RuckerT. D.: The top-selling drug products: How good are they?Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 37:836, June 1980.
2.
SammonsJ. H.: New controls on physician prescribing are not needed. In: Controversies in therapeutics (LasagnaL., ed.). Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Co., 1980. p. 543.
SilvermanM.LeeP. R.: Pills, profits, and politics. Berkeley, Univ. of California Press, 1974. p. 300.
7.
WolfeS. M.ColeyC. M.: Pills that don't work. Washington, Health Research Group, 1980. pp. 1, 201–207.
8.
ASHP statement of guiding principles on the operation of the hospital formulary system. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 21:40, Jan. 1964.
9.
LinkewichJ. A.PrevoznikS. J.: Guidelines on the operation of the pharmacy and therapeutics committee and formulary. Hosp. Pharm. 14:13, Jan. 1979.
10.
RuckerT. D.: Effective formulary development—which direction? op. cit., p. 31.
11.
RuckerT. D.: Restricted formulary drugs: An exploratory study. Hosp. Pharm. 17:246–253, May 1982.
12.
ASHP guidelines for hospital formularies. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 35:326–328, Mar. 1978.
13.
DavisN. M.: Formulary house cleaning. Hosp. Pharm. 14:2, Jan. 1979.
14.
RuckerT. D.MorseM. L.: The medicaid drug program in Louisiana: Critique of the Hefner-Pracon study. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 37:1350–1353, Oct. 1980.
15.
RuckerT. D.: Effective formulary development—which direction? op. cit., p. 39.
16.
RuckerT. D.ViscontiJ. A.: How effective are drug formularies? A descriptive and normative study. Washington, ASHP Research & Education Foundation, 1979. p. 26.
17.
World Health Organization: The selection of essential drugs. WHO Tech. Rep. Ser. No. 641, 1979. 44 pages.
18.
SilvermanM.LeeP. R.LydeckerM.: Pills and the public purse. Berkeley, Univ. of California Press, 1981. p. 102.
19.
RuckerT. D.ViscontiJ. A.: op. cit., p. 109.
20.
Quigley, M. A. and Brown, W. M.: A survey of selective administrative procedures in formulary maintenance. Hosp. Pharm. 16:374, July 1981.
21.
ASHP statement on the pharmacy and therapeutics committee, op. cit.
22.
ASHP guidelines for the scientific and therapeutic evaluation of drugs for hospital formularies. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 38:1043–1044, July 1981.
23.
RuckerT. D.: Effective formulary development—which direction? op. cit., pp. 40–41.
24.
WertheimerA. I., (ed.): Proceedings of the international conference on drug and pharmacy services reimbursement. DHEW Pub. No. (HRA) 77–3186, Nov. 2–5, 1976. p. 185.
25.
BlumR.HerxheimerA.StenzlC.WoodcockJ.: Pharmaceuticals and health policy. London, Croom Helm, Ltd., 1981. pp. 67, 69, 160 and 262.
26.
RuckerT. D.: The top-selling drug products: How good are they? op. cit., p. 835.
27.
QuigleyM. A.BrownW. M.: op. cit., p. 327.
28.
BlumR.KreitmanK.: Factors affecting individual use of medicine. In: Pharmaceuticals and health policy, (BlumR., eds.), op. cit., p. 156.
29.
TalleyC. R.: Hospitals defend formulary decisions against industry attacks. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 35:1154–1155, Sept. 1978.
30.
RuckerT. D.: Drug information: Findings from a major study of formularies. Drug. Inf. J.13:42–43, Jan./June 1979.
BunkerJ. P.FowlesJ.SchaffarzickR.: Evaluation of medical-technological strategies. N. Engl. J. Med.306:687–692, Mar. 18, 1982.
33.
Drug regulation reform act of 1979. Title XVIII, H.R. 4258 and S. 1075, 1st Session, 96th Congress.
34.
RuckerT. D.: Effective formulary development—which direction? op. cit., pp. 42–43.
35.
QuigleyM. A.BrownW. M.: op. cit., p. 373.
36.
RuckerT. D.: Eight superior hospital formularies: A critique. Hosp. Pharm. in press.
37.
World Health Organization, op. cit.
38.
HellerW. M., (ed.): The National Formulary and USP guide to select drugs. Rockville, MD., United State Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc., 1976. 295 pages.