This study, which was based on the General Learning Model, examined the effects of prosocial gaming on girls’ thoughts about perceived justified and unjustified aggressive attitudes as operationalized by 4 scenarios. The process was mediated by participants’ general perspective-taking and sympathy abilities, which relate to the cognitive and affective routes to learning. Structural equation modeling was used to examine the process. One hundred and forty-five girls between the ages of 7 and 15 completed the self-report online survey. Findings suggest that prosocial gaming is associated with greater perspective-taking and sympathizing abilities. These abilities positively correlated with thoughts about all types of violence as wrong whether or not “justified” and independent of severity. Error correlations suggest that younger girls’ processing comprises an affective component that bypasses the cognitive or perspective-taking route. Findings also intimate that in the case of justified violence assessments, girls not only evaluated the aggressor’s violent act but also assessed what precipitated the act thus suggesting more complex thought.
AdachiP. J .C.WilloughbyT. (2010). The effect of violent video games on aggression: Is it more than just the violence?Aggression and Violent behavior, 16, 55-62.
2.
AdachiP. J .C.WilloughbyT. (2011). The effect of video game competition and violence on aggressive behavior: Which characteristic has the greatest influence?Psychology of Violence, 1, 259-274.
3.
AndersonC. A.BushmanB. J. (2001). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science, 12, 353-359.
4.
AxelrodR. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York City, New York: Basic Books.
5.
BanduraA. (2002). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In BryantJ.ZillmannD. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 121-153). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6.
BarlettC. P.AndersonC. A. (2010). Examining media effects: The general aggression and general learning models. In ScharrerE. (Ed.), Media effects/media psychology (pp. 1-3). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell-Wiley.
7.
BatsonC. D. (1991). The altruism question. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
BuckleyK. E.AndersonC. A. (2006). A theoretical model of the effects and consequences of playing video games. In VordererP.BryantJ. (Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences (pp. 363-378). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
BurtS. A.DonnellanM. B.TackettJ. L. (2012). Should social aggression be considered “antisocial”?Journal of Psychopathy Assessment, 34, 153-163.
10.
CarnageyN. L.AndersonC. A. (2004). Violent video game exposure and aggression. Minerva Psichiatrica, 45, 1-18.
11.
ClarkC. (1987). Sympathy biography and sympathy margin. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 290-321.
12.
CudeckR.BrowneM. W. (1992). Constructing a covariance matrix that yields a specified minimizer and a specified minimum discrepancy function value. Psychometrika, 57, 357-369.
13.
DodgeT.BarabS.StuckeyB.WarrenS.HeiseltC.SteinR. (2008). Children’s sense of self: Learning and meaning in the digital age. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19, 225-249.
14.
EisenbergN. (1986). Altruistic emotion, cognition, and behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
EisenbergN. (2002). Empathy-related emotional responses, altruism, and their socialization. In DavidsonR. J.HarringtonA. (Eds.), Visions of compassion: Western scientists and Tibetan Buddhists examine human nature (pp. 131-164). New York City, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
EisenbergN.MorrisA. S. (2001). The origins and social significance of empathy-related responding. A review of “Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice” by M. L. Hoffman. Social Justice, 14, 95-120.
17.
FergusonC. J. (2007). Evidence for publication bias in video game violence effects literature: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 470-482.
18.
FergusonC. J. (2008). The school shooting/violent video game link: Causal relationship or moral panic?Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 5, 25-37.
19.
FergusonC. J. (2010). Media violence effects and violent crime: Good science or moral panic? In FergusonC. J. (Ed.), Violent crime: Clinical and social implications (pp. 37-56). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
FergusonC. J.DyckD. (2012). Paradigm change in aggression research: The time has come to retire the General Aggression Model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 220-228.
21.
FergusonC. J.GarzaA. (2011). Call of (civic) duty: Action games and civic behavior in a large sample of youth. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 770-775.
22.
FergusonC. J.CruzA. M.MartinezD.RuedaS. M.FergusonD. E.NegyC. (2008a). Personality, parental, and media influences on aggression personality and violent crime in young adults. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 17, 395-414.
23.
FergusonC. J.GarzaA.JerabeckJ.RamosR.GalindoM. (2012). Not worth the fuss after all? Cross-sectional and prospective data on violent video game influences on aggression, visuospatial cognition and mathematics ability in a sample of youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(8), 1-14.
24.
FergusonC. J.RuedaS.CruzA.FergusonD.FritzS.SmithS. (2008b). Violent video games and aggression: Causal relationship or byproduct of family violence and intrinsic violence motivation?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 311-332.
25.
FlanaganM.NissenbaumH. (2007). A game design methodology to incorporate social activist themes. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 181-190). New York City, NY: ACM Press.
26.
GentileD. A.AndersonC. A.YukawaS.IhoriN.SaleemM.MingL. K.. . . SakamotoA. (2009). The effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behaviors: international evidence from correlational, experimental, and longitudinal Studies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 752-763.
27.
GreitemeyerT. (2009a). Effects of songs with prosocial lyrics on prosocial behavior: Further evidence and a mediating mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1500-1511.
28.
GreitemeyerT. (2009b). Effects of songs with prosocial lyrics on prosocial thoughts, affect, and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 186-190.
29.
GreitemeyerT.OsswaldS. (2009). Prosocial video games reduce aggressive cognitions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 896-900.
30.
GreitemeyerT.OsswaldS. (2010). Effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 211-221.
31.
GreitemeyerT.OsswaldS.BrauerM. (2010). Playing prosocial video games increases empathy and decreases Schadenfreude. Emotion, 10, 796-802.
32.
HearoldS. (1986). A synthesis of 1043 effects of television on social behavior. In ComstockG. (Ed.), Public communication of behavior (pp. 65-133). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33.
HoffmanM. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
JohnsonM. (1994). Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
KahneJ.MiddaughE.EvansC. (2008). The civic potential of video games. In JohnD.CatherineT. (Eds.), Digital media and learning program. MacArthur Foundation (pp. 4-111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York City, NY: Guilford.
37.
KohlbergL. (1984). The Psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
38.
KooG.SeiderS. (2010). Video games for prosocial learning. In SchrierK.GibsonD. (Eds.), Ethics and game design: Teaching values through play (pp. 16-34). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
39.
KrcmarM.ValkenburgP. M. (1999). A scale to assess children’s moral interpretations of justified and unjustified violence and its relationship to television viewing. Communication Research, 26, 608-634.
40.
KrcmarM.VieiraE. T.Jr. (2005). Imitating life, imitating television: The effects of family and television models on children’s moral reasoning. Communication Research, 32, 1-28.
41.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
42.
LynchP. J.GentileD. A.OlsonA. A.BrederodeT. M. (2001). The effect of violent video game habits on adolescent aggressive attitudes and behaviors. Paper presented at the Biannual Conference of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, MN.
43.
MaresM.PalmerE.SullivanT. (2008). Prosocial effects of media exposure. In RobertL.JenkinsP.GullottaT. (Eds.), Preventing violence in America (pp. 133-155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
MaresM.WoodardE. H. (2005). Positive effects of television on children’s social interactions: A meta-analysis. Media Psychology, 7, 301-322.
NussbaumM. (2002). Upheavals of thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
PennerL. A. (2002). The causes of sustained volunteerism: an interactionist perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 447-467.
48.
PennerL. A.DovidioJ. F.PiliavinJ. A.SchroederD. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365-392.
49.
PiagetJ. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York City, NY: Free Press.
50.
PiliavinJ. A. (2004). Feeling good by doing good. In Processes of community change and social action. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51.
PiliavinJ. A.DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.ClarkR. D. (1981). Emergency intervention. New York City, NY: Academic Press.
52.
PowerM. R. (2009). Video games and a culture of conflict. Journal of Children and Media, 3(1), 90-94.
53.
ReedD. R. (1997). Following Kohlberg: Liberalism and the practice of democratic community. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
54.
RestJ.NarvaezD.BebeauM.ThomaS. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55.
RussellJ. A.CarrollJ. M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 3-30.
56.
RuusuvuoriJ. (2005). Empathy and sympathy in action: Attending to patients’ troubles in Finnish homeopathic and general practice consultations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 204-222.
57.
SakamotoA. (1994). Video game use and the development of sociocognitive abilities in children: Three surveys of elementary school students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 21-42.
58.
SaleemM.AndersonC. A.GentileD. A. (2012a). Effects of prosocial, neutral, and violent video games on children’s helpful and hurtful behaviors. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 281-287.
59.
SaleemM.AndersonC. A.GentileD. A. (2012b). Effects of prosocial, neutral, and violent video games on college students’ affect. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 263-271.
60.
SestirM. A.BartholowB. D. (2010). Violent and nonviolent video games produce opposing effects on aggressive and prosocial outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 934-942.
61.
ShafferD. (2007). How computer games help children learn. New York City, NY: Palgrave.
62.
StewartR. B.MarvinR. S. (1984). Sibling relations: The role of conceptual perspective-taking in the ontogeny of care giving. Child Development, 55, 1322-1332.
63.
VieiraE. T.KrcmarM. (2011). The influences of video gaming on US children’s moral reasoning about violence, Journal of Children and Media, 5(2), 113-131.
