Entertainment Contributes to Adaptive Coping: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Interplay Between Hedonic and Eudaimonic Entertainment,Escapism,and Meaning Making

Abstract

Traditionally, research has focused on investigating short-term effects of entertainment media use. This paper, however, takes a salutogenetic perspective in exploring the potential long-term effects of entertainment use on meaning making as an adaptive coping skill. We propose three theoretical pathways explaining potential effects of hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment, as well as escapist media use on meaning making—through vicarious experiences of adversity, experiencing positive affect, and distraction. In two preregistered longitudinal studies with varying time intervals (6 months, weekly, and daily observations), both hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment use showed positive within-person relationships with meaning making daily and weekly, but not over 6 months. Escapist media use negatively predicted meaning making across all time intervals. Additionally, vicarious experience and positive affect, but not distraction, mediated these effects. Our findings shed light on temporal dynamics of entertainment use and emphasize its role in fostering meaning making.

Keywords

hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment meaning making escapism meaning in life coping longitudinal random-intercept cross-lagged panel model multilevel models

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

D. R.

Collins

P. A.

Schmitt

K. L.

Jacobvitz

R. S.

(1996). Stressful life events and television viewing. Communication Research, 23(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023003001

Bandura

(2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0303_03

Barr

D. J.

Levy

Scheepers

Tily

H. J.

(2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001

Bartsch

Hartmann

(2017). The role of cognitive and affective challenge in entertainment experience. Communication Research, 44(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565921

Bartsch

Kalch

Oliver

M. B.

(2014). Moved to think: The role of emotional media experiences in stimulating reflective thoughts. Journal of Media Psychology, 26(3), 125–140. https://doi.org/10/gmddcs

Bates

Mächler

Bolker

Walker

(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10/gcrnkw

Bell

Fairbrother

Jones

(2019). Fixed and random effects models: Making an informed choice. Quality & Quantity, 53(2), 1051–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0802-x

Bonus

J. A.

Peebles

Mares

M.-L.

Sarmiento

I. G.

(2018). Look on the bright side (of media effects): Pokémon Go as a catalyst for positive life experiences. Media Psychology, 21(2), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1305280

Bonus

J. A.

Watts

Francemone

C. J.

(2022). When “meaningless” means more: Biographic resonance and audience appreciation of popular entertainment. Journal of Communication, 72(6), 647–660. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac028

10.

Carver

C. S.

(1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92–100. https://doi.org/10/d2jv23

11.

Carver

C. S.

Scheier

M. F.

Weintraub

J. K.

(1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10/c98n64

12.

de Graaf

Das

. (2023). Portrayals of threatened needs and human virtue: A review of the content of eudaimonic entertainment. Annals of the International Communication Association, 47(1), 55–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2022.2130811

13.

de Leeuw

R. N. H.

Weijers

Ahle

A.-M.

Daalmans

. (2024). How stories in the media can be meaningful in children’s lives. Media Psychology, 27(4), 479–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2023.2247322

14.

Diener

Wirtz

Tov

Kim-Prieto

Choi

D. W.

Oishi

Biswas-Diener

(2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y

15.

Folkman

(1997). Positive psychological states and coping with severe stress. Social Science & Medicine, 45(8), 1207–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00040-3

16.

Folkman

Moskowitz

J. T.

(2007). Positive affect and meaning-focused coping during significant psychological stress. In Hewstone

Schut

de Wit

Van Den Bos

Stroebe

(Eds.), The scope of social psychology: Theory and applications (pp. 193–208). Psychology Press.

17.

Fredrickson

B. L.

(1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300–319. https://doi.org/10/bkc3tg

18.

Fredrickson

B. L.

(2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/d2mt85

19.

Green

M. C.

Brock

T. C.

(2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10/bkr5dt

20.

Halfmann

Reinecke

(2021). Binge-watching as case of escapist entertainment use. In Vorderer

Klimmt

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 180–203). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190072216.013.11

21.

Hamaker

E. L.

Kuiper

R. M.

Grasman

R. P.

(2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/f67cvh

22.

Heine

S. J.

Proulx

Vohs

K. D.

(2006). The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), 88–110. https://doi.org/10/c59ncp

23.

Heintzelman

S. J.

King

L. A.

(2014). (The feeling of) meaning-as-information. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10/f5xx38

24.

Hooker

S. A.

Masters

K. S.

Park

C. L.

(2018). A meaningful life is a healthy life: A conceptual model linking meaning and meaning salience to health. Review of General Psychology, 22(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000115

25.

Huta

(2017). An overview of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being concepts. In Reinecke

Oliver

M. B.

(Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being (pp. 14–33). Routledge.

26.

Janicke-Bowles

S. H.

(2025). Introducing the transcendent media experience model (TMEM). Communication Research, 52(4), 427–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502241287830

27.

Janicke-Bowles

S. H.

Raney

A. A.

Oliver

M. B.

Dale

K. R.

Jones

R. P.

Cox

(2021). Exploring the spirit in U.S. audiences: The role of the virtue of transcendence in inspiring media consumption. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(2), 428–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019894927

28.

Janicke-Bowles

S. H.

Raney

A. A.

Oliver

M. B.

Dale

K. R.

Zhao

Neumann

Clayton

R. B.

Hendry

A. A.

(2022). Inspiration on social media: Applying an entertainment perspective to longitudinally explore mental health and well-being. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.5817/cp2022-2-1

29.

Kalisch

Müller

M. B.

Tüscher

(2015). A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1400082X

30.

Kashdan

T. B.

Steger

M. F.

(2007). Curiosity and pathways to well-being and meaning in life: Traits, states, and everyday behaviors. Motivation and Emotion, 31(3), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-007-9068-7

31.

Katz

Foulkes

(1962). On the use of the mass media as “escape”: Clarification of a concept. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(3), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1086/267111

32.

King

L. A.

Hicks

J. A.

(2021). The science of meaning in life. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 561–584. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-072420-122921

33.

King

L. A.

Hicks

J. A.

Krull

J. L.

Del Gaiso

A. K.

(2006). Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 179–196. https://doi.org/10/dj9bb4

34.

Kline

R. B.

(Ed.). (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.

35.

Knobloch-Westerwick

Hastall

M. R.

Rossmann

(2009). Coping or escaping? Effects of life dissatisfaction on selective exposure. Communication Research, 36(2), 207–228. https://doi.org/10/bd9fqm

36.

Lazarus

R. S.

Folkman

(1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.

37.

Lockwood

Shaughnessy

S. C.

Fortune

J. L.

Tong

M.-O.

(2012). Social comparisons in novel situations: Finding inspiration during life transitions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(8), 985–996. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212447234

38.

Martela

Steger

M. F.

(2016). The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1137623

39.

Meier

Meltzer

C. E.

Reinecke

(2018). Coping with stress or losing control? Facebook-induced strains among emerging adults as a consequence of escapism versus procrastination. In Kühne

Baumgartner

S. E.

Koch

Hofer

(Eds.), Youth and media: Current perspectives on media use and effects (pp. 167–186). Nomos.

40.

Nabi

R. L.

Demetriades

Walter

(2023). Can a video a day keep stress away? A test of media prescriptions. Health Communication, 38(13), 3080–3090. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2134700

41.

Nabi

R. L.

Demetriades

Walter

Wang

(2024). Media prescriptions for goal achievement: The differential effect of inspiring versus humorous content. Psychology of Popular Media, 13(2), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000448

42.

Neubaum

Krämer

N. C.

Alt

(2020). Psychological effects of repeated exposure to elevating entertainment: An experiment over the period of 6 weeks. Psychology of Popular Media, 9(2), 194–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000235

43.

Oliver

M. B.

(1993). Exploring the paradox of the enjoyment of sad films. Human Communication Research, 19(3), 315–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00304.x

44.

Oliver

M. B.

Bartsch

(2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01368.x

45.

Oliver

M. B.

Raney

A. A.

(2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 984–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01585.x

46.

Oliver

M. B.

Raney

A. A.

Slater

M. D.

Appel

Hartmann

Bartsch

Schneider

F. M.

Janicke-Bowles

S. H.

Krämer

Mares

M.-L.

Vorderer

Rieger

Dale

K. R.

Das

(2018). Self-transcendent media experiences: Taking meaningful media to a higher level. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 380–389. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx020

47.

Ott

J. M.

Tan

N. Q. P.

Slater

M. D.

(2021). Eudaimonic media in lived experience: Retrospective responses to eudaimonic vs. non-eudaimonic films. Mass Communication & Society, 24(5), 725–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1912774

48.

Ouwerkerk

J. W.

Johnson

B. K.

(2016). Motives for online friending and following: The dark side of social network site connections. Social Media + Society, 2(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116664219

49.

Park

C. L.

(2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018301

50.

Park

C. L.

(2016). Meaning making and resilience. In Kumar

(Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of psychosocial resilience (pp. 162–172). Routledge.

51.

Park

C. L.

Folkman

(1997). Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Review of General Psychology, 1(2), 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.1.2.115

52.

Possler

Scheper

Raney

A. A.

Klimmt

(2025). Is there an easy path to eudaimonia? Novel insights on the dual-process perspective in media entertainment. Communication Research, 52, 454–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502241306709

53.

Prestin

Nabi

(2020). Media prescriptions: Exploring the therapeutic effects of entertainment media on stress relief, illness symptoms, and goal attainment. Journal of Communication, 70(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa001

54.

Raney

A. A.

Janicke

S. H.

Oliver

M. B.

Dale

K. R.

Jones

R. P.

Cox

(2018). Profiling the audience for self-transcendent media: A national survey. Mass Communication & Society, 21(3), 296–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1413195

55.

R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

56.

Reinecke

Hartmann

Eden

(2014). The guilty couch potato: The role of ego depletion in reducing recovery through media use. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 569–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12107

57.

Reinecke

Kreling

R. J.

(2022). The longitudinal influence of hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment preferences on psychological resilience and wellbeing. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 991458. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.991458

58.

Reinecke

Rieger

(2021). Media entertainment as a self-regulatory resource: The recovery and resilience in entertaining media use (R²EM) model. In Vorderer

Klimmt

(Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Entertainment Theory (pp. 755–779). Oxford University Press.

59.

Reinecke

Trepte

(2014). Authenticity and well-being on social network sites: A two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias in SNS communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.030

60.

Rieger

Reinecke

Frischlich

Bente

(2014). Media entertainment and well-being-linking hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment experience to media-induced recovery and vitality. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 456–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12097

61.

Riepenhausen

Wackerhagen

Reppmann

Z. C.

Deter

H.-C.

Kalisch

Veer

I. M.

Walter

(2022). Positive cognitive reappraisal in stress resilience, mental health, and well-being: A comprehensive systematic review. Emotion Review, 14(4), 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739221114642

62.

Roth

Cohen

L. J.

(1986). Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. American Psychologist, 41(7), 813–819. https://doi.org/10/d3nsh2

63.

Schneider

F. M.

Bartsch

Oliver

M. B.

(2019). Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the appreciation, Fun, and suspense scales across US-American and German samples. Journal of Media Psychology, 31(3), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000236

64.

Slater

M. D.

Oliver

M. B.

Appel

(2019). Poignancy and mediated wisdom of experience: Narrative impacts on willingness to accept delayed rewards. Communication Research, 46(3), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215623838

65.

Slater

M. D.

Oliver

M. B.

Appel

Tchernev

J. M.

Silver

N. A.

(2018). Mediated wisdom of experience revisited: Delay discounting, acceptance of death, and closeness to future self. Human Communication Research, 44(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqx004

66.

Sliwinski

M. J.

(2008). Measurement-Burst designs for Social Health Research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00043.x

67.

Steger

M. F.

Frazier

Oishi

Kaler

(2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80

68.

Tingley

Yamamoto

Hirose

Keele

Imai

(2014). Mediation: R Package for causal mediation analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(5), 1–38. https://doi.org/10/gdgzgj

69.

Vorderer

Klimmt

Ritterfeld

(2004). Enjoyment: At the heart of media entertainment. Communication Theory, 14(4), 388–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00321.x

70.

Vorderer

Reinecke

(2015). From mood to meaning: The changing model of the user in entertainment research. Communication Theory, 25(4), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12082

71.

Ward

Womick

Titova

King

(2023). Meaning in life and coping with everyday stressors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(3), 460–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211068910

72.

Weinmann

Vorderer

(2018). A normative perspective for political entertainment research: Connecting deliberative democracy and entertainment theory. Communication Theory, 28(4), 466–486. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty018

73.

Wirz

D. S.

Eden

Ulusoy

Ellithorpe

M. E.

(2025). Beyond pleasurable and meaningful: Psychologically rich entertainment experiences. PLoS One, 20(2), e0315596. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315596

74.

Wolfers

L. N.

(2024). A social constructivist viewpoint of media effects: Extending the social influence model of technology use to media effects. Communication Theory, 34, 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtae015

75.

Wolfers

L. N.

Schneider

F. M.

(2021). Using media for coping: A scoping review. Communication Research, 48(8), 1210–1234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220939778

76.

Wrosch

Heckhausen

Lachman

M. E.

(2000). Primary and secondary control strategies for managing health and financial stress across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 15(3), 387–399. https://doi.org/10/b8n9f9

77.

Wulf

Breuer

J. S.

Schmitt

J. B.

(2022). Escaping the pandemic present: The relationship between nostalgic media use, escapism, and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychology of Popular Media, 11(3), 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000357

78.

Zillmann

(1988). Mood management through communication choices. American Behavioral Scientist, 31(3), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276488031003005

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB