Efficiency for Whom? Varying Impact of Performance-Based Funding on Community Colleges in Louisiana

Abstract

Objective: This study examines whether Louisiana’s performance-based funding (PBF) implementation in 2011 impacts various academic outcomes at community colleges, and whether the impact varies for institutions with higher proportions of underrepresented students. Method: Using institutional-level panel data between 2006 and 2016, I employ difference-in-differences to estimate the average treatment effect of the Granting Resources and Autonomies for Diplomas (GRAD) Act on credential production, retention, and graduation rates of Louisiana’s community colleges. I also examine how this effect differs between minority-serving-institutions (MSI) and non-MSIs, as well as between low-income-student-serving institutions (LSI) and non-LSI by calculating difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) estimates. Results: The findings indicate that PBF implementation is positively related to community colleges’ certificate production and graduation rates in Louisiana, but it has no impact on associate degree production or retention rates. Due to PBF implementation, LSIs grant fewer associate degrees than comparable non-LSI institutions. No disparate impact is found between MSIs and comparable non-MSIs. Contributions: Given the prevalence of PBF in the nation, this study examines the overall impact of PBF implementation on academic outcomes of community colleges in Louisiana, and it further disaggregates the community colleges by institutional characteristics, providing evidence for researchers and policymakers to support broad access and student success at MSIs and LSIs under PBF.

Keywords

performance-based funding academic outcomes minority-serving institutions low-income-student-serving institutions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abadie

Gardeazabal

(2003). The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque country. American Economic Review, 93, 112-132. doi:10.1257/000282803321455188

Abdul-Alim

(2013). The price of performance. Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 29(26), 14-15.

Alfonso

Bailey

Scott

(2005). The educational outcomes of occupational sub-baccalaureate students: Evidence from the 1990s. Economics of Education Review, 24, 197-212. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.02.003

Allison

P. D.

(2009). Fixed effect regression models. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

Altstadt

(2012). Tying funding to community college outcomes: Models, tools, and recommendations for states. Indianapolis, IN: Achieving the Dream.

Ashenfelter

(1978). Estimating the effect of training programs on earnings. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 47-57. doi:10.2307/1924332

Astin

A. W.

(1997). How “good” is your institution’s retention rate? Research in Higher Education, 38, 647-658. doi:10.1023/A:1024903702810

Bailey

T. R.

(2004, April 1-3). Community college students: Characteristics, outcomes, and recommendations for success. CCRC Currents. Retrieved from https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/attachments/currents-2004.pdf

Bailey

T. R.

Calcagno

J. C.

Jenkins

Leinbach

Kienzl

(2006). Is student-right-to-know all you should know? An analysis of community college graduation rates. Research in Higher Education, 47, 491-519. doi:10.1007/s11162-005-9005-0

10.

Bailey

T. R.

Jaggars

S. S.

Jenkins

(2015). Redesigning America’s community colleges: A clearer path to student success. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

11.

Bailey

T. R.

Morest

V. S.

(2006). The community college equity agenda in the twenty-first century: Moving from access to achievement. In Bailey

Morest

V. S.

(Eds.), Defending the community college equity agenda (pp. 246-270). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

12.

Bean

J. P.

Metzner

B. S.

(1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55, 485-540. doi:10.3102/00346543055004485

13.

Bell

D. A.

(2005). Changing organizational stories: The effects of performance-based funding on three community colleges in Florida (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest. (UMI No. 3210509)

14.

Bertrand

Duflo

Mullainathan

(2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 249-275. doi:10.1162/003355304772839588

15.

Bork

R. H.

Jones

S. M.

Vega

B. E.

(2015). Origins of the first wave of state performance funding implementations. In Dougherty

K. J.

Natow

R. S.

(Eds.), The politics of performance funding for higher education: Origins, discontinuations, and transformations (pp. 52-90). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

16.

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015, August). Hurricane Katrina: A look back at employment and unemployment. The Economics Daily. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2015/hurricane-katrina-a-look-back-at-employment-and-unemployment.htm

17.

Burke, J. C. (2002). Funding public colleges and universities for performance: Popularity, problems, and prospects. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute Press.

18.

Burke

J. C.

Modarresi

(2000). To keep or not to keep performance funding. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 432-453. doi:10.2307/2649147

19.

Calcagno

J. C.

Bailey

Jenkins

Kienzl

Leinbach

(2008). Community college student success: What institutional characteristics make a difference? Economic of Education Review, 27, 632-645. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.07.003

20.

The Chronicle of Higher Education. (2016). Louisiana public colleges (2-year). Available from http://collegecompletion.chronicle.com

21.

Cohen

A. M.

Brawer

F. B.

Kisker

C. B.

(2014). The American community college (6th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

22.

Complete College America. (2016). Game changer state data: Louisiana. Retrieved from https://completecollege.org/data-dashboard/

23.

Cook

T. D.

Shadish

W. R.

Wong

V. C.

(2008). Three conditions under which experiments and observational studies produce comparable causal estimates: New findings from within-study comparisons. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 724-750. doi:10.1002/pam.20375

24.

Cornwell

Mustard

Sridhard

(2006). The enrollment effects of merit-based financial aid: Evidence from Georgia’s HOPE program. Journal of Labor Economics, 24, 761-786. doi:10.1086/506485

25.

Costello

C. B.

(2012). Increasing opportunities for low-income women and student parents in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math at community colleges. Retrieved from https://iwpr.org/wp-content/uploads/wpallimport/files/iwpr-export/publications/C388.pdf

26.

Craig

A. J.

Ward

C. V. L.

(2008). Retention of community college students: Related student and institutional characteristics. Journal of College Student Retention, 9, 505-517. doi:10.2190/CS.9.4.f

27.

Dadgar

Trimble

M. J.

(2015). Labor market returns to sub-baccalaureate credentials: How much does a community college degree or certificate pay? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37, 399-418. doi:10.3102/0162373714553814

28.

DesJardins

S. L.

Ahlburg

D. A.

McCall

B. P.

(2006). The effects of interrupted enrollment on graduation from colleges: Racial, income, and ability differences. Economics of Education Review, 25, 575-590. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.06.002

29.

Deslatte

(2017, March 8). Louisiana community, technical college campuses to merge. U.S. News. Available from https://www.usnews.com

30.

Dolfman

M. L.

Wasser

S. F.

Bergman

(2007, June). The effects of Hurricane Katrina on the New Orleans economy. Monthly Labor Review, pp. 3-18.

31.

Donald

Lang

(2007). Inference with difference-in-differences and other panel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 221-233. doi:10.1162/rest.89.2.221

32.

Dougherty

K. J.

(1994). The contradictory college. Albany: State University of New York Press.

33.

Dougherty

K. J.

Hong

(2006). Performance accountability as imperfect panacea: The community college experience. In Bailey

Morest

V. S.

(Eds.), Defending the community college equity agenda (pp. 51-86). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

34.

Dougherty

K. J.

Jones

S. M.

Lahr

Natow

R. S.

Pheatt

Reddy

(2016). Performance funding for higher education. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

35.

Dougherty

K. J.

Natow

R. S.

(2015). The politics of performance funding for higher education: Origins, discontinuations, and transformations. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

36.

Dougherty

K. J.

Reddy

(2011, December). The impacts of state performance funding systems on higher education institutions: Research literature review and policy recommendations (CCRC Working Paper No. 37). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.

37.

Dougherty

K. J.

Reddy

(2013). Performance funding for higher education: What are the mechanisms? What are the impacts? ASHE Higher Education Report, 39(2), 1-134. doi:10.1002/aehe.20008

38.

Dowd

A. C.

Shieh

L. T.

(2013). Community college financing: Equity, efficiency, and accountability. In Smith

M. F.

(Ed.), The 2013 almanac of higher education (pp. 37-65). Washington, DC: National Education Association.

39.

Doyle

Zumeta

(2014). State-level responses to the access and completion challenge in the new era of austerity. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 655, 79-98. doi:10.1177/0002716214534606

40.

Feldman

M. J.

(1993). Factors associated with one-year retention in a community college. Research in Higher Education, 34, 503-512. doi:10.1007/BF00991857

41.

Fike

D. S.

Fike

(2008). Predictors of first-year student retention in the community college. Community College Review, 36, 68-88. doi:10.1177/0091552108320222

42.

Friedel

J. N.

Thornton

Z. M.

D’Amico

M. M.

Katsinas

S. G.

(2013). Performance-based funding: The national landscape. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Education Policy Center.

43.

Gándara

Rutherford

(2017). Mitigating unintended impacts? The effects of premiums for underserved populations in performance-funding policies for higher education. Research in Higher Education, 59, 681-703. doi:10.1007/s11162-017-9483-x

44.

Goldrick-Rab

(2010). Challenges and opportunities for improving community college student success. Review of Educational Research, 80, 437-469. doi:10.3102/0034654310370163

45.

Guo

Fraser

(2015). Propensity score analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

46.

Harnisch

T. L.

(2011). Performance-based funding: A re-emerging strategy in public higher education financing. Washington, DC: American Association of State Colleges and Universities. Available from http://www.aascu.org

47.

Haskins

Holzer

Lerman

(2009). Promoting economic mobility by increasing postsecondary education. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts.

48.

Hawley

T. H.

Harris

T. A.

(2005). Student characteristics related to persistence for first-year community college students. Journal of College Student Retention, 7, 117-142. doi:10.2190/E99D-V4NT-71VF-83DC

49.

Hearn

J. C.

(2003). Diversifying campus revenue streams: Opportunities and risks. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

50.

Heckman

J. J.

Smith

J. A.

(1999). The pre-program earnings dip and the determinants of participation in a social program: Implications for simple program evaluation strategies. Economic Journal, 109(457), 313-348. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00451

51.

Higher Education Research Institute at University of California, Los Angeles. (2010). Degrees of success: Bachelor’s degree completion rates among initial STEM majors. Available from https://www.heri.ucla.edu

52.

Hillman

N. W.

(2016). Why performance-based college funding doesn’t work. New York, NY: The Century Foundation. Available from https://tcf.org

53.

Hillman

N. W.

Fryar

A. H.

Crespín-Trujillo

(2018). Evaluating the impact of performance funding in Ohio and Tennessee. American Educational Research Journal, 55, 144-170. doi:10.3102/0002831217732951

54.

Hillman

N. W.

Tandberg

D. A.

Fryar

A. H.

(2015). Evaluating the impacts of “new” performance funding in higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37, 501-519. doi:10.3102/0162373714560224

55.

Hillman

N. W.

Tandberg

D. A.

Gross

J. P.

(2014). Performance funding in higher education: Do financial incentives impact college completions? The Journal of Higher Education, 85, 826-857. doi:10.1080/00221546.2014.11777349

56.

Imbens

Wooldridge

(2007). What’s new in econometrics? Cambridge, MA: The National Bureau of Economic Research.

57.

Jaeger

A. J.

Eagan

M. K.

(2009). Unintended consequences: Examining the effect of part-time faculty members on associate’s degree completion. Community College Review, 36, 167-194. doi:10.1177/0091552108327070

58.

Jenkins

Ellwein

Boswell

(2009). Formative evaluation of the student achievement initiative “learning year.” New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University. doi:10.7916/D80G3H6W

59.

Jenkins

Wachen

Moore

Shulock

(2012). Washington state student achievement initiative policy study: Final report. Sacramento, CA: Institute for Higher Education Leadership and Policy. doi:10.7916/D83J3B16

60.

Johnson

Yanagiura

(2016). Early results of outcomes-based funding in Tennessee. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation.

61.

Jones

Elliott

K. C.

Owens

L. R.

Assalone

A. E.

Gándara

(2017). Outcomes based funding and race in higher education: Can equity be bought? Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

62.

Kane

T. J.

(1999). The price of admission: Rethinking how Americans pay for college. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.

63.

Kane

T. J.

Rouse

C. E.

(1995). Labor market returns to two-year and four-year schools. American Economic Review, 85, 600-614.

64.

Kash

J. P.

Lasley

(2009). Defining merit: The impact of award structure on the distribution of merit aid. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 39(1), 30-40.

65.

Kelchen

(2018). Do performance-based funding policies affect underrepresented student enrollment? The Journal of Higher Education, 89, 702-727. doi:10.1080/00221546.2018.1434282

66.

Khandker

S. R.

Koolwal

G. B.

Samad

H. A.

(2010). Handbook on impact evaluation: Quantitative methods and practices. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

67.

Kennedy

A. I.

(2018). Performance funding policy effects on community college outcomes: Are short-term certificates on the rise? Community College Review, 46, 3-39. doi:10.1177/0091552117743790

68.

(2007). Characteristics of minority-serving institutions and minority undergraduates enrolled in these institutions (NCES 2008-156). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

69.

Long

B. T.

(2004). How do financial aid policies affect colleges? The institutional impact of the Georgia HOPE scholarship. Journal of Human Resources, 39, 1045-1066. doi:10.3368/jhr.XXXIX.4.1045

70.

Long

B. T.

(2014). The financial crisis and college enrollment: How have students and their families responded? In Brown

J. R.

Hoxby

C. M.

(Eds.), How the financial crisis and Great Recession affected higher education (pp. 209-233). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

71.

Louisiana Board of Regents. (2014). Finance committee report. Retrieved from https://regents.state.la.us/assets/docs/2014/07/Meeting-Minutes-Final1.pdf

72.

Louisiana Board of Regents. (2016). GRAD Act. Retrieved from https://regents.la.gov/grad-act/

73.

Louisiana Board of Regents. (2018). Outcome based funding formula. Available from http://www.regents.la.gov

74.

Louisiana State Legislature. (n.d.). Bill search for the 2010 regular session. Available from http://www.legis.la.gov/

75.

Luke

Redekop

Burgin

(2015). Psychological factors in community college student retention. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 39, 222-234. doi:10.1080/10668926.2013.803940

76.

MacCallum

(2008). Effect of financial aid processing policies on student enrollment, retention and success. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 37(2), 17-32.

77.

May

J. D.

(2012). Louisiana’s Community and Technical College. Available from https://www.lctcs.edu

78.

McKinney

Hagedorn

L. S.

(2015). Performance-based funding for community colleges in Texas: Are colleges disadvantaged by serving the most disadvantaged students? Bryan: The Greater Texas Foundation.

79.

McLendon

M. K.

Hearn

J. C.

(2007). Incorporating political indicators into comparative state study of higher education policy. In Shaw

K. M.

Heller

D. E.

(Eds.), State postsecondary research: New methods to inform policy and practice (pp. 11-36). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

80.

McLendon

M. K.

Hearn

J. C.

Deaton

(2006). Called to account: Analyzing the origins and spread of state performance-accountability policies for higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 1-24. doi:10.3102/01623737028001001

81.

Meyer

B. D.

(1995). Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13, 151-161. doi:10.3386/t0170

82.

Mitchell

Leachman

Masterson

(2016). Funding down, tuition up: State cuts to higher education threaten quality and affordability at public colleges. Available from http://www.cbpp.org

83.

Monks

(2009). The impact of merit-based financial aid on college enrollment: A field experiment. Economics of Education Review, 28, 99-106. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.03.002

84.

Napoli

A. R.

Wortman

P. M.

(1998). Psychosocial factors related to retention and early departure of two-year community college students. Research in Higher Education, 39, 419-455. doi:10.1023/A:1018789320129

85.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). Graduation rate from first institution attended within 150 percent of normal time for first-time, full-time degree/certificate-seeking students at 2-year postsecondary institutions, by race/ethnicity, sex, and control of institution: Selected cohort entry years, 2000 through 2011. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d14/tables/dt14_326.20.asp

86.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Undergraduate degree fields. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cta.asp

87.

National Conference of State Legislatures. (2016). Performance-based funding for higher education. Available from http://www.ncsl.org

88.

National Student Clearinghouse. (2016). Snapshot report: Persistence and retention. Washington, DC: National Student Clearinghouse Research Center.

89.

Ness

E. C.

Deupree

M. M.

Gándara

(2015). Campus responses to outcomes-based funding in Tennessee: Robust, aligned, and contested. Nashville: Tennessee Higher Education Coordinating Board.

90.

Ohio Board of Regents. (2011). Time and credits to degree for associate and bachelor’s degree graduates (FY 2010). Available from http://regents.ohio.gov

91.

Oreopoulos

Salvanes

(2011). Priceless: The nonpecuniary benefits of schooling. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25, 159-184. doi:10.1257/jep.25.1.159

92.

Pascarella

E. T.

Terenzini

P. T.

(2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

93.

Pelletier

S. G.

(2012, Summer). Rethinking revenue. Public Purpose, pp. 2-5.

94.

Pfeffer

Salancik

(1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

95.

Pike

G. R.

(2013). NSSE benchmarks and institutional outcomes: A note on the importance of considering the intended uses of a measure in validity studies. Research in Higher Education, 54, 149-170. doi:10.1007/s11162-012-9279-y

96.

Pike

G. R.

Graunke

S. S.

(2015). Examining the effects of institutional and cohort characteristics on retention rates. Research in Higher Education, 56, 146-165. doi:10.1007/s11162-014-9360-9

97.

Postsecondary Analytics. (2013). What’s working? Outcomes-based funding in Tennessee. Washington, DC: HCM Associates.

98.

Price

D. V.

Tovar

(2014). Student engagement and institutional graduation rates: Identifying high-impact educational practices for community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 38, 766-782. doi:10.1080/10668926.2012.719481

99.

Rizzo

M. J.

(2006). State preferences for higher education: A panel data analysis, 1977-2001. In Ehrenberg

R. G.

(Ed.), What’s happening to public higher education? (pp. 3-35). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

100.

Romano

R. M.

Palmer

J. C.

(2016). Financing community colleges: Where we are, where we’re going. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

101.

Rosenbaum

Ahearn

Becker

Rosenbaum

(2015). The new forgotten half and research directions to support them. New York, NY: William T. Grant Foundation.

102.

Russell

(2011). A guide to major U.S. college completion initiatives. Retrieved from https://www.aascu.org/policy/publications/policymatters/2011/collegecompletion.pdf

103.

Rutherford

Rabovsky

(2014). Evaluating impacts of performance funding policies on student outcomes in higher education. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 655, 185-208. doi:10.1177/0002716214541048

104.

Ryan

J. F.

(2004). The relationship between institutional expenditures and degree attainment at baccalaureate colleges. Research in Higher Education, 45, 97-113. doi:10.1023/B:RIHE.0000015691.02545.61

105.

St. John

E. P

. (2004). Public policy and college access: Investigating the federal and state roles in equalizing postsecondary opportunity. New York, NY: AMS Press.

106.

Sanford

Hunter

J. M.

(2011). Impact of performance-funding on retention and graduation rates. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19(33), 1-30. doi:10.14507/epaa.v19n33.2011

107.

Santibañez

(2014). Difference-in-differences. In Brewer

Picus

(Eds.), Encyclopedia of education economics & finance (Vol. 2, pp. 207-208). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

108.

Scott

G. A.

(2007). Low-income and minority serving institutions: Education has taken steps to improve monitoring and assistance, but further progress is needed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office.

109.

Scott

Bailey

Kienzl

(2006). Relative success? Determinants of college graduation rates in public and private colleges in the U.S. Research in Higher Education, 47, 249-279. doi:10.1007/s11162-005-9388-y

110.

Shin

J. C.

(2010). Impacts of performance-based accountability on institutional performance in the U.S. Higher Education, 60, 47-68. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9285-y

111.

Shin

J. C.

Milton

(2004). The effects of performance budgeting and funding programs on graduation rate in public four-year colleges and universities. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(22), 1-26. doi:10.14507/epaa.v12n22.2004

112.

State Higher Education Executive Officers Association. (2016). State higher education finance FY15. Available from http://www.sheeo.org

113.

Stock

J. H.

Watson

M. W.

(2008). Heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors for fixed effects panel data regression. Econometrica, 76, 155-174. doi:10.1111/j.0012-9682.2008.00821.x

114.

Tandberg

D. A.

Hillman

N. W.

(2014). State higher education performance funding: Data, outcomes, and policy implications. Journal of Education Finance, 39, 222-243. doi:10.1353/jef.2014.0007

115.

Tandberg

D. A.

Hillman

N. W.

Barakat

(2014). State higher education performance funding for community colleges: Diverse effects and policy implications. Teachers College Record, 116, 1-31.

116.

Tennessee Higher Education Commission. (2016). Outcomes-based formula model data definitions. Available from http://www.tn.gov

117.

Titus

M. A.

(2009). The production of bachelor’s degrees and financial aspects of state higher education policy: A dynamic analysis. The Journal of Higher Education, 80, 439-468. doi:10.1353/jhe.0.0055

118.

Trettel

B. S.

Yeager

J. L.

(2011). Linking strategic planning, priorities, resource allocation, and assessment. In Sutin

S. E.

Derrico

Raby

R. L.

Valeau

E. J.

(Eds.), Increasing effectiveness of the community college financial model (pp. 80-94). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

119.

Umbricht

M. R.

Fernandez

Ortagus

J. C.

(2015). An examination of the (un)intended consequences of performance funding in higher education. Educational Policy, 31, 643-673. doi:10.1177/0895904815614398

120.

Volkwein

J. F.

Tandberg

D. A.

(2008). Measuring up: Examining the connections among state structural characteristics, regulatory practices, and performance. Research in Higher Education, 49, 180-197. doi:10.1007/s11162-007-9066-3

121.

Webber

D. A.

Ehrenberg

R. G.

(2010). Do expenditures other than instruction affect graduation and persistence rates in American higher education? Economics of Education Review, 29, 947-958. doi:10.3386/w15216

122.

Wolfe

B. L.

Haveman

R. H.

(2002). Social and nonmarket benefits from education in an advanced economy. Boston, MA: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

123.

Wooldridge

J. M.

(2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

124.

Zumeta

A. Y.

(2016). Assessing the underpinnings of performance funding 2.0: Will this dog hunt? Retrieved from https://www.tiaainstitute.org/sites/default/files/presentations/2017-02/ti_assessing_the_underpinnings_of_performance_funding_2.pdf

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.32 MB