This study examined how Texas community college artist-educators balance artistic productivity with their teaching responsibilities. The 98 survey respondents represented 76.6% of a stratified random sample of the full-time instructors in visual arts departments within the 50 Texas public community college districts. Access to studio space and equipment, peer support, and new avenues for artistic expression and creative stimulation were seen as promoting or enhancing artistic production. Lack of studio time for producing one's artwork was cited a barrier to artistic production, as were the demands of teaching and related responsibilities. In addition, those who saw themselves more as artists than as educators or who saw themselves equally as artists and educators were more likely to balance art with teaching and service than were those who saw themselves more as educators than as artists.
Adams, J. (2003). The artist-teacher scheme as postgraduate professional development in higher education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 22, 183-194.
Ball, L. (1990). What role: Artist or teacher? Art Education, 43(1), 54-58.
4.
Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professorate . Princeton, N.J: Carnegie Foundation of the Advancement of Teaching.
5.
Brandstadter, J.T. (1969). The artist in higher education. Art Journal, 29(1), 45, 104.
6.
Brudney, K.M. (2001). Academic careers in community colleges. PS, Political Science & Politics, 34(1), 149-153.
7.
Burns, R.B. (2000). Introduction to research methods (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
8.
Cabanne, P. (1971). Dialogues with Marcel Duchamp (R. Padgett, Trans.). New York: Viking Press.
9.
Carroll, J. (2003). Artists who teach. Retrieved January 30, 2005, from http://www.aare.edu/au/03pap/car03759.pdf .
10.
Cohen, A.M., & Brawer, F.B. (2003). The American community college (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Crano, W.D., & Brewer, M.B. (2002). Principles and methods of social research (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Cusick, D. (2002). The artist as teacher: Catherine Ellis Muerdter . Fiberarts, 29(1), 42-46.
14.
Daniel, R. (2000). The right staff: The true key to arts-focused schools of choice. Arts Education Policy Review, 101(6), 33-37.
15.
Dillman, D.A. (1983). Mail and other self-administered questionnaires . In P. H. Rossi, J. D. Wright, & A. B. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (pp. 359-377). New York: Academic Press.
16.
Dillman, D.A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
17.
Finkel, E. (2005, October 10). The calm before the storm. Community College Week, pp. 6-8.
18.
Fowler, F.J., Jr. (2002). Survey research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19.
Fugate, A., & Amey, M. (2000). Career stages of community college faculty: A qualitative analysis of their career paths, roles, and development. Community College Review, 28(1), 1-22.
20.
Gahn, S., & Twombly, S. (2001). Dimensions of the community college faculty labor market. Review of Higher Education, 24, 259-282.
21.
Kelly, R.R. (1972). Art in the American university: Fact or façade ? Art Journal, 32(1), 226-230.
22.
Larrabee, E. (1970). Artist and university. In M. Mahoney & I. Moore (Eds.), The arts on campus: The necessity for change (pp. 39-50). Greenwich, CT: New York Graphic Society, LTD.
23.
Lowry, W.M. (1963). The university and the creative arts. In M. Risenhoover & R. T. Blackburn (Eds.), Artists as professors: Conversations with musicians, painters, sculptors (pp. 10-11). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
24.
Mannheimer, S. (1998). Guilty by association. New Art Examiner, 25(5), 15-17.
25.
May, T. (1997). Social research: Issues, methods and process (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
26.
Morrison, J. (1973). The rise of the arts on the American campus. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
Outcalt, C.L. (2000). Community college teaching: Toward collegiality and community. Community College Review, 28(2), 57-70.
28.
Pearse, H. (1999). Art subjects: Making artists in the American university . Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
29.
Rifkin, T. (2000). Public community college faculty. New expeditions: Charting the second century of community college (Issues paper No. 4). Washington, DC: American Association of Community Colleges . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED439739)
30.
Risenhoover, M., & Blackburn, R.T. (1976). Artists as professors: Conversations with musicians, painters, sculptors. Chicago : University of Illinois Press.
31.
Salant, P., & Dillman, D.A. (1994). How to conduct your own survey. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
32.
Singerman, H. (1999). Art subjects: Making artists in the American university . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
33.
Sperling, C.B. (2003). How community colleges understand the scholarship of teaching and learning. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 27, 593-601.
34.
Yeomans, M. (1996). Creativity in art and science: A personal view . The International Journal of Art & Design Education , 15, 241-250.
35.
Wang, S. (2001). A comparative study of the master if fine arts programs in independent, private, and public institutions of higher education in the United States. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL.
36.
Zwirn, S.G. (2002). To be or not to be: The teacher-artist conundrum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teacher's College, Columbia University.
