News decisions of social media editors shape the news supply on social media channels such as Facebook. This study assesses based on qualitative interviews and a quantitative survey of social media editors in two social-media-savvy European countries, Finland and Switzerland, how Facebook’s News Feed algorithm, Facebook users, journalistic standards, and the news brand determine social media news making. Results show that social media editors evaluate the news factors emotions and surprise as more important for Facebook news than for online news. Social media editors accentuate emotional and surprising story elements in a post to comply with user preferences and the logic of the News Feed algorithm. Thus, news values and news editing have become more user engagement driven. Yet traditional journalistic standards and the news brand characteristics set boundaries to a heavy user engagement orientation. Social media editors estimate that their outlet’s news supply on Facebook is higher for entertaining news and lower for foreign politics and economic news stories. But they strive for a ‘good mix’ of news adhering to both the Facebook logic and professional journalistic standards.
AnderssonUWadbringI (2015) Public interest or self-interest? How journalism attracts future journalists. Journal of Media Practice16(2): 126–138.
2.
BergerJMilkmanKL (2012) What makes online content viral?Journal of Marketing Research49(2): 192–205.
3.
BrüggemannMEngesserSBüchelF, et al. (2014) Hallin and Mancini revisited: Four empirical types of western media systems. Journal of Communication64(6): 1037–1065.
CraigDAYousufM (2013) Excellence in journalistic use of social media through the eyes of social media editors. #ISOJ3(2): 93–111.
8.
DeVitoMA (2017) From editors to algorithms. Digital Journalism5(6): 753–773.
9.
DimitrovR (2014) Do social media spell the end of journalism as a profession?Global Media Journal: Australian Edition8(1): 1–16.
10.
EkdaleBSingerJBTullyM, et al. (2015) Making change: Diffusion of technological, relational, and cultural innovation in the newsroom. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly92(4): 938–958.
GadePJ (2004) Newspapers and organizational development: Management and journalist perceptions of newsroom cultural change. Journalism & Communication Monographs6(1): 3–55.
13.
Gil de ZúñigaHWeeksBArdèvol-AbreuA (2017) Effects of the news-finds-me perception in communication: Social media use implications for news seeking and learning about politics. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication22(3): 105–123.
14.
GillisTLJohnsonK (2015) Younger journalists more likely to use social media. Newspaper Research Journal36(2): 184–196.
15.
GravengaardGRimestadL (2014) Socializing journalist trainees in the newsroom. Nordicom Review35: 81–95.
16.
Groot KormelinkTCostera MeijerI (2014) Truthful or engaging?Digital Journalism3(2): 158–174.
17.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
HedmanUDjerf-PierreM (2013) The social journalist: Embracing the social media life or creating a new digital divide?Digital Journalism1(3): 368–385.
19.
KarlssonMClerwallC (2013) Negotiating professional news judgment and ‘clicks’. Nordicom Review34(2): 65–76.
20.
KrebsILischkaJA (2017) Is audience engagement worth the buzz? The value of audience engagement, comment reading, and content for online news brands. Journalism. Epub ahead of print 28 January. DOI: 10.1177/1464884916689277.
LischkaJAWerningM (2017) Wie Facebook den Regionaljournalismus verändert: Publikums- und Algorithmusorientierung bei der Facebook-Themenselektion von Regionalzeitungen. Algorithmen, Kommunikation und Gesellschaft. Sonderausgabe von kommunikation@gesellschaft. Kommunikation@gesellschaft18: 1–25.
23.
LischkaJASiegertGKrebsI (2018) Marketing and branding. In: AlbarranABMierzejewskaBJungJ (eds) Handbook of Media Management and Economics. New York: Routledge, Chapter 11.
24.
McManusJH (1994) Market-Driven Journalism: Let the Citizen Beware?Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
NapoliPM (2006) Issues in media management and the public interest. In: AlbarranABChan-OlmstedSMWirthMO (eds) Handbook of Media Management and Economics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 275–295.
26.
NeubergerCLangenohlSNuernbergkC (2014) Social Media und Journalismus. Düsseldorf: Landesanst. für Medien Nordrhein-Westfalen (LfM).
27.
NewmanNFletcherRLevyDAL, et al. (2016) Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2016. Available at: http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/ (accessed 29 June 2016).
28.
NummelaT (n.d.) SuomiTwitter: Calculating Finnish tweeps since February 7th 2013. Available at: http://www.toninummela.com
29.
OremusW (2018) The Great Facebook Crash. slate.com, 27June.
30.
PapacharissiZ (2014) Toward new journalism(s). Journalism Studies16(1): 27–40.
31.
RyfeDM (2009) Broader and deeper: A study of newsroom culture in a time of change. Journalism10(2): 197–216.
32.
ScaccoJCurryALStroudNJ (2015) Digital divisions: Organizational gatekeeping practices in the context of online news. #ISOJ5(1): 106–123.
33.
SiegertGGerthMARademacherP (2011) Brand identity-driven decision making by journalists and media managers: The MBAC model as a theoretical framework. The International Journal on Media Management13(1): 53–70.
SteinerM (2016) Boulevardisierung goes Facebook?: Ein inhaltsanalytischer Vergleich politischer Nachrichten von tagesschau, heute, RTL Aktuell und Sat.1 Nachrichten im Fernsehen und auf Facebook. In LeißnerLBauseHHagemeyerL (eds) Politische Kommunikation - neue Phänomene, neue Perspektiven, neue Methoden: Düsseldorfer Forum Politische Kommunikation DFPK 6. Berlin: Frank & Timme, pp. 27–46.
36.
SylvieG (2007) Decision Making by Nordic Newspaper Editors: An Exploratory Study and Comparison to US Editors. Jönköping: Jönköping International Business School.
37.
TenenboimOCohenAA (2015) What prompts users to click and comment: A longitudinal study of online news. Journalism16(2): 198–217.
38.
UsherN (2014) Making News at the New York Times. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
39.
VuHT (2014) The online audience as gatekeeper: The influence of reader metrics on news editorial selection. Journalism15(8): 1094–1110.
40.
WasikeBS (2013) Framing news in 140 characters: How social media editors frame the news and interact with audiences via Twitter. Global Media Journal – Canadian Edition6(1): 5–23.
41.
WeberP (2014) Discussions in the comments section: Factors influencing participation and interactivity in online newspapers’ reader comments. New Media & Society16(6): 941–957.
