Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Transfer students are a distinct population. Their characteristics lead to a qualitatively different student experience. Drawing on interviews with a cross-sectional sample of transfer students at George Mason University (GMU), this study focused on the ways transfer students perceived their social and academic engagement, on the ways they engaged academically and socially at GMU, and on the ways in which their perceptions of engagement and their actual patterns of engagement affected their sense of belonging at GMU. Most notably, transfer students viewed social engagement in the context of family and community rather than college life. The findings have implications for how campuses support transfer students and question assumptions about some engagement theories.

Keywords

academic integration adult students student engagement social integration transfer students

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Association of Community Colleges. (2009). Community college enrollment surge: An analysis of estimated fall 2009 headcount enrollments at community colleges. Washington, DC: Author.

Angell

L. R.

(2009). Construct validity of the Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE). Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 33, 564-570. doi:10.1080/10668920801901217

Astin

A. W.

(1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308.

Astin

A. W.

(2001). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Borglum

Kabala

(2000). Academic and social integration of community college students: A case study. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 24, 567-576. doi:10.1080/10668920050139712

Braxton

J. M.

Milem

J. F.

Sullivan

A. S.

(2000). The influence of active learning on the college student departure process: Toward a revision of Tinto’s theory. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 569-590.

Center for Community College Student Engagement. (2010). The heart of student success: Teaching, learning, and college completion. Retrieved from http://www.ccsse.org/center/resources/docs/publications/CCCSE_2010_national_report.pdf

Donaldson

J. F.

Graham

(1999). A model of college outcomes for adults. Adult Education Quarterly, 50, 24-40. doi:10.1177/074171369905000103

Flaga

C. T.

(2006). The process of transition for community college transfer students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 30, 3-19. doi:10.1080/10668920500248845

10.

Gibson

A. M.

Slate

J. R.

(2010). Student engagement at two-year institutions: Age and generational status differences. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 34, 371-385. doi:10.1080/10668920802466384

11.

Greene

T. G.

Marti

N. C.

McClenney

(2008). The effort-outcome gap: Differences for African American and Hispanic community college students in student engagement and academic achievement. Journal of Higher Education, 79, 513-539.

12.

Hill

J. R.

(1965). Transfer shock: The academic performance of the junior college transfer. Journal of Experimental Education, 33, 201-215.

13.

Hurtado

Carter

D. F.

(1997). Effects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial climate on Latino college students’ sense of belonging. Sociology of Education, 70, 324-345. doi:10.2307/2673270

14.

Ishitani

T. T.

McKitrick

S. A.

(2010). After transfer: The engagement of community college students at a four-year collegiate institution. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 34, 576-594. doi:10.1080/10668920701831522

15.

Jaschik

(2011, April 7). NSSE’s validity questioned. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/04/07/research_raises_questions_about_nsse

16.

Kember

(1999). Integrating part-time study with family, work and social obligations. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 109-124. doi:10.1080/03075079912331380178

17.

Kuh

G. D.

Kinzie

Schuh

J. H.

Whitt

E .J.

(2005). Assessing conditions to enhance educational effectiveness: The Inventory for Student Engagement and Success. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

18.

Laanan

F. S.

(Ed.). (2006). Understanding students in transition: Trends and issues (New Directions for Student Services, No. 114). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

19.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 163-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

20.

McClenney

K. M.

(2007). Research update: The Community College Survey of Student Engagement. Community College Review, 35, 137-146. doi:10.1177/0091552107306583

21.

McCormick

A. C.

(2003). Swirling and double-dipping: New patterns of student attendance and their implications for higher education. In King

J. E.

Anderson

E. L.

Corrigan

M. E.

(Eds.), Changing student attendance patterns: Challenges for policy and practice (New Directions for Higher Education, No. 121, pp. 13-24). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi:10.1002/he.98

22.

Mertens

D. M.

(2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

23.

Obama

(2009, July 14). Remarks by the President on the American Graduation Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-american-graduation-initiative-warren-mi

24.

Office of Institutional Assessment. (2010, February). National Survey of Student Engagement 2009: Self-comparison and peer comparison reports. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.

25.

Office of Institutional Research and Reporting. (2012). Factbook 2011-12. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.

26.

Pascarella

E. T.

Terenzini

P. T.

(1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

27.

Pascarella

E. T.

Terenzini

P. T.

(2005). How college affects students: Vol. 2. A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

28.

Saenz

V. B.

Hatch

Bukoski

B. E.

Kim

Lee

Valdez

(2011). Community college student engagement patterns: A typology revealed by exploratory cluster analysis. Community College Review, 39, 235-267. doi:10.1177/0091552111416643

29.

Schneider

(2009, November 24). Assessing NSSE. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2009/11/24/schneider

30.

Strauss

Corbin

(1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

31.

Swigart

T. E.

Murrell

P. H.

(2001). Factors influencing estimates of gains made among African-American and Caucasian community college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 25, 297-312. doi:10.1080/106689201750122406

32.

Terenzini

P. T.

Springer

Pascarella

E. T.

Nora

(1995). Academic and out-of-class influences on students’ intellectual orientations. Review of Higher Education, 19, 23-44.

33.

Tierney

(1992). An anthropological analysis of student participation in college. Journal of Higher Education, 63, 603-618. doi:10.2307/1982046

34.

Tinto

(1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89-125. doi:10.3102/00346543045001089

35.

Tinto

(1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.).Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

36.

Townsend

B. K.

Wilson

(2006). “A hand hold for a little bit”: Factors facilitating the success of community college transfer students to a large research university. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 439-456. doi:10.1353/csd.2006.0052

Transfer Student Engagement

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References