Power calculations are provided for many of the variables recorded in general toxicology studies. It is hoped that these will help the statistician and scientist to discuss what differences are biologically important. Hypotheses relating to satellite recovery groups (also called off-dose groups) are also discussed.
WilliamsDA. A test for differences between treatment means where several dose levels are compared with a zero dose control. Biometrics.1971;27:103–177.
2.
WilliamsDA. The comparison of several dose levels with a zero dose control. Biometrics.1972;28:519–531.
3.
ShirleyENewnhamP. The choice between analysis of variance and analysis of covariance with special reference to the analysis of organ weights in toxicology studies. Stat Med.1984;3:85–91.
4.
WinerBJ. Statistical principles in experimental design.2nd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill; 1971:33–34.
5.
HauschkeD. Statistical proof of safety in toxicological studies. Drug Inf J.1997;31.
6.
DunnettCW. An alternative to the use of two-sided tests in clinical trials. Stat Med.1996;15:1729–1738.
7.
ShirleyE. The value of specialized tests in studies where ordered group means are expected. Stat Med.1985;4:489–496.
8.
DunnettCW. New tables for multiple comparisons with a control. Biometrics.1964;20:482–491.
9.
HochbergYTamhaneAC. Multiple comparison procedures.New York: John Wiley; 1987:129.
10.
BellamyN. Ankylosing spondylitis antirheumatic drug trials. II. Tables for calculating sample size for clinical trials. J Rheumatol.1991;18:1709–1715.
