Open adoption relationships are rife with privacy dilemmas and fuzzy boundaries, which require ongoing coordination of private disclosures as a result. The present study employed communication privacy management (CPM) theory to examine adoptive parents’ (N = 354) private disclosures with the birth family across in-person and mediated (i.e., texting and social media) contexts. SEM analysis revealed that adoptive families who were more private and were concerned about the birth family sharing private information with others viewed disclosures to the birth family as risky. These privacy concerns related to adoptive parents being more clear with the birth family about preferences for sharing that private information with others. More social media contact between birth and adoptive parents predicted increased perceptions of risk of disclosure to birth parents. Results advance CPM theorizing by underscoring the motivational bases of perceived risk, the importance of anticipated boundary turbulence, and the nuanced privacy management processes within communication modes.
BaxterL. A. (2014). Remaking family communicatively. Peter Lang.
3.
BlackK. A.MoyerA. M.GoldbergA. E. (2016). From face-to-face to Facebook: The role of technology and social media in adoptive family relationships with birth family members. Adoption Quarterly, 19(4), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2016.1217575
4.
BrodzinskyD. M.GoldbergA. E. (2016). Contact with birth family in adoptive families headed by lesbian, gay male, and heterosexual parents. Children and Youth Services Review, 62, 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.01.014
5.
CashenK. K.GrotevantH. D.Wyman BattalenA.SellersC. M.McRoyR. G. (2020). Tech-mediated and traditional communication modes in adult adoptees’ contact with birth parents. Family Relations, 70(1), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12477
6.
ChildJ. T.StarcherS. C. (2016). Fuzzy Facebook privacy boundaries: Exploring mediated lurking, vague-booking, and Facebook privacy management. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 483–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.035
7.
ColanerC. W.HalliwellD.GuignonP. (2014). “What do you say to your mother when your mother’s standing beside you?” Birth and adoptive family contributions to adoptive identity via relational identity and relational-relational identity gaps. Communication Monographs, 81(4), 469–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.955808
8.
ColanerC. W.HorstmanH. K.RittenourC. E. (2018). Negotiating adoptive and birth shared family identity: A social identity complexity approach. Western Journal of Communication, 82, 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2017.1384564
9.
ColanerC. W.ScharpK. (2016). Maintaining open adoption relationships: Practitioner insights on adoptive parents’ regulation of adoption kinship networks. Communication Studies, 67(3), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2016.1164208
10.
EbersoleD. S.HernandezR. A. (2016). “Taking good care of our health”: Parent-adolescent perceptions of boundary management about health information. Communication Quarterly, 64(5), 573–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2016.1176939
11.
GalvinK.ColanerC. W. (2013). Created through law and language: Communicative complexities of adoptive families. In FloydK.MormanM. T. (Eds.), Widening the family circle (2nd ed., pp. 191–209). Sage.
12.
GrotevantH. D. (2009). Emotional distance regulation over the life course in adoptive kinship networks. In WrobelG.NeilE. (Eds.), International advances in adoption research for practice (pp. 295–316). Wiley.
13.
GrotevantH. D.WrobelG. M.FiorenzoL.LoA. Y.McRoyR. G. (2019). Trajectories of birth family contact in domestic adoptions. Journal of Family Psychology, 33(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000449
14.
HaysA.ButauskiM. (2018). Privacy, disability, and family: Exploring the privacy management behaviors of parents with a child with Autism. Western Journal of Communication, 82(3), 376–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2017.1398834
15.
HaysA.HorstmanH.ColanerC. W.NelsonL. R. (2016). “She chose us to be your parents”: Exploring the content and process of adoption entrance narratives told in families formed through open adoption. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(7), 917–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515611494
16.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed). Guilford Press.
17.
HayesA. F.MatthesJ. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 924–936. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.3.924
18.
HesseC.RauscherE. A. (2013). Privacy tendencies and revealing/concealing: The moderating role of emotional competence. Communication Quarterly, 61(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2012.720344
19.
HolbertR. L.GrillC. (2015). Clarifying and expanding the use of confirmatory factor analysis in journalism and mass communication research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(2), 292–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015583718
20.
HorstmanH. K.ColanerC. W.NelsonL. R.BishA.HaysA. (2018). Communicatively constructing birth family relationships in open adoptive families: Naming, connecting, and relational functioning. Journal of Family Communication, 18(2), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2018.1429444
21.
Kennedy-LightseyC. D.MartinM. M.ThompsonM.HimesK. L.ClingermanB. (2012). Communication privacy management theory: Exploring coordination and ownership between friends. Communication Quarterly, 60(5), 665–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2012.725004
22.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principle and practice of Structural Equation Modeling (3rd ed). Guilford Press.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
25.
MacDonaldM. (2016). Parenthood and open adoption: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Springer.
26.
Miller-OttA. E.KellyL.DuranR. L. (2014). Cell phone usage expectations, closeness, and relationship satisfaction between parents and their emerging adults in college. Emerging Adulthood, 2(4), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696814550195
27.
PertmanA. (2011). Adoption nation: How the adoption revolution is transforming our family – and America. Harvard Common Press.
28.
PetronioS. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. SUNY Press.
PetronioS.BantzC. (1991). Controlling the ramifications of disclosure: “Don’t tell anybody but. . .”Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 10(4), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x91104003
31.
PlanderK. L. (2013). Checking accounts: Communication privacy management in familial financial caregiving. Journal of Family Communication, 13(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2012.742090
32.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
33.
SerewiczM. C. M.CanaryD. J. (2008). Assessments of disclosure from the in-laws: Links among disclosure topics, family privacy orientations, and relational quality. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 25(2), 333–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507087962
34.
SerewiczM. C. M.DicksonF. C.MorrisonJ. H. T. A.PooleL. L. (2007). Family privacy orientation, relational maintenance, and family satisfaction in young adults’ family relationships. Journal of Family Communication, 7(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267430701221578
SteuberK. R.McLarenR. M. (2015). Privacy recalibration in personal relationships: Rule usage before and after an incident of privacy turbulence. Communication Quarterly, 63(3), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2015.1039717
37.
TaylorS. H.LedbetterA. M. (2017). Extending media multiplexity theory to the extended family: Communication satisfaction and tie strength as moderators of violations of media use expectations. New Media & Society, 19(9), 1369–1387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816638458
38.
VenetisM. K.GreeneK.Magsamen-ConradK.BanerjeeS. C.ChectonM. G.BagdasarovZ. (2012). “You can’t tell anyone but. . .”: Exploring the use of privacy rules and revealing behaviors. Communication Monographs, 79(3), 344–365https://doi.org10.1080/03637751.2012.697628
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
