Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026-3
Associations between interactions with support providers and depression during times of isolation: Integrating perceived support and media multiplexity
Integrating aspects of social interaction and communicating via technology, this study examines perceived support as a mechanism through which frequent interactions with support providers are linked to depression. Building off of Taylor and Bazarova’s (2018) developments to media multiplexity theory, it also theorizes and tests the moderating effect of multiple forms of media multiplexity, including average multiplexity, overall multiplexity, and multiplexity variability. Survey data from N = 946 U.S. adults recruited through an online panel in April 2020 showed that interaction frequency with support providers was negatively associated with depression through perceived support. This mediating effect of perceived support was further moderated by media multiplexity, such that it was stronger when individuals on average used more channels in interactions with each of their support providers and when their channel use manifested a high level of heterogeneity across their network. Conversely, it was weaker when the total number of channels used across providers was high. The findings extend media multiplexity theory and contribute to understanding social interactions and computer-mediated communication.
AfifiT. D.MerrillA. F.DavisS. (2016). The theory of resilience and relational load. Personal Relationships, 23(4), 663–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12159
2.
AshidaS.HeaneyC. A. (2008). Differential associations of social support and social connectedness with structural features of social networks and the health status of older adults. Journal of Aging and Health, 20(7), 872–893. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264308324626
3.
BaekY. M.BaeY.JangH. (2013). Social and parasocial relationships on social network sites and their differential relationships with users’ psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(7), 512–517. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0510
4.
BerkmanL.GlassT. (2000). Social integration, social networks, social support and health. In BerkmanL.KawachiI. (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 137–173). Oxford University Press.
5.
BerkmanL. F.GlassT.BrissetteI.SeemanT. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine, 51(6), 843–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4
BuehlerE. M.HighA. C. (2023). Indirect effects of video chat on outcomes of receiving support: Uniting theorizing about supportive communication and computer-mediated communication. Communication Monographs, 90(1), 92–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2022.2117393
8.
BurlesonB. R.MacGeorgeE. L. (2002). Supportive communication. In KnappM. L.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 374–424). Sage.
9.
CaughlinJ. P.SharabiL. L. (2013). A communicative interdependence perspective of close relationships: The connections between mediated and unmediated interactions matter. Journal of Communication, 63(5), 873–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12046
CutronaC. E. (1986). Objective determinants of perceived social support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.349
12.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
13.
DerntlB.SeidelE. M.EickhoffS. B.KellermannT.GurR. C.SchneiderF.HabelU. (2011). Neural correlates of social approach and withdrawal in patients with major depression. Social Neuroscience, 6(5–6), 482–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2011.579800
14.
Dutta-BergmanM. J. (2004a). Complementarity in consumption of news types across traditional and new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4801_3
15.
Dutta-BergmanM. J. (2004b). Interpersonal communication after 9/11 via telephone and internet: A theory of channel complementarity. New Media & Society, 6(5), 659–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144804047086
16.
EttmanC. K.AbdallaS. M.CohenG. H.SampsonL.VivierP. M.GaleaS. (2020). Prevalence of depression symptoms in US adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Network Open, 3(9), Article e2019686. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19686
17.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2015). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 19(2), 113–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314544222
18.
FrazierP. A.TixA. P.BarnettC. L. (2003). The relational context of social support: Relationship satisfaction moderates the relations between enacted support and distress. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(9), 1133–1146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203254545
GreyI.AroraT.ThomasJ.SanehA.TohmeP.Abi-HabibR. (2020). The role of perceived social support on depression and sleep during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatry Research, 293, 113452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113452
21.
HallJ.PenningtonN.HolmstromA. (2021). Connecting through technology during COVID-19. Human Communication & Technology, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.17161/hct.v3i1.15026
22.
HannaR.RohmA.CrittendenV. L. (2011). We’re all connected: The power of the social media ecosystem. Business Horizons, 54(3), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.007
23.
HaythornthwaiteC. (2002). Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. The Information Society, 18(5), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290108195
24.
HaythornthwaiteC. (2005). Social networks and internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8(2), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180500146185
25.
HighA. (2019). Theorizing a more complete picture: Integrating interpersonal communication with computer-mediated communication. Human Communication & Technology, 1(1), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.17161/hct.v1i1.11977
26.
HighA. C.FoxJ.McEwanB. (2024). Technology, relationships, and well-being: An overview of critical research issues and an introduction to the special issue. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 41(5), 1055–1072. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075241236986
27.
HighA. C.ScharpK. M. (2015). Examining family communication patterns and seeking social support direct and indirect effects through ability and motivation. Human Communication Research, 41(4), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12061
28.
HighA. C.SolomonD. H. (2014). Communication channel, sex, and the immediate and longitudinal outcomes of verbal person-centered support. Communication Monographs, 81(4), 439–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.933245
HolmstromA. J. (2012). What helps–and what doesn't–when self-esteem is threatened? Retrospective reports of esteem support. Communication Studies, 63(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2011.586399
31.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
32.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
33.
KrämerN. C.SauerV.EllisonN. (2021). The strength of weak ties revisited: Further evidence of the role of strong ties in the provision of online social support. Social Media + Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211024958
34.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
35.
LedbetterA. M. (2021). Media multiplexity theory: Explaining tie strength and technology use. In BraithwaiteD. O.SchrodtP. (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (pp. 354–365). Routledge.
36.
LedbetterA. M. (2023). Tie strength and media use in friendships across the course of a year: Testing media multiplexity theory’s third proposition. New Media & Society, 27(4), 2146–2167. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231207100
37.
LinM.HirschfeldG.MargrafJ. (2019). Brief form of the perceived social support questionnaire (F-SozU K-6): Validation, norms, and cross-cultural measurement invariance in the USA, Germany, Russia, and China. Psychological Assessment, 31(5), 609–621. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000686
38.
LiuP. L.YeoT. E. D. (2022). Weak ties matter: Social network dynamics of mobile media multiplexity and their impact on the social support and psychological well-being experienced by migrant workers. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(1), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211001106
39.
LovibondP. F.LovibondS. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u
McEwanB.FoxJ. (2022). Before methods: Social media research consideration. In Quan-HaaseA.SloanL. (Eds.), Handbook of social media research methods (2nd ed., pp. 27–39). Sage.
42.
ParksM. R. (2017). Embracing the challenges and opportunities of mixed-media relationships. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12125
43.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
44.
SharabiL. L.Dorrance-HallE. (2022). Communication interdependence and cohabitation: The role of interpersonal technologies in satisfaction and disillusionment among couples in transition. Human Communication Research, 48(2), 292–319. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqab021
45.
TandocE. C.Jr.LouC.MinV. L. H. (2019). Platform-swinging in a poly-social-media context: How and why users navigate multiple social media platforms. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy022
46.
TaylorS. E. (2011). Social support: A review. In FriedmanH. S. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of health psychology (pp. 189–214). Oxford University Press.
47.
TaylorS. H.BazarovaN. N. (2018). Revisiting media multiplexity: A longitudinal analysis of media use in romantic relationships. Journal of Communication, 68(6), 1104–1126. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy055
48.
TaylorS. H.BazarovaN. N. (2021). Always available, always attached: A relational perspective on the effects of mobile phones and social media on subjective well-being. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 26(4), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab004
49.
ThoitsP. A. (1985). Social support processes and psychological wellbeing: Theoretical possibilities. In SarasonI. G.SarasonB. (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 51–72): Springer.
50.
TianY.RobinsonJ. D. (2008). Media use and health information seeking: An empirical test of complementarity theory. Health Communication, 23(2), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230801968260
51.
UchinoB. N. (2009). Understanding the links between social support and physical health: A life-span perspective with emphasis on the separability of perceived and received support. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 4(3), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01122.x
52.
WellmanB. (2002). The rise (and possible fall) of networked individualism. Connections, 24(3), 30–32.
53.
WethingtonE.MoenP.GlasgowN.PillemerK. (2000). Multiple roles, social integration, and health. In PillemerK.MoenP.WethingtonE.GlasgowN. (Eds.), Social integration in the second half of life (pp. 48–71). Johns Hopkins University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
