One of the major issues facing contemporary democracies is how the rapidly changing media environment influences democratic citizenship. Rather than strengthening or weakening citizenship per se, the present study analyzes whether traditional news and interactive online media encourage different forms of civic and political engagement among adolescents. More specifically, we use three waves of annually gathered panel data to study Swedish adolescents’ development of self-actualizing (AC) and dutiful (DC) citizen qualities. Overall, the analyses lend support for the AC-DC model and suggest that communicative practices matter. While traditional news media use is related to DC qualities—such as institutional participation, political trust, and external efficacy—interactive online media use promotes AC qualities, including both online and offline cause-oriented activism.
BakkerT.de VreeseC. H. (2011). Good news for the future? Young people, internet use, and political participation. Communication Research, 38, 451-470. doi:10.1177/0093650210381738
5.
BaumanZ. (1995). Life in fragments: Essays in postmodern morality. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
6.
BeckU. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity Trans.). London, England: Sage. (Original work published 1986)
7.
BeckU.Beck-GernsheimE. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized institutionalism and its social and political consequences. London, England: Sage.
8.
BennettL. (2007). Civic learning in changing democracies. Challenges for citizenship and civic education. In DahlgrenP. (Ed.), Young citizens and new media: Learning for democratic participation (pp. 59-77). New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
BennettL. (2008). Changing citizenship in the digital age. In BennettL. (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 1-24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
BennettL.WellsC.RankA. (2009). Young citizens and civic learning: Two paradigms of citizenship in the digital age. Citizenship Studies, 13, 105-120. doi:10.1080/13621020902731116
11.
BlekesauneA.ElvestadE.AalbergT. (2012). Tuning out the world of news and current affairs—An empirical study of Europe’s disconnected citizens. European Sociological Review, 28, 110-126. doi:10.1093/esr/jcq051
12.
BoulianneS. (2009). Does internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26, 193-211. doi:0.1080/10584600902854363
13.
CastellsM. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society: Vol. 1. The information age: Economy, society and culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
14.
ChaffeeS.KanihanF. (1997). Learning about Politics from the Mass Media. Political Communication, 14, 421-430. doi:10.1080/105846097199218
15.
DahlgrenP. (2009). Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication and democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
DaltonR. (2009). The good citizen: How a younger generation is reshaping American politics. Washington, DC: QC Press.
17.
Delli CarpiniM. X. (2000). Gen.com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication, 17, 341-349. doi:10.1080/10584600050178942
18.
DilliplaneS.GoldmanS. K.MutzD. C. (2013). Televised exposure to politics: New measures for a fragmented media environment. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 236-248. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00600.x
19.
EkströmM.ÖstmanJ. (2015). Information, interaction, and creative production: The effects of three forms of internet use on youth democratic engagement. Communication Research, 42, 796-818. doi:10.1177/0093650213476295
20.
FinkelS. (2008). Linear panel analysis. In MenardS. (Ed.), Handbook of longitudinal research: Design measurement and analysis (pp. 475-504). Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
21.
FreelonD. G. (2011). Talking among themselves: Online youth civic communication in managed and autonomous environments. Information, Communication & Society14, 198-218. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2010.495410
22.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
23.
GilDeZunigaH.Puig-I-AbrilE.RojasH. (2009). Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: An assessment of how the internet is changing the political environment. New Media & Society, 11, 553-574. doi:10.1177/1461444809102960
24.
InglehartR. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
JenkinsH. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
26.
LeeN.-J.ShahD.McLeodJ. M. (2013). Processes of political socialization: A communication mediation approach to youth civic engagement. Communication Research, 40, 669-697.
27.
LewisJ.InthornS.Wahl-JorgensenK. (2005). Citizens or consumers? What the media tell us about political participation. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
28.
LoaderB. (2007). Young citizens in the digital age: Political engagement, young people and new media. London, England: Routledge.
29.
MilnerH. (2010). The internet generation: Engaged citizens or political dropouts. Medford, OR: Tufts University Press.
30.
MutzD.YoungL. (2011). Communication and public opinion: Plus Ça change?Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 1018-1044. doi:10.1093/poq/nfr052
31.
NewtonK. (1999). Mass media effects: Mobilization or media malaise?British Journal of Political Science, 29, 577-599.
32.
NiemiR. G.CraigS. C.MatteiF. (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 national election study. The American Political Science Review, 85, 1407-1413.
33.
NorrisP. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communication in postindustrial societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
NorrisP. (2003, November27-28). Young people and political activism: From the politics of loyalties to the politics of choice. Report for the Council of Symposium, Strasbourg, France.
35.
OscarssonH.PerssonM. (2010). Unga väljare i Sverige 1956-2006 [Young voters in Sweden 1956-2006]. Stockholm, Sweden: Ungdomsstyrelsen.
36.
ÖstmanJ. (2012). Information, expression: How involvement in user-generated content relates to democratic engagement among young people. New Media & Society, 14, 1004-1021. doi:10.1177/1461444812438212
37.
PasekJ.MoreE.RomerD. (2009). Realizing the social internet? Online social networking meets offline social capital. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6, 197-215. doi:10.1080/19331680902996403
38.
PriorM. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy. How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
39.
PutnamR. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
40.
QuintelierE.VissersS. (2008). The effect of internet use on political participation: An analysis of survey results from 16-year-olds in Belgium. Social Science Computer Review, 26, 411-427. doi:10.1177/0894439307312631
41.
ShahD. V.McLeodJ. M.LeeN. (2009). Communication competence as a foundation for civic competence: Processes of socialization into citizenship. Political Communication, 26, 102-117. doi:10.1080/10584600802710384
42.
SlaterM. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17, 281-303. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
43.
Statistics Sweden. (2010). Utrikes födda efter län, ålder i tioårsklasser och kön. År 2001-2010.
44.
ThompsonJ. B. (1995). The media and modernity: A social theory of the media. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
45.
VromenA. (2011). Constructing Australian youth online: Empowered but dutiful citizens?Information, Communication & Society, 14, 959-980. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2010.549236
46.
WellsC. (2010). Citizenship and communication in online youth civic engagement projects. Information, Communication & Society, 13, 419-441. doi:10.1080/13691180902833208
47.
XenosM.FootK. (2008). Not your father’s Internet: The generation gap in online politics. In BennettL. (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 51-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.
48.
XenosM.MoyP. (2007). Direct and differential effects of the Internet on political and civic engagement. Journal of Communication, 57, 704-718. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00364.x
49.
ZukinC.KeeterS.AndolinaM.JenkinsK.Delli CarpiniM. (2006). A new engagement? Political participation, civic life and the changing American citizen. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
