The good life is broadly understood to mean a life worth living, characterized by positive human functioning and well-being. Psychologists have primarily focused on aspects of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being at the individual level. While this continues to be important, the narrative scripts that influence individuals’ concepts of the good life are underexplored. Scripts about “the good life” circulate in every culture and for Asian American Christians, they potentially come from three sources—Asian cultures experienced prior to or during diaspora, Christian culture, and the individual’s personal meaning-making. This exploratory study focuses on perspectives of the good life, told by 31 East-Asian American Christians in the Seattle area. Through interviews, researchers captured participants’ conceptualizations of the good life at societal, communal, and personal levels and thematically coded these stories for motivational themes. For the East-Asian American Christians in our study, master narratives of the good life constellate around achievement and security, and dominant narratives of the perpetual foreigner and model minority persist. Furthermore, alternative narratives of the good life informed by the Christian tradition constellate around relatedness, purpose, and competence. These themes also emerge for personal narratives of the good life, with an amplified emphasis on relatedness.
AdlerJ. M. (2012). Living into the story: Agency and coherence in a longitudinal study of narrative identity development and mental health over the course of psychotherapy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 367–389.
2.
AdlerJ. M.DunlopW. L.FivushR.LilgendahlJ. P.Lodi-SmithJ.McAdamsD. P.McLeanK. C.PasupathiM.SyedM. (2017). Research methods for studying narrative identity: A primer. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617698202
3.
AdlerJ. M.Lodi-SmithJ.PhilippeF. L.HouleI. (2016). The incremental validity of narrative identity in predicting well-being: A review of the field and recommendations for the future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(2), 142–175.
4.
AlderferC. P. (1972). Existence, relatedness, and growth: Human needs in organizational settings. Free Press.
5.
AmmermanN. (2003). Religious identities and religious institutions. In DillonM. (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of religion (pp. 207–224). Cambridge University Press.
6.
AzizS. K. (2023). Cross-cultural narratology: A comparative study of storytelling techniques in Eastern and Western literature. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 12, 742–753. https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2023.12.4.58
7.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
8.
BrunerJ. (1991, Autumn). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18, 1–22. http://doi.org.10.1086/48619
9.
ChenB.VansteenkisteM.BeyersW.BooneL.DeciE. L.Van der Kaap-DeederJ.DuriezB.LensW.MatosL.MouratidisA.RyanR. M.SheldonK. M.SoenensB.Van PetegemS.VerstuyfJ. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 216–236. https://doi-org.ezproxy.spu.edu/10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1
10.
ChengS. K. (1990). Understanding the culture and behaviour of East Asians: A Confucian perspective. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 24(4), 510–515. https://doi.org/10.3109/00048679009062907
11.
ChengH.-L.ZhangJ.SuJ.KimH. Y. (2020). Race-based marginalization and private racial regard in Asian Americans: Self-esteem and nativity as moderators. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 11(3), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000202
CordaroD. T.BrackettM.GlassL.AndersonC. L. (2016). Contentment: Perceived completeness across cultures and traditions. Review of General Psychology, 20(3), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000082
14.
DienerE.OishiS. (2005). The nonobvious social psychology of happiness. Psychological Inquiry, 16(4), 162–167.
15.
EspinozaB. D. (2013). The Christian story and our stories: Narrative pedagogy in congregational life. Christian Education Journal, 10(2), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/073989131301000213
GuptaA.SzymanksiD. M.LeongF. T. L. (2011). The “Model Minority Myth”: Internalized racialism of positive stereotypes as correlates of psychological distress, and attitudes toward help-seeking. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 2(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024183
18.
HauerwasS. (1981). A community of character. University of Notre Dame Press.
19.
HennickM.KaiserB. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science and Medicine, 292, 1–10.
20.
HennickM.KaiserB. N.MarconiV. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough?Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591–608.
HuynhQ. L.DevosT.SmalarzL. (2011). Perpetual foreigner in one’s own land: Potential implications for identity and psychological adjustment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30(2), 133–162. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2011.30.2.133
24.
JeungR. (2005). Faithful generations: Race and new Asian American churches. Rutgers University Press.
25.
KiangL.HuynhV. W.CheahC. S. L.WangY.YoshikawaH. (2017). Moving beyond the model minority. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 8(1), 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aap0000070
26.
KimC. J. (1999). The racial triangulation of Asian Americans. Politics & Society, 27(1), 105–138.
27.
KimH. J. (2020). Reconstructing Asian America’s religious past. In YooD. K.JoshiK. Y. (Eds.), Envisioning religion, race, and Asian Americans (pp. 13–40). University of Hawaii Press.
28.
KimP. Y.LeeD. (2014). Internalized model minority myth, Asian values, and help-seeking attitudes among Asian American students. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033351
29.
LeeE. (2016). The making of Asian America. Simon & Schuster.
LiengN.AtkinA. L.KimA. Y.WuC. S. (2024). Are Asian Americans BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color)? Internalization of the model minority stereotype and COVID-19 racial bias on interracial solidarity toward Black Americans. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000698
32.
LorrimarV. (2018). Human flourishing, joy, and the prospect of radical life extension. The Expository Times, 129(12), 554–561.
McAdamsD. P. (2008). Personal narratives and the life story. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 242–262). The Guilford Press.
35.
McAdamsD. P.HoffmanB. J.DayR.MansfieldE. D. (1996). Themes of agency and communion in significant autobiographical scenes. Journal of Personality, 64, 339–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00514.x
36.
McClellandD. C. (2014). Human motivation. Cambridge University Press.
37.
McLeanK. C.LilgendahlJ. P.FordhamC.AlpertE.MarsdenE.SzymanowskiK.McAdamsD. P. (2017). Identity development in cultural context: The role of deviating from master narratives. Journal of Personality, 86, 631–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12341
38.
McLeanK. C.SyedM. (2016). Personal, master, and alternative narratives: An integrative framework for understanding identity development in context. Human Development, 58(6), 318–349. https://doi.org/10.1159/000445817
39.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. University of Chicago Press.
40.
MistryJ.KiyamaF. (2021). Navigating marginalization and invisibility as Asian Americans in the U.S. American Psychologist, 76, 582–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000782
NisbettR. E.MiyamotoY. (2005). The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.004
43.
O’ConnorC.JoffeH. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406919899220.
44.
ParkL. S. (2008). Continuing significance of the model minority myth: The second generation. Social Justice, 35, 133–144.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
47.
RyanR. M.HutaV.DeciE. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 9(1), 139–170. https://doi-org.ezproxy.spu.edu/10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4
48.
RyffC. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263
SchwartzS. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
51.
ShinT. (2021). God, the good life, and pastoral practice: What does religion/spirituality have to do with the science of well-being?Theology Today, 77(4), 440–459.
52.
SonA. (2006). Confucianism and the lack of the development of the self among Korean American women. Pastoral Psychology, 54, 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-005-0003-0
SyedM.McLeanK. C. (2021). Master narrative methodology: A primer for conducting structural-psychological research. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 29, 53–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000470
55.
SyedM.McLeanK. C. (2022). Who gets to live the good life? Master narratives, identity, and well-being within a marginalizing society. Journal of Research in Personality, 100, 104285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104285
56.
TrieuM. M.LeeH. C. (2018). Asian Americans and internalized racial oppression: Identified, reproduced, and dismantled. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 4(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649217725757
57.
WangQ.Kim KohJ. B.SongQ. (2015). Meaning making through personal storytelling: Narrative research in the Asian American context. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 6, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037317
YiJ.LaR.LeeB. A.SawA. (2023). Internalization of the model minority myth and sociodemographic factors shaping Asians/Asian Americans’ experiences of discrimination during COVID-19. American Journal of Community Psychology, 71(1–2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12635
60.
YooH. C.BurrolaK. S.StegerM. F. (2010). A preliminary report on a new measure: Internalization of the model minority myth measure (IM-4) and its psychological correlates among Asian American college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 114–127.
61.
YooD. K.JoshiK. Y. (Eds.). (2020). Envisioning religion, race, and Asian Americans. University of Hawaii Press.
62.
YostP. R.YoderM. P.ChungH. H.VoetmannK. R. (2015). Narratives at work: Story arcs, themes, voice, and lessons that shape organizational life. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 67, 163–188.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
