Adoption of mobile devices (e.g., smart phones and tablets) has popularized a neck-down posture during media consumption that is different from the traditional upright body posture for video viewing. A neck-down posture exerts substantial pressure upon the spine, and this posture has been previously linked to psychological effects. This study advances the literature by studying the impact of posture effects on processing audiovisual information. In a mixed design experiment (N = 87), the effect of neck posture when viewing 24 video PSAs was tested using physiological and self-report measures. Multilevel modeling analyses of heart rate and corrugator data showed that spinal flexion lowered attentional engagement and caused incongruent emotional responses to the messages compared to a neutral spine posture. However, spinal-flexion participants exhibited greater skin conductance, counter to the predicted emotional disengagement. The impact of neck posture on message processing was largest at the beginning of the experiment and faded over time.
CacioppoJ. T.BerntsonG. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.401
4.
CarneyD. R.CuddyA. J. C.YapA. J. (2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1363–1368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610383437
5.
CarneyD. R.CuddyA. J. C.YapA. J. (2015). Review and summary of research on the embodied effects of expansive (vs. contractive) nonverbal displays. Psychological Science, 26(5), 657–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614566855
6.
CesarioJ.JonasK. J.CarneyD. R. (2017). CRSP special issue on power poses: What was the point and what did we learn?Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2(1), 1–5.
7.
ChoJ. (2013). Campaign tone, political affect, and communicative engagement. Journal of Communication, 63(6), 1130–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12064
8.
ClaytonR. B.LeshnerG.BollsP. D.ThorsonE. (2017). Discard the smoking cues: Keep the disgust: An investigation of tobacco smokers’ motivated processing of anti-tobacco commercials. Health Communication, 32(11), 1319–1330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1220042
9.
CuddyA. J. C.WilmuthC. A.YapA. J.CarneyD. R. (2015). Preparatory power posing affects nonverbal presence and job interview performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1286–1295. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038543
10.
ElkjærE.MikkelsenM. B.MichalakJ.MenninD. S.O’TooleM. S. (2022). Expansive and contractive postures and movement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of motor displays on affective and behavioral responses. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17, 276–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620919358
11.
FallaD.FarinaD. (2007). Neural and muscular factors associated with motor impairment in neck pain. Current Rheumatology Reports, 9(6), 497–502.
12.
HanJ.ZhengX. (2017, May). Coping as motivational bias: Physiological connection between motivational systems and coping styles [Conference session]. The annual conference of the International Communication Association, San Diego, CA, United States.
13.
HansrajK. K. (2014). Assessment of stresses in the cervical spine caused by posture and position of the head. Surgical Technology International, 25(25), 277–279.
14.
HayesA. F.MatthesJ. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 924–936. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.3.924.
15.
HewesG. W. (1961). Food transport and the origin of hominid bipedalism 1. American Anthropologist, 63(4), 687–710. https://www.jstor.org/stable/666665
16.
JablonskiN. G.ChaplinG. (1993). Origin of habitual terrestrial bipedalism in the ancestor of the Hominidae. Journal of Human Evolution, 24(4), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.1993.1021
17.
JollyC. J. (1970). The seed-eaters: A new model of hominid differentiation based on a baboon analogy. Man, 5(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/2798801
18.
JuddC. M.WestfallJ.KennyD. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54.
19.
KeeneJ. R.RasmussenE. E.BerkeC. K.DensleyR. L.LoofT.AdamsR. B.MummaG. H.MarshallA. (2019). The effect of plot explicit, educational explicit, and implicit inference information and coviewing on children’s internal and external cognitive processing. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 47(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2019.1581367
20.
KörnerR.PetersenL.-E.SchützA. (2021). Do expansive or contractive body postures affect feelings of self-worth? High power poses impact state self-esteem. Current Psychology, 40(8), 4112–4124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00371-1
LangA.BaileyR. L. (2015). Understanding information selection and encoding from a dynamic, energy saving, evolved, embodied, embedded perspective. Human Communication Research, 41(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12040
23.
LangA.BollsP.PotterR. F.KawaharaK. (1999). The effects of production pacing and arousing content on the information processing of television messages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43(4), 451–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159909364504
24.
LangA.KuritaS.RubenkingB. R.PotterR. F. (2011). MiniMAM: Validating a short version of the motivation activation measure. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(2), 146–162.
25.
LangA.ParkB.Sanders-JacksonA. N.WilsonB. D.WangZ. (2007). Cognition and emotion in TV message processing: How valence, arousing content, structural complexity, and information density affect the availability of cognitive resources. Media Psychology, 10(3), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701532880
LoncarT. (2021). A decade of ‘power posing’: Where do we stand? Tom Loncar on credibility and challenges. Psychologist, 34, 40–45.
30.
NiemitzC. (2010). The evolution of the upright posture and gait: A review and a new synthesis. Naturwissenschaften, 97(3), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-009-0637-3
31.
PassatoreM.RoattaS. (2006). Influence of sympathetic nervous system on sensorimotor function: Whiplash associated disorders (WAD) as a model. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 98(5), 423–449.
RasmussenE. E.KeeneJ. R.BerkeC. K.DensleyR. L.LoofT. (2017). Explaining parental coviewing: The role of social facilitation and arousal. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2016.1259532
36.
ReadG. L. (2018). Facial Electromyography (EMG). In MatthesJ.DavisC. S.PotterR. F. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 769–778). Wiley-Blackwell.
37.
ReevesB.LangA.KimE. Y.TatarD. (1999). The effects of screen size and message content on attention and arousal. Media Psychology, 1(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0101_4
38.
ReevesB.NassC. (1996). The media equation. CLSI Publications.
39.
ReevesB.RamN.RobinsonT. N.CummingsJ. J.GilesC. L.PanJ.ChiattiA.ChoM. J.RoehrickK.YangX.GagnejaA.BrinbergM.MuiseD.LuY.LuoM.FitzgeraldA.YeykelisL. (2021). Screenomics: A framework to capture and analyze personal life experiences and the ways that technology shapes them. Human–Computer Interaction, 36(2), 150–201.
RiskindJ. H. (1984). They stoop to conquer: Guiding and self-regulatory functions of physical posture after success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(3), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.3.479
42.
RiskindJ. H.GotayC. C. (1982). Physical posture: Could it have regulatory or feedback effects on motivation and emotion?Motivation and Emotion, 6(3), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992249
43.
Sae-limW.PhukpattaranontP.ThongpullK. (2018, July18–21). Effect of electrode skin impedance on electromyography signal quality [Conference session]. The processing of the 15th international conference on electrical engineering/electronics, computer, telecommunications and information technology (ECTI-CON), Chiang Rai, Thailand (pp. 748–751). https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTICon.2018.8619967
44.
SmithM. E.GevinsA. (2004). Attention and brain activity while watching television: Components of viewer engagement. Media Psychology, 6(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0603_3
45.
SukullaF.BilandzicH.BollsP. D.BuselleR. W. (2016). Embodiment of narrative engagement: Connecting self-reported narrative engagement to psychophysiological measures. Journal of Media Psychology, 28, 175–186.
TuranB. (2015). Is a submissive posture adaptive when being evaluated negatively? Effects on cortisol reactivity. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 36(4), 394–398.
48.
WashburnS. L. (1967). Behaviour and the origin of man. Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 1967, 21–27.
49.
WinderI. C.DevèsM. H.KingG. C. P.BaileyG. N.InglisR. H.Meredith-WilliamsM. (2015). Evolution and dispersal of the genus Homo: A landscape approach. Journal of Human Evolution, 87, 48–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.07.002
50.
WiseK. (2017). Electrorocardiography (ECG). In MatthesJ.DavisC. S.PotterR. F. (Eds.), The international Encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 573–587). Wiley-Blackwell.
