The dual-process perspective in entertainment research differentiates between hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment experiences. Hedonic responses are thought to result from relatively effortless reception of non-challenging (or “light”) media fare. In contrast, eudaimonic entertainment experiences are theorized to depend on cognitively or affectively challenging content (e.g., tragedies) and effortful reflection. The present work builds on the meaning-as-information framework and the meaning-making model to suggest a conceptual alternative. We argue that audience members can have eudaimonic experiences—particularly, meaningful experiences—without intense challenges and cognitive labor by detecting meaning in messages that affirm (or “celebrate”) their core values. An online experiment (NStudy1 = 275) and a pre-registered replication (NStudy2 = 253) with viewers of short video clips provided substantial support for this proposition. Our discussion highlights that the analytical differentiation of low-effort hedonic and high-effort eudaimonic modes of entertainment needs revision.
AlgoeS. B.HaidtJ. (2009). Witnessing excellence in action: The ‘other-praising’ emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(2), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760802650519
BartschA.HartmannT. (2017). The role of cognitive and affective challenge in entertainment experience. Communication Research, 44(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565921
4.
BartschA.KalchA.OliverM. B. (2014). Moved to think: The role of emotional media experiences in stimulating reflective thoughts. Journal of Media Psychology, 26(3), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000118
5.
BartschA.SchneiderF. M. (2014). Entertainment and politics revisited: How non-escapist forms of entertainment can stimulate political interest and information seeking. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 369–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12095
6.
BartschA.VordererP.MangoldR.ViehoffR. (2008). Appraisal of emotions in media use: Toward a process model of meta-emotion and emotion regulation. Media Psychology, 11(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701813447
7.
BosshartL.MacconiI. (1998). Media entertainment. Communication Research Trends, 18(3), 3–8.
8.
BryantJ.Roskos-Ewoldsen, DavidR.CantorJ. (Eds.). (2003). Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann. Routledge.
DaleK. R.RaneyA. A.JanickeS. H.SandersM. S.OliverM. B. (2017). YouTube for good: A content analysis and examination of elicitors of self-transcendent media. Journal of Communication, 67(6), 897–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12333
12.
DeAndreaD. C.HolbertR. L. (2017). Increasing clarity where it is needed most: Articulating and evaluating theoretical contributions. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1304163
Ersner-HershfieldH.MikelsJ. A.SullivanS. J.CarstensenL. L. (2008). Poignancy: Mixed emotional experience in the face of meaningful endings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.158
FiskeA. P.SeibtB.SchubertT. W. (2019). The sudden devotion emotion: Kama muta and the cultural practices whose function is to evoke it. Emotion Review, 11(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917723167
18.
FitzgeraldK.GreenM. C.ParavatiE. (2020). Restorative narratives: Using narrative trajectory for prosocial outcomes. The Journal of Public Interest Communications, 4(2), 51. https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v4.i2.p51
19.
FreytagA.PosslerD.SpreenN.RaneyA.KlimmtC. (2024). Explaining the rich entertainment appeal of nature documentaries and its conflicting motivational consequences. Mass Communication and Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2024.2415987
HartmannT. (2013). Media entertainment as a result of recreation and psychological growth. In ScharrerE.ValdiviaA. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of media studies: Media effects/Media psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 170–188). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444361506.wbiems112
22.
HeintzelmanS. J.KingL. A. (2013). On knowing more than we can tell: Intuitive processes and the experience of meaning. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.830758
23.
HeintzelmanS. J.KingL. A. (2014). (The feeling of) meaning-as-information. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313518487
24.
HeintzelmanS. J.KingL. A. (2016). Meaning in life and intuition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(3), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000062
HoekenH.den OudenH. (2022). Sadly and joyfully moving ads: The influence of hedonic and eudaimonic experiences on the attitude toward the ad. Journal of Promotion Management, 28(6), 843–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2021.2015512
27.
HutaV.WatermanA. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(6), 1425–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0
28.
IzardC. E. (1991). The psychology of emotions. Plenum Press.
29.
Janicke-BowlesS. H.SchubertT.BlomsterJ. K. (2021). Kama muta as a eudaimonic entertainment experience. In VordererP.KlimmtC. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 403–418). Oxford University Press
30.
Janicke-BowlesS. H.BartschA.OliverM. B.RaneyA. A. (2021). Transcending eudaimonic entertainment: A review and expansion of meaningful entertainment. In VordererP.KlimmtC. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 362–381). Oxford University Press.
31.
JonesJ. P. G.Thomas-WaltersL.RustN. A.VeríssimoD. (2019). Nature documentaries and saving nature: Reflections on the new Netflix series Our Planet. People and Nature, 1(4), 420–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10052
32.
KaplanK. J. (1972). On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 77(5), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032590
33.
KatzE.FoulkesD. (1962). On the use of the mass media as “escape”: Clarification of a concept. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(3), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1086/267111
KingL. A. (2012). Meaning: Effortless and ubiquitous. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Meaning, mortality, and choice: The social psychology of existential concerns (pp. 129–144). American Psychological Association.
36.
KingL. A.HicksJ. A. (2009). Detecting and constructing meaning in life events. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(5), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760902992316
KobanK.BowmanN. D. (2021). Further validation and cross-cultural replication of the video game demand scale. Journal of Media Psychology, 33(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000280
39.
KreibigS. D.GrossJ. J. (2017). Understanding mixed emotions: Paradigms and measures. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 15, 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.016
40.
LangA. (2009). The limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing. In NabiR. L.OliverM. B. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 193–205). Sage.
41.
LarsenJ. T.McGrawA. P. (2014). The case for mixed emotions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(6), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12108
42.
LeinerD. J. (2019). Too fast, too straight, too weird: Non-reactive indicators for meaningless data in internet surveys. Survey Research Methods, 13(3), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2019.v13i3.7403
43.
LewisR. J.TamboriniR.WeberR. (2014). Testing a dual-Process model of media enjoyment and appreciation. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12101
44.
MillsS. (1997, February21). Pocket Tigers: The sad, unseen reality behind the wildlife film. Times Literary Supplement.
45.
OliverM. B. (1993). Exploring the paradox of the enjoyment of sad films. Human Communication Research, 19(3), 315–342. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00304.x
OliverM. B.BartschA. (2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01368.x
48.
OliverM. B.BartschA. (2011). Appreciation of entertainment: The importance of meaningfulness via virtue and wisdom. Journal of Media Psychology, 23(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000029
49.
OliverM. B.HartmannT. (2010). Exploring the role of meaningful experiences in users’ appreciation of “good movies.”Projections, 4(2), 128–150. https://doi.org/10.3167/proj.2010.040208
50.
OliverM. B.RaneyA. A.SlaterM. D.AppelM.HartmannT.BartschA.SchneiderF. M.Janicke-BowlesS. H.KrämerN. C.MaresM.-L.VordererP.RiegerD.DaleK. R.DasE. (2018). Self-transcendent media experiences: Taking meaningful media to a higher level. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 380–389. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx020
51.
ParkC. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018301
PosslerD.Raney (2022, May26–30). Making sense and sense making: Extending dual-process models of entertainment to account for self-transcendent experiences [Conference presentation]. 72nd Annual Conference of the International Communication Association (ICA), Paris, France.
54.
RaneyA. A. (2004). Expanding disposition theory: Reconsidering character liking, moral evaluations, and enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14(4), 348–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00319.x
55.
RaneyA. A.Janicke-BowlesS.OliverM. B.DaleK. R. (2021). Introduction to positive media psychology. Routledge.
56.
RaneyA. A.JanickeS. H.OliverM. B.DaleK. R.JonesR. P.CoxD. (2018). Profiling the audience for self-transcendent media: A national survey. Mass Communication and Society, 21(3), 296–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1413195
57.
ReineckeL.RiegerD. (2021). Media entertainment as a self-regulatory resource: The recovery and resilience in entertaining media use (R2EM) model. In VordererP.KlimmtC. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 754–779). Oxford University Press.
58.
RenaudD.UnzD. (2006). Die M-DAS - eine modifizierte Version der Differentiellen Affekt Skala zur Erfassung von Emotionen bei der Mediennutzung [The M-DAS - a modified version of the Differential Affect Scale to assess emotions in media use]. Zeitschrift Für Medienpsychologie, 18(2), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1026/1617-6383.18.2.70
59.
RiegerD.KlimmtC. (2019). The daily dose of digital inspiration: A multi-method exploration of meaningful communication in social media. New Media & Society, 21(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818788323
60.
SchlützD. M. (2016). Contemporary quality TV: The entertainment experience of complex serial narratives. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40(1), 95–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11735257
SchneiderF. M.BartschA.OliverM. B. (2019). Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the appreciation, fun, and suspense scales across US-American and German samples. Journal of Media Psychology, 31(3), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000236
63.
SchrammH.WirthW. (2008). A case for an integrative view on affect regulation through media usage. Communications, 33(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2008.002
64.
SlaterM. D.OliverM. B.AppelM. (2019). Poignancy and mediated wisdom of experience: Narrative impacts on willingness to accept delayed rewards. Communication Research, 46(3), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215623838
65.
TamboriniR.GradyS. M.BaldwinJ.McClaranN.LewisR. (2021). The narrative enjoyment and appreciation rationale. In VordererP.KlimmtC. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 44-62). Oxford University Press
66.
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12024
67.
VordererP.KlimmtC.BryantJ. (2021). A brief analysis of the state of entertainment theory: Historical achievements, contemporary challenges, and future possibilities. In VordererP.KlimmtC. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 1–22). Oxford University Press.
VordererP.ReineckeL. (2015). From mood to meaning: The changing model of the user in entertainment research. Communication Theory, 25(4), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12082
70.
WirthW.HoferM.SchrammH. (2012). Beyond pleasure: Exploring the eudaimonic entertainment experience. Human Communication Research, 38(4), 406–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01434.x
ZillmannD. (2006). Dramaturgy for emotions from fictional narration. In BryantJ.VordererP. (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 215–238). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
73.
ZillmannD.BryantJ. (1994). Entertainment as media effect. In BryantJ.ZillmannD. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research. (pp. 437–461). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
