Computer-mediated communication (CMC), and specifically social media, may affect the mental health (MH) and well-being of its users, for better or worse. Research on this topic has accumulated rapidly, accompanied by controversial public debate and numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Yet, a higher-level integration of the multiple disparate conceptual and operational approaches to CMC and MH and individual review findings is desperately needed. To this end, we first develop two organizing frameworks that systematize conceptual and operational approaches to CMC and MH. Based on these frameworks, we integrate the literature through a meta-review of 34 reviews and a content analysis of 594 publications. Meta-analytic evidence, overall, suggests a small negative association between social media use and MH. However, effects are complex and depend on the CMC and MH indicators investigated. Based on our conceptual review and the evidence synthesis, we devise an agenda for future research in this interdisciplinary field.
AalbersG.McNallyR. J.HeerenA.de WitS.FriedE. I. (2019). Social media and depression symptoms: A network perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(8), 1454–1462. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000528
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
3.
AppelM.MarkerC.GnambsT. (2020). Are social media ruining our lives? A review of meta-analytic evidence. Review of General Psychology, 24(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268019880891
4.
BallardM.MontgomeryP. (2017). Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: A scoping review of methodological guidance and four-item checklist. Research Synthesis Methods, 8(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1229
5.
BayerJ. B.EllisonN.SchoenebeckS.BradyE.FalkE. B. (2018). Facebook in context(s): Measuring emotional responses across time and space. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1047–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816681522
BoothA.PapaioannouD.SuttonA. (2012). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Sage.
8.
BruntonG.WebbeJ.OliverS.GaleC. (2020). Adding value to core outcome set development using multimethod systematic reviews. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 248–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1391
9.
BurkeM.KrautR. E. (2016). The relationship between Facebook use and well-being depends on communication type and tie strength. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(4), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12162
ChanM. (2015). Multimodal connectedness and quality of life: Examining the influences of technology adoption and interpersonal communication on well-being across the life span. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12089
12.
ConwayC. C.ForbesM. K.ForbushK. T.FriedE. I.HallquistM. N.KotovR.Mullins-SweattS. N.ShackmanA. J.SkodolA. E.SouthS. C.SunderlandM.WaszczukM. A.ZaldD. H.AfzaliM. H.BornovalovaM. A.CarragherN.DochertyA. R.JonasK. G.KruegerR. F.. . . EatonN. R. (2019). A hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology can transform mental health research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618810696
13.
DienerE.LucasR. E.OishiS. (2018). Advances and open questions in the science of subjective well-being. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.115
14.
EllisonN. B.boydd. m. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. In DuttonW. H. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Internet studies (pp. 151–172). Oxford University Press.
15.
EvansS. K.PearceK. E.VitakJ.TreemJ. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180
16.
GonzalesA. L.WuY. (2016). Public cellphone use does not activate negative responses in others. . . unless they hate cellphones. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(5), 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12174
17.
GreenspoonP. J.SaklofskeD. H. (2001). Toward an integration of subjective well-being and psychopathology. Social Indicators Research, 54(1), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007219227883
18.
HallJ. A. (2018). When is social media use social interaction? Defining mediated social interaction. New Media & Society, 20(1), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816660782
19.
HidesL.QuinnC.StoyanovS.CockshawW.KavanaghD. J.ShochetI.DeaneF. P.KellyP.J.KeyesC. L. M. (2020). Testing the interrelationship between mental well-being and mental distress in young people. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(3), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2019.1610478
20.
HollandG.TiggemannM. (2016). A systematic review of the impact of the use of social networking sites on body image and disordered eating outcomes. Body Image, 17, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.02.008
21.
HuangC. (2017). Time spent on social network sites and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(6), 346–354. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0758
22.
HutaV. (2017). An overview of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being concepts. In ReineckeL.OliverM. B. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (pp. 14–33). Routledge.
23.
HutaV.WatermanA. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(6), 1425–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0
24.
KeyesC. L. M. (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(3), 539–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.539
25.
KramerM. D.KruegerR. F.HicksB. M. (2008). The role of internalizing and externalizing liability factors in accounting for gender differences in the prevalence of common psychopathological syndromes. Psychological Medicine, 38(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291707001572
26.
KvarvenA.StrømlandE.JohannessonM. (2020). Comparing meta-analyzes and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(4), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0787-z
27.
LaheyB. B.KruegerR. F.RathouzP. J.WaldmanI. D.ZaldD. H. (2017). A hierarchical causal taxonomy of psychopathology across the life span. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 142–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000069
28.
LedbetterA. M. (2014). The past and future of technology in interpersonal communication theory and research. Communication Studies, 65(4), 456–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2014.927298
29.
LiuD.BaumeisterR. F.YangC.-C.HuB. (2019). Digital communication media use and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(5), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/zmz013
30.
MartelaF.SheldonK. M. (2019). Clarifying the concept of well-being: Psychological need satisfaction as the common core connecting eudaimonic and subjective well-being. Review of General Psychology, 23(4), 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268019880886
31.
MeierA.DomahidiE.GüntherE. (2020). Computer-mediated communication and mental health: A computational scoping review of an interdisciplinary field. In YatesS.RiceR. E. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of digital technology and society (pp. 79–110). Oxford University Press.
32.
MeierA.SchäferS. (2018). Positive side of social comparison on social network sites: How envy can drive inspiration on Instagram. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(7), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0708
OrbenA. (2020). Teenagers, screens and social media: A narrative review of reviews and key studies. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 55(4), 407–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-019-01825-4
35.
OrbenA.PrzybylskiA. K. (2019). The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1
36.
O’SullivanP. B.CarrC. T. (2018). Masspersonal communication: A model bridging the mass-interpersonal divide. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1161–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686104
37.
PieperD.AntoineS.-L.MathesT.NeugebauerE. A. M.EikermannM. (2014). Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(4), 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.007
38.
PolaninJ. R.MaynardB. R.DellN. A. (2017). Overviews in education research: A systematic review and analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 172–203. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316631117
39.
RafaeliS. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. Sage Annual Review of Communication Research: Advancing Communication Science, 16, 110–134.
40.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
41.
SarmientoI. G.OlsonC.YeoG.ChenY. A.TomaC. L.BrownB. B.BellmoreA.MaresM.-L. (2018). How does social media use relate to adolescents’ internalizing symptoms? Conclusions from a systematic narrative review. Adolescent Research Review, 36(5), 517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-018-0095-2
42.
SaxenaS.FunkM.ChisholmD. (2013). World health assembly adopts comprehensive mental health action plan 2013–2020. The Lancet, 381(9882), 1970–1971. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61139-3
43.
SbarraD. A.BriskinJ. L.SlatcherR. B. (2019). Smartphones and close relationships: The case for an evolutionary mismatch. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(4), 596–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619826535
44.
SmockA. D.EllisonN. B.LampeC.WohnD. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2322–2329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.011
45.
ThomsonD.RussellK.BeckerL.KlassenT.HartlingL. (2010). The evolution of a new publication type: Steps and challenges of producing overviews of reviews. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(3–4), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.30
46.
TwengeJ. M.MartinG. N.CampbellW. K. (2018). Decreases in psychological well-being among American adolescents after 2012 and links to screen time during the rise of smartphone technology. Emotion, 18(6), 765–780. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000403
47.
TwomeyC.O’ReillyG. (2017). Associations of self-presentation on Facebook with mental health and personality variables: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(10), 587–595. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0247
48.
VerduynP.YbarraO.RésiboisM.JonidesJ.KrossE. (2017). Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 274–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033
49.
WaltherJ. B. (2010). Computer-mediated communication. In BergerC. R.RoloffM. E.Roskos-EwoldsenD. R. (Eds.), The handbook of communication science (2nd ed., pp. 489–505). Sage.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
