Is There an Easy Path to Eudaimonia? Novel Insights on the Dual-process Perspective in Media Entertainment

Abstract

The dual-process perspective in entertainment research differentiates between hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment experiences. Hedonic responses are thought to result from relatively effortless reception of non-challenging (or “light”) media fare. In contrast, eudaimonic entertainment experiences are theorized to depend on cognitively or affectively challenging content (e.g., tragedies) and effortful reflection. The present work builds on the meaning-as-information framework and the meaning-making model to suggest a conceptual alternative. We argue that audience members can have eudaimonic experiences—particularly, meaningful experiences—without intense challenges and cognitive labor by detecting meaning in messages that affirm (or “celebrate”) their core values. An online experiment (N_Study1 = 275) and a pre-registered replication (N_Study2 = 253) with viewers of short video clips provided substantial support for this proposition. Our discussion highlights that the analytical differentiation of low-effort hedonic and high-effort eudaimonic modes of entertainment needs revision.

Keywords

hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment pleasure meaning appreciation cognitive and affective challenges

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Algoe

S. B.

Haidt

(2009). Witnessing excellence in action: The ‘other-praising’ emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(2), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760802650519

Aristotle. (1994). Nicomachean ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). The Internet Classics Archive. http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.html (Original work published ca. 350 B.C.E)

Bartsch

Hartmann

(2017). The role of cognitive and affective challenge in entertainment experience. Communication Research, 44(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565921

Bartsch

Kalch

Oliver

M. B.

(2014). Moved to think: The role of emotional media experiences in stimulating reflective thoughts. Journal of Media Psychology, 26(3), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000118

Bartsch

Schneider

F. M.

(2014). Entertainment and politics revisited: How non-escapist forms of entertainment can stimulate political interest and information seeking. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 369–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12095

Bartsch

Vorderer

Mangold

Viehoff

(2008). Appraisal of emotions in media use: Toward a process model of meta-emotion and emotion regulation. Media Psychology, 11(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701813447

Bosshart

Macconi

(1998). Media entertainment. Communication Research Trends, 18(3), 3–8.

Bryant

Roskos-Ewoldsen, David

Cantor

(Eds.). (2003). Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann. Routledge.

Chang

(2023). Being inspired by media content: Psychological processes leading to inspiration. Media Psychology, 26(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2022.2097927

10.

Cova

Deonna

J. A.

(2014). Being moved. Philosophical Studies, 169(3), 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0192-9

11.

Dale

K. R.

Raney

A. A.

Janicke

S. H.

Sanders

M. S.

Oliver

M. B.

(2017). YouTube for good: A content analysis and examination of elicitors of self-transcendent media. Journal of Communication, 67(6), 897–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12333

12.

DeAndrea

D. C.

Holbert

R. L.

(2017). Increasing clarity where it is needed most: Articulating and evaluating theoretical contributions. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1304163

13.

de Wied

Zillmann

Ordman

. (1995). The role of empathic distress in the enjoyment of cinematic tragedy. Poetics, 23(1–2), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)00010-4

14.

Ebiri

(2019, July 19). Disney’s The Lion King feels like an unusually good nature documentary. Is that what we wanted? Vulture. https://www.vulture.com/2019/07/the-lion-king-2019-review.html

15.

Ersner-Hershfield

Mikels

J. A.

Sullivan

S. J.

Carstensen

L. L.

(2008). Poignancy: Mixed emotional experience in the face of meaningful endings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.158

16.

Evans

J. St. B. T

. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629

17.

Fiske

A. P.

Seibt

Schubert

T. W.

(2019). The sudden devotion emotion: Kama muta and the cultural practices whose function is to evoke it. Emotion Review, 11(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917723167

18.

Fitzgerald

Green

M. C.

Paravati

(2020). Restorative narratives: Using narrative trajectory for prosocial outcomes. The Journal of Public Interest Communications, 4(2), 51. https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v4.i2.p51

19.

Freytag

Possler

Spreen

Raney

Klimmt

(2024). Explaining the rich entertainment appeal of nature documentaries and its conflicting motivational consequences. Mass Communication and Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2024.2415987

20.

Giddings

(1999). The circle of life: Nature and representation in Disney’s The Lion King. Third Text, 13(49), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528829908576825

21.

Hartmann

(2013). Media entertainment as a result of recreation and psychological growth. In Scharrer

Valdivia

(Eds.), The international encyclopedia of media studies: Media effects/Media psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 170–188). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444361506.wbiems112

22.

Heintzelman

S. J.

King

L. A.

(2013). On knowing more than we can tell: Intuitive processes and the experience of meaning. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.830758

23.

Heintzelman

S. J.

King

L. A.

(2014). (The feeling of) meaning-as-information. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313518487

24.

Heintzelman

S. J.

King

L. A.

(2016). Meaning in life and intuition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(3), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000062

25.

Hershfield

H. E.

Larsen

J. T.

(2012). On the measurement of mixed emotions: A critical review [White paper]. National Institute on Aging. http://affectandemotionlab.weebly.com/uploads/9/0/9/6/90962030/hershfield_larsen_2012.pdf

26.

Hoeken

den Ouden

(2022). Sadly and joyfully moving ads: The influence of hedonic and eudaimonic experiences on the attitude toward the ad. Journal of Promotion Management, 28(6), 843–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2021.2015512

27.

Huta

Waterman

A. S.

(2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(6), 1425–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0

28.

Izard

C. E.

(1991). The psychology of emotions. Plenum Press.

29.

Janicke-Bowles

S. H.

Schubert

Blomster

J. K.

(2021). Kama muta as a eudaimonic entertainment experience. In Vorderer

Klimmt

(Eds.), The oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 403–418). Oxford University Press

30.

Janicke-Bowles

S. H.

Bartsch

Oliver

M. B.

Raney

A. A.

(2021). Transcending eudaimonic entertainment: A review and expansion of meaningful entertainment. In Vorderer

Klimmt

(Eds.), The oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 362–381). Oxford University Press.

31.

Jones

J. P. G.

Thomas-Walters

Rust

N. A.

Veríssimo

(2019). Nature documentaries and saving nature: Reflections on the new Netflix series Our Planet. People and Nature, 1(4), 420–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10052

32.

Kaplan

K. J.

(1972). On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 77(5), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032590

33.

Katz

Foulkes

(1962). On the use of the mass media as “escape”: Clarification of a concept. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(3), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1086/267111

34.

Keltner

Bowman

Richards

(2017). Exploring the emotional state of ‘real happiness’: A study into the effects of watching natural history television content [White paper]. BBC. https://cms.bbcearth.com/sites/default/files/2022-04/bbcw-real-happiness-white-paper-final-v2-58ac1df7_2.pdf

35.

King

L. A.

(2012). Meaning: Effortless and ubiquitous. In Mikulincer

Shaver

P. R.

(Eds.), Meaning, mortality, and choice: The social psychology of existential concerns (pp. 129–144). American Psychological Association.

36.

King

L. A.

Hicks

J. A.

(2009). Detecting and constructing meaning in life events. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(5), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760902992316

37.

King

L. A.

Hicks

J. A.

(2021). The science of meaning in life. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 561–584. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-072420-122921

38.

Koban

Bowman

N. D.

(2021). Further validation and cross-cultural replication of the video game demand scale. Journal of Media Psychology, 33(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000280

39.

Kreibig

S. D.

Gross

J. J.

(2017). Understanding mixed emotions: Paradigms and measures. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 15, 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.016

40.

Lang

(2009). The limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing. In Nabi

R. L.

Oliver

M. B.

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 193–205). Sage.

41.

Larsen

J. T.

McGraw

A. P.

(2014). The case for mixed emotions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(6), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12108

42.

Leiner

D. J.

(2019). Too fast, too straight, too weird: Non-reactive indicators for meaningless data in internet surveys. Survey Research Methods, 13(3), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2019.v13i3.7403

43.

Lewis

R. J.

Tamborini

Weber

(2014). Testing a dual-Process model of media enjoyment and appreciation. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12101

44.

Mills

(1997, February 21). Pocket Tigers: The sad, unseen reality behind the wildlife film. Times Literary Supplement.

45.

Oliver

M. B.

(1993). Exploring the paradox of the enjoyment of sad films. Human Communication Research, 19(3), 315–342. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00304.x

46.

Oliver

M. B.

(2008). Tender affective states as predictors of entertainment preference. Journal of Communication, 58(1), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00373.x

47.

Oliver

M. B.

Bartsch

(2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01368.x

48.

Oliver

M. B.

Bartsch

(2011). Appreciation of entertainment: The importance of meaningfulness via virtue and wisdom. Journal of Media Psychology, 23(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000029

49.

Oliver

M. B.

Hartmann

(2010). Exploring the role of meaningful experiences in users’ appreciation of “good movies.” Projections, 4(2), 128–150. https://doi.org/10.3167/proj.2010.040208

50.

Oliver

M. B.

Raney

A. A.

Slater

M. D.

Appel

Hartmann

Bartsch

Schneider

F. M.

Janicke-Bowles

S. H.

Krämer

N. C.

Mares

M.-L.

Vorderer

Rieger

Dale

K. R.

Das

(2018). Self-transcendent media experiences: Taking meaningful media to a higher level. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 380–389. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx020

51.

Park

C. L.

(2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018301

52.

Park

C. L.

Folkman

(1997). Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Review of General Psychology, 1(2), 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.2.115

53.

Possler

Raney (2022, May 26–30). Making sense and sense making: Extending dual-process models of entertainment to account for self-transcendent experiences [Conference presentation]. 72nd Annual Conference of the International Communication Association (ICA), Paris, France.

54.

Raney

A. A.

(2004). Expanding disposition theory: Reconsidering character liking, moral evaluations, and enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14(4), 348–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00319.x

55.

Raney

A. A.

Janicke-Bowles

Oliver

M. B.

Dale

K. R.

(2021). Introduction to positive media psychology. Routledge.

56.

Raney

A. A.

Janicke

S. H.

Oliver

M. B.

Dale

K. R.

Jones

R. P.

Cox

(2018). Profiling the audience for self-transcendent media: A national survey. Mass Communication and Society, 21(3), 296–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1413195

57.

Reinecke

Rieger

(2021). Media entertainment as a self-regulatory resource: The recovery and resilience in entertaining media use (R²EM) model. In Vorderer

Klimmt

(Eds.), The oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 754–779). Oxford University Press.

58.

Renaud

Unz

(2006). Die M-DAS - eine modifizierte Version der Differentiellen Affekt Skala zur Erfassung von Emotionen bei der Mediennutzung [The M-DAS - a modified version of the Differential Affect Scale to assess emotions in media use]. Zeitschrift Für Medienpsychologie, 18(2), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1026/1617-6383.18.2.70

59.

Rieger

Klimmt

(2019). The daily dose of digital inspiration: A multi-method exploration of meaningful communication in social media. New Media & Society, 21(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818788323

60.

Schlütz

D. M.

(2016). Contemporary quality TV: The entertainment experience of complex serial narratives. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40(1), 95–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11735257

61.

Schonlau

Toepoel

(2015). Straightlining in Web survey panels over time. Survey Research Methods, 9(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2015.v9i2.6128

62.

Schneider

F. M.

Bartsch

Oliver

M. B.

(2019). Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the appreciation, fun, and suspense scales across US-American and German samples. Journal of Media Psychology, 31(3), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000236

63.

Schramm

Wirth

(2008). A case for an integrative view on affect regulation through media usage. Communications, 33(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2008.002

64.

Slater

M. D.

Oliver

M. B.

Appel

(2019). Poignancy and mediated wisdom of experience: Narrative impacts on willingness to accept delayed rewards. Communication Research, 46(3), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215623838

65.

Tamborini

Grady

S. M.

Baldwin

McClaran

Lewis

(2021). The narrative enjoyment and appreciation rationale. In Vorderer

Klimmt

(Eds.), The oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 44-62). Oxford University Press

66.

Valkenburg

P. M.

Peter

(2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12024

67.

Vorderer

Klimmt

Bryant

(2021). A brief analysis of the state of entertainment theory: Historical achievements, contemporary challenges, and future possibilities. In Vorderer

Klimmt

(Eds.), The oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 1–22). Oxford University Press.

68.

Vorderer

Klimmt

Ritterfeld

(2004). Enjoyment: At the heart of media entertainment. Communication Theory, 14(4), 388–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00321.x

69.

Vorderer

Reinecke

(2015). From mood to meaning: The changing model of the user in entertainment research. Communication Theory, 25(4), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12082

70.

Wirth

Hofer

Schramm

(2012). Beyond pleasure: Exploring the eudaimonic entertainment experience. Human Communication Research, 38(4), 406–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01434.x

71.

Zillmann

(1988). Mood management through communication choices. American Behavioral Scientist, 31(3), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276488031003005

72.

Zillmann

(2006). Dramaturgy for emotions from fictional narration. In Bryant

Vorderer

(Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 215–238). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

73.

Zillmann

Bryant

(1994). Entertainment as media effect. In Bryant

Zillmann

(Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research. (pp. 437–461). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

2.15 MB