This article examines measures of student success, with a focus on how they apply to community colleges. A conceptual framework is presented as a way of facilitating thinking about and accurately grounding discussions of student success. The article closes with an examination of emerging concepts related to the measurement of student success in higher education generally and at community colleges particularly.
AdelmanC. (1988). Transfer rates and the going mythologies: A look at community college patterns. Change, 20(1), 38-41.
2.
AdelmanC. (2009). The spaces between numbers: Getting international data on higher education straight. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
3.
American Association of Community Colleges. (2011a). What is the VFA?Retrieved from http://www.aacc.nche.edu/vfa
BaileyT.JenkinsD.LeinbachT. (2005, September). Graduation rates, student goals, and measuring community college effectiveness (Community College Research Center Brief No. 28). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED489098)
7.
BaldwinN.ParkinA. (2009, November). An easy target? What American educators need to know to overtake Canada as the OECD’s most educated country, and what Canadian educators need to know to prevent it. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
BermanP.CurryJ.NelsonB.WeilerD. (1990). Enhancing transfer effectiveness: A model for the 1990s. Washington, DC: American Association of Community and Junior Colleges and the National Effective Transfer Consortium. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 324050.
10.
BersT. H. (Ed.). (1989) Using student tracking systems effectively (New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 66). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
BersT. H. (2004). Assessment at the program level. In SerbanA. M.FriedlanderJ. (Eds.), Developing and implementing assessment of student learning outcomes (New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 126, pp. 43-52). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
BersT. H. (2008). (Ed.). Student tracking in the community college (New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 143). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
BurkeJ. C. (1998). Arguments and answers. In BurkeJ. C.SerbanA. M. (Eds.), Performance funding for public higher education: Fad or trend (New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 97, pp. 85-90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
CourtyP.HeinrichC. J.MarschkeG.SmithJ. (2011). U.S. employment and training programs and performance standards system design. In HeckmanJ. J.HeinrichC. J.CourtyP.MarschkeG.SmithJ. (Eds.), The performance of performance standards (pp. 15-28). Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
20.
EwellP. (2007). Community college bridges to opportunity initiative: Joint state data toolkit. Austin, TX: Bridges to Opportunity Initiative and Community College Leadership Program, University of Texas at Austin.
21.
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 34 CFR § 99.3 (1974).
HauptmanA. (2011, February). Increasing higher education attainment in the United States: Challenges and opportunities. Paper presented at the American Enterprise Institute conference, Washington, DC.
25.
HiroseS. M. (1994). Calculating student transfer rates: The Transfer Assembly Project. Community College Review, 22(1), 62-70.
26.
HomW. C. (2009). The denominator as the “target.”Community College Review, 37, 136-152.
27.
HornL.LiX. (2009, November). Changes in postsecondary awards below the bachelor’s degree: 1997 to 2007(NCES 2010-167). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010167.pdf
28.
JonesE. B. (1991). A model for deriving the transfer rate: Report of the Transfer Assembly Project. Washington, DC: American Association of Community and Junior Colleges. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED340430)
29.
LeinbachD.JenkinsD. (2008, January). Using longitudinal data to increase community college student success: A guide to measuring milestone and momentum point attainment (CCRC Research Tools No. 2). New York, NY: Community College research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
30.
LeslieL. L.BrinkmanP. T. (1988). The economic value of higher education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
MajchrzakA. (1984). Methods for policy research (Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 3). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
33.
McLendonM. K.HearnJ. C.DeatonR. (2006). Called to account: Analyzing the origins and spread of state performance-accountability policies for higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 1-24.
34.
McMahonW. L. (2009). Higher learning, greater good: The private and social benefits of higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
35.
MedwickA. J. (2009, August). Transfer-out reporting on the IPEDS Graduation Rate Survey: A first look at trends and methods (AIR/NCES Data Policy Fellowship Report). Retrieved from http://www3.airweb.org/images/medwick_final_report_2010.pdf
36.
MilesC. L.WilsonC. (2004). Learning outcomes for the twenty-first century: Cultivating student success for college and the knowledge economy. In SerbanA. M.FriedlanderJ. (Eds.), Developing and implementing assessment of student learning outcomes (New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 126, pp. 87-100). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
37.
MorestV. S.JenkinsD. (2007, April). Institutional research and the culture of evidence at community colleges (Report No. 1 in the Culture of Evidence Series). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED499359)
MullinC. M. (2012). Workforce outcomes of educational pursuits. In MullinC. M.BersT.HagedornL. S. (Eds.), Data use in the community college (New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 153, pp. 75-88). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
41.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). 2001 Baccalaureate and beyond longitudinal study(B&B:2000/01) [Data file]. Washington, DC: Institute for Education Studies, U.S. Department of Education.
42.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011a). Integrated postsecondary education data system [Data files]. Retrieved from http://www.nces.ed.gov/ipeds
43.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011b). Beginning postsecondary student study, second follow-up[Data file]. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/datalab/
44.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011c). 2007-08 National postsecondary student aid study[Data file]. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/npsas/
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1999). Classifying educational programmes: Manual for ISCED-97 implementation in OECD countries (1999 ed.). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/7/2/1962350.pdf
PalmerJ. (1990). Accountability through student tracking: A review of the literature. Washington, DC: American Association of Communtiy and Junior Colleges. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED322956)
53.
PeterK.CataldiE. F. (2005). The road less traveled? Students who enroll in multiple institutions (NCES 2005-157). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005157.pdf
54.
Program Integrity: Gainful Employment—Debt Measures,76 Fed. Reg. 34386 (2011) (to be codified at 34 C. F. R. pt. 668).
55.
Program Integrity: Gainful Employment, 75 Fed. Reg. 43616 (2010) (to be codified at 34 C. F. R. pt. 668).
SerbanA. M. (2004). Assessment of student learning at the institutional level. In SerbanA. M.FriedlanderJ. (Eds.), Developing and implementing assessment of student learning outcomes (New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 126, pp. 17-28). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
61.
SerbanA. M.FriedlanderJ. (Eds.). (2004). Developing and implementing assessment of student learning outcomes (New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 126). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
62.
SnyderT. D.DillowS. A. (2011, April). Digest of education statistics: 2010 (NCES 2011-015). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
63.
Student Assistance General Provisions, 34 C. F. R pt. 668 (2012).
64.
Student Right-to-Know and Campus Security Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-542 (1990)
65.
TownsendB. K. (2002). Transfer rates: A problematic criterion for measuring the community college. In BersT. H.CalhounH. D. (Eds.), Next steps for the community college (New Directions for Community Colleges, No. 117, pp. 13-23). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
WirtJ.ChoyS.RooneyP.ProvasnikS.SenA.TobinR. (2004, June). The condition of education (NCES 2004-077). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
