There is a growing awareness within Christian scholarship and practice that the biblical theology and practice of lament is not outdated but rather of vital importance for the health of the church in how it relates to God, others, and the self. What this article seeks to explore in a fresh way is why lament is so important by examining how the practice of it achieves the health that is so desperately needed. At the heart of this exploration is a rereading of the biblical lament tradition through the pioneering work of Object Relations Theory psychiatrist Donald Winnicott. A key aspect of Winnicott’s work was how the “true self” develops, and it is his work around this subject that is used here to enable exploration of how lament may achieve the development of the true self, rather than a “false self” in the life of those lamenting. It is intended that this will throw fresh light on the theology and practice of lament as well as giving new impetus to Christian communities to consider how they respond to those suffering in their midst.
BierMiriam J.BulkeleyTim (eds.) (2014). Spiritual Complaint: The Theology and Practice of Lament. Cambridge: James Clarke and Co. Ltd.
2.
BillmanKathleen D.MiglioreDaniel L. (1999). Rachel’s Cry: Prayer of Lament and Rebirth of Hope. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock.
3.
BrueggemannWalter (1980). Psalms and the life of faith: A suggested typology of function. JSOT, 17, 3–32.
4.
BrueggemannWalter (1984). The Message of the Psalms: A Theological Commentary. Minneapolis: Augsburg.
5.
BrueggemannWalter (1985). A shape for Old Testament Theology I: Structure legitimation. CBQ, 47, 28–46.
6.
BrueggemannWalter (1987). Hopeful Imagination: Prophetic Voices in Exile. Philadelphia: Fortress.
7.
BrueggemannWalter (1995a). From hurt to joy, from death to life. In MillerPatrick D. (ed.), The Psalms and the Life of Faith. Minneapolis: Fortress, pp. 67–83.
8.
BrueggemannWalter (1995b). The costly loss of lament. In MillerPatrick D. (ed.), The Psalms and the Life of Faith. Minneapolis: Fortress, pp. 98–111.
9.
BrueggemannWalter (1997). Theology of the Old Testament: Testimony, Dispute, Advocacy. Minneapolis: Fortress.
10.
BrueggemannWalter (2009). Psychological criticism: Exploring the self in the text. In LeMonJoel M.RichardsKent Harold (eds.), Method Matters: Essays on the Interpretation of the Hebrew Bible in Honor of David L. Petersen. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature, pp. 213–232.
11.
ClinesDavid J. A. (2011). Job 38–42. Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
12.
DunnJames D. G. (2001). Judaism and Christianity: One covenant or two? In CartledgeMark J.MillsDavid (eds.), Covenant Theology: Contemporary Approaches. Carlisle, UK: Paternoster Press, pp. 33–55.
13.
FretheimTerence E. (2005). God and the World in the Old Testament: A Relational Theology of Creation. Nashville: Abingdon.
14.
GillRobin (2001). Health care and covenant: Withholding and withdrawing treatment. In CartledgeMark J.MillsDavid (eds.), Covenant Theology: Contemporary Approaches. Carlisle, UK: Paternoster Press, pp. 101–116.
15.
GoldmanDodi (2012). Vital sparks and the form of things unknown. In AbramJan (ed.), Donald Winnicott Today. Hove, UK: Routledge, 2013, pp. 331–357.
16.
GomezLavinia (1997). An Introduction to Object Relations. London: Free Association Books.
17.
HammanJaco J. (2000). The Restoration of Job: A Study Based on D. W. Winnicott’s Theory of Object Usage and its Significance for Pastoral Theology. Unpublished PhD thesis, Princeton, New Jersey.
18.
HarperG. GeoffreyBarkerKit (eds.) (2017). Finding Lost Words: The Church’s Right to Lament. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock.
19.
HartleyJohn E. (1988). The Book of Job. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
20.
HopkinsBrooke (1993). Jesus and object use: A Winnicottian account of the resurrection myth. In RudnytskyPeter L. (ed.), Transitional Objects and Potential Spaces: Literary Uses of D.W. Winnicott. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 249–260.
21.
JanzenJ. Gerald (1985). Job. Atlanta, GA: John Knox Press.
22.
MiddletonJ. Richard (2006). A new heaven and a new earth: The case for a holistic reading of the biblical story of redemption. Journal for Christian Theological Research, 11, 73–97.
23.
MiddletonJ. Richard (2016). God’s loyal opposition: Psalmic and prophetic protest as a paradigm for faithfulness in the Hebrew Bible. The Canadian-American Theological Review, 5:1, 51–65.
24.
MiddletonJ. Richard (2017). Does God come to bury Job or to praise him? The significance of YHWH’s second speech from the whirlwind. St Mark’s Review, 239, 1–27.
25.
NewsomCarol (1996). The book of Job: Introduction, commentary and reflections. In KeckLeander E.et al. (eds.), The New Interpreters Bible, vol. 4. Nashville: Abingdon Press, pp. 317–637.
26.
PargamentKenneth I. (1997). The Psychology of Religion and Coping: Theory, Research, Practice. New York: The Guildford Press.
27.
ParkerStephen E. (2011). Winnicott and Religion. Plymouth, UK: Jason Aronson.
PopeMarvin (1974). Job. Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Company.
30.
TilleyTerrence W. (2000). Evils of Theodicy. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock.
31.
TorrStephen C. (2013). A Dramatic Pentecostal/Charismatic Anti-theodicy: Improvising on a Divine Performance of Lament. Eugene, OR: Pickwick.
32.
TorrStephen C. (2017). Lamenting in tongues: Glossolalia as a pneumatic aid to lament. Journal of Pentecostal Theology, 26, 30–47.
33.
VanhoozerKevin J. (2010). Remythologizing Theology: Divine Action, Passion, and Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
VillanuevaFederico G. (2007). The Uncertainty of a Hearing: A Study of the Sudden Change of Mood in the Individual Lament Psalms. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Bristol.
35.
WestermannClaus (1981). Praise and Lament in the Psalms. Trans. CrimKeith R.SoulenRichard N.Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
36.
WestermannClaus (1987). The Structure of the Book of Job. Trans. MuenchowCharles A.Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
37.
WinnicottD. W. (1958). The capacity to be alone. In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. London: Hogarth Press, 1965; reprint, London: Karnac Books, 2007, pp. 29–36.
38.
WinnicottD. W. (1960a). Ego distortion in terms of true and false self. In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. London: Hogarth Press, 1965; reprint, London: Karnac Books, 2007, pp. 140–152.
39.
WinnicottD. W. (1960b). The theory of the parent–infant relationship. In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. London: Hogarth Press, 1965; reprint, London: Karnac Books, 2007, pp. 37–55.
40.
WinnicottD. W. (1962). Ego integration in child development. In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. London: Hogarth Press, 1965; reprint, London: Karnac Books, 2007, pp. 56–63.
41.
WinnicottD. W. (1963). From dependence towards independence in the development of the individual. In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. London: Hogarth Press, 1965; reprint, London: Karnac Books, 2007, pp. 83–92.
42.
WinnicottD. W. (1967). The concept of a healthy individual. In Home is Where We Start from. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1986, pp. 21–38.
43.
WinnicottD. W. (1975). The Child, the Family, and the Outside World. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1964; reprint.
44.
WinnicottD. W. (1988). Babies and Their Mothers, ed. WinnicottClareet al. London: Free Association Books.
45.
WinnicottD. W. (1993). Playing and Reality. Tavistock Publications, USA, 1971; reprint, London: Routledge.
