Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study extends the diffusion of innovations theory by considering the threat of technology and examining the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace over time from a dynamic, differential-effects perspective. Findings from a three-wave survey study reveal an association between the threat of AI (i.e., job security concerns) and increasingly negative attitudes toward AI adoption among employees over time. Relative advantage, compatibility, and observability correlated with more positive attitudes, whereas ease of use and trialability showed no significant association. In testing the differential effects on attitudes toward AI adoption among different groups of potential adopters, we found that trialability positively influenced attitudes only among employees who held a positive attitude previously. Observability and the threat of AI, however, were more influential among employees who held a negative attitude previously. Theoretical and practical implications were discussed.

Keywords

diffusion of innovations innovation attributes artificial intelligence AI adoption longitudinal dynamic threat employment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allison

P. D.

(2009). Fixed effects regression models. Sage.

Allison

P. D.

Williams

Moral-Benito

(2017). Maximum likelihood for cross-lagged panel models with fixed effects. Socius, 3, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117710578

Angelov

P. P.

Soares

E. A.

Jiang

Arnold

N. I.

Atkinson

P. M.

(2021). Explainable artificial intelligence: An analytical review. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 11(5), e1424. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1424

Antonakis

Bendahan

Jacquart

Lalive

(2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010

Atkin

D. J.

Hunt

D. S.

Lin

C. A.

(2015). Diffusion theory in the new media environment: Toward an integrated technology adoption model. Mass Communication & Society, 18(5), 623–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1066014

Bailey

D. E.

Barley

S. R.

(2020). Beyond design and use: How scholars should study intelligent technologies. Information and Organization, 30(2), 100286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.100286

Brougham

Haar

(2018). Smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics, and algorithms (STARA): Employees’ perceptions of our future workplace. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(2), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016.55

Buzsàki

(2006). Rhythms of the brain. Oxford University Press.

Cacioppo

J. T.

Gardner

W. L.

Berntson

G. G.

(1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 839–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.839

10.

Cacioppo

J. T.

Petty

R. E.

(1979). Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.97

11.

Carpenter

Young

D. K.

Barrett

McLeod

A. J.

(2019). Refining technology threat avoidance theory. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 44. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04422

12.

Chattopadhyay

Basu

(1990). Humor in advertising: The moderating role of prior brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(4), 466–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379002700408

13.

Cheng

Lin

Shen

X.-L.

Zarifis

Mou

(2022). The dark sides of AI. Electronic Markets, 32(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00531-5

14.

Croissant

Millo

(2008). Panel data econometrics in R: The PLM package. Journal of Statistical Software, 27(2), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v027.i02

15.

Dearing

J. W.

(2021). What will affect the diffusion of AI agents? Human-Machine Communication, 3, 83–89. https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.3.6

16.

Dearing

J. W.

Kee

K. F.

Peng

T.-Q.

(2018). Historical roots of dissemination and implementation science. In Brownson

R. C.

Colditz

G. A.

Proctor

E. K.

(Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice (2nd ed., pp. 47–62). Oxford University Press.

17.

Granger

C. W. J.

(1980). Testing for causality: A personal viewpoint. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2, 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(80)90069-x

18.

Gross

N. C.

(1942). The diffusion of a culture trait in two Iowa townships. [Master’s thesis, Iowa State College]. Iowa State University Digital Repository. https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/entities/publication/77e4611d-b49d-4ac0-9a14-90ad5e3b924a

19.

Hansen

C. H.

Hansen

R. D.

(1988). Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 917–924. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.917

20.

Hermann

(2022). Artificial intelligence and mass personalization of communication content—An ethical and literacy perspective. New Media & Society, 24(5), 1258–1277. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211022702

21.

Kahneman

Tversky

(1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrics, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

22.

Kee

K. F.

(Ed.). (2017). Adoption and diffusion. In Scott, C., & Lewis, L. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of organizational communication (pp. 41–54). Wiley-Blackwell.

23.

Kelly

Kaye

S.-A.

Oviedo-Trespalacios

(2023). What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review. Telematics and Informatics, 77, 101925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925

24.

Koo

T. K.

M. Y.

(2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

25.

Liang

Lee

S. A.

(2017). Fear of autonomous robots and artificial intelligence: Evidence from national representative data with probability sampling. International Journal of Social Robotics, 9(3), 379–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0401-3

26.

Lilienfeld

S. O.

Latzman

R. D.

(2014). Threat bias, not negativity bias, underpins differences in political ideology. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 318–319. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x1300263x

27.

Liu

(2021). In AI we trust? Effects of agency locus and transparency on uncertainty reduction in human–AI interaction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 26(6), 384–402. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab013

28.

McSorley

van Reekum

C. M.

(2013). The time course of implicit affective picture processing: An eye movement study. Emotion, 13(4), 769–773. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032185

29.

Meyer

(2004). Diffusion methodology: Time to innovate? Journal of Health Communication, 9(Suppl 1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730490271539

30.

Mirbabaie

Brünker

Möllmann Frick

N. R. J.

Stieglitz

(2022). The rise of artificial intelligence – understanding the AI identity threat at the workplace. Electronic Markets, 32(1), 73–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00496-x

31.

Moore

G. C.

Benbasat

(1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192

32.

Myers

L. B.

Goodwin

(2011). Determinants of adults’ intention to vaccinate against pandemic swine flu. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-15

33.

Rai

Constantinides

Sarker

(2019). Next generation digital platforms: Toward human-AI hybrids. MIS Quarterly, 43(1), iii–ix.

34.

Rainie

Funk

Anderson

Tyson

(2022). AI and human enhancement: Americans’ openness is tempered by a range of concerns. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/03/17/ai-and-human-enhancement-americans-openness-is-tempered-by-a-range-of-concerns/

35.

Rice

R. E.

(2017). Intermediality and the diffusion of innovations. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12119

36.

Rice

R. E.

Pearce

K. E.

(2015). Divide and diffuse: Comparing digital divide and diffusion of innovations perspectives on mobile phone adoption. Mobile Media & Communication, 3(3), 401–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157915590469

37.

Rogers

E. M.

(1962). Diffusion of innovations (1st ed.). Free Press.

38.

Rogers

E. M.

(1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). Free Press.

39.

Rogers

E. M.

(2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

40.

Ryan

Gross

N. C.

(1943). The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology, 8, 15–24.

41.

Shinn

Labash

Gopinath

(2023). Reflexion: An autonomous agent with dynamic memory and self-reflection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11366.

42.

Slater

M. D.

(2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x

43.

Stahl

(2021, March 10). How AI will impact the future of work and life. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/ashleystahl/2021/03/10/how-ai-will-impact-the-future-of-work-and-life/

44.

Sundar

S. S.

(2020). Rise of machine agency: A framework for studying the psychology of human–AI interaction (HAII). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz026

45.

Thibodeau

(2014, October 6). One in three jobs will be taken by software or robots by 2025. Computer World. http://www.computerworld.com/article/2691607/one-in-three-jobs-will-be-taken-by-software-or-robots-by-2025.html

46.

Wang

Lang

Busemeyer

J. R.

(2011). Motivational processing and choice behavior during television viewing: An integrative dynamic approach. The Journal of Communication, 61(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01527.x

47.

Wang

Vang

Lookadoo

Tchernev

J. M.

Cooper

(2015). Engaging high-sensation seekers: The dynamic interplay of sensation seeking, message visual-auditory complexity and arousing content. The Journal of Communication, 65(1), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12136

48.

Wooldridge

J. M.

(2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hhcfr

49.

Coman

I. A.

Yamamoto

Najera

C. J.

(2023). Exposure effects or confirmation bias? Examining reciprocal dynamics of misinformation, misperceptions, and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines. Health Communication, 38(10), 2210–2220. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2059802

50.

(2022). A tool or a social being? A dynamic longitudinal investigation of functional use and relational use of AI voice assistants. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221108112

51.

Wang

(2022). Multiple selves and multitasking: A dynamic longitudinal study. Communication Research, 49(6), 891–914. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650221991493

Examining the Diffusion of Innovations from a Dynamic,Differential-Effects Perspective: A Longitudinal Study on AI Adoption Among Employees

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References