TurnerJR. Editor's commentary: A vision for the journal's continued growth. Drug Inf J. 2011;45:113–117.
2.
TurnerJR. Editor's commentary: Regulatory science and the science of safety. Drug Inf J. 201145:221–227.
3.
GarattiniS. Evaluation of benefit-risk. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28:981–986.
4.
JohnsonKP. Risks vs benefits of glatiramer acetate: A changing perspective as new therapies emerge for multiple sclerosis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2010;6:153–172.
5.
OsterGWeyckerDEdelsbergJBenefits and risks of live attenuated influenza vaccine in young children. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(9): e235–244.
6.
CoplanPMNoelRALevitanBSFergusonJMussenF. Development of a framework for enhancing the transparency, reproducibility and communication of the benefit-risk balance of medicines. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;89:312–315.
7.
CupponeFBriaEVaccaroVMagnitude of risks and benefits of the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer patients: Meta-regression analysis of randomized trials. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2011;30:54.
8.
SchulmanSMajeedA. A benefit-risk assessment of dabigatran in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic surgery. Drug Saf. 2011;34:449–463.
9.
TurnerJR. New Drug Development: An Introduction to Clinical Trials, 2nd ed.New York: Springer; 2010.
10.
DurhamTATurnerJR. Introduction to Statistics in Pharmaceutical Clinical Trials. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2008.
11.
TurnerJRSatinLZCallahanTSLitwinJS. The science of cardiac safety. Appl Clin Trials. 2010;19 (11, suppl):4–8, 14.
12.
Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. The Future of Drug Safety: Promoting and Protecting the Health of the Public. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007. (Report released September 2006, published in book form in 2007.).
13.
StromBL. Sample size considerations for pharmacoepidemiology studies. In StromBL (ed.), Pharmacoepidemiology, 4th ed.Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2005.
14.
CaveneyETurnerJR. Regulatory landscapes for future antidiabetic drug development (part I): FDA guidance on assessment of cardiovascular risks. J Clin Stud. 2010;(January):34–36.
15.
CaveneyECaveneyBJSomaratneRTurnerJRGourgiotisL. Pharmaceutical interventions for obesity: A public health perspective. Diabetes Obesity Metabol. 2011;13:490–497.
16.
Food and Drug Administration. The Sentinel Initiative: national strategy for monitoring medical product safety. Washington, DC: Food and Drug Administration; May 2008.
17.
CaliffRM. How should we determine benefit:risk and how much risk is acceptable? Presentation at the DIA conference “Cardiovascular Safety in Drug Development: State-of-the-art Assessments,” Washington DC, April 14–15, 2011.
18.
O'NeillRT. A perspective on characterizing benefits and risks derived from clinical trials: Can we do more?Drug Inf J. 2008;42:235–245.
19.
GuoJJPandeySDoyleJA review of quantitative risk-benefit methodologies for assessing drug safety and efficacy-report of the ISPOR risk-benefit management working group. Value Health. 2010;13:657–666.
20.
OuelletD. Benefit-risk assessment: The use of clinical utility index. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2010;9:289–300.
21.
FreedmanANYuBGailMHBenefit/risk assessment for breast cancer chemoprevention with raloxifene or tamoxifen for women age 50 years or older. J Clin Oncol. 2011;(May 2) [Epub ahead of print].
22.
TervonenTvan ValkenhoefGBuskensEHillegeHLPostmusD. A stochastic multicriteria model for evidence-based decision making in drug benefit-risk analysis. Stat Med. 2011;30:1419–1428.
23.
Van HoutvenGJohnsonFRKilambiVHauberAB. Eliciting benefit-risk preferences and probability-weighted utility using choice-format conjoint analysis. Med Decis Making. 2011;31:469–480.
24.
WalkerSLibertiLMcAuslaneN. Refining the benefit-risk framework for the assessment of medicines: Valuing and weighting benefit and risk parameters. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;89: 179–182.
25.
YuanZLevitanBBerlinJA. Benefit-risk assessment: To quantify or not to quantify, that is the question. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;(April 27) [Epub ahead of print].