The present experiments investigated how individuals’ cognitive thinking styles and the influence agent’s sex would affect the extent to which people mindfully respond to informational social influence. In Study 1, participants played a trivia game with an ostensible partner via computer and were presented with either real information that provided a rationale for the partner’s choice or placebic information that merely restated accompanying self-confidence ratings in verbal format. As predicted, real information was more likely than was placebic information to elicit conformity (a) among high compared to low rationals, (b) when the partner expressed the highest ambiguity (50% confident), and (c) when a female compared to a male character represented the partner, albeit only among men. By employing more direct measures of information processing, reaction time and perceived validity of the partner’s claims, Study 2 confirmed that greater acceptance of real rather than placebic information stemmed from more effortful message decoding.
Berger, C. R., & Douglas, W. (1982). Thought and talk: “Excuse me, but have I been talking to myself?” In F. E. X. Dance (Ed.), Human communication theory: Comparative essays (pp. 42-60). New York: Harper & Row.
2.
Berger, C. R., Johnson, J. T., & Lee, E.-J. (2003). Antidotes for anthrax anecdotes: The role of rationality and base-rate data in assuaging apprehension. Communication Research, 30, 198-223.
3.
Berger, C. R., Lee, E.-J., & Johnson, J. T. (2003). Gender, rationality, and baserate explanations for increasing trends. Communication Research, 30, 737-765.
4.
Berger, J., Fisek, H., Norman, R., & Zelditch, M. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction. New York: Elsevier.
5.
Burgoon, J. K., Berger, C. R., & Waldron, V. R. (2000). Mindfulness and interpersonal communication. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 105-127.
6.
Cacioppo, J.T., & Petty, R.E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
7.
Carli, L. L. (1991). Sex, status, and influence. In E. J. Lawler, B. Markovski, C. L. Ridgeway, & H. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes (pp. 89-113). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
8.
Carli, L. L. (1999). Sex, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 81-93.
9.
Carli, L. L., LaFleur, S. J., & Loeher, C. C. (1995). Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1030-1041.
10.
Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium(Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Chanowitz, B., & Langer, E. J. (1981). Premature cognitive commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1051-1063.
12.
Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York: Guilford.
13.
Eagly, A. H. (1983). Gender and social influence: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 38, 971-981.
14.
Eagly, A.H., Makhijani, M.G., & Klonski, B.G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.
15.
Epstein, S. (1994). An integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724.
16.
Epstein, S., & Pacini, R. (1999). Some basic issues regarding dual-process theories from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 462-482). New York: Guilford.
17.
Folkes, V. S. (1985). Mindlessness or mindfulness: A partial replication and extension of Langer, Blank, and Chanowitz. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 600-604.
18.
Hample, D. (1992). Writing mindlessly. Communication Monographs, 59, 315-323.
19.
Hewes, D. E. (1995). Cognitive processing of problematic messages: Reinterpreting to “unbias” texts. In D. E. Hewes (Ed.), Cognitive bases of interpersonal communication (pp. 113-140). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Kellermann, K. (1992). Communication: Inherently strategic and primarily automatic. Communication Monographs, 59, 288-300.
21.
Kitayama, S., & Burnstein, E. (1988). Automaticity in conversations: A reexamination of the mindlessness hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 219-224.
22.
Langer, E. J. (1989). Minding matters: The consequences of mindlessness-mindfulness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 137-173). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23.
Langer, E. J. (1994). The illusion of calculated decisions. In R. C. Schank & E. J. Langer (Eds.), Beliefs, reasoning, and decision making: Psycho-logic in honor of Bob Abelson (pp. 33-53). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
Langer, E. J., Blank, A., & Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 635-642.
25.
Langer, E.J., Chanowitz, B., & Blank, A. (1985). Mindlessness-mindfulness in perspective: A reply to Valerie Folkes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 605-607.
26.
Langer, E. J., & Imber, L. (1979). When practice makes imperfect: The debilitating effects of overlearning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2014-2025.
27.
Langer, E. J., & Newman, H. M. (1979). The role of mindlessness in a typical social psychological experiment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 295-298.
28.
Lee, E.-J. (2004). Effects of visual representation on social influence in computer-mediated communication: Experimental tests of the social identity model of deindividuation effects. Human Communication Research, 30, 234-259.
29.
McAllister, D., Mitchell, T., & Beach, L. (1979). The contingency model for the selection of decision strategies: An empirical test of the effects of significance, accountability, and reversibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24, 228-244.
30.
Meeker, B. F., & Weitzel-O’Neill, P. A. (1977). Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in task-oriented groups. American Sociological Review, 42, 91-105.
31.
Motley, M. T. (1992). Mindfulness in solving communicators’ dilemmas. Communication Monographs, 59, 306-314.
32.
Norris, P., & Epstein, S. (2002). The investigation of some fundamental issues concerning rational-analytical and intuitive-experiential thinking styles with a short form of the rational-experiential inventory. Manuscript submitted for publication.
33.
Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratiobias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 972-987.
34.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
35.
Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 41-72). New York: Guilford.
36.
Pollock, C. L., Smith, S. D., Knowles, E. S., & Bruce, H. J. (1998). Mindfulness limits compliance with the that’s-not-all technique. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1153-1157.
37.
Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2002). Behavior online: Does anonymous computer communication reduce sex inequality?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1073-1083.
38.
Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (2002). Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization. Group Dynamics, 6, 3-16.
39.
Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Sex, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues57, 637-655.
40.
Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Images of mindfulness. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 11-26.
42.
Tetlock, P. (1983). Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 74-83.
43.
Wagner, D. G., & Berger, J. (1997). Gender and interpersonal task behaviors: Status expectation accounts. Sociological Perspectives, 40, 1-32.
44.
Wood, W., & Karten, S. J. (1986). Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex differences in competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 341-347.
