Multiple Selves and Multitasking: A Dynamic Longitudinal Study

Abstract

This study integrates the theory of multiple selves within the theoretical framework of dynamic motivational activation (DMA) to identify the dynamic patterns of multiple self-concepts (i.e., the potential self, the actual self) in multitasking (e.g., primary and secondary activities) in daily life. A three-week experience sampling study was conducted on college students. Dynamic panel modeling results suggest that the self-concepts are both sustaining and shifting in daily activities and media activities. Specifically, the potential and actual selves sustained themselves over time in primary and secondary activities, but they also shifted from one to another to achieve a balance in primary activities over time. Interestingly, secondary activities were not driven by the alternative self-concept in primary activities, but instead, by the emotional experiences of primary activities. Furthermore, the findings identified that multitasking to fulfill their actual self did not motivate people to re-prioritize their potential self later.

Keywords

self multiple selves multitasking reinforcement experience sampling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baltagi

B. H.

(2008). Forecasting with panel data. Journal of Forecasting, 27(2), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.1047

Belk

R. W.

(1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168. https://doi.org/10.1086/209154

Belk

R. W.

(2016). Extended self and the digital world. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.11.003

Blundell

Bond

(1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8

Buzsàki

(2006). Rhythms of the brain. Oxford University Press.

Carver

(2003). Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect. Cognition and Emotion, 17(2), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930302294

Carver

C. S.

Scheier

M. F.

(1981). The self-attention-induced feedback loop and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17(6), 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(81)90039-1

Carver

C. S.

Scheier

M. F.

(2011). Self-regulation of action and affect. In Vohs

K. D.

Baumeister

R. F.

(Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications, 2nd ed. (pp. 3–21). Guilford Press.

Comello

M. L. G.

(2009). William James on “possible selves”: Implications for studying identity in communication contexts. Communication Theory, 19(3), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01346.x

10.

Cross

Bacon

Morris

(2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.791

11.

Cross

S. E.

Hardin

E. E.

Gercek-Swing

(2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 142–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310373752

12.

Hansen

L. P.

(1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50(4), 1029–1054. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912775

13.

Hardin

E. E.

Leong

F. T. L.

(2005). Optimism and pessimism as mediators of the relations between self-discrepancies and distress among Asian and European Americans. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.1.25

14.

Higgins

E. T.

(1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319

15.

Higgins

E. T.

Shah

Friedman

(1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.515

16.

Hwang

Kim

Jeong

S.-H.

(2014). Why do media users multitask?: Motives for general, medium-specific, and content-specific types of multitasking. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 542–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.040

17.

Inzlicht

Schmeichel

B. J.

Macrae

C. N.

(2014). Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(3), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.009

18.

James

(1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1), 8th publication of original work (1981). Harvard University Press.

19.

Jeong

S.-H.

Fishbein

(2007). Predictors of multitasking with media: media factors and audience factors. Media Psychology, 10(3), 364–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701532948

20.

Kihlstrom

J. F.

Klein

S. B.

(1994). The self as a knowledge structure. Handbook of social Cognition, 1, 153–208.

21.

Knobloch-Westerwick

(2015). The selective exposure self- and affect-management (SESAM) Model: Applications in the realms of race, politics, and health. Communication Research, 42(7), 959–985. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214539173

22.

Kurzban

Duckworth

Kable

J.W.

Myers

(2013). An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(6), 661–679. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12003196

23.

Lang

(1994). Measuring psychological responses to media messages. Routledge.

24.

Larsen

J. T.

McGraw

A. P.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(2001). Can people feel happy and sad at the same time? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 684–696. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.4.684

25.

Lim

W. M.

(2015). Enriching information science research through chronic disposition and situational priming: A short note for future research. Journal of Information Science, 41(3), 399–402.

26.

Lim

W. M.

(2018). Demystifying neuromarketing. Journal of Business Research, 91, 205–220.

27.

Lin

(2009). Breadth-biased versus focused cognitive control in media multitasking behaviors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15521–15522. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908642106

28.

Lin

(2013). Multiple dimensions of multitasking phenomenon. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), 9(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.4018/jthi.2013010103

29.

Markus

Nurius

(1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954

30.

Markus

Wurf

(1987). The dynamic self-concept: a social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38(1), 299–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.001503

31.

Menard

(2002). Longitudinal research (Vol. 76). Sage.

32.

Ophir

Nass

Wagner

A. D.

(2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587.

33.

Oyserman

Elmore

Smith

(2012). Self, self-concept, and identity. In Leary

M. R.

Tangney

J. P.

(Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 69–104). The Guilford Press.

34.

Potter

R.F.

Bolls

(2011). Psychophysiological measurement and meaning: Cognitive and emotional processing of media. Routledge.

35.

Rosen

L. D.

Mark Carrier

Cheever

N. A.

(2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 948–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.001

36.

Segijn

C. M.

Voorveld

H. A. M.

Vandeberg

Smit

E. G.

(2017). The battle of the screens: Unraveling attention allocation and memory effects when multiscreening. Human Communication Research, 43(2), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12106

37.

Slater

M. D.

(2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x

38.

Slater

M. D.

(2015). Reinforcing spirals model: Conceptualizing the relationship between media content exposure and the development and maintenance of attitudes. Media Psychology, 18(3), 370–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.897236

39.

Tajfel

Turner

J. C.

(1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel

Austin

(Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson.

40.

Wang

(2014). Bridging media processing and selective exposure: A dynamic motivational model of media choices and choice response time. Communication Research, 41(8), 1064–1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214534963

41.

Wang

Irwin

Cooper

Srivastava

(2015). Multidimensions of media multitasking and adaptive media selection: cognitive dimensions of media multitasking. Human Communication Research, 41 (1), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12042

42.

Wang

Lang

Busemeyer

J. R.

(2011). Motivational processing and choice behavior during television viewing: an integrative dynamic approach. Journal of Communication, 61(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01527.x

43.

Wang

Tchernev

J. M.

(2012). The “myth” of media multitasking: Reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal Needs, and gratifications. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01641.x

44.

Wang

David

(2016). Media multitasking and well-being of university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.040

45.

Wang

Woods

(2019). Multitasking and dual motivational systems: A dynamic longitudinal Study. Human Communication Research, 45(4), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqz009