High-Priced Textbooks’ Impact on Community College Student Success

Abstract

Objective:

This research study examined textbook costs and student success rates at one community college in the Southwest United States.

Method:

Descriptive statistics were used in the study to identify the mean textbook costs and student success rates over five semesters. Chi-square tests for independence were used to determine if a statistically significant relationship exists between textbook costs and student success rates based on course level of lower or upper-level courses.

Results:

The chi-square tests of independence found a statistically significant relationship between textbook costs and student success rates in lower and upper-level courses.

Contributions:

Research shows college students often opt not to purchase commercial textbooks due to costs, thus resulting in higher D, F, and W rates. The results of this study support numerous recent research studies on the impact of textbook costs and student success.

Keywords

commercial textbooks student success rates community college students no-cost/low-cost

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Becker

(2022). Improving student success rates with OER. Academic Leader. http://www.academic-leader.com/topics/curriculum-planning/improving-student-success-rates-with-oer/

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016). College tuition and fees increase 63 percent since January 2006. United States Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2016/college-tuition-and-fees-increase-63-percent-since-january-2006.htm

Chiorescu

(2017). Exploring open educational resources for college algebra. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3003

Clinton

(2018). Savings without sacrifice: A case report on open-source textbook adoption. Open Learning: The Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning, 33(3), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1486184

Clinton

Khan

(2019). Efficacy of open textbook adoption on learning performance and course withdrawal rates: A meta-analysis. AERA Open, 5(3), 2332858419872212. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419872212

Coauette

C. M.

(2010). “You know how it works, it is a dance, an art, not a science”: A qualitative study on decision making by public two-year college presidents. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED522031

Collins

Mitchell

Nojeim

(2020). Free is my favorite flavor! Using OER course materials in GenEd courses. APSA Preprints. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2020-7jz1x

Colson

Scott

Donaldson

(2017). Supporting librarians in making the business case for OER. The Reference Librarian, 58(4), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2017.1377665

Colvard

N. B.

Watson

C. E.

Park

(2018). The impact of open educational resources on various student success metrics. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(2), 262–276. https://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE3386.pdf

10.

Fischer

Hilton

3rd Robinson

Wiley

. (2015). A multi-institutional study of the impact of open textbook adoption on the learning outcomes of post-secondary students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(3), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-015-9101-x

11.

Florida Virtual Campus. (2018). 2018 Florida student textbook survey. Florida Virtual Campus. https://dlss.flvc.org/documents/210036/1314923/2018+Student+Textbook+and+Course+Materials+Survey+Report+–+FINAL+VERSION+–+20190308.pdf/07478d85-89c2-3742-209a-9cc5df8cd7ea

12.

Green

K. C.

(2018). Campus computing 2018: The 29th national survey of computing and information technology in american higher education. The Campus Computing Project. https://www.campuscomputing.net/content/2018/10/31/the-2018-campus-computing-survey

13.

Griffiths

Mislevy

Wang

Ball

Shear

Desrochers

(2020). OER at scale: The academic and economic outcomes of achieving the Dream’s OER degree initiative. SRI International. https://www.achievingthedream.org/resource/17993/oer-at-scale-the-academic-and-economic-outcomes-of-achieving-the-dream-s-oer-degree-initiative

14.

Grimaldi

P. J.

Basu Mallick

Waters

A. E.

Baraniuk

R. G.

(2019). Do open educational resources improve student learning? Implications of the access hypothesis. PLoS One, 14(3), e0212508. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212508

15.

Gurung

R. A. R.

(2017). Predicting learning: Comparing an open educational resource and standard textbooks. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 3(3), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000092

16.

Hearn

J. C.

(2003). Diversifying campus revenue streams: Opportunities and risks. https://ihe.uga.edu/sites/default/files/inline-files/Diversifying_Campus_Revenue.pdf

17.

Hilton

(2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9

18.

Hilton

(2020). Open educational resources, student efficacy, and user perceptions: A synthesis of research published between 2015 and 2018. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 853–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09700-4

19.

Hilton

Laman

(2012). One college’s use of an open psychology textbook. Open Learning: The Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning, 27(3), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2012.716657

20.

Huntsman

Edenfield

Davis

(2020). Open access textbooks in a professional communication classroom: A pilot study. Journal on Empowering Teaching Excellence, 4(1), 7.

21.

Institute of Education Sciences. (2017). IPEDS data feedback report.

22.

Institute of Education Sciences. (2019). IPEDS data feedback report.

23.

Jhangiani

R. S.

Dastur

F. N.

Le Grand

Penner

(2018). As good or better than commercial textbooks: Students’ perceptions and outcomes from using open digital and open print textbooks. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2018.1.5

24.

Magro

Tabaei

S. V.

(2019). Results from a psychology OER pilot program: Faculty and student perceptions, cost savings, and academic outcomes. Open Praxis, 12(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.12.1.1007

25.

Medley-Rath

(2018). Does the type of textbook matter? Results of a study of free electronic reading materials at a community college. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 42(12), 908–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2017.1389316

26.

Miller

Headlam

Manno

Cullinan

(2020). Increasing community college graduation rates with a proven model: Three-year results from the Accelerated Study in Associate Programs (ASAP) Ohio demonstration. MDRC. https://www.mdrc.org/sites/default/files/ASAP_OH_3yr_Impact_Report_1.pdf

27.

National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. (2019). Current term enrollment estimates. https://nscresearchcenter.org/current-term-enrollment-estimates-2019/

28.

Palvia

Aeron

Gupta

Mahapatra

Parida

Rosner

Sindhi

(2018). Online education: Worldwide status, challenges, trends, and implications. Journal of Global Information Technology Management: JGITM, 21(4), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198x.2018.1542262

29.

Pawlyshyn

Braddlee Casper

Miller

(2013, November 4). Adopting OER: A case study of cross-institutional collaboration and innovation. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/11/adopting-oer-a-case-study-of-crossinstitutional-collaboration-and-innovation

30.

Perry

M. J.

(2020, January 14). Chart of the day. . . or century? American Enterprise Institute. https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/chart-of-the-day-or-century-3/

31.

Powell

Kerr

(2020, August 5). 12 Ways to cut your textbook costs. US News. https://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/paying-for-college/slideshows/ways-to-cut-your-textbook-costs

32.

Robinson

T. J.

(2015). The effects of open educational resource adoption on measures of post-secondary student success (Order No. 3714922) [Doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Publicly Available Content Database. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6814&context=etd

33.

Seaman

J. E.

Seaman

(2017). Opening the textbook: Educational resources in US higher education. Babson Survey Research Group. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED582411.pdf

34.

Skomsvold

(2014). Profile of undergraduate students: 2011–12, web tables (NCES 2015-167). National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015167.pdf

35.

Spilovoy

Seaman

Ralph

(2020). The impact of OER initiatives on faculty selection of classroom materials. WCET and Bay View Analytics. https://www.bayviewanalytics.com/reports/impactofoerinitiatives.pdf

36.

Texas Woman’s University Library. OER faculty mini-grants. OER Course Redesign Mini-Grants. Libraries, Texas Woman’s University. Retrieved August 21, 2022, from https://libguides.twu.edu/c.php?g=1134139

37.

The Maricopa Millions Open Educational Resources Project. (n.d.). Open Maricopa. Maricopa Community Colleges, MCLI. Retrieved August 21, 2022, from https://mcli.maricopa.edu/open-maricopa

38.

University of Kansas Libraries. Open educational resources grant initiative. The University of Kansas. Retrieved August 21, 2022, from https://lib.ku.edu/services/oer/grant

39.

University of Pittsburgh Library System. (n.d.). Open educational resources. University of Pittsburgh Library System. Retrieved August 21, 2022, from https://www.library.pitt.edu/open-educational-resources

40.

Wiley

D. A.

(2020). Open educational resources: Undertheorized research and untapped potential. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 411–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09907-w

41.

Zhao

Satyanarayana

Cooney

(2020). Impact of open educational resources (OER) on student academic performance and retention rates in undergraduate engineering departments. CUNY Academic Works. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1656&context=ny_pubs