeful equity. In R. Muraskin (Ed.), It’s a crime: Women and justice (pp. 183-204). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, S. ( 2003). Gender-responsive strategies: Research practice and guiding principles for women offenders. Washington, DC: USDOJ, National Institute of Corrections.
25.
Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, S. ( 2004). Women offenders and the gendered effects of public policy . Review of Policy Research, 21, 31-48.
26.
Blume, S. ( 1997). Women: Clinical aspects. In J. Lowinson, P. Ruiz , A. Milkman, & J. Langrod (Eds.), Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook (pp. 645-654). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
27.
Bonta, J. ( 1989). Native inmates: Institutional responses, risks, and needs . Canadian Journal of Criminology, 31, 49-62.
28.
Bonta, J., & Motiuk, L.L. ( 1987). The diversion of incarcerated offenders to correctional halfway houses. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency , 24, 302-323.
29.
Bonta, J., & Motiuk, L.L. ( 1990). Classification to correctional halfway houses: A quasi-experimental evaluation. Criminology, 28, 497-506.
Bonta, J., Pang, B., & Wallace-Capretta, S. (1995). Predictors of recidivism among incarcerated female offenders. The Prison Journal, 75, 277-294.
32.
Brennan, T. ( 1998). Institutional classification of females: Problems and some proposals for reform. In R. T. Zaplin (Ed.), Female offenders: Critical perspectives and effective interventions (pp. 179-204). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
33.
Brennan, T., & Austin, J. ( 1997). Women in jail: Classification issues. Washington, DC: USDOJ, National Institute of Corrections .
34.
Brennan, T., Dieterich, W., & Ehret, B. ( 2009). Evaluating the predictive validity of the COMPAS risk and needs assessment system. Criminal Justice & Behavior , 36, 21-40.
35.
Brennan, T., Dieterich, W., & Oliver, W. ( 2006). COMPAS: Technical manual and psychometric report Version 5.0. Traverse City, MI: Northpointe Institute.
36.
Brown, S.L., & Motiuk, L.L. ( 2005). The Dynamic Factor Identification and Analysis (DFIA) component of the Offender Intake Assessment (OIA) process: A meta-analytic, psychometric, and consultative review (Research Report R-164). Ottawa, Ontario: Correctional Service Canada.
37.
Browne, A., Miller, B., & Maguin, E. ( 1999). Prevalence and severity of lifetime physical and sexual victimization among incarcerated women. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 22, 301-322.
38.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999). Special report: Women offenders. Washington, DC : USDOJ.
39.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2000). Incarcerated parents and their children. Washington, DC : USDOJ.
40.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2006). Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. Washington, DC: USDOJ.
41.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2007). Prisoners in 2006. Washington, DC: USDOJ.
42.
Burke, P. ( 2008). TPC reentry handbook: Implementing the NIC transition from prison to community model. Washington, DC: USDOJ, National Institute of Corrections.
43.
Bush-Baskette, S. ( 1999). The war on drugs: A war against women? In S. Cook & S. Davies (Eds.), Harsh punishment: International experiences of women’s imprisonment (pp. 216-217). Boston: Northeastern University Press.
44.
Campbell, D., Campbell, J., King, C., Parker, B., & Ryan, J. ( 1994). The reliability and factor structure of the Index of Spouse Abuse with African-American women. Violence & Victims , 9, 259-274.
45.
Carlson, J. ( 2001). Prison nursery 2000: A five-year review of the prison nursery at the Nebraska Correctional Center for Women. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 33, 75-97.
46.
Carp, S.V., & Schade, L. ( 1992, August). Tailoring facility programming to suit female offenders’ needs. Corrections Today, 154-158.
47.
Case, P., & Fasenfest, D. ( 2004). Expectations for opportunities following prison education: A discussion of race and gender. Journal of Correctional Education , 55, 24-39.
48.
Chandler, S.M., & Kassebaum, G. ( 1994). Drug-alcohol dependence of women prisoners in Hawaii . Affilia, 9, 157-170.
49.
Chesney-Lind, M. ( 1997). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
Chesney-Lind, M., & Rodriguez, N. ( 1983). Women under lock and key. Prison Journal , 63, 47-65.
51.
Chesney-Lind, M., & Shelden, R.G. ( 2004). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth.
52.
Coleman, F.L. ( 1997). Stalking behavior and the cycle of domestic violence . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 420-432.
53.
Coulson, G., Ilacqua, G., Nutbrown, V., Giulekas, D., & Cudjoe, F. ( 1996). Predictive utility of the LSI for incarcerated female offenders. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 23, 427-439.
54.
Covington, S. ( 1998). The relational theory of women’s psychological development: Implications for the criminal justice system. In R. T. Zaplin (Ed.), Female offenders: Critical perspectives and effective interventions (pp. 113-128). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishing.
55.
Covington, S. ( 2000). Helping women to recover: Creating gender-specific treatment for substance-abusing women and girls in community corrections. In M. McMahon (Ed.), Assessment to assistance: Programs for women in community corrections (pp. 171-233). Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.
56.
Covington, S. ( 2002). Helping women recover: Creating gender-responsive treatment . In S. Straussner & S. Brown (Eds.), The handbook of addiction treatment for women: Theory and practice. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
57.
Covington, S., & Bloom, B. ( 2007). Gender-responsive treatment and services in correctional settings. In E. Leeder (Ed.), Inside and out: Women, prison, and therapy. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
58.
Crowley, J.D., & Dill, D. ( 1992). Silencing the Self Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 97-106.
59.
Cullen, F., & Gendreau, P. ( 2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation. In J. Horney (Ed.), Criminal Justice 2000: Vol 3. Policies, processes, decisions of the criminal justice system . Washington, DC: USDOJ, National Institute of Justice .
60.
Daly, K. ( 1992). Women’s pathways to felony court: Feminist theories of lawbreaking and problems of representation. Southern California Review of Law and Women’s Studies, 2, 11-52.
61.
Daly, K. ( 1994). Gender, crime, and punishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
62.
Dowden, C., & Andrews, D.A. ( 1999). What works for female offenders: A meta-analytic review . Crime & Delinquency, 45, 438-452.
Funk, S. ( 1999). Risk assessment for juveniles on probation: A focus on gender. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 26, 44-68.
67.
Gavazzi, S., Yarcheck, C., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2006). Global risk indicators and the role of gender in a juvenile detention sample. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 33, 597-612.
68.
Gehring, K., Van Voorhis, P., & Bell, V. (2010). "What Works" for female probationers?: An evaluation of the Moving On Program. Women, Girls, and Criminal Justice , 11, 1, 6-10.
69.
Gendreau, P. ( 1996). The principles of effective intervention with offenders . In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 117-130). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70.
Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. ( 1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!Criminology, 34, 575-607.
71.
Gilligan, C. ( 1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72.
Hall, E., Prendergast, M., Wellisch, J., Patten, M., & Cao, Y. ( 2004). Treating drug-using women prisoners: An outcome evaluation of the Forever Free program. The Prison Journal , 84, 81-105.
73.
Hannah-Moffat, K. ( 2004). Gendering risk: At what cost? Negotiations of gender and risk in Canadian women’s prisons. Feminism & Psychology, 14, 243-249.
74.
Hannah-Moffat, K. ( 2009). Gridlock or mutability: Reconsidering gender and risk assessment. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 209-219.
75.
Hardyman, P.L., Austin, J., & Tulloch, O.C. ( 2002). Revalidating external prison classification systems: The experience of ten states and model for classification reform. Washington, DC: USDOJ, National Institute of Corrections .
76.
Hardyman, P.L., & Van Voorhis, P. (2004). Developing gender-specific classification systems for women offenders. Washington, DC: USDOJ, National Institute of Corrections.
77.
Harm, N., Thompson, P., & Chambers, H. ( 1998). The effectiveness of parent education for substance abusing women offenders. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 16, 63-77.
78.
Hein, D., Cohen, L., Litt, L., Miele, G., & Capstick, C. ( 2004). Promising empirically supported treatments for women with comorbid PTSD and substance use disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 1426-1432.
79.
Hewitt, J., Poole, E., & Regoli, R. ( 1984). Self-reported and observed rule breaking in prison: A look at disciplinary response. Justice Quarterly, 3, 437-448.
80.
Holsinger, A.M., Lowenkamp, C.T., & Latessa, E.J. ( 2003). Ethnicity, gender, and the Level of Service Inventory- Revised. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 309-320.
81.
Holsinger, K. ( 2000). Feminist perspectives on female offending: Examining real girls’ lives. Women & Criminal Justice, 12, 23-51.
82.
Holsinger, K., Belknap, J., & Sutherland, J. (1999). Assessing the gender specific program and service needs for adolescent females in the juvenile justice system . Report presented to the State of Ohio’s Office of Criminal Justice Services, November.
83.
Holtfreter, K., & Morash, M. ( 2003). The needs of women offenders: Implications for correctional programming. Women & Criminal Justice, 14, 137-160.
84.
Holtfreter, K., Reisig, M.D., & Morash, M. ( 2004). Poverty, state capital, and recidivism among women offenders . Criminology & Public Policy, 3, 185-208.
85.
Houck, K.D.F., & Loper, A.B. ( 2002). The relationship of parenting stress to adjustment among mothers in prison. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry , 72, 548-558.
86.
Hubbard, D.J., & Pratt, T.C. ( 2002). A meta-analysis of the predictors of delinquency among girls. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 34(3), 1-13.
87.
Kaplan, A.G. ( 1984). The "self in relation": Implications for depression in women (Publication No. 14). Wellesley, MA: Stone Center.
88.
Kessler, R. ( 1998). Sex differences in DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: Results from the national co-morbidity survey. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 53, 142-155.
89.
Koons, B.A., Burrow, J.D., Morash, M., & Bynum, T. ( 1997). Expert and offender perceptions of program elements linked to successful outcomes for incarcerated women. Crime & Delinquency, 43, 515-532.
90.
Kroner, D.G., & Mills, J.F. ( 2001). The accuracy of five risk appraisal instruments in predicting institutional misconduct and new convictions. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 28, 471-489.
91.
Langan, N.P., & Pelissier, B. ( 2001). Gender differences among prisoners in drug treatment . Journal of Substance Abuse, 13, 291-301.
92.
Law, M.A., Sullivan, S.M., & Goggin, C. (in press). Security classification measures for female offenders and predictors of female criminal conduct: A literature review. Ottawa, Ontario: Correctional Service Canada.
93.
Lipsey, M. ( 2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims & Offenders, 4, 124-147.
94.
Loucks, A.D. ( 1995). Criminal behaviour, violent behaviour, and prison maladjustment in federal female offenders. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario , Canada.
95.
Lowenkamp, C.T., Holsinger, A.M., & Latessa, E.J. ( 2001). Risk/need assessment, offender classification, and the role of childhood abuse. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 28, 543-563.
96.
MacKenzie, D. ( 2006). What works in corrections: Reducing the criminal activities of offenders and delinquents. New York: Cambridge University Press.
97.
Makarios, M. ( 2007). Race, abuse, and female criminal violence. Feminist Criminology, 2, 100-116.
98.
Mauer, M., Potler, C., & Wolf, R. ( 1999). Gender and justice: Women, drugs and sentencing policy . Washington, DC: Sentencing Project .
99.
McClellan, D.S., Farabee, D., & Crouch, B.M. ( 1997). Early victimization, drug use, and criminality: A comparison of male and female prisoners. Criminal Justice & Behavior , 24, 455-476.
100.
McKeown, M. ( 1993). An evaluative study of the extended visits scheme . Issues in Criminological & Legal Psychology, 20, 32-40.
101.
Miller, J.B. ( 1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.
102.
Miller, J., & Stiver, I. ( 1997). The healing connection: How women form relationships in therapy and life. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley Centers for Women.
103.
Morash, M. ( 2009). A great debate over using the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) with women offenders. Criminology & Public Policy , 8, 173-181.
104.
Morash, M., Bynum, T.S., & Koons, B.A. ( 1998). Women offenders: Programming needs and promising approaches . Washington, DC: USDOJ, National Institute of Justice.
105.
Motiuk, M.S., Motiuk, L.L., & Bonta, J. ( 1992). A comparison between self-report and interview-based inventories in offender classification. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 19, 143-159.
106.
Murphy, C., & Hoover, S. ( 1999). Measuring emotional abuse in dating relationships as a multifactorial construct. Violence & Victims, 14, 39-53.
107.
Najavits, L., Gallop, R., & Weiss, R. ( 2006). Seeking safety therapy for adolescent girls with PTSD and substance abuse: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 33, 453-463.
108.
Najavits, L., Weiss, R., Shaw, S., & Muenz, L. ( 1998). Seeking safety: Outcomes of a new cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy for women with posttraumatic stress disorder and substance dependence . Journal of Traumatic Stress, 11, 437-456.
109.
Neff, J., & Waite, D. ( 2007). Male versus female substance abuse patterns among incarcerated juvenile offenders: Comparing strain and social learning variables . Justice Quarterly, 24, 106-132.
110.
Olds, D., Robinson, J., Pettitt, L., Luckey, D., Holmberg, J., Ng, R., et al. (2004). Effects of home visits by paraprofessionals and by nurses: Age 4 follow-up results of a randomized trial. Pediatrics, 114, 1560-1568.
111.
Olson, D.E., Alderden, M., & Lurigio, A.J. ( 2003). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus, but what role does gender play in probation recidivism?Justice Research & Policy, 5, 33-54.
112.
Owen, B. ( 1998). In the mix: Struggle and survival in a woman’s prison. Albany: State University of New York Press.
113.
Owen, B., & Bloom, B. ( 1995). Profiling the needs of California’s female prisoners: A needs assessment. Washington, DC: USDOJ, National Institute of Corrections.
114.
Peters, R.H., Strozier, A.L., Murrin, M.R., & Kearns, W.D. ( 1997). Treatment of substance abusing jail inmates: Examination of gender differences. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment , 14, 339-349.
115.
Piquero, A.R., Farrington, D.P., Welsh, B.C., Tremblay, R., & Jennings, W.G. (2009). Effects of early family/parent training programs on antisocial behavior and delinquency. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5, 83-120.
116.
Pollock, J. ( 1999). Criminal women. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
117.
Pollock, J. ( 2002). Women, prison, and crime (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole .
118.
Prendergast, M., Wellisch, J., & Falkin, G. ( 1995). Assessment of services for substance-abusing women offenders and correctional settings. Prison Journal, 75, 240-256.
119.
Quinsey, V., Harris, G., Rice, M., & Cormier, C. ( 1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
120.
Reisig, M.D., Holtfreter, K., & Morash, M. ( 2006). Assessing recidivism risk across female pathways to crime . Justice Quarterly, 23, 384-405.
121.
Rettinger, L.J. ( 1998). A recidivism follow-up study investigating risk and need within a sample of provincially sentenced women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Carleton University, Ottawa , Canada.
122.
Richie, B. ( 1996). Compelled to crime: The gendered entrapment of battered black women. New York: Routledge .
123.
Robertson, K., & Murachver, T. ( 2007). Correlates of partner violence for incarcerated women and men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 639-655.
124.
Rodenberg, F., & Fantuzzo, J. ( 1993). The measure of wife abuse: Steps toward the development of a comprehensive assessment technique. Journal of Family Violence, 8, 203-228.
125.
Roehling, P., & Gaumond, E. ( 1996). Reliability and validity of the Codependent Questionnaire . Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 14, 85-95.
126.
Rosenberg, M. ( 1979). The concept of self. New York : Basic Books.
127.
Ross, T., Khashu, A., & Wamsley, M. ( 2004). Hard data on hard times: An empirical analysis of maternal incarceration, foster care, and visitation. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
128.
Rumgay, J. ( 2004). Scripts for safer survival: Pathways out of female crime . Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 405-419.
129.
Salisbury, E. ( 2007). Gendered pathways: An empirical investigation of women offenders’ unique paths to crime. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Cincinnati.
130.
Salisbury, E., Van Voorhis, P., & Spiropoulis, G. (2009). The predictive validity of a gender-responsive risk/needs assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 55, 550-585.
131.
Salisbury, E.J., & Van Voorhis, P. (2009). Gendered pathways: An empirical investigation of women probationers’ paths to incarceration . Criminal Justice & Behavior, 36, 541-566.
132.
Schram, P.J., & Morash, M. ( 2002). Evaluation of a life skills program for women inmates in Michigan. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 34, 47-70.
133.
Seligman, M. ( 2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Free Press.
134.
Shepard, M., & Campbell, J. ( 1992). The Abusive Behavior Inventory: A measure of psychological and physical abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 291-305.
135.
Sherer, M., Maddux, J.E., Mercadante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R.W. ( 1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation . Psychological Reports, 51, 663-671.
136.
Sherman, L., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. ( 1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. Washington, DC: USDOJ, National Institute of Justice.
137.
Shields, I.W., & Simourd, D.J. ( 1991). Predicting predatory behavior in a population of incarcerated young offenders. Criminal Justice & Behavior , 18, 180-194.
138.
Showers, J. ( 1993). Assessing and remedying parenting knowledge among women inmates. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 20, 35-46.
139.
Siegel, J.A., & Williams, L.M. (2003). The relationship between child sexual abuse and female delinquency and crime: A prospective study. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 40, 71-94.
140.
Simourd, L., & Andrews, D.A. ( 1994). Correlates of delinquency: A look at gender differences . Forum on Corrections Research, 6, 26-31.
141.
Smart, C. ( 1982). The new female offender: Reality or myth? In B. Price & N. Sokoloff (Eds.), The criminal justice system and women (pp. 105-116). New York: Clark Boardman.
142.
Smith, P., Cullen, F., & Latessa, E. ( 2009). Can 14,737 women be wrong? A meta-analysis of the LSI-R and recidivism for female offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 183-208.
143.
Snyder-Joy, Z., & Carlo, T. ( 1998). Parenting through prison walls: Incarcerated mothers and children’s visitation programs. In S. Miller (Ed.), Crime control and women: Feminist implications of criminal justice policy (pp. 130-150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
144.
Sorbello, L., Eccleston, L., Ward, T., & Jones, R. ( 2002). Treatment needs of female offenders: A review . Australian Psychologist, 37, 198-205.
145.
Spann, L., Fischer, J.L., & Crawford, D. ( 1991). Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale. In J. Ridley, An investigation of prevalence of codependency personalities who enter nursing rather than other health care-related fields. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Walden University .
146.
State of New York Department of Correctional Services. ( 2002). Profile and three-year follow-up on Bedford Hills and Taconic nursery program participants; 1997 & 1998. Albany, NY: DCS, Division of Program Planning, Research and Evaluation.
147.
Steffensmeier, D., & Allan, E. ( 1996). Gender and crime: Toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 459-487.
148.
Swets, J., Dawes, R., & Monahan, J. ( 2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions . Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 1-26.
149.
Task Force on Federally Sentenced Women. ( 1990). Creating choices: The report of the Task Force on Federally Sentenced Women. Ottawa, Ontario: Ministry of the Solicitor General Canada.
150.
Taylor, K., & Blanchette, K. (2009). The women are not wrong: It is the approach that is debatable. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 221-229.
151.
Tuerk, E.H., & Loper, A.B. ( 2006). Contact between incarcerated mothers and their children: Assessing parenting stress. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation , 43, 23-43.
152.
Van Voorhis, P. ( 1994). Measuring prison disciplinary problems: A multiple indicators approach to understanding prison adjustment. Justice Quarterly , 11(4), 679-709.
153.
Van Voorhis, P., Bauman, A., Wright, E., & Salisbury, E. ( 2009). Implementing the Women’ Risk/Needs Assessments (WRNAs); Early lessons from the field. Women, Girls, and Criminal Justice, 10(6), 81-82, 89-91.
154.
Van Voorhis, P., & Presser, L. ( 2001). Classification of women offenders: A national assessment of current practices. Washington, DC: USDOJ, National Institute of Corrections.
155.
Van Voorhis, P., Salisbury E., Bauman, A., Holsinger, K., & Wright, E. ( 2008). Classifying women offenders: Achieving accurate pictures of risk and identifying gender-responsive needs. In B. Bloom (Ed.), ICCA 2007 Plenary Addresses . Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.
156.
Van Wormer, K. ( 2001). Counseling female offenders and victims: A strengths-restorative approach. New York: Springer.
157.
Veysey, B. ( 1997). Specific needs of women diagnosed with mental illnesses in U.S. jails. Delmar, NY: National GAINS Center Policy Research.
Woititz, J. ( 1983). Adult children of alcoholics. Hollywood, FL: Health Communications.
160.
Women’s Prison Association. (2009). Mothers, infants and imprisonment: A national look at prison nurseries and community-based alternatives. New York: Women’s Prison Association.
161.
Wright, E., Salisbury, E., & Van Voorhis, P. (2007). Predicting the prison misconducts of women offenders: The importance of gender-responsive needs . Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23(4), 310-340.
162.
Wright, E., Van Voorhis, P., Bauman, A., & Salisbury, E.J. (2008). Results of Minnesota gender-responsive classification study. Cincinnati, OH : University of Cincinnati Center for Criminal Justice Research.
163.
Wright, E., Van Voorhis, P., Salisbury, E.J., & Bauman, A. ( 2009). Gender-responsive prisons: Lessons from the NIC/UC gender responsive classification project. Women, Girls, & Criminal Justice, 10(6), 85-87, 95-96.
