Drug and alcohol treatment agencies are challenged to improve their infrastructure to meet growing technological and organizational demands. Health care reform and increased emphasis on performance monitoring in the United States are leading to improvements in health information technology. We assess literature to: (1) survey opportunities for health information technology for publicly-funded substance abuse treatment; (2) describe the use of electronic medical records in U.S. substance use treatment programs; (3) identify barriers and facilitators to implementing technology in substance abuse treatment programs; and (4) discuss applications of these concepts to private and international substance abuse treatment. Although these technologies hold promise to improve outcomes in the areas of cost-effectiveness, provider time savings, and quality improvement, substantial barriers exist to implementing health information technology in substance abuse treatment programs. Increased incentives, evidence, and implementation guidance can facilitate health information technology infrastructure improvement in substance abuse treatment to increase competitiveness in the U.S. health care market and improve the quality of care.
AmarasinghamR.PlantingaL.Diener-WestM.GaskinD.J., & PoweN.R. (2009). Clinical information technologies and inpatient outcomes: A multiple hospital study. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169, 108–114.
3.
AndrzejewskiM.E.KirbyK.C.MorralA.R., & IguchiM.Y. (2001). Technology transfer through performance management: The effects of graphical feedback and positive reinforcement on drug treatment counselors' behavior. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 63, 179–186.
4.
AshJ.S.BergM., & ColeraE. (2004). Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information system-related errors. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 11(2), 104–112.
5.
BaborT.F.SteniusK., & RomelsjoA. (2008). Alcohol and drug treatment systems in public health perspective: Mediators and moderators of population effects. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 17(S1), S50–S59.
6.
BergM. (1999). Patient care information systems and health care work: A sociotechnical approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 55, 87–101.
7.
BremerR.W.ScholleS.H.KeyserD.HoutsingerJ.V., & PincusH.A. (2008). Pay for performance in behavioral health. Psychiatric Services, 59, 1419–1429.
8.
BrownT.G.ToppJ., & RossD. (2003). Rationales, obstacles and strategies for local outcome monitoring systems in substance abuse treatment settings. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24, 31–42.
9.
BudrysG. (2005). Our Unsystematic Health Care System. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
10.
CampJ.M.KrakowM.McCartyD., & ArgeriouM. (1992). Substance abuse treatment management information systems: Balancing federal, state, and service provider needs. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 19, 5–19.
11.
CampbellK.M. (2009). Impact of record-linkage methodology on performance indicators and multivariate relationships. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 36(1), 110–7.
12.
CampbellK.M.DeckD., & KrupskiA. (2008). Record linkage software in the public domain: A comparison of Link Plus, The Link King, and a “basic” deterministic algorithm. Health Informatics Journal, 14(1), 5–15.
13.
ChaudhryB.WangJ.WuS.MaglioneM.MojicaW.RothE. (2006). Systematic review: Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144, E12–E22.
14.
CiceroT.J.InciardiJ.A., & MuñozA. (2005). Trends in abuse of OxyContin® and other opioid analgesics in the United States: 2002–2004. Journal of Pain, 6, 662–672.
15.
Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety. (2003). Key capabilities of an electronic medical record system. Joint Commission Journal of Quality and Safety, 29, 479–489.
16.
D'AunnoT. (2006). The role of organization and management in substance abuse treatment: Review and roadmap. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31, 221–233.
17.
DetmerD.E. (2003). Building the national health information infrastructure for personal health, health care services, public health, and research. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 3(1).
18.
DucharmeL.J.KnudsenH.K., & RomanP.M. (2005). Computer systems in addiction treatment programs: Availability and implications for program evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28, 368–378.
19.
EvansE.GrellaC.E.MurphyD.A. & HserY.I. (1993). Using administrative data for longitudinal substance abuse research. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 37, 252–271.
20.
FriedenT.R., & MostashariF. (2008). Health care as if health mattered. Journal of the American Medical Association, 299(80), 950–952.
21.
GargA.Z.AdhikariN.K.J.McDonaldH.Rosas-ArellanoM.P.DeverauxP.J., & BeyeneJ. (2005). Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on Practitioner performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 293, 1223–1238.
22.
GoldzweigC.L.TowfighA.MaglioneM., & ShekelleP.G. (2009). Costs and benefits of health information technology: New trends from the literature [electronic version]. Health Affairs, w282–w293.
23.
HealthfieldH.PittyD., & HankaR. (1998). Evaluating information technology in health care: Barriers and challenges. British Medical Journal, 316, 1959–1961.
24.
HelmsM.M.MooreR., & AhmadiM. (2008). Information technology (IT) and the healthcare industry: A SWOT analysis. International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informaties, 31, 75–92.
25.
HillestadR.BigelowJ.BowerA.GirosiF.MeiliR.ScovilleR. (2005). Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Affairs, 24(5), 1103–1117.
26.
HserY.I., & EvansE. (2008). Cross-system data linkage for treatment outcome evaluation: Lessons learned from the California Treatment Outcome Project. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31(2), 125–35.
27.
IezzoniL.I. (1997). Assessing quality using administrative data. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 666–674.
28.
JeyarajA.RottmanJ.W., & LacityM.C. (2006). A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research. Journal of Information Technology, 21, 1–23.
29.
JhaA.K.FerrisT.G.DonelanK.DesRochesC.ShieldsA.RosenbaumS., & BlumenthalD. (2006). How common are electronic medical records in the United States? A summary of the evidence. Health Affairs, 25(6), w496–w507.
30.
JhaA.K.DesRochesC.M.CampbellE.G.DonelanK.RaoS.R.FerrisT.G. (2009). Use of electronic medical records in U.S. hospitals. New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 1628–1638.
31.
KaushalR., & BatesD.W. (2001). Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) with Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs). In ShojaniaK. G.DuncanB. W.McDonaldK. M., & WachterR.M. (Eds.), Making Health Care Safer: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices (AHRQ Publication No. 01-E058). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
32.
KerrE.A.SmithD.M.HoganM.M.KreinS.L.PogachL.HoferT.P. (2002). Comparing clinical automated, medical record, and hybrid data sources for diabetes quality measures. Joint Commission Journal of Quality Improvement, 28, 555–565.
33.
KimberJ.DolanK.Van BeekI.HedrichD., & ZurholdH. (2003). Drug consumption facilities: An update since 2000. Drug and Alcohol Review, 22, 227–233.
34.
KnudsenH.K.JohnsonJ.A. & RomanP.M. (2003). Retaining counseling staff at substance abuse treatment centers: Effects of management practices. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24(2), 129–135.
35.
KoppelR.MetlayJ.P.CohenA.AbaluckB.LocalioA.R.KimmelS.E. (2005). Role of computerized physician order entry system in facilitating medication errors. Journal of the American Medical Association, 293, 1197–1203.
36.
KramerT.L.OwenR.R.CannonD.SloanK.L.ThrushC.R.WilliamsD.K. (2003). How well do automated performance measures assess guideline implementation for new-onset depression in the Veterans Health Administration?Joint Commission Journal for Quality and Safety, 29, 479–489.
37.
MackD.BrantleyK. M., & BellK.G. (2007). Mitigating the health effects of disasters for medically underserved populations. Journal of Healthcare for the Poor and Underserved, 18, 432–442
38.
McCartyD. (2007). Performance measurement for systems treating alcohol and drug use disorders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33, 353–354.
39.
McCartyD.FullerB.E.ArfkenC.MillerM.NunesE.V.EdmundsonE. (2007). Direct care workers in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network: Characteristics, opinions, and beliefs. Psychiatric Services, 58(2), 181–190.
40.
McCartyD.GustafsonD.CapocciaV.A., & CotterF. (2008). Improving care for the treatment of alcohol and drug disorders. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 36(1), 52–60.
41.
McCartyD.KunkelL., & CampbellB. (2009). Confidentiality. In FisherG. L., & RogetN. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Substance Abuse Prevention, Treatment, and Recovery (pp. 225–228). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
McCorryF.GarnickD.W.BartlettJ.CotterF., & ChalkM. (2000). Developing performance measures for alcohol and other drug services in managed care plans. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 26(11), 633–643.
43.
McLellanA.T.CariseD., & KleberH.D. (2003). The national addiction treatment infrastructure: Can it support the public's demand for quality care?Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 25, 117–121.
44.
McLellanA.T.KempJ.BrooksA., & CariseD. (2008). Improving public addiction treatment through performance contracting: The Delaware experiment. Health Policy, 87, 296–308.
45.
McLellanA.T.McKayJ.R.FormanR.CacciolaJ., & KempJ. (2005). Reconsidering the evaluation of addiction treatment: From retrospective follow-up to concurrent recovery monitoring. Addiction, 100, 447–458.
46.
MillerR.H.WestC.BrownT.M.SimI., & GanchoffC. (2005). The value of electronic medical records in solo or small group practices. Health Affairs, 24(5), 1127–1137.
47.
MillerW.R.SorensonJ.L.SelzerJ.A., & BrighamG.S. (2006). Disseminating evidence-based practices in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31, 25–39.
NembhardI.M.AlexanderJ.A.HoffT.J., & RamanujamR. (2009). Why does the quality of health care continue to lag? Insights from management research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(1), 24–42.
50.
ParryC.D.H.PlüddemannA., & MyersB.J. (2007). Cocaine treatment admissions at three sentinel sites in South Africa (1997–2006): Findings and implications for policy, practice and research. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 2, 37.
51.
PincusH.A.PageA.E.K.DrussB.AppelbaumP.S.GottliebG., & EnglandM.J. (2007). Can psychiatry cross the quality chasm? Improving the quality of health care for mental and substance use conditions. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 712–719.
52.
PoissantL.PereiraJ.TamblynR., & KawasumiY. (2005). The impact of electronic medical records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12, 505–516.
53.
RathsD. (2009). Behavioral health IT forecast: Cloudy. Behavioral Healthcare, 29, 26–27.
54.
RomanP.M.DucharmeL.J., & KnudsenH.K. (2006). Patterns of organization and management in private and public substance abuse treatment programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31, 235–243.
55.
RushB.CoreaL., & MartinG. (2009). Monitoring alcohol and other drug treatment: What would an optimal system look like?Contemporary Drug Problems, 36, 545–574.
56.
SatreD.WolfeW.EisendrathS., & WeisnerC. (2008). Computerized screening for alcohol and drug use among adults seeking outpatient psychiatric services. Psychiatric Services, 59, 441–444.
SidorovJ. (2006). It ain't necessarily so: The electronic medical record and the unlikely prospect of reducing health care costs. Health Affairs, 25(4), 1079–1085.
59.
SimonR.DonmallM.HartnollR.KokkeviA.OuwehandA.W.StauffacherM. (1999). The EMCDDA/Pompidou group treatment demand indicator protocol: A European core item set for treatment monitoring and reporting. European Addiction Research, 5, 197–207.
60.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Office of Applied Studies. (2008). National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS): 2007 Data on Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities. Retrieved January 23, 2010, from http://wwwdasis.samhsa.gov/07nssats/nssats2k7web.pdf.
61.
TorreyW.C.FinnertyM.EvansA., & WyzikP. (2003). Strategies for leading the implementation of evidence-based practices. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 26, 883–897.
62.
TrivediM.H., & DalyE.J. (2007). Measurement-based case for refractory depression. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 88(Suppl. 2), 561–571.
63.
WaegemannC.P. (1996). The five levels of electronic medical records. MD Computing, 13, 199–203.
64.
WangS.J.ProsserL.A.BardonC.G.SpurrC.D.CarchidiP.J.KittleraA.F. (2003). A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. American Journal of Medicine, 114(5), 397–403.
65.
WellsS.J., & JohnsonM.A. (2001). Selecting outcome measures for child welfare settings: Lessons for use in performance management. Children and Youth Services Review, 23, 169–199.
66.
WisdomJ.P.FordJ.H.HayesR.A.HoffmanK.EdmundsonE., & McCartyD. (2006). Addiction treatment agencies' use of data: A qualitative assessment. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 33(4), 394–407.
67.
WisdomJ.GabrielR.EdmundsonE.BielavitzS., & HromcoJ. (2008). Challenges substance abuse treatment agencies faced in adoption of computer-based technology to improve assessment. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 35(2), 158–169.
68.
WisdomJ.P.FordJ.H.WiseM.MacKeyD., & GreenC.A. (under review). Substance abuse treatment programs' data management capacity: An exploratory study. Manuscript submitted for publication.
