While being frequently covered in the news media is key to political success, previous research demonstrates that some politicians are systematically more visible in the media than others. The current study advances our understanding of which politicians gain higher media visibility by exploring the effects of their personality traits. Utilizing a unique sample of 339 incumbent politicians in three countries, we find that the two personality traits that speak directly to one’s interpersonal orientation—agreeableness and extraversion—affect visibility, with less agreeable and more extraverted politicians appearing more frequently in the news. We also find that open to experience and emotionally stable politicians get covered more frequently and that being highly conscientious predicts media visibility in some cases, but not in others. Politicians high on these traits, we argue, enjoy an inherent advantage in the competition for the media’s attention.
AmsalemE.SheaferT.WalgraveS.LoewenP. J.SorokaS. N. (2017). Media motivation and elite rhetoric in comparative perspective. Political Communication, 34, 385-403. doi:10.1080/10584609.2016.1266065
2.
ArnoldR. D. (2004). Congress, the press and political accountability. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BakkerR.De VriesC.EdwardsE.HoogheL.JollyS.MarksG.. . . VachudovaM. A. (2015). Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999-2010. Party Politics, 21, 143-152. doi:10.1177/1354068812462931
4.
BestH. (2011). Does personality matter in politics? Personality factors as determinants of parliamentary recruitment and policy preferences. Comparative Sociology, 10, 928-948. doi:10.1163/156913311X607638
5.
CappellaJ. N.JamiesonK. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
CapraraG. V.BarbaranelliC.ZimbardoP. G. (2002). When parsimony subdues distinctiveness: Simplified public perceptions of politicians’ personality. Political Psychology, 23, 77-95. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00271
7.
CapraraG. V.ZimbardoP. G. (2004). Personalizing politics: A congruency model of political preference. American Psychologist, 59, 581-594. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.581
8.
CohenJ.TsfatiY.SheaferT. (2008). The influence of presumed media influence in politics: Do politicians’ perceptions of media power matter?Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 331-344. doi:10.1093/poq/nfn014
9.
CookT. E. (2005). Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray’s needs and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 258-265. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.258
11.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
12.
CredéM.HarmsP.NiehorsterS.Gaye-ValentineA. (2012). An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 874-888. doi:10.1037/a0027403
13.
DavisA. (2007). Investigating journalist influences on political issue agendas at Westminster. Political Communication, 24, 181-199. doi:10.1080/10584600701313033
14.
DeYoungC. G.WeisbergY. J.QuiltyL. C.PetersonJ. B. (2013). Unifying the aspects of the Big Five, the interpersonal circumplex, and trait affiliation. Journal of Personality, 81, 465-475. doi:10.1111/jopy.12020
15.
DietrichB. J.LasleyS.MondakJ. J.RemmelM. L.TurnerJ. (2012). Personality and legislative politics: The Big Five trait dimensions among U.S. state legislators. Political Psychology, 33, 195-210. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00870.x
16.
DunnW. S.MountM. K.BarrickM. R.OnesD. S. (1995). Relative importance of personality and general mental ability in managers’ judgments of applicant qualifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 500-509. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.500
17.
FridkinK. L.KenneyP. J. (2011). The role of candidate traits in campaigns. Journal of Politics, 73, 61-73. doi:10.1017/S0022381610000861
18.
GeißS.SchäferS. (2017). Any publicity or good publicity? A competitive test of visibility-and tonality-based media effects on voting behavior. Political Communication, 34, 444-467. doi:10.1080/10584609.2016.1271068
19.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.DohertyD.DowlingC. M. (2011a). The Big Five personality traits in the political arena. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 265-287. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051010-111659
20.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.DohertyD.DowlingC. M. (2011b). Personality traits and the consumption of political information. American Politics Research, 39, 32-84. doi:10.1177/1532673X10381466
21.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.DohertyD.DowlingC. M.HaS. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104, 111-133. doi:10.1017/S0003055410000031
22.
GoldbergL. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
23.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
24.
HazanR. Y.DiskinA. (2015). Plus ça Change, Plus C’est La Même Chose: The 2015 Israeli elections. Electoral Studies, 40, 411-418. doi:10.1080/13608746.2014.939853
25.
HelferL.Van AelstP. (2016). What makes party messages fit for reporting? An experimental study of journalistic news selection. Political Communication, 33, 59-77. doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.969464
26.
HopmannD. N.Van AelstP.LegnanteG. (2012). Political balance in the news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13, 240-257. doi:10.1177/1464884911427804
27.
HopmannD. N.VliegenthartR.De VreeseC.AlbækE. (2010). Effects of election news coverage: How visibility and tone influence party choice. Political Communication, 27, 389-405. doi:10.1080/10584609.2010.516798
28.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114-158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
30.
KedrowskiK. M. (1996). Media entrepreneurs and the media enterprise in the U.S. Congress. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
31.
KellyD.GeldenhuisA.JamesA.HollandE. P.PlankM. J.BrockieR. E.. . . ByormA. E. (2013). Of mast and mean: Differential-temperature cue makes mast seeding insensitive to climate change. Ecology Letters, 16, 90-98. doi:10.1111/ele.12020
32.
MaleskyE. J.NguyenC. V.TranA. (2014). The impact of recentralization on public services: A difference-in-differences analysis of the abolition of elected councils in Vietnam. American Political Science Review, 108, 144-168. doi:10.1017/S0003055413000580
33.
McCraeR. R. (1993). Openness to experience as a basic dimension of personality. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 13, 39-55. doi:10.2190/H8H6-QYKR-KEU8-GAQ0
34.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins’s circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586-595. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.4.586
35.
MondakJ. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36.
MondakJ. J.HalperinK. D. (2008). A framework for the study of personality and political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 335-362. doi:10.1017/S0007123408000173
37.
RameyA. J.KlinglerJ. D.HollibaughG. E.Jr. (2017). More than a feeling: Personality, polarization, and the transformation of the US Congress. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
RubenzerS. J.FaschingbauerT. R. (2004). Personality, character, and leadership in the White House: Psychologists assess the presidents. Washington, DC: Brassey’s.
39.
SeibertS. E.KraimerM. L. (2001). The five-factor model of personality and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 1-21. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2000.1757
40.
SellersP. J. (2000). Manipulating the message in the US Congress. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 5, 22-31. doi:10.1177/1081180X00005001003
41.
SevenansJ.WalgraveS.VosD. (2015). Political elites’ media responsiveness and their individual political goals: A study of national politicians in Belgium. Research & Politics, 2, 1-7. doi:10.1177/2053168015593307
42.
SheaferT. (2001). Charismatic skill and media legitimacy: An actor-centered approach to understanding the political communication competition. Communication Research, 28, 711-736. doi:10.1177/009365001028006001
43.
StrömbäckJ. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13, 228-246. doi:10.1177/1940161208319097
44.
StrömbäckJ.EsserF. (2014). Mediatization of politics: Towards a theoretical framework. In StrömbäckJ.EsserF. (Eds.), Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of western democracies (pp. 3-30). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
45.
TsfatiY.Markowitz-ElfassiD.Waismel-ManorI. (2010). Exploring the association between Israeli legislators’ physical attractiveness and their television news coverage. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15, 175-192. doi:10.1177/1940161209361212
46.
Van AelstP.MaddensB.NoppeJ.FiersS. (2008). Politicians in the news: Media or party logic? Media attention and electoral success in the Belgian election campaign of 2003. European Journal of Communication, 23, 193-210. doi:10.1177/0267323108089222
47.
VosD. (2014). Which politicians pass the news gates and why? Explaining inconsistencies in research on news coverage of individual politicians. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2438-2461. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc
48.
Waismel-ManorI.TsfatiY. (2011). Why do better-looking Members of Congress receive more television coverage?Political Communication, 28, 440-463. doi:10.1080/10584609.2011.617719
49.
WigginsJ. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395-412. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.395
50.
WolfsfeldG. (2011). Making sense of media and politics: Five principles in political communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
ZoiznerA.SheaferT.WalgraveS. (2017). How politicians’ attitudes and goals moderate political agenda setting by the media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22, 431-449. doi:10.1177/1940161217723149
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
